Metering and management of demand on piped water systems

Download Report

Transcript Metering and management of demand on piped water systems

Metering and management of
demand on piped water systems
By Sam Kayaga (WEDC)
Scope of presentation






Context
Concepts of Demand-Side Management (DSM)
The role of metering in DSM
Pros and Cons of Metering
DSM for PRODWAT?
Conclusion
Context
 Household water use should conform to
Integrated Resource Planning (IRP).
 It should be managed in a way that satisfies
multiple objectives for the water resource use and
Conform to development objectives
Minimise economic costs of delivering the service
Contribute to reliability & sustainability of supply
Promote equity considerations
Minimise environmental impacts
Treat water as an economic, finite resource
Projected water & food scarcity in 2025
 2b people
(25%) will
have absolute
water scarcity
 2.7b people
(33%) will need
to develop their
water
resources by
25%

Source:
http://www.iwmi.c
giar.org/home/ws
map.htm#A1
What is Demand Side Management (DSM)?
 DSM is part of IRP, and corrects the traditional
overemphasis on supply-side planning
 DSM is a coordinated set of measures to improve
energy, water or other environmental services by
inducing changes at the point of consumption
 DSM programs involve a systematic effort to
manage the amount and/or timing of water
demanded by customers
Common DSM Instruments






Rationing, by limiting time of use and/or quantity
Retrofitting of water faucets e.g. low-flush toilets
Education and advertising campaigns
Pressure reduction at the customer end
Financial incentives: rebates, subsidised retrofits
Encouragement and training regarding rainwater
harvesting, recycling and/or wastewater reuse
 Moral persuasion – calls for voluntary reductions
 Pricing instruments through tariff structures
Metering for DSM
 Metering of service connections is a prerequisite if some
DSM tools are to be applied
 Metering encourages water conservation and minimises
wastage, e.g.
 In Canada, households on a flat rate used ~ 474 l/c/d in
2001, which was 74% higher than those metered
(Environment Canada, 2004).
 Metering also enables
 Pricing water by volume used, i.e. promoting equitable use
 Full-cost pricing for water
 Accurate quantification of non-revenue water
 Evening out the peak loads
Problems with metering (1)
 Results into higher operational costs, in terms of
 Capital and installation costs
 Meter reading, bill processing and distribution
 Maintenance costs
 Could provide inaccurate readings due to
technical faults
 Meters could be tampered with (common in
developing countries)
 Customer acceptance of metering
Problems with metering (2)
 Other practical and operational matters
 Meter location –accessibility to demand & supply
 Meter installation in multi-occupied properties
 Inaccurate readings from some types of meters for
intermittent water supply
 Changing meter technology to allow greater accuracy
 Tariff issues
 The tariff structure will of necessity be more complex
 There is need to balance between fixed and variable costs
PRODWAT and DSM (1)
 If well designed, the objectives of DSM could reinforce
those of PRODWAT
 The supply-fix approach has often favoured affluent
consumers over the poor
 The water saved through DSM could be channelled to
disadvantaged households, to cater for health and
productive uses
 Metering could ensure that those using more water for
production uses pay more
 Education and training under DSM could have differentiated
messages to encourage household productive use of water
PRODWAT and DSM (2)
 Metering and volumetric charges could promote
the ethos of PRODWAT, through increasing block
tariffs.
 Increasing Block Tariff could be designed to cater
for differentiated use of water in the household,
e.g.
 Lifeline block for drinking, cooking, dish-washing,
garment washing, house-cleaning
 A block for productive uses of water around the
households, which could be at par with luxury uses
such as swimming pool
Conclusion
 DSM is not in conflict with the objectives of
PRODWAT
 Both concepts could work together to contribute to
sustainable urban water management