Transcript Slide 1
Medium Format Digital Cameras: Standards and Specifications for Calibration and Stability Analysis A. F. Habib Digital Photogrammetry Research Group http://dprg.geomatics.ucalgary.ca Department of Geomatics Engineering University of Calgary, Canada CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Introduction 2 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Operational Photogrammetric Systems • Classification of digital cameras (photogrammetric perspective): – Line Cameras (ADS 40) – Large format digital frame cameras (??) – Multi-head digital frame cameras (DMCTM, UltrCam, DiMAC 2.0) – Medium-format Digital Cameras (MFDC): • Mass-produced MFDC for mapping purposes (DSS, DiMAC Light) • MFDC for mapping purposes from data providers (DAC 101) • Amateur medium format digital cameras (AMFDC) 3 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 MFDC from Data Providers • DAC 101: Camera assembled by Selkirk Remote Sensing • The camera utilizes a 60mm Rollei lens with a Rodenstock Apo-Sironar shutter and a 22 megapixel digital back (5440x4080 Imacon Ixpress 132 Digital Back with 9µm pixel size) 4 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Amateur Medium-Format Digital Cameras Kodak 14n Canon EOS 1D AMFDC 5 SONY 717 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Large Format Analog Cameras (LFAC) WILD RC10 6 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Medium Format Digital Cameras (AMFDC) SONY DSC F717 7 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 MFDC: Relevant Questions • Is the use of amateur MFDC in mapping applications a temporary or permanent phenomenon? • How to develop meaningful standards for evaluating the outcome from the calibration procedure? • How to develop meaningful standards for evaluating the stability of the involved camera? • Is there a flexibility in choosing the stability analysis tool, which is commensurate with the geo-referencing procedure to be implemented for this camera? 8 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Standards and Specification Philosophy • Regulating the use of imaging systems in mapping applications can be done through either: – Having a government body (third party) responsible for the evaluation/calibration of the imaging systems. • Widely adopted for analog cameras (USGS, NRCAN). – Certifying the imaging systems. • Suitable for digital imaging systems intended for mapping applications (DMCTM, ADS 40, UltrCam, DiMAC, DSS, etc.). – Transferring the responsibility to the data provider after establishing a set of standards and specifications. • Appropriate for AMFDC and MFDC from data providers. – Calibration, stability analysis, achievable accuracy. 9 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Indoor Calibration Test Field 10 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Indoor Calibration Test Field 11 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Indoor Calibration Test Field 12 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Indoor Calibration Test Field 13 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Tested Cameras (Example) 14 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Tested Cameras (Example) 15 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Data Acquisition 16 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Calibration Images Center High & Low 17 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Calibration Images Left High & Low 18 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Calibration Images Right High & Low 19 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Calibration Specifications • Variance component of unit weight: – Tier I < 1 Pixel – Tier II < 1.5 Pixels – Tier III < N/A Pixels • No correlation should exist among the estimated parameters • Standard deviations of the estimated IOP parameters (xp, yp, c): – Tier I < 1 Pixel – Tier II < 1.5 Pixels – Tier III < N/A 20 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Stability Analysis: Proposed Approach Top View Side View P.C.I cI ? ≡ P.C.II cII Bundle I Bundle II Original Image Grid Points Distortion-free Grid Points using IOPI Distortion-free Grid Points using IOPII 21 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Stability Analysis: Proposed Approach • Method 1: Zero Rotation (ZROT) – Same perspective center (no shift allowed) – Parallel image coordinate systems (no rotation allowed) P.C. Offset x2 cI cI x1 c II Ray from Bundle I Ray from Bundle II cII Original Image Points Distortion-free Grid Point using IOPI c x2 I cII Distortion-free Grid Point using IOPII Projected Grid Point of IOPII x2 22 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Stability Analysis: Proposed Approach • Method 2: Rotation (ROT) – Same perspective center (no shift allowed) – Rotation allowed P.C. (0, 0, 0) Spatial Offset pI (xI, yI,-cI) R (, , ) pII (xII, yII,-cII) Original Image Points Distortion-free Grid Point using IOPI Distortion-free Grid Point using IOPII Projected Grid Point of IOPII 23 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Stability Analysis: Proposed Approach • Method 3: Single Photo Resection (SPR) – Object space comparison – Spatial and rotational offsets permitted cI P.C.I P.C.II Original Image Points Distortion-free Grid Point using IOPI Distortion-free Grid Point using IOPII Bundle I Bundle II Back-projected Object Points 24 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Stability Specifications • The similarity measure (RMSE offset) value is computed to express the degree of similarity between the bundles from two sets of IOPs. • The cameras must meet the following specifications to be deemed stable. – Tier I < 1 Pixel – Tier II < 1.5 Pixels – Tier III : N/A • A software is available for the calibration and stability analysis procedures. 25 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 MFDC: Relevant Questions • Can the stability analysis be used for evaluating the equivalency of different distortion models? – Appropriate distortion models. • Should the standards for the calibration and stability analysis be expressed in terms of image or object space units? • What is the achievable accuracy from MFDC? – Geo-referencing method (GCP, GNSS-assisted, GNSS/INSS). – Number of tie points. • What are the applications most suited for MFDC? – Small blocks, in combination with LiDAR systems, in combination with high resolution satellite scenes. 26 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 MFDC & Aerial Mapping • Kodak DCS-14n • CMOS (4536x 3024) • 50 mm Zeiss lens • Pixel size: 7.9x7.9 µm • 12 Photos • Flying height: 1200 m • GSD: 0.20 meters 27 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 MFDC & Aerial Mapping Federal University of Parana, Brazil 28 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 MFDC & Aerial Mapping Number of Check Points Mean (m) Standard dev. (m) RMSE (m) 17 Signalized Targets X 0.055 0.147 0.157 Y 0.210 0.113 0.238 Z 0.170 0.311 0.355 X 0.231 0.343 0.413 Y 0.201 0.141 0.246 Z -0.033 0.693 0.694 28 Natural Targets Root Mean Square Error Analysis 29 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 MFDC & Aerial Mapping Orthophoto generated for Kodak (left) and RC10 (right) imagery 30 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 MFDC, LiDAR & Satellite Scenes IKONOS stereo-pair up DSS three six-image blocks with GPS position of exposure stations middle LIDAR data down 31 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 Experimental Results: Dataset Lower Block Lower LIDAR Scan DSS: Lower Block 32 CRSS/ASPRS 2007 MFDC, LiDAR & Satellite Scenes 35.000 N/A 30.000 NO Frames 25.000 Frame GPS RMSE, m 20.000 Lines(45) 15.000 Lines (138) Patches (45) 10.000 Patches (139) 5.000 0.000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 40 Number of Control Points 33 CRSS/ASPRS 2007