Transcript Slide 1

‘Promoters and or students are to blame’: A
critique of the research promotion process
Mamolahluwa Mokoena, Director Academic Development Centre
Mamolahluwa [email protected]
Livingstone Makondo, Senior Instructional Designer/Senior Academic
Development Advisor
[email protected]
North West University, Mafikeng Campus, South Africa
• Like sheep led to the slaughter some students meticulously
follow the suggestions and prescriptions of their promoters yet
they are shocked when they realize that they have failed to
successfully complete their research component.
• Universities, as centres of higher education ought to provide
teaching-learning, research and community services to their
diverse stakeholders.
• This study examines the role being played by promoters
towards the successful completion of the research component
by students within specified time periods.
• This discussion submits that research promotion by the
promoter and execution by the student is a ‘two-man dance’.
• The dancers therefore need to click for them to have
a harmonious rhythmic dance.
• Conversely, the dance suggests that the promoter is
the senior dancer who should have the acumen to
guide the ‘amateur’ dancer.
• If the former fails to effectively control the dancing,
for reasons within this scope, the results range from
students failure to complete on time to withdraw
among others.
• To this end, this study explores what researcher
promoters at North West University, Mafikeng
Campus can do to ensure that the throughput rate is
improved upon.
• The role of the Academic Development Centre is
also examined.
• This on-going study submits that the
unpreparedness of some students to successfully
navigate their way through the research component
at postgraduate level is compounded by the
inabilities of some of the promoters to give befitting
guidance.
• To this end, this action research shares experiences
aimed at capacitating the promoters so that the
dance should have the intended happy ending.
Faculty
Number
Education
73
Law
34
Human and social science
21
Challenges
• Staff members’ handicap
• Student oriented challenges
• Challenges relating to data
collection, data analysis,
and presentation of results
(Amenta and Mosbo, 1994).
• It also requires analysis of how the preparation for research is
best organized and how the additional benefits that might be
expected to derive from research will be measured and
assessed (Wenzel, 2004).
• The process of institutional change is not simple and is most
often slow. It can be jump-started by individuals and supported
by funding of small projects. (Brakke,2009.268).
• A report of preliminary findings and analysis from student
discussion groups held on 7 U.S. campuses in Fall 2008,
suggest that conducting research is particularly challenging.
Students’ greatest challenges are related to their perceived
inability to find desired materials (Head and Eisenberg, 2009.1).
• Graduate education should prepare students for an
increasingly interdisciplinary, collaborative and
global job market and should not be viewed only as
a byproduct of immersion in an intensive research
experience (Golde and Gallagher, 1999.1).
• One prominent and persistent critique is that
American doctoral education trains students too
narrowly in a subspecialty, leaving new degree
holders unprepared to conduct interdisciplinary
work (e.g., Boyer 1990; Committee on Science
Engineering and Public Policy 1995).
• The ideal dissertation advisor is supportive,
experienced, supplies resources, and socializes the
student into the discipline.
• Choosing an advisor with whom the student can
build a supportive professional relationship is
perhaps the most critical decision a student makes.
• In many respects, the student is shaped and
changed by the advisor: learning how to identify and
think through a problem, how to conduct highquality research, how to write manuscripts and
where to publish them, and so forth.
• For a student with interdisciplinary
interests, a good advisor also needs to
understand and share the student's
commitment
to
interdisciplinary
research.
• Interdisciplinary research by students
is easiest when the advisor conducts
such research him- or herself (Golde
and Gallagher, 1999.283).
• For a student who attempts to conduct investigations outside
or beyond the advisor's expertise, additional problems emerge.
The advisor may be unable to help the student identify relevant
literature and resources.
• The advisor is likely to be hard-pressed to assist the student in
minimizing false starts on research ideas.
• Relatedly, the student might face the additional hurdle of
finding a supportive dissertation committee (Golde and
Gallagher, 1999.284).
• Successful collaboration requires power sharing and building
trusting interpersonal relationships (Whyte 1978; Heberlein
1988; Wood and Gray 1991; Hafernik and others 1997).
Way forward
• Need for proper introduction to
research
• Collaboration: Need for a vibrant
summer research community (Brakke
et al., 2003).
• Research seminar series
• Research modules: Udergraduate
research as a developmental process
and it requires preparation. Students
learn how to approach research and to
ask questions (Brakke and Nelson,
2003).
• Staff development
• Utilizing ADC staff services
• Utilizing student support services
• Thank you