Transcript Slide 1
Roswell Historic Gateway Project Community Advisory Group Meeting #1 February 3rd at Roswell Landing Welcome and Introductions • Community Advisory Group – Tell us your name and your interest in the project • City of Roswell – Steve Acenbrak, Director of Roswell DOT • City of Roswell – Rich Dippolito, City Council • Project Consultant Team – Jonathan and Alice People on the Project Alice Wiggins Jonathan Reid Consultant Outreach Coordinator Consultant Project Manager 20+ yrs leading public involvement Specializes in traffic operations, in Georgia and California modeling and innovative design Will be “face” of public involvement Day-to-day manager for for duration of project duration of project Robert Dell-Ross City Project Manager City primary point of contact Experience in Metro Atlanta private and public sectors transportation projects Community Advisory Group (CAG) • Primary role of the CAG is to: – Provide consultation to the project team on key community issues – Provide public forums and collateral materials that provide clear, concise information to enable public to make informed decisions – Stakeholder feedback • Will convene at least quarterly and/or major project milestones through duration of public process (first 18 months) • Comprised of stakeholders along the project corridor • Hereafter open to public CAG Member Responsibilities • Provide feedback to project team on project recommendations, research, etc. - particularly as related to project milestones • Forum for collaborative discussions on specific, project issues • Link to wider constituencies (disseminate information presented to friends & family, HOA’s, church groups, etc. • Assist in connecting the program to increased economic development opportunities • Respectfully listen to comments, questions and issues provided by all CAG members and project team Outreach Coordinator Responsibilities • Management of overall Outreach and Communications process • Development and Implementation of the Community Outreach and Communications Plan • Regular calls/e-blasts to CAG/TAG members to encourage ongoing participation and remind of project meeting and logistics • Update website on project activities including meeting materials, summaries, notes/minutes and public comment logs • Be available for smaller “one-on-one” presentations Project Description • Atlanta Street (SR 9) is an important transportation corridor serving City of Roswell communities and businesses • Traffic congestion and safety issues have been problematic on the reversible lane section between Marietta Hwy and Riverside/Azalea • City Council has initiated project to to plan and design improvements on this section of Atlanta Street • Atlanta Street from Hwy 120 thru and including Riverside/ Azalea intersection (approx 1.25 miles) • Recommended logical project termini is Hwy 120 intersection and Bridge over Chattahoochee (extent of reversible lane section) 1.25 miles Project Study Area Project History • Many studies of Atlanta Street over past decades recommending various improvements to address corridor deficiencies: – Mid 90’s study recommended widening Chattahoochee Bridge and constructing four-lane median-divided highway – 2006 Transportation Master Plan / 2008 LCI Studies focused on innovative solutions to reduce impacts – 2008 study considered restriping 2 lanes plus center-turn lane – 2009 Atlanta Street Cultural Resources Analysis identified structures of historic value impacted by potential expansion – 2009 study of “non-traditional” intersection improvements Project Goals • Primary goal: make multimodal transportation and safety improvements along the corridor • Secondary goal: improve operations and safety at Atlanta Street at Riverside/Azalea intersection • Provide extensive public involvement process to hear all needs and concerns • Provide a solution will best meets the needs of community residents, businesses, and commuters who rely on quality transportation services in this corridor Context Sensitive Solutions • Project will seek Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) that integrate and balance community, aesthetic, historic and environmental values with transportation safety and efficiency goals – Interdisciplinary teams working with stakeholders – End product is collaborative, creative, and flexible solutions – Meet access and mobility needs for all users while respecting and enhancing community characteristics and natural environment – Save money, shorten implementation, provides win-win outcomes Project Process • Series of citizen and public meetings designed to solicit detailed input from the community • With public input, develop/evaluate alternatives, determine recommended improvement alternative • Detailed environmental review process concluding with Public Hearing • Prepare design plans for construction NEPA Process • The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) established a national environmental policy focused on Federal activities and desire for a sustainable environment balanced with essential needs of present and future generations • Mandate for Federal agencies to consider the potential environmental consequences of their proposals, document the analysis, and make information available to the public for comment prior to implementation Issues Identification • Determine how aspects of project impact stakeholders and other constituency groups • Consider residential and business impacts – – – – – equity, mobility, commute times, lane usage accessibility for all modes Transit accessibility and schedules land-use, construction mitigation, signage, noise, lighting planned/potential new development, sustainability • Develop list of community and regional benefits that the project will seek to generate Project Purpose and Need Purpose and Need will focus on multi-modal, economic development, safety and congestion improvements • Multi-modal needs in the corridor – Connect pedestrian/bicycle connectivity between river and square – Improve transit access and reliability • Reversible lanes present safety/congestion problems – Corridor is among highest crash-rate facilities in City – Corridor has local/regional significance, high level of congestion Project Purpose and Need • Corridor is sits in area rich in environmental and historic resources – Protect and promote these resources • Atlanta Street has a vital business district – Needs quality transportation service, access and connectivity to enhance and further encourage economic development • Purpose and Need will be refined through the early public process Community Survey • December attitude survey of City transportation problems and specifically the reversible lanes (not circumvent public process) – Support for safer, more attractive Atlanta Street to improve traffic movement and business opportunities – Traffic congestion bad, difficult to travel on alternate modes – Support adding lanes to improve safety and ease traffic congestion – Majority believe adding 1 or 2 lanes good use of tax dollars – Strongest arguments against improvements: concern for other, non-specified City issues on which funding should be allocated Historic Gateway Project Website • Project page on City website: http://www.roswellgov.com/ • Project schedule of events, meetings, alternatives, documents, presentations, FAQ’s • Forum for project input • Updated at project milestones Project Milestones – Phase I • Public involvement and planning – Greatest interaction between the project team and community – Project purpose and need is refined, alternatives considered and evaluated and a recommendation is made for a preferred alternative – Initial coordination begins with the resource agencies in order to understand their concerns and requirements Project Milestones – Phase II • Environmental Review Process – Ensures NEPA compliance – Detailed technical environmental studies will be completed and Environmental Assessment (EA) prepared – Greater coordination with the resource agencies in order to meet the local, state and federal requirements for the project – Public Hearing will be held – Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) issued for selected alternative Project Milestones – Phase III • Preliminary Plans – Preliminary plans for the selected alternative will be prepared – Determination of right-of-way impacts and acquisitions – Identify changes in utilities, roadway, earthwork, access, and signalization improvement requirements – Development of preliminary plans for cost estimation – Final design plans will be prepared in a later project and any right-of-way acquisitions will be made once construction funding is established Public Meeting Schedule (Preliminary) • Meeting #1: March 1st at 555 Atlanta Street (SE of Square) – Will focus on citizen concerns/issues, project Purpose and Need • • • • • Meeting #2 – May 2011 Meeting #3 – September 2011 Meeting #4 – December 2011 Public Information Open House – May 2012 Public Hearing – September 2012 * * Subject to environmental process CAG Schedule • • • • 2011 February 3 April 5 August 23 November 8 • • • • 2012 February 21 April 24 September 13 November 8 (if needed) Technical Advisory Committee (TAG) • Primary role of the TAG is to: – Assess all of the technical aspects of the project – To be available to the CAG’s for consult • Will convene quarterly and/or at major project milestones throughout the duration of the project • Comprised of agency representatives with technical expertise relative to project, including MARTA, Parks & Rec, Utilities, Chattahoochee Preserve, GDOT, Cobb County, ARC, Law Enforcement Agencies, City Departments, etc Contacts Ms. Alice Wiggins, Outreach Consultant E-mail: [email protected]; phone: 404-364-2665 Mr. Robert Dell-Ross, City Project Manger E-mail: [email protected]; phone: 770-594.6292 Mr. Jonathan Reid, Consultant Project Manager E-mail: [email protected]; phone: 404-364-5225 Question and Answers