Transcript Document

IMPLEMENTING SCREENING AND BRIEF ALCOHOL
INTERVENTION IN PILOT GP PRACTICES IN THE TYNE AND
WEAR HEALTH ACTION ZONE
Level 1 Training
Screening and simple, structured advice
1ST SESSION (Background)
What is a standard unit of alcohol?

1 Unit equals:
1 half pint of
beer, lager or
cider (3.5%
abv)
1 pub
measure
(50ml) of
fortified
wine (20%
abv)
1 pub measure
(125ml) of
wine (8% abv)
1 pub
measure
(25ml) of
spirits (40%
abv)
Varieties of alcohol-related harm:
acute











Homicide
Suicide
Other intentional injuries (i.e., interpersonal violence)
Domestic violence
Sexual assault
Unprotected sex
Motor vehicle accidents
Other accidents
Drowning
Burns
Public disorder
Varieties of alcohol-related harm:
chronic







Liver cirrhosis and other forms of alcoholrelated liver disease
Hypertension and haemorrhagic stroke
Cancers of the mouth, larynx, pharynx and
oesophagus
Other cancers, including breast cancer
Foetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) and foetal
alcohol effects
Mental illness
Alcohol Dependence Syndrome
Other alcohol-related harms






Lower workplace productivity
Unemployment
To family & social networks
Truancy & school exclusion
Homelessness
Economic costs
Recommended limits






Adult Women: regular consumption of no more than
2-3 units per day and no more than 14 units per week
Adult Men: regular consumption of no more than 3-4
units per day and no more than 21 units per week
Lower limits in younger people (< 18 years)
2 alcohol-free days after an episode of heavy drinking
Consistent consumption at the upper limit is not
recommended
“Very heavy” drinking is defined as over 35 (women)
or 50 (men) units/week
Terminology





Low-risk drinking - below medically recommended limits
Hazardous drinking - a pattern of consumption which increases
the risk of harm (physical, psychological or social), i.e., drinking
above recommended limits
Harmful drinking - a pattern which is likely to have already led
to harm (physical, psychological or social) or, for some purposes,
drinking at “very heavy” levels
Binge drinking – originally episodic heavy drinking but now
heavy drinking in a single session, i.e., twice the daily limit, above
6 units for women 8 units for men
Alcohol dependence – a cluster of physiological, behavioural and
cognitive phenomena conforming to the “alcohol dependence
syndrome”.
How the English adult population
drinks
Prevalence








In the English general population, 27% of adult (16+) males and
15% of adult females are hazardous drinkers or above
6% of adult males and 3% of adult females are “very heavy
drinkers”
In 2001, 21% of men and 9% of women reported “binge
drinking” at least once in preceding week
Usual figure for prevalence of hazardous and harmful drinkers in
general practice population is 20%
Average GP sees 364 hazardous/harmful drinkers per year;
however most GP’s have only 7 patients registered for alcohol
problems
GPs may be missing as many as 98% of hazardous and harmful
drinkers on their lists
In terms of years lost to poor health and premature death,
excessive alcohol consumption is the 3rd most important risk
factor after smoking and raised blood pressure
It has recently been estimated that alcohol-related harm costs
England £20 billion each year
Screening for hazardous and
harmful drinking






Screening is necessary to detect risky drinkers whose level of
consumption may not be apparent
Short questionnaires offer the most efficient means of screening
Biochemical markers (GGT, MCV, CDT) can be used too but are
relatively expensive, intrusive and not more accurate than questionnaires
Screening can be either universal, in which all or nearly all patients
attending the practice are screened, or targeted, in which only specific
groups of patients on the list are screened
If screening is targeted, it might be directed at patients who are unlikely
to object to questions about their drinking (e.g. new patient registrations)
or those thought to be at higher risk for excessive drinking (e.g. diabetes
clinics, CHD clinics, Emergency contraception, Smear clinics; IHD
clinics
Patients who under-estimate their alcohol consumption can be assumed
not to wish to receive advice about it and have a prefect right to hold this
view.
Screening tools suitable for
primary care




Full AUDIT (10 items)
AUDIT-C (3 items)
FAST (1 item plus 3 further items
depending on response to 1st item)
SASQ (1 item)
Drinker typology based on AUDIT scores
Possible
Dependence 20-40
Harmful
16-19
Hazardous
8-15
Low risk
1-7
Abstainers
0
Diagnose & refer to specialist
service
Brief counselling/follow-up
Simple structured advice
Positive reinforcement
? No action
indicated
Shortened versions of AUDIT




The full AUDIT tool has the best sensitivity
and specificity (overall accuracy) but takes
longer to complete
In routine consultations a shortened version of
AUDIT may be more feasible
However, there is a trade-off between
shortness of the screening tool and its accuracy
Several practices in the Tyne & Wear HAZ
Project used AUDIT-C and FAST and were
satisfied with them.
AUDIT-C








Stands for AUDIT-consumption questions
Consists of first 3 items from the full AUDIT, q.v.
Takes 1 minute to administer
A score of 5+ is indicative of hazardous or harmful drinking
Men: 78% sensitivity & 75% specificity
Women: 50% sensitivity & 93% specificity
AUDIT-C cannot by itself be used to determine which level of
brief intervention is appropriate or if a referral for treatment is
called for.
In the event of a positive result on AUDIT-C, these decisions
should be based on clinical judgement or administration of the
full AUDIT
The Fast Alcohol Screening Test (FAST)
SASQ







Stands for Single Alcohol Screening Question
“When was the last time you had more than X drinks in 1 day”,
where X=4 for women and X=5 for men
Never/ More than 12 months ago/ 3-12 months ago/ Within the
past 3 months
“Within the past 3 months” = +ve response
Sensitivity and specificity = 86% for detecting hazardous
drinking in past 3 months or alcohol use disorder in past year
Equally efficient among men and women
Will be used in SBI Implementation Pilot Project funded by
Department of Health but details of UK adaptation (i.e., values of
X) have yet to be finalised
What is brief alcohol intervention?


“… the giving of information, advice and
encouragement to the patient to consider the positives
and negatives of their drinking behaviour, plus
support and help to the patient if they do decide they
want to cut down on their drinking.”
“Brief interventions are usually ‘opportunistic’ – that
is, they are administered to patients who have not
attended a consultation to discuss their drinking”
(from the Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy for England,
p.37)
Features of brief interventions






A family of interventions ranging from a few minutes simple but structured advice
to 20 minutes counselling with repeat consultations
We recommend 2 levels of brief intervention:

(i) simple structured advice (simple brief intervention) taking 1-2 minutes to
deliver

(ii) brief counselling (or extended brief intervention) taking 10-20 minutes to
deliver and involving repeat consultations where necessary
Brief interventions are delivered by generalists in community settings, e.g. GPs,
practice nurses, health visitors, dieticians and other primary health care
professionals in the normal course of their work
But they can also be delivered by more specialist workers (CPNs, lifestyle
counsellors, alcohol health workers) or NHS health trainers if one is employed by
the practice
Normally aimed at a goal of low-risk drinking (i.e., under medically-recommended
levels)
But patients who prefer to become abstinent should not be discouraged
What is the rationale for screening and
brief intervention?



Early intervention and secondary
prevention, i.e., of medical and social
harm but also more severe dependence
Contribution to public health –
broadening the base of interventions
against alcohol-related harm
Reduced use of health-care resources
and cost-effectiveness
ADVANTAGES OF LOCATING SBI
IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE





78% of population visit GP at least once a year
Stigma can be avoided
Intervention possible at “teachable moments”
Intervention in context of ongoing relationship
with patient and family
Advice from GPs, practice nurses and other
PHC staff likely to be respected
Who are the targets for SBI ?



Hazardous drinkers, including
regular excessive drinkers and
“binge drinkers”
Harmful drinkers, including regular
excessive drinkers and “binge
drinkers”
NOT “alcoholics”
Evidence on the effectiveness of
brief interventions




At least 56 controlled trials of effectiveness, the majority in
primary health care
At least 13 meta-analyses and/or systematic reviews, including 5
specifically focused on primary health care and reaching
favourable conclusions on the effectiveness of brief interventions
In the best meta-analysis so far (Moyer et al., 2002), small to
medium aggregate effect sizes in favour of brief interventions
emerged across different follow-up points
At follow-up of 3-6 months or more, the effect for brief
interventions compared to control conditions was significantly
larger when individuals showing more severe alcohol problems
were excluded from the analysis
Evidence on the effectiveness of
brief interventions cont…





Estimates of NNT range from 8 to 12
This compared favourably smoking cessation advice
(NNT = 20)
Some recent evidence of a reduction in mortality
following SBI
Also evidence of reductions in number of alcoholrelated problems
Effects of intervention still present after 4 years in one
US study and after 10-16 years in a Swedish study,
though an Australian study did not find an effect after
10 years
Summary of main points






Screening and brief intervention (SBI) for hazardous and
harmful drinkers in PHC is effective in reducing alcohol-related
harm
SBI is highly cost-effective in terms of reducing future burden on
NHS
Screening should be targeted rather than universal
It is suggested that practices should offer simple structured
advice to all patients screening positive …
and, if resources permit, brief counselling to patients who would
benefit from it and are willing to accept it
Patients with significant alcohol dependence should be offered or
referred to more intensive intervention