Transcript Slide 1
CHAPTER 13 Renal Transplantation Goh Bak Leong Fan Kin Sing Rohan Malek Bin Dato’ Dr. Johan Rosnawati Yahya S. Prasad Menon Tan Si Yen Wong Hin Seng Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.1.1: Stock and flow of renal transplantation, 1993-2012 Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 200 2 New transplant patients 140 204 105 151 129 106 128 144 162 172 Died 24 30 17 37 32 28 29 32 40 38 Graft failure 20 22 27 24 35 48 36 30 39 33 Lost to Follow up 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 5 2 2 Functioning graft at 31st December 144 3 201 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2 734 884 943 1033 1095 1124 1186 1263 1344 New transplant patients 162 192 171 151 111 130 141 128 122 94 Died 41 44 48 58 47 59 49 47 54 46 Graft failure 41 43 21 36 36 39 37 46 42 41 Lost to Follow up 4 6 6 3 12 13 12 6 9 9 Year Functioning graft at 31st December 1519 1618 1714 1768 1784 1803 1846 1875 1892 189 4 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.1.1: Stock and flow of renal transplantation, 1993-2012 Functioning graft at 31st Dec New patients 2,000 1,800 No. of patients 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 Year Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.1.2: New transplant rate per million population (pmp), 19932012 Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 New transplant patients 140 204 105 151 129 106 128 144 162 172 7 10 5 7 6 5 6 6 7 7 New transplant rate (pmp) Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 New transplant patients 162 192 171 151 111 130 141 128 122 94 6 7 6 6 4 5 5 5 4 3 New transplant rate (pmp) Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.1.2: New transplant rate, 1993-2012 Rate, pmp 10 New Transplant rate, pmp 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 Year Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.1.3: Transplant prevalence rate per million population (pmp), 1993-2012 Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Functioning graft at 31st December 734 884 943 1033 1095 1124 1186 1263 1344 1443 Transplant prevalence rate (pmp) 37 44 46 49 50 50 52 54 56 58 Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Functioning graft at 31st December 1519 1618 1714 1768 1784 1803 1846 1875 1892 1894 Transplant prevalence rate (pmp) 60 62 65 66 66 65 66 66 66 65 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.1.3: Transplant prevalence rate, 1993-2012 Rate, pmp Transplant Prevalence rate, pmp 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 Year Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.2.1: Renal transplant recipients’ characteristics, 1993-2012 Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 New Transplant Patients 140 204 105 151 129 106 128 144 162 172 Age at transplant (years), Mean 38 38 35 38 36 37 37 39 41 40 Age at transplant (years), SD 13 11 11 11 12 11 13 14 13 12 % Male 60 67 59 56 64 58 63 65 62 58 % Diabetic (co-morbid/ primary 11 12 13 10 11 10 11 16 19 15 renal disease) % HbsAg positive 9 10 7 13 5 6 4 5 5 7 % Anti-HCV positive 23 13 16 19 7 18 11 8 15 8 Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 New Transplant Patients 162 192 171 151 111 130 141 128 122 94 Age at transplant (years), Mean 42 42 38 37 37 37 38 40 38 37 Age at transplant (years), SD 13 13 14 15 16 14 14 14 15 13 % Male 66 63 68 66 64 59 64 66 70 60 % Diabetic (co-morbid/ primary 23 21 21 18 15 18 20 20 14 16 renal disease) % HbsAg positive 8 5 5 6 9 3 2 4 4 3 % Anti-HCV positive 10 8 3 8 9 3 7 3 4 2 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.2.2: Primary causes of end stage renal failure, 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.3.1: Type of renal transplantation, 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.3.2: Place of transplantation, 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.4.1: Post-transplant complications, 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.4.2: Biochemical data, 2004-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.4.3: Transplant patients’ death rate and graft loss, 19932012 Year Number at risk Transplant death Transplant death rate % Graft loss Graft loss rate % Acute rejection Acute rejection rate % All losses All losses rate % 1993 734 24 3.3 20 2.7 0 0 44 6 1994 809 30 3.7 22 2.7 0 0 52 6.4 1995 914 17 1.9 27 3 0 0 44 4.8 1996 988 37 3.7 24 2.4 0 0 61 6.2 1997 1064 32 3 35 3.3 0 0 67 6.3 1998 1110 28 2.5 48 4.3 0 0 76 6.8 1999 1155 29 2.5 36 3.1 0 0 65 5.6 2000 1225 32 2.6 30 2.4 1 0.1 62 5.1 2001 1304 40 3.1 39 3 0 0 79 6.1 2002 1394 38 2.7 33 2.4 0 0 71 5.1 Year Number at risk Transplant death Transplant death rate % Graft loss Graft loss rate % Acute rejection Acute rejection rate % All losses All losses rate % 2003 1481 41 2.8 41 2.8 4 0.3 82 5.5 2004 1569 44 2.8 43 2.7 19 1.2 87 5.5 2005 1666 48 2.9 21 1.3 14 0.8 69 4.1 2006 1741 58 3.3 36 2.1 19 1.1 94 5.4 2007 1776 47 2.6 36 2 14 0.8 83 4.7 2008 1794 59 3.3 39 2.2 24 1.3 98 5.5 2009 1825 49 2.7 37 2 32 1.8 86 4.7 2010 1861 47 2.5 46 2.5 81 4.4 93 5 2011 1884 54 2.9 42 2.2 53 2.8 96 5.1 2012 1893 45 2.4 41 2.2 20 1.1 86 4.5 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.4.3(a): Transplant recipient death rate, 1993-2012 Annual death rate 3.5 Death rate % 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 .5 0 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 Year Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.4.3(b): Transplant recipient graft loss rate, 1993-2012 Annual graft loss rate 4.5 4 Graft loss rate % 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 .5 0 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 Year Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.4.4(a): Causes of death in transplant recipients, 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.4.4(b): Causes of graft failure, 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.5.1.1: Patient survival, 1993-2012 Interval (years) n % Survival SE 0 2879 100 1 2553 95 0 2 2357 93 0 3 2162 92 1 4 1959 90 1 5 1783 88 1 6 1603 86 1 7 1409 84 1 8 1208 83 1 9 1020 81 1 10 872 79 1 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.5.1.1: Patient survival, 1993-2012 Transplant patient survival, 1993-2012 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Duration in years 14 16 18 20 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.5.1.2: Risk factors for transplant patient survival 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.5.1.3: Graft survival, 1993-2012 Interval (years) n % Survival 2879 100 1 2553 92 1 2 2357 89 1 3 2162 86 1 4 1959 83 1 5 1783 80 1 6 1603 77 1 7 1409 73 1 8 1208 71 1 9 1020 68 1 10 872 65 1 0 SE Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.5.1.3: Graft survival, 1993-2012 Transplant graft survival, 1993-2012 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Duration in years 14 16 18 20 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.5.1.4: Risk factors for transplant graft survival 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.5.2.1: Unadjusted patient survival by type of transplant, 19932012 Type of Transplant Commercial Cadaver Interval (years) n % Survival SE 0 1252 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1165 1127 1079 1005 914 844 740 628 500 416 96 94 92 89 87 85 83 83 81 79 *n=Number at risk Commercial Live Donor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n Live Donor % Survival SE 423 100 383 345 297 263 243 220 193 180 161 152 97 95 92 90 87 84 80 77 74 72 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 n Cadaver % Survival SE 745 100 637 588 541 485 447 394 355 304 272 239 97 96 96 94 94 93 91 90 88 88 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 n %Survival SE 379 100 285 232 194 163 142 113 95 83 74 59 89 86 84 83 80 78 77 75 73 71 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 SE=standard error Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.5.2.1: Patient survival by type of transplant, 1993-2012 Transplant patient survival by Type of Transplant, 1993-2012 1.00 Live donor 0.75 Cadaver Commercial cadaver 0.50 Commercial live donor 0.25 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Duration in years 16 18 20 22 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.5.2.2: Graft survival by type of transplant, 1993-2012 Type of Transplant Interval (years) Commercial Cadaver n % Survival SE 0 1252 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1167 1129 1081 1007 916 847 742 629 504 418 94 91 89 85 82 80 77 74 72 70 *n=Number at risk Commercial Live Donor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n Live Donor % Survival SE 423 100 392 353 306 271 251 227 198 182 162 153 95 91 86 82 77 72 66 63 59 55 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 n Cadaver % Survival SE 745 100 638 584 542 488 446 394 353 301 267 234 92 91 90 87 86 83 81 78 75 71 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 n % Survival SE 379 100 286 232 195 163 142 113 96 83 74 59 81 76 73 70 67 63 61 58 56 51 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 SE=standard error Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.5.2.2: Graft survival by type of transplants, 1993-2012 Transplant graft survival by Type of Transplant, 1993-2012 1.00 0.75 Live donor 0.50 Commercial cadaver Cadaver Commercial live donor 0.25 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Duration in years 16 18 20 22 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.5.3.1: Patient survival by year of transplant (Living related transplant, 1993-2012) Year of Transplant Interval (years) n 1993-2002 % Survival 0 328 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 298 296 285 276 271 259 248 238 228 217 98 97 96 96 95 95 94 93 92 91 SE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 n 2003-2012 % Survival 278 100 226 197 175 141 115 93 67 37 19 1 96 96 95 93 93 89 88 88 83 83 SE 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 5 5 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.5.3.1: Patient survival by year of transplant (Living related transplant, 1993-2012) Transplant patient survival by Year of Transplant, 1993-2012 1.00 Year 2003-2012 Year 1993-2002 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Duration in years 14 16 18 20 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table13.5.3.2: Graft survival by year of transplant (Living related transplant, 1993-2012) Year of Transplant Interval (years) n 1993-2002 % Survival 0 328 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 322 320 309 299 293 281 270 257 244 233 90 90 87 84 83 79 77 73 70 67 SE 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 n 2003-2012 % Survival 278 100 317 264 233 189 153 113 83 45 23 1 94 92 92 89 88 85 84 84 84 77 SE 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.5.3.2: Graft survival by year of transplant (Living related transplant, 1993-2012) Transplant graft survival by Year of Transplant, 2002-2012 1.00 Year 2003-2012 0.75 Year 1993-2002 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Duration in years 14 16 18 20 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.5.4.1: Patient survival by year of transplant (Commercial cadaver transplant, 1993-2012) Year of Transplant Interval (years) n 1993-2002 % Survival 0 642 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 601 585 569 536 510 491 466 448 432 416 95 93 91 88 86 84 81 81 79 78 SE 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 n 2003-2012 % Survival 610 100 566 544 517 471 406 356 276 181 75 2 96 94 92 91 89 88 87 86 85 85 SE 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.5.4.1: Patient survival by year of transplant (Commercial cadaver transplant, 1993-2012) Transplant patient survival by Year of Transplant, 1993-2012 1.00 Year 2003-2012 0.75 Year 1993-2002 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Duration in years 14 16 18 20 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.5.4.2: Graft survival by year of transplant (Commercial cadaver transplant, 1993-2012) Year of Transplant Interval (years) n 1993-2002 % Survival 0 642 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 601 585 569 536 510 491 466 448 432 416 94 91 88 84 80 77 74 72 70 67 SE 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 n 2003-2012 % Survival 610 100 566 544 517 471 406 356 276 181 75 2 94 92 89 87 85 82 80 78 77 77 SE 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.5.4.2: Graft survival by year of transplant (Commercial cadaver transplant, 1993-2012) Transplant graft survival by Year of Transplant, 1993-2012 1.00 Year 2003-2012 0.75 Year 1993-2002 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Duration in years 14 16 18 20 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.6.1: Medication data, 2004-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.6.1(a)(i): Calcineurin inhibitors: Cyclosporin vs Tacrolimus CsA Tacrolimus 80 Proportion of patients 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 Year Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.6.1(a)(ii): Antimetabolites: Azathioprine vs Mycophenolic Acid Azathioprine Mycophenolic Acid Proportion of patients 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 Year Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.6.2: Use of anti-hypertensive medications Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.1: Risk factors for IHD in renal transplant recipients at year 2004-2012 Diabetes Hypertension** CKD Diabetes + Hypertension** Diabetes + CKD CKD + Hypertension** Diabetes + CKD + Hypertension** Diabetes Hypertension** CKD Diabetes + Hypertension** Diabetes + CKD CKD + Hypertension** Diabetes + CKD + Hypertension** 2004 27 (1.8) 501 (34.1) 121 (8.2) 149 (10.1) 21 (1.4) 530 (36.1) 2005 21 (1.4) 508 (33.1) 142 (9.3) 163 (10.6) 20 (1.3) 537 (35.0) 2006 21 (1.4) 452 (30.9) 177 (12.1) 158 (10.8) 18 (1.2) 489 (33.4) 2007 25 (1.6) 586 (37.2) 127 (8.1) 179 (11.4) 11 (0.7) 515 (32.7) 2008 18 (1.1) 662 (41.7) 117 (7.4) 204 (12.8) 22 (1.4) 456 (28.7) 120 (8.2) 143 (9.3) 148 (10.1) 134 (8.5) 110 (6.9) 2009 28 (1.8) 644 (41.0) 156 (9.9) 164 (10.4) 18 (1.1) 472 (30.1) 2010 35 (2.1) 635 (37.8) 166 (9.9) 197 (11.7) 22 (1.3) 514 (30.6) 2011 38 (2.2) 674 (38.9) 159 (9.2) 215 (12.4) 33 (1.9) 508 (29.3) 2012 37 (2.2) 596 (36.1) 225 (13.6) 203 (12.3) 33 (2.0) 457 (27.7) 88 (5.6) 109 (6.5) 105 (6.1) 100 (6.1) **Hypertension: BP systolic > 140 and BP diastolic > 90, or on anti-hypertensive drugs Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.1(a): Venn diagram for pre and post transplant complications (in %) at year 2004 CKD 8,2 36.1 1.4 8.2 34.1 HPT 10.1 1.8 DM Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.1(b): Venn diagram for pre and post transplant complications (in %) at year 2006 CKD 12.1 33.4 1.2 10.1 1.4 30.9 HPT 10.8 DM Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.1(c): Venn diagram for pre and post transplant complications (in %) at year 2008 CKD 9.9 28.7 1.4 6.9 41.7 HPT 12.8 1.1 DM Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.1(d): Venn diagram for pre and post transplant complications (in %) at year 2010 CKD 9.9 30.6 1.3 6.5 2.2 37.8 HPT 11.7 DM Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.1(e): Venn diagram for pre and post transplant complications (in %) at year 2012 CKD 12.3 27.7 2.0 6.1 2.2 36.1 HPT 13.6 DM Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.2(a): Systolic BP, 2004-2012 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 n % n % n % n % n % <120 208 13 234 14 252 16 244 14 296 17 120-129 345 22 318 19 398 25 396 23 384 22 130-139 468 30 480 29 486 30 540 32 620 36 140-159 429 27 455 28 356 22 412 24 336 19 160-179 102 6 136 8 93 6 99 6 79 5 >=180 23 1 24 1 19 1 17 1 11 1 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 n % n % n % n % <120 270 16 348 19 357 18 346 18 120-129 376 22 402 21 424 22 564 29 130-139 650 38 688 37 651 34 594 31 140-159 344 20 328 17 424 22 375 19 160-179 62 4 101 5 65 3 48 2 >=180 10 1 10 1 21 1 13 1 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.2(a): Systolic BP, 2004-2012 Systolic BP <120 Systolic BP 120-129 Systolic BP 130-139 Systolic BP 140-159 Systolic BP 160-179 Systolic BP >=180 100 Percent 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.2(b): Diastolic BP, 2004-2012 Year <80 80-84 85-89 90-99 100-109 >=110 2004 n 524 614 48 321 56 12 Year <80 80-84 85-89 90-99 100-109 >=110 2005 % 33 39 3 20 4 1 n 526 660 74 312 65 10 % 32 40 4 19 4 1 2009 n 866 533 84 197 27 5 2006 n 632 589 74 244 61 4 2007 n 39 37 5 15 4 0 2010 % 51 31 5 12 2 0 n 971 557 114 204 27 4 % 711 617 74 262 39 5 2011 % 52 30 6 11 1 0 n 927 629 142 219 22 3 2008 n 42 36 4 15 2 0 % 908 537 51 202 23 5 n 53 31 3 12 1 0 2012 % 48 32 7 11 1 0 n 1089 522 171 143 20 5 % 56 27 9 7 1 0 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.2(b): Diastolic BP, 2004-2012 Diastolic BP <80 Diastolic BP <85 Diastolic BP 85-89 Diastolic BP 90-99 Diastolic BP 100-109 Diastolic BP >=110 100 Percent 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.3: CKD stages, 2004-2012 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 n % n % n % n % n % Stage 1 119 8 119 7 117 7 180 11 165 10 Stage 2 579 37 583 36 542 34 598 35 636 37 Stage 3 738 47 805 49 803 50 773 46 751 44 Stage 4 113 7 113 7 109 7 116 7 123 7 Stage 5 15 1 19 1 24 2 23 1 27 2 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 n % n % n % n % Stage 1 169 10 237 13 227 12 224 12 Stage 2 605 36 652 35 754 39 772 40 Stage 3 777 46 773 42 772 40 749 39 Stage 4 107 6 131 7 133 7 141 7 Stage 5 22 1 51 3 25 1 38 2 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.3: CKD stages by year CKD Stage 1 CKD Stage 2 CKD Stage 4 CKD Stage 5 CKD Stage 3 100 Percent 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.4: BMI, 2004-2012 Year <20 20-25 25-30 > 30 Year <20 20-25 25-30 > 30 2004 n 248 487 575 265 2005 % 16 31 37 17 2009 n 272 450 705 285 n 272 467 616 292 2006 % 17 28 37 18 n 266 445 626 267 2010 % 16 26 41 17 n 309 500 731 337 % 17 28 39 17 2007 n 262 474 653 319 2011 % 16 27 39 18 n 301 536 746 359 2008 % 15 28 38 19 n 259 464 730 273 % 15 27 42 16 2012 % 15 28 38 18 n 285 633 692 344 % 15 32 35 18 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.4: BMI, 2004-2012 BMI <20 BMI 20-25 BMI 25-30 BMI > 30 100 Percent 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.5(a): LDL, 2004-2012 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 n % n % n % n % n % < 2.6 287 18 424 26 497 31 531 31 595 34 2.6-3.4 962 61 865 53 741 46 794 46 792 46 >= 3.4 326 21 358 22 366 23 383 22 339 20 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 n % n % n % n % < 2.6 651 38 635 34 614 32 656 34 2.6-3.4 727 42 895 48 982 51 935 48 >= 3.4 334 20 347 18 346 18 363 19 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.5(a): LDL, 1993-2012 LDL <2.6 LDL 2.6-3.4 LDL >= 3.4 100 Percent 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.5(b): Total cholesterol, 2004-2012 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 n % n % n % n % n % <4.1 116 7 160 10 162 10 215 13 211 12 4.1-5.1 422 27 460 28 492 31 544 32 543 31 5.1-6.2 761 48 777 47 706 44 730 43 736 43 6.2- 7.2 200 13 174 11 174 11 159 9 162 9 > 7.2 116 7 160 10 162 10 215 13 211 12 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 n % n % n % n % <4.1 233 14 272 14 301 15 258 13 4.1-5.1 513 30 557 30 629 32 668 34 5.1-6.2 731 43 828 44 799 41 815 42 6.2- 7.2 159 9 151 8 138 7 150 8 > 7.2 76 4 69 4 75 4 63 3 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.5(b): Total cholesterol, 2004-2012 Total Cholesterol <4.1 Total Cholesterol 4.1-5.1 Total Cholesterol 5.1-6.2 Total Cholesterol 6.2-7.2 Total Cholesterol > 7.2 100 Percent 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.5(c): HDL, 2004-2012 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 n % n % n % n % n % <1 89 6 119 7 106 7 110 6 119 7 1-1.3 258 16 315 19 302 19 355 21 387 22 >1.3 1228 78 1213 74 1196 75 1243 73 1220 71 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 n % n % n % n % <1 153 9 148 8 136 7 135 7 1-1.3 424 25 412 22 440 23 461 24 >1.3 1135 66 1317 70 1366 70 1358 69 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.7.5(c): HDL, 2004-2012 HDL <1 HDL 1-1.3 HDL > 1.3 100 Percent 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.6(a): Treatment for hypertension, 2004-2012 % on anti% on 1 anti% on 2 anti% on 3 antihypertensive drug hypertensive drug hypertensive drug hypertensive drug Year n 2004 1566 81 41 31 9 2005 1639 80 38 29 11 2006 1599 75 37 25 11 2007 1695 80 34 32 12 2008 1705 72 35 27 10 2009 1701 74 37 28 8 2010 1864 75 41 24 8 2011 1924 75 44 22 8 2012 1940 68 39 23 6 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.6(b): Distribution of systolic BP without anti-hypertensive, 2004-2012 Year n Mean SD Median LQ UQ % Patients ≥ 160mmHg 2004 262 126.7 13.5 130 120 132 4 2005 295 127.4 15.9 130 120 140 4 2006 356 124.7 14.3 120 119.5 130 3 2007 281 125.8 16.4 123 115 138 4 2008 271 124 14.8 120 113 130 3 2009 337 124.4 15.1 121 112 130 2 2010 397 128.5 36.7 124 119 137 5 2011 414 125.1 15.1 124 115 131 3 2012 569 127.3 24.9 126 117.5 132.5 2 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.6(c): Distribution of diastolic BP without anti-hypertensive, 2004-2012 Year n Mean SD Median LQ UQ % patients ≥ 90mmHg 2004 262 78.4 9.6 80 70 80 19 2005 295 79.1 9.2 80 70 81 19 2006 356 77.6 10 80 70 80 15 2007 281 76.7 9.7 80 70 80 13 2008 270 75.8 9.5 80 70 80 11 2009 337 77.6 9.2 80 70 80 14 2010 396 77.3 10 80 70 82 15 2011 414 77.1 9.2 80 70 80 11 2012 569 77.6 13 77.5 71.8 82.3 7 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.6(d): Distribution of systolic BP on anti-hypertensives, 20042012 Year n Mean SD Median LQ UQ % Patients ≥ 160mmHg 2004 1240 133.4 16.4 130 120 140 9 2005 1287 134.8 17.2 130 120 144 11 2006 1172 132.5 16.4 130 120 140 9 2007 1306 132.9 15.9 130 120 140 8 2008 1182 130.3 16.8 130 120 140 7 2009 1120 131.6 15.9 130 120 140 6 2010 1260 130.6 16.2 130 120 140 7 2011 1339 131.7 16.1 130 120 140 6 2012 1261 132.8 18.3 130.5 123.3 140 4 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.7.6(e): Distribution of diastolic BP on anti-hypertensives, 2004-2012 Year n Mean SD Median LQ UQ % Patients ≥ 90 mmHg 2004 1240 80.7 9.8 80 75 90 27 2005 1287 80.9 9.4 80 76 90 26 2006 1172 79.3 10 80 70 86 22 2007 1305 79.2 9.6 80 70 85 21 2008 1168 77.6 10.1 80 70 80 17 2009 1118 78.3 9.5 80 70 82 16 2010 1255 77.9 22 80 70 82 14 2011 1339 77.8 9.8 80 70 83 15 2012 1261 78.6 9.9 79 73 83 10 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.8.3.1: Allograftraft and patient survival, Azathioprine vs Mycophenolic Acid 1993-2012 Azathioprine Survival (%) Mycophenolic Acid n Graft Patient n Graft Patient 1 year 1487 100 100 1564 100 100 3 years 1248 84 91 1095 88 92 5 years 1129 77 86 823 84 89 10 years 869 61 77 211 72 82 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.8.3.1(a): Graft survival, Azathioprine vs Mycophenolic Acid 1993-2012 Graft survival, 2012 1.00 Mycophenolic Acid Azathioprine 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Duration in months 90 100 110 120 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.8.3.1(b): Patient survival, Azathioprine vs Mycophenolic Acid, 1993-2012 Transplant patient survival, 2012 1.00 Mycophenolic Acid Azathioprine 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Duration in months 90 100 110 120 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.8.3.2: Graft and patient survival, CsA vs Tacrolimus CsA Survival (%) Tacrolimus n Graft Patient n Graft Patient 1 year 2111 100 100 969 100 100 3 years 1401 87 92 588 87 91 5 years 1231 81 88 394 83 89 10 years 722 66 80 71 68 82 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.8.3.2(a): Graft survival, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 1993-2012 Graft survival, 2012 1.00 Tacrolimus CsA 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Duration in months 90 100 110 120 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.8.3.2(b): Patient survival, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 1993-2012 Transplant patient survival, 2012 1.00 Tacrolimus CsA 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Duration in months 90 100 110 120 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.8.3.3: Mean SBP, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 2004-2012 Mean SBP CsA Mean SBP Tacrolimus 2004 132.7 128.7 2005 134.2 130.5 2006 131.4 127.6 2007 132.6 128 2008 130.6 125.2 2009 131.3 127.4 2010 130.2 128.1 2011 131.7 127.4 2012 131.4 129.2 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.8.3.3: Mean SBP, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 2004-2012 134 133 132 Mean SBP 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 '04 '05 '06 '07 CsA '08 Year '09 '10 '11 '12 Tacrolimus Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.8.3.4: Mean GFR, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 2004-2012 Mean GFR CsA Mean GFR Tacrolimus 2004 99.3 126.1 2005 97.3 111 2006 97.6 109.8 2007 96 104.4 2008 97.3 111 2009 95.6 108.8 2010 91.6 106.4 2011 90.7 101.9 2012 92.1 100.7 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.8.3.4: Mean GFR, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 2004-2012 130 Mean GFR 120 110 100 90 '04 '05 '06 '07 CsA '08 Year '09 '10 '11 '12 Tacrolimus Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.8.3.5: Mean LDL, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 2004-2012 Mean LDL CsA Mean LDL Tacrolimus 2004 3.2 3 2005 3 2.8 2006 3 2.9 2007 3 2.8 2008 2.9 2.8 2009 2.8 2.7 2010 2.9 2.8 2011 2.9 2.9 2012 2.9 2.8 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.8.3.5: Mean LDL, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 1993-2012 3.2 Mean LDL 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 '04 '05 '06 '07 CsA '08 Year '09 '10 '11 '12 Tacrolimus Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.8.3.6: Incidence of post transplant diabetes mellitus, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 2004-2012 Post Tx DM CsA Post Tx DM Tacrolimus 2004 15 27 2005 15 25 2006 16 18 2007 13 15 2008 14 14 2009 10 9 2010 11 10 2011 11 9 2012 11 10 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.8.3.6: Cumulative incidence of post transplant diabetes, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 2004-2012 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Cumulative incidence of post transplant diabetes, CsA vs Tacrolimus, 2004-2012 2004 2005 2006 2007 Post Tx DM CsA 2008 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Post Tx DM Tacrolimus Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.9.1: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to dialysis modality, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Dialysis modality Number of patients QoL score 2227 Centile 0 0 0.05 9 0.1 10 0.25 (LQ) 10 0.5 (median) 10 0.75 (UQ) 10 0.9 10 0.95 10 1 10 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.9.1: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to dialysis modality, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Cumulative distribution of QOL by Modality, Transplant Patients 1 .8 .6 .4 .2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 QL-Index Score 7 8 9 10 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.9.2: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to diabetes mellitus, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Diabetes mellitus No Yes 1954 273 0 0 0 0.05 9 7 0.1 10 8 0.25 (LQ) 10 10 0.5 (median) 10 10 0.75 (UQ) 10 10 0.9 10 10 0.95 10 10 1 10 10 Number of patients Centile Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.9.2: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to diabetes mellitus, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Cumulative distribution of QOL by DM, Transplant Patients 1 .8 .6 .4 .2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 QL-Index Score No 7 8 9 10 Yes Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.9.3: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to gender, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Gender Male Female Number of patients 1391 836 0 0 0 0.05 9 9 0.1 10 9 0.25 (LQ) 10 10 0.5 (median) 10 10 0.75 (UQ) 10 10 0.9 10 10 0.95 10 10 1 10 10 Centile Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.9.3: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to gender, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Cumulative distribution of QOL by Gender, Transplant Patients 1 .8 .6 .4 .2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 QL-Index Score Male 7 8 9 10 Female Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.9.4: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to age, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Age group (years) <20 20-39 40-59 >=60 Number of patients 218 944 954 111 0 0 0 0 0 0.05 9 9 8 7 0.1 10 10 9 8 0.25 (LQ) 10 10 10 9 0.5 (median) 10 10 10 10 0.75 (UQ) 10 10 10 10 0.9 10 10 10 10 0.95 10 10 10 10 1 10 10 10 10 Centile Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.9.4: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to age, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index by Age Group, Transplant patients 1 .8 .6 .4 .2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 QL-Index Score Age <20 Age 40-59 7 8 9 10 Age 20-39 Age >=60 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Table 13.9.5: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to year of entry, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR Figure 13.9.5: Cumulative distribution of QoL-Index score in relation to year of entry, transplant recipient patients 1993-2012 Cumulative distribution of QOL by Year of Entry, Transplant Patients 1 .8 .6 .4 .2 0 0 1 2 3 Year 1993 Year 1999 Year 2005 Year 2011 4 5 6 QL-Index Score Year 1995 Year 2001 Year 2007 7 8 9 10 Year 1997 Year 2003 Year 2009 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR