The Affordable Care Act Implementation: A National Overview

Download Report

Transcript The Affordable Care Act Implementation: A National Overview

American Academy of HIV Medicine

The Affordable Care Act Implementation: A National Overview Spring 2015

US Census: Majority of Americans 19-64 Years Of Age Are Enrolled in Commercial Insurance Private Public Uninsured 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 19-25 26-34 35-44 Age Group 45-64

ACA Medicaid Expansion

Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions, January 2015

Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, January 2015. http://kff.org/health-reform/slide/current-status-of-the-medicaid-expansion-decision/

Medicaid Managed Care (MCOs)

ACA Marketplace

ACA Marketplace/Exchange

• Online one stop virtual “marketplace,” where individuals, families, and employees of small businesses can purchase health insurance from Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) Individuals and families with incomes between 100-400% FPL ineligible for other affordable employer-based or government based may be eligible for premium tax credits and/or cost sharing reductions • • • • • • Cannot charge higher premiums based on gender or health status Cannot deny coverage to individuals based on pre-existing conditions Cannot set annual or lifetime limits on the amount of benefits paid Extends dependent coverage up to 26 years of age Prohibits imposing annual dollar limits on essential health benefits Cover specified preventive health services without cost-sharing

QHPs Offer Premiums Based on “Metal Levels” or Actuarial Value” Bronze: Member pays 40%, QHP pays 60% Silver: Member pays 30%, QHP pays 70% Gold: Member pays 20%, QHP pays 80% Platinum: Member pays 10%, QHP pays 90%

Impact of the ACA Marketplace and Medicaid on the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program

Impact of the ACA and Medicaid Expansion on RWHAP

• • • The HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) administers RWHAP HAB determined that the RWHAP is the “payer of last resort” Grantees must “vigorously pursue” client enrollment in private or public insurance – Some programs have been aggressive in enrolling clients without adequate ongoing education and navigation assistance • Grantees may not disenroll clients from services if they do not enroll in health insurance

Impact of the ACA and Medicaid Expansion on RWHAP

• • • HAB encourages ADAPs to assist clients to enroll in insurance if – Insurers’ formularies include at least one drug in each ARV class – It is cost-effective to support premiums compared to purchasing medications RWHAP-funded providers have variable experience with public and commercial health insurance markets – – – – Must enroll in QHP and Medicaid MCO provider networks Credential their clinicians Develop health insurance billing capacity Undertake intensive “coordination of benefits” for clients enrolled ADAP and QHPs or Medicaid MCOs The RWHAP’s future is unclear at the federal and state levels

Problem Areas & Trends

National Trends

• • • Positive Side The number of Americans without health insurance has been reduced by about 25 percent (8 to 11 million people) – Will continue HIV Patients that could not get covered before are now Patient Protections under the law we never used to have

Issues: Patients

• Affordability Issues – True Out-of-Pocket • Formulary Issues – – – – Tiering of HIV meds Coverage of Single Tablet Regimens (STRs) Formulary Changes (Additions/Drops) throughout coverage year Requirements based of the USP categories – – Formulary Appeals Process cumbersome Success Rate?

• Non Discrimination Requirements – Enforced?

Issues: Patients

• Loss of Case Management Services – RWCA levels vs. Medicaid • Pharmacy Issues – – Required use of Mail-Order Pharmacies Adherence disruptions • Provider Networks – – – Not Up-to-date Directories Access &Travel Burden Out-of-Network Standards

Issues: Patients – Premium Affordability

Issues: Patients – Formulary Tiering

Issues: Patients – Formulary Tiering

Issues: Patients - Gaps In Coverage SERVICE HIV Testing RX MEDICAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORAL HEALTH LABS MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT HIV PRIMARY CARE QHP MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES

Adapted from West Virginia Ryan White Part B Program

MEDICAID RW/ ADAP/CDC Continue to cover in certain settings Cost-sharing assistance Limited Coverage Cost-sharing assistance Cost-sharing assistance Cost-sharing assistance Cost-sharing assistance

Issues: Patients – Medication Affordability

Issues: Patients - Pharmacy

• • • Requirements to use Mail-Order Pharmacies: Patient Adherence Subject to Shipping Loss of Adherence Counseling Services Outsourced services with different coverage

Issues: Providers

• Prior Authorization Burden – Formulary not aligned with HIV Treatment Guidelines • • Step Therapy Requirements Required use of components / generics – Utilization Management Restrictions • Provider Networks – Reports of closed networks – – Unfamiliarity with contracting Out of date Provider lists • Reimbursement & Future Planning

Issues: Providers – Utilization Management

Issues: Providers – Formulary vs. Treatment Guidelines

• EHB Standard = same number of drugs per U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP ) category/class as state’s benchmark plan

Federal Advocacy Efforts

Federal Advocacy Efforts

• • Federal AIDS Policy Partnership & Health Care Access Working Group Comments on proposed rules and regulations.

Communications with federal law makers – – Administration- HHS, CMS, HRSA, etc.

Congress – Oversight committees

Federal Advocacy Efforts

• • CMS Notice of Payment and Benefit Parameters for 2016 Better definition of EHBs Stronger Prescription Drug Standard – Replace Benefits Managers with P&T Committees – – Refer to National Treatment Guidelines as basis for coverage Review new meds within 30 days and determination by 90 days

Federal Advocacy Efforts

• Move from USP to American Hospital Formulary Services (AHFS) – – More nuanced subclasses of ARVs Includes combination therapies • Formulary Exceptions Process – – 24 hour appeal process Secondary external review process • Formulary Transparency for Consumers – – – Ability to view PA or UM Co-insurance & Cost-sharing No changes mid-year

Federal Advocacy Efforts

• Mail Order Pharmacy – – Optional brick & morter Additional costs count towards Out of Pocket Max • Non-Discrimination – Plan designs that impact HIV patients selection • Network Adequacy – Reasonable access standard in terms of time and distance • HRSA Standards – Exception for Out-of-Network Providers – Transparency, Updated Lists, Identify ECPs

Changes in 2016

• Final Rule – Changes to the 2016 plans P&T Committees – plans must establish pharmacy and therapeutics committees that will in turn develop drug formularies.

• Formularies – have to provide appropriate access to drugs included in broadly accepted treatment guidelines and be consistent with best practice formularies

2016 Plans

• Exception Process – plans must make a decision and notify the enrollee or physician within 24 hours of a request – New “standard exceptions process,” • patient or physician can request coverage of a clinically appropriate non-formulary drug and receive a decision within 72 hours of a request.

• State regulators will be primarily responsible for enforcing these requirements.

Florida precedent

• The AIDS Institute & National Health Law Project Filed a complaint with the Office of Civil Right at HHS (May 2014) – – CoventryOne, Cigna, Humana, Preferred Medical Allege discriminatory benefit design • Aetna & Coventry voluntarily announced it will HIV medications to a generic brand tier that will lower co payments to a range of $5-$100, after deductibles (effective June 1, 2015)

Louisiana Precedent

• 2014 Lambda Legal filed law suit Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) announced they would not longer accept 3 rd party payments – Ryan White Premium Assistance • CMS clarification that they expect insurers to accept 3 rd party payments • The Louisiana Legislature passed, and Governor Jindal signed, Louisiana Revised Statute 22:1080(June 2014) – Forcing insurers to accept RW payments

Which cop is on the beat?

Federal Regulators

Federal Regulators

Federal Regulators

Advocacy on Your Behalf The Most Important Thing:

Document and report discriminatory, illegal, and medically inadvisable practices & requirements!

AAHIVM Health Reform Reporting Survey www.aahivm.org

• Project Speak Up! HIVHealthReform.org and the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation Harvard Law School http://www.hivhealthreform.org/speakup/

For more information contact: Holly Kilness Packett Director Public Policy [email protected]