Presentazione di PowerPoint - Home page

Download Report

Transcript Presentazione di PowerPoint - Home page

CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
29th ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS – SCA&I
CHICAGO, IL – MAY 10-14, 2006
Main Session - Drug Eluting Stents
Bifurcation lesions
Antonio Colombo
Centro Cuore Columbus Milan, Italy
S. Raffaele Hospital Milan, Italy
Columbia University, NY, USA
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Conflicts:
Minor stock holder in Cappella Inc.
Manufacturing side branch stent
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
1 or 2 stents?
A) If the side branch is significantly diseased at
its ostium or nearby, it is sufficiently large to
be stented, safety and duration of PCI are an
issue: 2 stents
B) In all other conditions 1 stents and then
evaluate
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Treatment of Bifurcation Lesion with two stents
Can you really use one stent ?
Baseline
Final Result
11186/02
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Treatment of Bifurcation Lesion with two stents
Treatment
Baseline
11162/02
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Treatment of Bifurcation Lesion with two stents
Final Result
11162/02
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Crush
• Standard Crush: 7F, two stents in position together, side branch inflated
first, main branch stent crushes side branch
• Reverse Crush, used when provisional stenting requires another stent in
the side branch: 6F, main branch stent deployed first, side branch stent
is crushed against the main vessel stent with a balloon
• Inverted Crush, makes recrossing easier and improves side branch
coverage: 7F similar to Standard Crush but the side branch stent is
positioned more proximally than the main branch stent, the side
branch stent will crush the main branch stent.
• Step Crush, as standard Crush but can be done with 6F.Advance and
deploy stent in side branch
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
•
•
•
•
•
•
About the side branch: wires for recrossing
and Kissing Balloon dilatation
Dilate the main vessel stent at high pressure
The original Universal Balance wire
Prowater/ Rinato (Asahi Intech wire)
Intermediate wire
Pilot 50 or 150 wire
Always perform high pressure inflation in the side
branch before doing kissing
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
DES in Bifurcation Lesions
(Milan experience April 2002 – March 2005)
368
Total number bifurcations: 389
Total number of patients:
Type D
True bifurcational lesions:
Type F
Type G
60%
Bifurcations treated with Cypher stent:
Bifurcations treated with Taxus stent:
54%
46%
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
DES in Bifurcation Lesions
(389 de-novo bifurcations)
Lesion location
LMT
(n=97)
25%
6%
18%
51%
LAD-diag
(n=199)
LCX-OM
(n=71)
RCA
(n=22)
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
DES in Bifurcation Lesions
Stent technique
390 bifurcations
193 (49.6%)
One stent
on the MB
197 (50.4%)
Stent on
both branches
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
DES in Bifurcation Lesions
Stent technique (one stent vs two stents)
Left main
(n=98)
32%
68%
= One stent only
Other locations
(n=292)
58%
42%
= Stent on both branches
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
DES in Bifurcation Lesions
Stent technique (one stent vs two stents)
True bifurcations
(n=232)
41%
59%
= One stent only
Other bifurcations
(n=158)
63%
37%
= Stent on both branches
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
DES in Bifurcation Lesion in 292 lesions
Two-stent techniques
NO LMT lesions
3%
7%
7%
83%
Crush
T-stent
V-stent
Culotte
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
DES in Bifurcation Lesion in 292 lesions
Two-stent techniques
Left main lesions
9%
54%
Crush
T-stent
27%
10%
V-stent
Culotte
CENTRO
DES in Bifurcation Lesion
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Milan Experience
Baseline Clinical Characteristics (II)
Group 1S
Group 2S
(n = 155 patients)
(n = 119 patients)
37 (24%)
24 (21%)
0.5
26.80±18.1
37.69±23.4
0.001
54±9
53±9
0.2
10 (7%)
10 (9%)
0.5
Prior MI, %
68 (54%)
41 (43%)
0.8
Unstable angina, %
49 (43%)
40 (35%)
0.7
GP 2b/3a inhibitors, %
17 (11%)
27 (23%)
0.009
Diabetes mellitus, %
SYNTAX score
LVEF, %
Prior CABG, %
P Value
CENTRO
DES in Bifurcation Lesion
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Milan Experience
Clinical Follow-Up at 12 months
(n=367) All patients
Group 1S
Group 2S
(n = 185 patients)
(n = 183 patients)
Death
3 (1.7%)
5 (2.7%)
0.5
MI
(after hospital discharge)
1 (0.6%)
4 (2.2%)
0.2
TLR
18 (5.0%)
40 (11.0%)
0.002
TVR
25 (6.9%)
52 (14.4%)
0.001
Cumulative MACE
28 (7.6%)
55 (15.0%)
0.001
P Value
CENTRO
DES in Bifurcation Lesion
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Milan Experience
Clinical Follow-Up at 12 months
NO left main (n=274)
SES
PES
P Value
(n = 156 patients)
(n = 118 patients)
Death
2 (1.3%)
1 (0.9%)
0.7
MI
(after hospital discharge)
4 (2.6%)
0
0.08
TLR
25 (16%)
14 (12%)
0.3
TVR
33 (21%)
18 (16%)
0.2
Cumulative MACE
35 (22%)
19 (16%)
0.2
CENTRO
DES in Bifurcation Lesion
CUORE
Milan Experience
COLUMBUS
Angiographic follow-up
(performed in 85% of lesions)
P=0.07
20
Restenosis
rate (%)
17.0%
15
10
8.6%
10.0%
6.6%
No kissing
(24%)
5
0
Main branch
Final kissing
(76%)
Side branch
CENTRO
Angiographic follow-up
CUORE
COLUMBUS
restenosis rate (%)
One stent only
20
P=0.03
12.0%
5.6%
4.0%
5
4.6%
15
10
P=0.04
23%
20
15
10
Stents on both branches
28%
11%
7.3%
5
0
0
Main branch
Side branch
= final kissing
Main branch
Side branch
= No kissing
DES in Bifurcation Lesion
CENTRO
CUORE
Milan Experience
COLUMBUS
Stent thrombosis
3
(%)
0.5% 2.5%
2
1
0
0.5% 1.5%
0% 0.5%
1C
1C
acute
4T
1C
sub-acute
2T
1C
1C
confirmed
and late
one stent only
both branches stent
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Provisional SB stenting
Provisional Balloon – T stenting
of Bifurcation Lesions
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
3
2
1
Baseline
Taxus 2.75/32: LAD
(wire protection of Septal)
Balloon: D1
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Provisional Balloon – T stenting
of Bifurcation Lesions
3 STEPS:
-stent at 15-18atm.
KISS
-stent balloon down to
8 atm.
-main branch balloon
up to 20 atm.
4
6
5
Intermediate result
• Taxus 2.5/24: D1
• Balloon: LAD
RESULT
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Provisional Balloon – T stenting
of Bifurcation Lesions
(8)
(7)
Additional Taxus at proximal LAD
(wire protection of RIM)
Final result
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting with
IVUS control
Baseline: LAD/ Diagonal
CENTRO
CUORE
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting
COLUMBUS
Rotablation prox/mid LAD burr 1.5mm
After Rotablation
CENTRO
CUORE
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting
COLUMBUS
Stenting prox LAD, Cypher 3.5/33
Result after LAD stent
CENTRO
CUORE
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting
COLUMBUS
Wiring SB
Dilatation SB
Result of SB Dilatation
CENTRO
CUORE
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting
COLUMBUS
3 STEPS:
-stent at 15-18atm.
KISS
-stent balloon down to 8 atm.
-main branch balloon up to 20 atm.
Cypher stenting at side branch ostium: 2.5/18mm
MB: Quantum Maverick 3.5 mm
CENTRO
CUORE
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting
COLUMBUS
FINAL RESULT
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting IVUS
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
controlled (Main Branch)
After Rotabltor at MB,
before SB balloon dilatation
Post bifurcation stenting
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting Final
IVUS: from MB to SB
diagonal
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting Final
IVUS: from SB to MB
LAD
Into the
diagonal
CENTRO
CUORE
Provisional Bifurcation Crush Stenting Final
IVUS: from MB and from SB
COLUMBUS
LAD
dia
dia
LAD
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Ostial disease: Type B, Type 4
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
V Stent-Balloon Technique
For bifurcational ostial lesions (IIIB and IV)
Baseline
HSR 39456
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
V Stent-Balloon Technique
For bifurcational ostial lesions (IIIB and IV)
Step 1
HSR 39456
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
V Stent-Balloon Technique
For bifurcational ostial lesions (IIIB and IV)
Step 2
HSR 39456
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
V Stent-Balloon Technique
For bifurcational ostial lesions (IIIB and IV)
Final Result
HSR 39456
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Randomized study MB vs MB and SB stenting
Steigen et al ACC I2 Summit 2006
MB stenting 207 pts randomized vs MB+SB stenting 209
• Procedural and fluoro time, contrast use and biomarkers >
when 2 stents where implanted
• 6 months MACE rates < 5% in 1 or 2 stents strategy with no
difference
No report about angio FU,
We do not know how many bifurcations where “True”
bifurcations: the lesion length in the SB was 6 mm vs 16
mm in the MB
CACTUS:
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS

A prospective randomized study
n = 250 patients
“ Crushing”
CYPHER™ SELECT
n = 125
de novo TRUE
bifurcation
lesions of the
native coronary
arteries
R
Pre-dilatation
Provisional T
CYPHER™ SELECT
n = 125
1- month
Clinic.
F/U
6month
Angio.
F/U
12, 18, 24- month
Clinical F/U
CENTRO
CUORE
COLUMBUS
Conclusions for bifurcations
• Most bifurcations need the SB to stay open at the
end of the procedure, residual stenosis appears
less relevant
1 stent strategy
Angio F-U only if clinically needed
• If optimal result on the side branch is important,
in a true bifurcation 2 stents may be needed at
least 50% of the time