Transcript Document

Making it Real in Yorkshire and Humber
Supporting Yorkshire and Humber
Individual Service Funds
Workshop 24th April 2013
Busy times for TLAP
What is Making it Real?
A set of 26 “I”
statements developed
by people who use
services, carers and
citizens supporting
organisations to move
towards more
personalised and
community based
support
Agenda for the day
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
10.00 Introductions, overview and plan for the day
10.30 An introduction to Individual Service Funds
11.30 Break
11.45 ISFs in different settings exercise
12.45 Lunch
1.30 ISF Journeys so far
2.30 Break
2.45 Action planning
3.30 Next steps
3.45 Close
Why are ISFs important?
• They build on provider expertise in
delivering personalised support
• They focus on outcomes for the
individual and move away from
clock watching
• They embed person-centred
practice into the fabric of a service
• They make managed personal
budgets more meaningful
• They ensure personalisation doesn’t
stop at the care home door and
works for people with the most
complex needs
• They enable organisations to make
progress with Making it Real!
What are they?
ISFs address the issue that traditional methods of service
costing can inhibit choice and control for people, they mean
that:
– The person supported has a clear idea of how much resource
(£/hours) is available for their care and support
– £/hours are held by the provider on the person’s behalf on their
support and other costs necessary to provide it (not as a pooled fund)
– The person is supported to develop a plan for how to use the £/hours
in their individual control
– There is more flexibility in the usage and banking of £/hours, which
can sometimes be used outside the service
– They can be an option for personal budget holders but are not
dependent on personal budgets
How they work
1. The Individual allocation:
Identify each person’s share
of the funding based on their
individual needs
2. Core support and shared costs:
Identify what support and
shared costs are necessary
3. In my control:
Maximise people’s choice and
control of the remaining
money
How are they being used?
Most work to develop ISFs has been provider led and three
different approaches have emerged:
1.Identifying core, shared and individual control hours within
an existing contract (Partial disaggregation)
2. Doing the above to a greater degree and identifying a pot
of money the person controls (Full disaggregation)
3. Setting up a new service that builds support around the
individual (Micro commissioning)
Choice and control in commissioned services
Partial disaggregation example:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Riverview is a residential care home for older people
Created an internal resource allocation system to work out the
hours each person was entitled to
Divided into “background hours” (that everyone shares) and
“individual hours” (the dedicated hours for each person) by
working backwards from the current contract price
78 year old Sam had 4 individual hours a month – staff worked
with him to develop a support plan
The manager put these hours into an “agreement” to review with
Sam in 6 months time
Sam used his hours to reconnect with friends he has lost –
matched with a staff member to take him bowling
Full disaggregation example:
•
•
•
•
•
Down Street was a group home for 4 people run by IAS in Greater
Manchester commissioned through a block contract
IAS negotiated with the Local Authority to redistribute resources
to deconstruct the contract and provide individually designed
services
There were sufficient resources allocated to enable one man to
move into his own place with 24/7 support, another to get his own
tenancy with several hours support a day and the remaining two
men to pool their resources and rent somewhere together
For all 4 men, resources were identified and ring fenced to
implement their support plan
Each individual has been able to use the resource flexibly – saving
up hours, converting “standard hours” to “enhanced hours” or
converting hours into money
Micro commissioning example:
•
•
•
•
•
Jennie is a young woman with autism who lives in her own
flat in Stockport and uses her personal budget to purchase
care and support from a provider, Independent Options
Jennie has a circle of support made up of family, friends and
professionals who know her well
Jennie and her circle developed a support plan and then
interviewed providers about how they would deliver what
was in the plan and recruit staff for her within the indicative
allocation
Jennie asked the council to commission the service for her
using her personal budget – this is treated as her money and
as a restricted fund
Independent Options report clearly and transparently on
spend against the budget to the council and Jennie’s circle
Contractual and financial implications
• An ISF is not a contract: accountability/liability remains between
the council and the provider unless the person has a direct payment
• ISFs do not necessarily require different forms of contract, though
there may be a need for contractual variations
• E.g. Nottinghamshire have negotiated changes to their contractual
specification to enable piloting of ISFs in light of issues that arose
around subcontracting, banking of hours and “cash conversion”
• ISFs mean moving towards budgets structured around individuals
rather than services – this is a big shift
• They often require a decision about how to break down an existing
contract to reflect individual needs: CFC, RAS etc?
• They should ideally involve a way of showing people what they have
used or spent and what they have left
• They can mean new or different training for staff in how to support
people to manage their money
Practice implications
ISFs mean using the best tools you can to enable people to say
how they want their support to look, including…
how I want
my life to
change
Working/not
working
Aspirations
Gifts
My perfect
week
Relationship Map
Community Map
1 page
profiles
Decision
making
agreements
Important to/for
What best support
looks like
What does success look like?
Top tips
• Start from a clear view of what success looks like
• Keep it as simple as possible but involve the right expertise
• Give yourself enough time – you will uncover historical anomalies in
how funding works and some income streams arte less flexible than
others
• Concentrate on people not just money
• Use whichever tool makes sense to calculate hours/£
• Start small and share stories of success
• Build partnerships – while you can achieve a lot alone, the best
outcomes require commissioners and providers working together
Stay connected with Think Local Act Personal:
• Twitter: @TLAP1, @samhbenn
• Tel: 0208 6789 536
• Email enquiries: [email protected] or
[email protected]