Transcript DomainKeys

Electronic mail – protocol evolution

E-mail standards

Electronic Mail

outgoing message queue user mailbox Three major components: • user agents • mail servers • simple mail transfer protocol: SMTP, TCP port 25 mail server User Agent • a.k.a. “mail reader” • composing, editing, reading mail messages • e.g., Eudora, Outlook, elm, Netscape Messenger • outgoing, incoming messages stored on server SMTP mail server user agent user agent SMTP SMTP user agent mail server user agent user agent user agent

Email terminology

SMTP (RFC 821)

Sample SMTP interaction: TCP port 25

S: 220 hamburger.edu C: HELO crepes.fr S: 250 Hello crepes.fr, pleased to meet you C: MAIL FROM: S: 250 [email protected]... Sender ok C: RCPT TO: S: 250 [email protected] ... Recipient ok C: DATA S: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself C: Do you like ketchup? C: How about pickles? C: . S: 250 Message accepted for delivery C: QUIT S: 221 hamburger.edu closing connection

Mail Standard RFC822

• Published in 1982 • Lines no longer than 1000 char • Message body - plain US-ASCII text • Message header lines - plain US-ASCII text • Limit on message length

RFC 822 format

RFC 822 restrictions

• no multiple objects in a single message • no multi-part message bodies • no non-textual bodies • no X.400 messages can be gatewayed • no multifont messages

ASCII times are over!

Now we want:

• National language support • Possibility to send – pictures – audiofiles – other applications – video files – multimedia applications

MIME - Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension

RFC 2045-2048 obsolete RFC 1521, 1522,1590 • RFC 2045 Format of Internet Message Bodies • RFC 2046 Media Types • RFC 2047 Message Header Extension for Non-ASCII Text • RFC 2048 Registration Procedures

To solve RFC822 restrictions without serious incompatibilities with it

MIME

MIME types and sub-types

base64 encoding

Mail message format

header SMTP: protocol for exchanging email msgs RFC 822: standard for text message format: • header lines, e.g., – To: – From: – Subject:

different from SMTP commands

!

• body – the “message”, 7-bit ASCII characters only body blank line

Message format: multimedia extensions

• MIME: multimedia mail extension, RFC 2045, 2056 • additional lines in msg header declare MIME content type MIME version method used to encode data multimedia data type, subtype, parameter declaration encoded data

From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Picture of yummy crepe. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: image/jpeg base64 encoded data ..... ......................... ......base64 encoded data

Multipart Type

From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Picture of yummy crepe. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=98766789 --98766789 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain Dear Bob, Please find a picture of a crepe.

--98766789 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: image/jpeg base64 encoded data ..... ......................... ......base64 encoded data --98766789--

Multipart Type

From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Picture of yummy crepe. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=StartOfNextPart --StartOfNextPart Dear Bob, Please find a picture of a crepe.

--StartOfNextPart Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: image/jpeg base64 encoded data ..... ......................... ......base64 encoded data --StartOfNextPart Do you want the reciple?

Mail access protocols

user agent SMTP SMTP access protocol sender’s mail server receiver’s mail server • SMTP: delivery/storage to receiver’s server • Mail access protocol: retrieval from server – POP: Post Office Protocol [RFC 1939] • authorization (agent <-->server) and download – IMAP: Internet Mail Access Protocol [RFC 1730] • more features (more complex) • manipulation of stored msgs on server – HTTP: Hotmail , Yahoo! Mail, etc.

user agent

Try SMTP interaction for yourself:

telnet servername 25

• see 220 reply from server • enter HELO, MAIL FROM, RCPT TO, DATA, QUIT commands above lets you send email without using email client (reader)

Post Office Protocol (POP3)

POP3 protocol

authorization phase • client commands: –

user:

declare

S: +OK POP3 server ready C: user bob S: +OK C: pass hungry S: +OK user successfully logged on

username – • server responses – –

pass: +OK -ERR

password transaction phase, client: • • •

list:

numbers list message

retr:

number retrieve message by

dele:

delete

C: list S: 1 498 S: 2 912 S: . C: retr 1 S: S: . C: dele 1 C: retr 2 S: S: . C: dele 2 C: quit S: +OK POP3 server signing off quit

IMAP

Web Mail

http://www.squirrelmail.org

(Adjusted) Mail Architecture

Off-Campus E-mail Anti-virus Director petrel alpha admsrvcs Content Filter Antispam

Outgoing mail authentication RDC 2554

S: 220 smtp.example.com ESMTP server ready

C: EHLO jgm.example.com

S: 250-smtp.example.com

S: 250 AUTH CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 C: AUTH FOOBAR S: 504 Unrecognized authentication type.

C: AUTH CRAM-MD5 S: 334 U0NnbmhNWitOMjNGNndAZWx3b29kLmlubm9zb2Z0LmNvbT4= C: ZnJlZCA5ZTk1YWVlMDljNDBhZjJiODRhMGMyYjNiYmFlNzg2ZQ== S: 235 Authentication successful.

Spam mail

SMTP: MAIL FROM:

Return-Path: Delivered-To: [email protected]

Received: by server.thirdstone.net (Postfix, from userid 80) To: [email protected]

Subject: Your online account has been limited Content-Type: text/html Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:40:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.2 (20050629) at latnet.lv

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.448 tagged_above=0 required=7 MESSAGE_ID_EXIST2=-0.1, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0, SARE_RD_GOOGLE=0.8, URL_STARTS_WITH_WWW=-0.1] X-Spam-Level: *****

SMTP: HELO server.thirdstone.net Received: from server.thirdstone.net (unknown [66.216.98.139])

by pumpis4.latnet.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09DF4943B for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:34:29 +0200 (EET) id 2628636A33E; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:40:35 -0800 (PST) From: Chase Card Services Online Services Team Message-Id: <[email protected]> tests=[BAYES_40=-0.002, HTML_40_50=0.496, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=1.052, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_TAG2=0.1, MESSAGE_ID_EXIST1=-0.1, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=3.2, ONLINE_IN_BODY=0.1,

Reverse DNS lookup

Return-Path:

Received: from fifa.org (218-175-82-64.dynamic.hinet.net [218.175.82.64])

by alfred.taide.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 675FB3430E for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:12:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <000001c650b5$5fc868b0$0548a8c0@cmb1> Reply-To: "Aegle Freudenburg" From: "Aegle Freudenburg" To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: new Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:12:15 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at taide.net

X-Spam-Status: GOOD 0.0000000 4d8e508788a7565e07ee1405c73c45f1

Mail from El Presidente

Return-Path: < [email protected]

> Delivered-To: [email protected]

Received: from fake-name.example.com

by gp.word-to-the-wise.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DD7790000D for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:55:36 -0800 (PST) From: El Presidente To: Steve Atkins Subject: Fake Mail Message-Id: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:55:36 -0800 (PST) Status: RO Content-Length: 15 Lines: 1 ( unknown [ 64.71.176.18

]) Some body text

Sending spam (relay hijacking)

Third-party mailserver (10.11.12.13) Spammer (64.71.176.18) SMTP SMTP Recipients MX POP3

Sending spam (relay hijacking)

Received: from openrelay.com (mail.openrelay.com [10.11.12.13]) by gp.word-to-the-wise.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DD7790000D for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:55:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from fake-spammer-helo (spammer.net [64.71.176.18]) by openrelay.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DD7790000D for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:55:36 -0800 (PST)

You can see the relay, and the original spammer

Sending spam (direct to MX)

Spammer (64.71.176.18) SMTP Recipients MX POP3

Sending spam (direct to MX)

Received: from fake-spammer-helo (spammer.net [64.71.176.18]) by gp.word-to-the-wise.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DD7790000D for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:55:36 -0800 (PST)

You can see the spammer

Sending spam (proxy hijacking)

Open proxy (192.168.1.1) Spammer (64.71.176.18) HTTP SMTP Recipients MX POP3

Sending spam (proxy hijacking)

Received: from fake-spammer-helo (open-proxy.net [192.168.1.1]) by gp.word-to-the-wise.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DD7790000D for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:55:36 -0800 (PST)

You can see the open proxy

Mapping email to postal mail the envelope

~ Sender ID’s authorization proof Mail From / Envelope From / Return Path Recipient To

Email Authentication Proposals (not directly related to spam!)

Client SMTP Validation (CSV):

– http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-marid-csv-intro-01.txt

Bounce Address Tag Validation (BATV):

– http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-levine-mass-batv-00.txt

DomainKeys:

– http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys •

Identified Internet Mail (IIM):

– http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fenton-identified-mail-01.txt

Sender ID (SPF + PRA):

– – http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt

SPF: Sender Policy Framework

Domains use public records (DNS) to direct requests for different services (web, email, etc.) to the machines that perform those services.

All domains already publish email (MX) records to tell the world what machines receive mail for the domain.

SPF works by domains publishing "reverse MX" records to tell the world what machines send mail from the domain.

from where it should be coming from.

When receiving a message from a domain, the recipient can check those records to make sure mail is coming With SPF, those "reverse MX" records are easy to publish: one line in DNS is all it takes.

DomainKeys

Under DomainKeys, a

domain owner generates one or more private/public key-pairs

that will be used to sign messages originating from that domain. The

domain owner places the public-key in his domain namespace

(i.e., in a DNS record associated with that domain), and makes the

private-key available to the outbound email system

. When an email is submitted by an authorized user of that domain, the email system uses the private-key to digitally sign the email associated with the sending domain.

The signature is added as a "DomainKey-Signature:" header to the email

, and the message is transferred to its recipients in the usual way.

When a message is received with a DomainKey signature header, the receiving system can

verify the signature as follows

: 1. Extract the signature and claimed sending domain from the email.

2. Fetch the public-key from the claimed sending domain namespace.

3. Use public-key to determine whether the signature of the email has been generated with the corresponding private-key, and thus whether the email was sent with the authority of the claimed sending domain.

In the event that an

email arrives without a signature

or when the signature verification fails, the

receiving system retrieves the policy of the claimed sending domain

to ascertain the preferred disposition of such email.

$ openssl rsa -in rsa.private -out rsa.public -pubout -outform PEM -----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY---- MHwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADawAwaAJhAKJ2lzDLZ8XlVambQfMXn3LRGKOD5o6l MIgulclWjZwP56LRqdg5ZX15bhc/GsvW8xW/R5Sh1NnkJNyL/cqY1a+GzzL47t7E XzVc+nRLWT1kwTvFNGIoAUsFUq+J6+OprwIDAQAB -----END PUBLIC KEY-----

This public-key data is placed in the DNS:

_domainkey IN TXT "t=y; o=-; n=notes; r=emailAddress"

DomainKeys Example

DNS TXT query for: brisbane._domainkey.football.example.com

DomainKey-Status: good

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=brisbane; d=football.example.com; c=simple; q=dns; b=dzdVyOfAKCdLXdJOc9G2q8LoXSlEniSbav+yuU4zGeeruD00lszZ VoG4ZHRNiYzR; Received: from dsl-10.2.3.4.football.example.com [10.2.3.4] by submitserver.football.example.com with SUBMISSION; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 21:01:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joe SixPack" To: "Suzie Q" Subject: Is dinner ready?

Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 21:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <[email protected]> Hi.

We lost the game. Are you hungry yet?

Joe.

DNS to distribute Domain-Level Keys

[DomainKeys]

DomainKeys

DomainKeys

• intra-domain authentication?

• SK must be online • mail-forwarding services?

>

Autentisks E-mails no ft.com

guntis@gulbis:~$ nslookup > set type=any

uk.update.ft.com

Return-Path: Delivered-To: [email protected]

Received: from Server: 159.148.108.1

update.ft.com (transit246.email.mms.eloyalty.net [64.73.138.246])

by pumpis4.latnet.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0115A5DB for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:10:43 +0300 (EEST)

DomainKey-Signature:

a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=ftcom; d=uk.update.ft.com; b=oILD038lHibyKsc7uPFA3Qx7n7CwegCQeNOAOIg+BZ3ZG+aIE68Mc5zB6FdHrJlWb+yxzkYOlqmf 8Qqzc2rmJXOtwtEFgO4BGUYpmGa6mYvXohBJC8Lf5CFbnyr0UjuGVzU46O249STEJ88e+A5eN3ep 9OvvBrSxGJ9HPnGHdsE=; Received: by update.ft.com (PowerMTA(TM) v3.0r11) id h54jse07d1s6 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 06:10:39 -0600 (envelope-from ) From: "FT.com" To: Subject: The latest news and features on FT.com

Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 06:10:42 -0600 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Return: allowed MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Address: 159.148.108.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: uk.update.ft.com

Address: 64.73.138.246

uk.update.ft.com mail exchanger = 10 uk.update.ft.com.

uk.update.ft.com

text = "v=spf1 ip4:64.73.138.0/24 -all“

>

ftcom._domainkey.uk.update.ft.com

Server: 159.148.108.1

Address: 159.148.108.1#53 Non-authoritative answer:

ftcom._domainkey.uk.update.ft.com text = "k=rsa\; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQCoNyixo7zQAb2mLAhB29hV6a7djDXrTZBo67Wa+j XykAt0O1vFhaLE1p5bFJnqhQzgmT91eVw58/Y2+MWqusiPrzycSQl7FNsmPW2iFqmO5wJbaytjkqvS5D wEiB4aHGQyCbi1Vobs7INFy1SAATdzqXFD8GNKNZRuf5fmqHvesQIDAQAB"

>