Transcript Document

Airport-ANSP
Growth & Efficiency
ACDM-CATFM
17-07-2015
Daily Operations - AOCC
AGENDA
• Airport Capacity
– Growth Plans
– Challenges
• Airport Collaborative Decision Making
– KIA Perspective
• CATFM
– Airport Expectation
Airport Capacity
Growth Plans
• Traffic Forecasting
• Identify Capacity requirements
• Evaluate Options
• Costing and Consultations
• Finalize Concept Design
Challenges
• Unpredictable Nature of Business
• Long gestation period for Capacity Creation
• Huge Capital Investments
• Stakeholder resource augmentation
• Sustaining Operations in the interim
A-CDM Objectives
 Improve Predictability
 Improve On Time Performance
 Reduce Ground Movement Cost
 Optimise Use of ground handling resource
 Optimise Use of Airport infrastructure
 Reduce ATFM slot wastage
 Flexible pre departure planning
 Reduce Apron and Taxiway congestion
Daily Operations - AOCC
17-07-2015
KIA A-CDM
CATFM
17-07-2015
Daily Operations - AOCC
Core Elements
INFORMATION EXCHANGE WITH CATFM
5. CDM in Adverse
Conditions
4. Pre-Departure
Sequencing
3. Variable Taxi Time
2. Milestone Approach
1. Information Sharing
17-07-2015
Consecutive implementation
6. Collaborative
Management of Flight
Updates
ADVERSE CONDITION OPERATION
ESTABLISH OFF BLOCK SEQUENCE
CALCULATED AFTER ANALYSIS AND PUBLISHED
SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
DATA EXCHANGE
Daily Operations - AOCC
Information Flow
17-07-2015
Daily Operations - AOCC
Milestones

Improve Predictability

Improve On Time Performance

Reduce Ground Movement Cost

Optimise / enhance use of ground handling resource

Optimise/ enhance use of stands/ Gates.

Optimise use of airport infrastructure and reduce congestion

Reduce ATFM slot wastage

Flexible pre departure planning

Reduce Apron and Taxiway conggestion
Daily Operations - AOCC
17-07-2015
How
• GAP ANALYSIS – Process Analysis as per Euro Control Standards
• GAP ANALYSIS – System Analysis as per A-CDM Requirements
1
• System Up gradation to accommodate A-CDM requirements
• User Requirement Document for the Upgraded System
2
• NEED TO ACHIEVE- Enhanced level of predictability on ground. Linking all
Ground Operations together
3
4
• WHAT IS REQUIRED – TOBT from Airlines/GHA
• WHAT IS REQUIRED - Variable Taxi Time; EXIT/EXOT at KIA
• WHAT IS REQUIRED – TSAT and TTOT from ATC > Pre-Departure Sequencing
TRAININGS
MEETINGS
In-Depth A-CDM
Awareness Sessions
for External & Internal
Stakeholders
150+ staffs trained
UFIS 5.1 sessions for
Internal / External
Stakeholders
TOBT MATRIX
TOBT TRIALS
AMENDMENTS
INTG. TRIALS
First BIA
A-CDM
Integrated
Stakeholder
were
10 Meetings of A-CDMAligning stakeholder’s
TOBT prediction
trials
nd March
Trials
from
18-22
shown results of their
Working Groups; to define
conducted from Sep’2012
processes with Airport
with
ATC
giving
and
Prediction
process, data integration
onwards till date withTOBTTSAT
process, to predict an
Manual Calculation.
from ATC & deliverables
from Aircraft Ready
Stakeholders
in a– phased
accurate
Time TTOT
86%
of
flights
followed the
every Stakeholders, defining
manner
or TOBT.
sequence (sample size 30)
TOBT, Variances , KPIs etc.
Second BIA A-CDM
Amendment in the
Integrated Trials from 1st
Regular meeting withAirlines
ATC
Trials to validate
defined
processes / tolerances
July 2013-15th July 2013.
We have identified, mapped
their TOBT Matrix the agreed TOBT
as per the results &
of flights followed Preand documented all required
process with72%
each
feedback agreed
Departure Sequence
SELEX messages for arrival
stakeholders.
through WG Meetings
(sample size 173)
and departure updates into
UFIS 5.1
DEFINED VARIANCES
PARAMETER1
PARAMETER2
DEFINED VARIANCE
TOBT
ARDT
+/- 4 MINUTES
TSAT
ASRT
+/- 3 MINUTES
TSAT
AOBT
+/- 3 MINUTES
TTOT
ATOT
+/- 5 MINUTES
AIBT
ACGT
SAME VALUE
AOBT
AEGT
SAME VALUE
AIRLINE TOBT MATRIX
TOBT MATRIX -EK 85 MINUTES
Flight No : _______ STA ______ HRS STD ________HRS. Ground Time 85 MTS
S.no
Flight Process Event
1
Check in Process
2
Department
Start of the Event End of the Event
Commercial
180
60
Positioning of resource at Bay
Ramp Operations
120
95
3
Alligning of Step Ladder / Aero Bridge
Ramp Operations
85
84
4
Opening of Holds
Airline Engg Team
84
84
5
Alligning of Conveyor Belt
Ramp Operations
83
83
6
Fuelling
Ramp Operations
84
30
7
Disembarkation
Airline Commercial Team
84
69
8
Off Loading
Ramp Operations
82
62
9
Cabin Cleaning
Ramp Operations
69
54
10
Catering
Catering
69
52
11
Last bag received from BMA
Ramp Operations
55
40
12
Loading
Ramp Operations
61
31
13
Boarding
Airline Commercial Team
53
20
DEPARTURE IMMIGRATION
Commercial
175
30
Departure Customs
Commercvial
20
15
14
Load and Trim Reporting
Ramp Operations
30
15
15
Positioning of Push Back Tractor
Ramp Operations
10
10
16
Connecting of Push Back
Ramp Operations
9
9
17
Commencement of Push Back
Ramp Operations
0
6
17-07-2015
Daily Operations - AOCC
Actual Start
Actual End
TOBT
Continuous Stakeholder Engagement
1. All Airlines & GHA’s Update TOBT (All flights of all Airlines)
– Difference between TOBT defined by GHA/Airlines and AOBT
– Acceptable Variance within +/- 4 minutes
2. Regular meetings & follow up’s with Airline’s / GHA’s
Overall Predictability (%)
100
90
TOBT Prediction Level (%)
80
66
70
60
55
60
59
60
60
59
Dec'13
Jan'14
Feb'14
Mar'14
Apr'14
70
73
72
Jul'14
Aug'14
50
40
30
20
10
0
Nov'13
May'14
Jun'14
TOBT Prediction
60
40
20
0
87
93
78
90
72
7572
72
60
60
62
73
84807981848281
TOBT Prediction Level (%)
TOBT Prediction Level (%)
80
60
40
20
63 61
42 47 39 42
0
Airlines below 60 % are KA, MK, SV & WY
71
79
86 84
60 78 82 74 747775
7674
70
67
66
66
60
40
55
55 565851
48
20
Aug'14
Jun'14
Apr'14
Feb'14
Dec'13
Oct'13
Aug'13
Jun'13
0
TOBT Prediction Levels for
Indigo Airlines
100
80
80
Apr'13
0
100
Oct'12
93
82
60
74 72 72 7375 68 79726870727072
67 66
40 56
54
20
TOBT Prediction Level (%)
80
TOBT Prediction Levels for
Spice Jet
TOBT Prediction Levels for Air
India
100
100
TOBT Prediction Level (%)
100
80
60
717575
7066 63 6569
40
62
60
57
56
55
54
54
53
20
40464042
0
TOBT Prediction Levels for Jet
Airways & Jetlite
TOBT Prediction Levels for Air
India SATS
TOBT Prediction Level (%)
TOBT Prediction Level (%)
TOBT Prediction Levels for Globe
Ground India
100
80
60
40
20
0
898694
7268 687069 6976727570
65
65
61
60
53 53
Gap Analysis
Nov’13 to
Jan’14
Feb’14 to
Aug’14
15255
36717
Target Landing Time Variance
1:22
01:36
Difference between
ALDT and TLDT
No of Flights without TLDT
value
389
1611
4.37% of Total Flights
TMO Variance
4:04
04:03
Difference between
ALDT and TMO
No of Flights without TMO
Value
415
814
01:09
01:09
PARAMETER
No of Flights (Sample Size)
EXIT Variance for the flights
Remarks
2.22% of Total Flights
Difference between
the AIBT and EIBT
KIA ACDM Progress
Dec‘
11
Jan' Feb' Mar' Apr' May' Jun' Jul' Aug' Sep' Oct' Nov' Dec' Jan' Feb' Mar' Apr' May' Jun' Jul' Aug' Sep' Oct' Nov' Dec' Jan‘ Feb' Mar‘ Apr‘ May' Jun‘ Jul‘ Aug' Sep‘
12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
INTIAL PHASE
CONCEPTUALISATION PHASE
TRAINING PHASE
TRIALS PHASE
TESTING & SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
PROCESS FORMALIZATION PHASE - AIP
Completed
On Going
Nearing Completion
KIA-ACDM Implementation
System generated TSAT or Manual (Ongoing)
CATFM-Airport Expectation
• Capacity determination
• Compatibility for System Interfaces
• FUM-DPI Message Exchange
• Collaboration during all phases
• Post Operation Analysis – Airports
17-07-2015
Daily Operations - AOCC
Thank You
17-07-2015
Daily Operations - AOCC