AECM and differente guarantees
Download
Report
Transcript AECM and differente guarantees
AECM and the Different
European Guarantee Models
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
AECM – European Mutual Guarantee Association
Founded in 1992
International non-profit organisation based in Brussels
Open, democratic, politically independent association
Main objectives:
Representing the interests of members
Partner of the European Commission
Reflects the economic role of Guarantee Entities
Exchange of information for the benefit of SMEs
2
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
3
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
AECM Members’ Main Figures
€ 3 845 million
Own funds
Outstanding commitments
€ 38 210 million
Guarantees granted
€ 14 970 million
Number of beneficiary SMEs
2 million
(data: 2003 annual reports of AECM members)
4
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
European Union and SMEs
25 countries
455 million inhabitants
23 million businesses
99% of which are Micro and SMEs
75 million jobs
on average, between 3 and 4 employees per business
57% contribution to GDP
5
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
European Guarantee Environment
Some general beliefs:
SMEs require special attention to assure their
access to finance
Finance is better supplied by banks and other
financial entities
SME intrinsic risk is often very high in the
viewpoint of lenders / Even higher in the case of
agriculture SMEs
Guarantee Schemes help overcome this SME
problem
6
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
European Credit Guarantee Schemes
Private / public initiatives
National / regional schemes
Entrepreneurs and SME directly or indirectly involved in
the shareholding
credit decision making process
scheme or MGS daily / strategical management
7
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
European Credit Guarantee Schemes
Public support provides equity and protection
higher leverage and efficiency
Counter guarantee
national / supra national
provided and funded by the EU Commission and managed by the
European Investment Fund (EIF)
8
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
European Different Models
Guarantee Funds
Initiative taken by Public Authorities (State, Region...)
Mainly public shareholding
Management selected by public majority
Solvency related to public umbrella
9
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
European Different Models
Mutual Guarantee Schemes
Initiative of SMEs and SME representative organisations
(such as Chambers of Commerce, Industry and Regional SME Associations...)
Mainly private shareholding
Management as a partnership between
SME representatives and bankers
Mutualism as a core idea
Self protected solvency with public support
10
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
Guarantee Triangular Relationship
Bank loan
Banks
SMEs
Guarantee
commission
(fee)
Guarantee
Sheme
Guarantee
State
Counter Guarantee
Financial Support
Legal environment and framework
11
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
Benefits for SMEs
Access to finance and
Access to better credit conditions:
lower interest rates and better maturity terms
Thanks to the compensation of SME collaterals shortage
Promotion of entrepreneurship (start-ups, take-overs)
Provision of instruments for SME and their product life cycles
Availability of advice and coaching
12
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
Benefits for Banks
Partial outsourcing of credit risk
Guarantee as a clear instrument for risk mitigation
Guarantees may be combined with several financial products
Reduction of banks’ capital requirements on SME loan
portfolio (importance of guarantee quality)
Reduction of banks’ provisions on SME loans
Possibility for the bank to leverage its assets
13
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
Benefits / Relevance for Public Authorities
Guarantee Schemes are used as a vehicle for
SME economic policy and SME support
Possibility to design instruments for macroeconomic
strategy and SME needs
Subsidy of SME cost of capital (guarantee fee below market levels…)
Possibility to sit at the Scheme Board (being a Scheme stakeholder)
Usually responsible for financial funds availability or
Scheme solvency assurance
14
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
Challenges to Guarantee Schemes
General
Improve SME access to finance in countries with
relatively low rate of financial intermediation
Particularly within industries with stronger acess to
finance difficulties
Product diversification in order to guarantee:
15
start-ups
innovative instruments
internationalization
micro-guarantees…
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
Challenges to European Guarantee Schemes
Basel II
Increase SME credit worthiness
Strengthen SME equity base (together with venture capital)
Qualify guarantee so that it may reduce bank
capital requirements
Improve / develop internal rating (scoring)
methodologies
16
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
Performance Indicators
Market Relevance
Additionality
Effectiveness
Leverage
Efficiency
Sustainability
17
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
Portuguese Mutual Guarantee Scheme
- Counter Guarantee Fund Management
- Portuguese Mutual Guarantee Scheme development and
marketing (“umbrella”)
- Several Back-Office services to Mutual Guarantee Societies
- First level control of the Scheme
- Minority Participations in the MGS share capital
SPGM
EIF
Scheme “holding”
COUNTER
GUARANTEE
Mutual Guarantee
Societies (MGS)
Guarantees
Automatic Counter
Guarantee
FUND
-NORGARANTE
Banks and other
guarantee
beneficiaries
Interest
(FCGM)
- LISGARANTE
Counter
Guarantee fees
Guaranteed
loans
and loan
repayments
- GARVAL
Guarantee fees
- AGROGARANTE
Counter Guarantee held by public entities
SME
MGS shares - mutualism
Mutual Guarantee Societies mainly privately held
All MGS apply a homogeneous credit assessment, according to principles and
rules discussed and approved by all entities of the scheme
18
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca
Thank you very much for your attention.
M. Sousa Branca
SPGM – Sociedade de Investimento, S. A.
Porto, Portugal
Managing Director
AECM – European Mutual Guarantee Association
Brussels, Belgium
Vice President
19
Berlin, 5 May 2006
M. Sousa Branca