LINKING SERVICES FOR BLACK AND MINORITY ETHNIC (BME) HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS (LSP)

MARCH 2005 – JULY 2007

RACE ON THE AGENDA

Dr. Theo Gavrielides, Head of Policy [email protected]

Presentation overview • Who are we?

• The project: target groups, disadvantages tackled, deliverables, methodology.

• Best practice – pilots, examples and challenges.

• Conclusions & recommendations.

RACE ON THE AGENDA

ROTA is a social policy think tank devoted to issues that affect Black and minority ethnic (BME) communities in London.

Key policy priorities are: •Crime & Antisocial Behaviour. •Equalities & Human Rights.

•Community Cohesion.

•Education, Health & Social Services. •Social Inclusion & Homelessness.

•Regional Governance.

Linking Services for Black & minority ethnic homeless individuals Project (LSP)

• • • • • •

TO TEST:

referral routes between BME and homeless provision over a period of a year.

TO MAP:

BME training provision for BME homeless individuals.

TO RAISE AWARENESS:

of mainstream and BME organisations of the needs of BME homeless individuals seeking routes out of inactivity and worklessness.

TO CREATE UNDERSTANDING:

of the challenges faced and the work produced by the BME and homeless sectors.

TO PROVIDE SUPPORT & MENTORING

: to 15 BME homeless individuals (e.g. training on service users participation techniques, information on their rights and possible routes out of homelessness and worklessness).

BEST PRACTISE SHARING:

through a best practice toolkit in partnership with mainstream and BME homeless service provides and a directory of BME homeless Education Advice and Training services.

LSP: Target groups & Disadvantages covered

Target groups

• BME homeless individuals (sample of 15).

• BME homeless organisations.

• Mainstream (voluntary, community sector, public) homeless organisations.

• • • • •

Disadvantages Covered

BME/ Homeless/ unemployed – disabled.

BME/ Homeless/ unemployed ex-offenders.

BME/ Homeless/ unemployed – new arrivals (lack of language skills, lack of the knowledge of the country etc).

BME/ Homeless/ unemployed – mental health.

BME/ Homeless/ unemployed – substance abuse.

Methodology

Phase 1 (Round 1 & 2) Phase 2 (Round 3)

• Scoping exercise (completed).

• Project Brief (completed).

• Desk Research (completed).

• Fieldwork - qualitative research (under way).

• Stakeholder engagement/ consultation (ongoing).

• Communication & dissemination strategy.

• Awareness raising.

• Policy/ legislative input: local – national – European levels.

Best practice: findings so far

“Ideal services” as seen by the service user (BME homeless individuals) – interviews/ questionnaires & focus groups: -

Organisations that provide

verbal

rights and how to claim them.

explanations of benefit - Accurate, timely and tailored information to queries not vague “problems”.

- User-friendly, accessible (language) info (e.g. on housing benefits).

- Multiple disadvantages being addressed by one key worker.

- Addressing their fears (e.g. working in informal and unofficial employment sector – disadvantages and dangers).

- Organisations that provide employment cultural orientation (cultural sensitive).

Challenges & pitfalls

• • • •

Xenophobia & racism

accommodation.

(the anti-Muslim backlash following the London bombings, anti EU sentiments and negative press coverage of migration). vulnerable single male BME Homeless Individuals/ mainstream organisations/ temporary shared

Lack of coordination

disadvantages.

to address multiple

Lack of training

to deal with multiple disadvantages.

Funding:

does not support links across sectors and between organisations and promote competition for clients and funding.

Challenges & Pitfalls

• • •

Inadequate systems

to assess and record BME disadvantages. The challenge is how to make the system fit the people.

Definitions

(race, BME, addiction, domestic violence). Not corresponding to the realities of multi-disadvantaged BME homeless people.

Adult literacy funding under threat

(training and activity opportunities for BME homeless individuals, including language skills).

Conclusions

• • Scope for partnership: BME and Homeless sectors.

Considerable support for this from within the two sectors themselves.

• Homeless agencies generally have a wider variety of referral sources than BME organisations.

• Homeless Agencies are less likely to report formal links with BME organisations than BME organisations were to Homeless Agencies; • No specific studies have been conducted that examine the links between the BME and Homeless sectors.

• LSP: to establish links between BME organisations and Homeless agencies that can be organised under 4 broad headings – information sharing activities; partnership development activities; events and resource provision; and staff development activities.

• Findings and conclusions to be reported in June 2006.

Race on the Agenda (ROTA)

Budapest October 2006 Unit 101, Cremer Business Centre 37 Cremer Street , London E2 8HD 020 7729 1310, 020 7739 6712 (fax), www.rota.org.uk