Transcript Slide 1
Farmer Producer Organisations Pathway to integrate producers in the value chain Performance and prospects in Eastern India Overview of FPO network structure SFAC Marketing linkage/inputs/credit State level State Level Producer Company (Policy advocacy, explore wider markets, strategic partnerships) (10000+ farmers) Cluster level KPC (10-12 villages) (1000 farmers/ (Credit, inputs, technology, capacity building, marketing linkages) 50 FIGs in each) Village level FIG (Crop planning, seed production, demonstration, knowledge sharing, aggregation) (15-20 farmers in each group) Kisan Producer Co/Coop FIG FIG Collective Marketing HRD Credit Equity Ecosystem for sustainable FPO Services (Technical) Networking Infrastructure development S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 State Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Bihar Chhattisgarh Delhi Goa Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jammu Srinagar Jharkhand Karnataka Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Odisha Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Tamil Nadu Telangana Tripura Uttarakhand Uttar Pradesh West Bengal Total STATE WISE PROGRESS OF FPO PROMOTION as on 31.03.2015 No. of Farmers No. of FPOs Under Under the process Mobilized Total Registered Mobilization of registration 0 7000 7000 0 7 1750 0 1750 2 0 13295 4705 18000 8 11 13293 12707 26000 5 20 3535 0 3500 4 0 1810 0 1750 0 2 19047 953 20000 10 11 8408 0 11750 16 9 3733 1117 48F50 0 4 3060 921 3981 1 2 3120 960 4080 1 3 10009 0 10000 8 0 25377 59123 84500 14 68 83277 61723 145000 48 96 62278 29222 91500 40 49 1750 1200 2950 2 1 1970 1780 3750 2 2 1000 1700 2700 0 3 1750 0 1750 1 1 23263 15637 38900 6 35 6288 0 6000 7 0 40277 6223 46500 26 12 1876 0 1750 2 0 11116 0 11000 1 10 23492 506 23998 10 10 2850 0 2750 3 1 6004 0 6000 7 0 27453 5547 33000 20 14 58599 10901 69500 16 51 459680 224529 684209 260 422 Total 7 2 19 25 4 2 21 25 4 3 4 8 82 144 89 3 4 3 2 41 7 38 2 11 20 4 7 34 67 682 Promotion of Farmer Producer Organizations in Eastern States Target S.No Achievement Name of State No. of Farmers No. of FPOs No. of Farmers FPO Registered FPOs/ regn. 1 Bihar 18000 19 13295 8 11 2 Chhattisgarh 26000 25 13293 5 20 3 Jharkhand 10000 10 10009 8 - 4 Odisha 38900 41 23263 6 35 5 West Bengal 69500 67 58599 16 51 27453 33000 20 34 28 28 Uttar Pradesh WHY ER lags behind • Addressing the 3 deficits critical: 1. Institutions 2. Investments 3. Incentives Institutional deficits • Land titles, land records and tenancy situation is messy • Rural credit institutions are weak or nonexistent • Technology delivery system is not working well • Marketing institutions are absent or in poor shape Investment deficits • Underinvestment due to weak credit linkages • Poor access to institutional finance: high cost of informal credit • Lack of post-harvest infrastructure: high losses • Poor value chain integration: low returns Incentive deficits • Poor market infrastructure deters competition • Monopoly/monopsony conditions in mandis • Weak performance and poor targeting of govt. schemes • Poor coverage of MSP regime (except CG) • Disincentives for land consolidation • Generally uninviting stance towards private players in agriculture; security issues in parts Leveraging agriculture in Eastern India for sustainable livelihoods Some ideas on the way forward Towards sustainable agri livelihoods • Closing institutional deficit: 1. Digitization of land records in 5 yrs on mission mode 2. Liberalizing tenancy policy for SMF – more land availability for food and HVA 3. Seed capital grant to promote new small finance banks for agri credit 4. PPP for agri extension in specific value chains (maize, sugarcane, potato, medicinal plants, fruits, spices): focus on on-the-shelf technologies; mechanization 5. Liberal marketing policies to attract private investment in market infrastructure; e-marketing; contract farming Towards sustainable agri livelihoods • Closing investment deficit: 1. Large scale promotion of FPOs in every state of ER and NER: leverage power of collective, reduce costs, deploy mobile technology 2. Promote selected value chains with private partners (begin with commercial crops)- backward linkage with FPOs 3. Incentivize new financial institutions to enter, promote savings, develop new financial products: IS CROP CREDIT MODEL WORKING? 4. Govt. schemes to be prioritised for FPOs wherever formed for better targeting and impact 5. Set up risk fund for region for select crops to incentivize new insurance products 6. Select agri processing zones with lead public investment in infrastructure to attract value addition: land, security etc. Towards sustainable agri livelihoods • Closing incentive deficit: 1. MSP purchases for major cereals in ER must 2. Adopt liberal investment policies in agri to attract private investment: create land banks 3. Develop internal market in conservation credits for select ER states (CG, JH) 4. Open up border trade with neighbours: look beyond to ASEAN for markets for niche produce Next steps • Niti Aayog and DAC help each ER state to create Strategic Plan for Agriculture (SPA)3/5/7 year deliverables identified • Prepare minimum policy reform suite which would trigger enhanced financial support • Jointly monitor outputs and outcomes and modify as necessary