Transcript Slide 1
Focus Areas 2/3 Forest Nanomaterials/Control of Water Lignocellulosic Interactions for Modification of Properties
Focus Area 2: Forest Nanomaterials
Target
:
Liberation and use of nanocellulose building blocks Technical Challenges Nano-fractionalization and nano catalysis for separations; Non covalent disassembly/re-assembly Entropic effects in the assembly and disassembly of nanomaterials in forest materials
Cellulose Morphology (
William T. Winter, Cellulose Research Institute, SUNY – ESF, Syracuse NY)
Fiber (cell) White pine tracheids ESF archives
Wood Cell Schematic Cote -ESF Microfibril Hanna, ESF
Cellulose Nanowhiskers
Field-emission electron micrograph of freeze-dried cellulose whiskers of nanoscale cross-sectional dimensions prepared at Paprican’s Vancouver laboratory from H 2 SO 4 hydrolyzed bleached Kraft softwood pulp
W. Hamad. Can. Jour. Chem. Eng. 84. Oct. 2006. pp513 – 519
Nanocrystalline Cellulose
William T. Winter, Cellulose Research Institute, SUNY – ESF, Syracuse NY 13210 200 nm 25% - 30% strength of Carbon Nanotubes
Surface Area vs. Aspect Ratio
25
Montmorillonite Clay: Length: 1 nm Diameter: 200 – 400 nm Aspect Ratio: 0.005 – 0.0025 (200 – 400)
20 15 10 5 0 0.001
0.1
10 Aspect Ratio (l/d) 1000
Cellulose Nanocrystals: Length: 100 nm – several
m
m Diameter: 3 – 20 nm Aspect Ratio: 10 – 10,000 William T. Winter, Cellulose Research Institute, SUNY – ESF, Syracuse NY 13210
Crystal and Microfibril Preparation (
William T. Winter, Cellulose Research Institute, SUNY – ESF, Syracuse NY) Extraction, Bleaching: Hydrolysis (for nanocrystals):
Microfibrils + Acid
Nanocrystals 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Dewax- Soxhlet Mill Alkali solution Sodium chlorite homogenize
• • • • •
acid (HCl, H 2 SO 4 ) concentrations ( 65%) temperature (40 °C ) hydrolysis time (1 – 2 h) acid-to-substrate ratio (0.1 – 0.5 mol/g)
Liberation and Use of Nanocellulose
Need
Identify/develop more commercially attractive methods to liberate nanocellulose, in either the whisker or crystalline forms
Once liberated, nanomaterials must be:
Characterized Stabilized Incorporated into existing and new applications
Focus Area 3 : Understand the control of water-lignocellulose interaction for modification of properties
Target Understand water forest materials interactions Control effects of water on wood and paper properties Shed water more efficiently Technical Challenges Interfacial properties at nanoscale Production of hydrophilic/hydrophobic switchable surfaces Biological activity control
Background
The response of lignocellulosics to moisture (liquid and vapor) is due almost entirely to the supermolecular structure of the biopolymers and nanoscale structures of the composites that comprise the wood fiber Primary microfibrils – 4 –10 nm in cross-section Microfibril angle Degree of crystallinity Species, growing conditions, processing conditions – all affect interactions between water and lignocellulosics
Background
Control/modification of surfaces of lignocellulosic materials using nano coatings or impregnation of nano particles can be used to provide physical/chemical barriers to modify the effect of moisture by changing wetting (hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity) and adhesion forces. Durability and other end use properties of wood and paper products closely tied to the response to moisture Interfiber bond strength - paper Dimensional stability – wood and paper Decay, fungi, rot, UV stability - wood Very large volumes of water are handled in the manufacture of forest products. Nano materials which can modify drainage rates and drying could result in significant reductions in energy requirements.
WATER VAPOR AS A PROBE TO CHARACTERIZE SURFACES AND NANOSTRUCTURES
2.30
2.28
2.26
2.24
2.22
2.20
2.18
5 MOISTURE PICK UP AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY vs. TIME 10 15 20 25 TIME (hours) 30 35 40 10 45 0 50 40 30 20 80 70 60
WATER VAPOR ADSORPTION ISTHOERM CELLULOSE POWDER (CF 11) 0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
RELATIVE VAPOR PRESSURE (p/p 0 ) 0.8
0.06
0.04
0.02
1.0
0.00
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08
WATER VAPOR ACCESSIBLE SURFACE AREA AND SURFACE ENERGY OF ADSORPTION FOR SELECTED MODEL COMPOUNDS AND PULPS PULP SAMPLE AVERAGE S. A.
AVERAGE S.E.A.
(m 2 /g) (ergs/cm 2 ) 103.71
189.85
Microgranular Cell.
(model) CarboxyMethyl Cell.
(model) 215.89
197.12
Xylan Powder - Larch (model) Softwood Bleached Kraft TMP Radiata Pine Pulp 349.20
173.57
226.32
148.7
198.14
171.87
137.14
175.2
Pine (Russian) Eucalyptus 144.4
132.7
174.1
187.7
Summary
Lignocellulosic fiber is a nanocomposite
Water accessible surface area
determined by nanostructure which is dependent on species and pulping processes
Surface energy of adsorption
Model compounds show impact of different functional groups and the concentration of those groups on the surface Pulps show differences due to both pulping process and species Eucalyptus has a lower accessible surface area, but a significantly higher surface energy of adsorption indicating a higher concentration of hydrophilic groups on the accessible surface
Examples
Relate to Macroscopic Properties
Growth rings 1 cm 50 m m Cell wall layers
Dry sheet
News, 45 g/m²
Moisturized sheet ESEM - Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope
G. A. Baum 2003
Water Droplets on “Nanoseal” Treated Wood
Nanoparticles adhere directly to the substrate molecules (molecular bonding) and assemble into an invisible ultra thin nanoscopic mesh providing a long lasting, self-cleaning, hydrophobic surface. The wood is protected against decay, fungi and rot. It is dimensionally and UV stable. It will not wear off and cannot be removed by water, normal cleaning agents or high pressure equipment.
Wood Surface Repels Water Droplets
Water droplets rest on a wood surface impregnated with BASF’s “Lotus Spray” The surface is superhydrophobic . Thus contact area between the surface of the wood and the water is reduced to a minimum, and the adhesive forces are greatly decreased making the water drops assume a globular form.