LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS - ProBono | Pro
Download
Report
Transcript LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS - ProBono | Pro
LAWYERS FOR HUMAN
RIGHTS
REFUGEE AND MIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT
Arrest and Detention in SA Migration Law
Bail for Foreign Nationals
17 June 2009
Werkmans Attorneys
Sandton
What we’ll be covering
The Basics: Provisions of the Immigration Act and
Refugees Act
Role of Law Enforcement
The Basics of Bail as they apply to Foreign Nationals
The Basics: Applicable Law
Immigration Act (Act no 13 of 2002, as amended)
Section 41: identification
Police or immigration may ask you to ID yourself
Must ID as a citizen, permanent resident or a foreigner
Regulation 32: steps to follow
Allow access to documents
Allow contact to others
Accessing governmental records
The Basics: The Law cont’d
Section 34: detention and deportation of “illegal
foreigners”
34(1): detention for 30 days for the purposes of deportation
34(2): detention for 48 hours for purposes other than deportation
Regulation 29
Process to be followed to extend a warrant
Must provide notification and opportunity to provide reasons
why he or she should not be detained
Detentions under the Immigration Act
Section 34(1) allows an immigration officer to arrest
and illegal foreigner or “cause” him or her to be
arrested
Must therefore issue a warrant of arrest / detention, etc.
Illegal immigrants in police stations or prisons who have
been there for more than 48 hours must either have an
immigration warrant or have been brought before a
magistrate
Section 34 “protections”
s. 34(1)(a): must be notified in writing of the decision
to deport and informed of the right to appeal to the
Minister
Practical difficulties make this almost impossible in
Lindela (i.e. no paper, no pens, no access to immigration
officers)
s. 34(1)(b): the detainee may ask “at any time” to have
the detention confirmed by a warrant within 48 hours
or he / she must be released
“at any time” includes after a warrant has been issued?
Section 34(1) Cont’d
s. 34(1)(c): must be informed upon arrest of the
procedures under 34(1)(a) and (b) and when “possible,
practicable and available” in a language that the
detainee understands
It is rarely possible, practicable or available
Detentions exceeding 30 days
s. 34(1)(d): the detainee may not be held longer than 30
days without a warrant of a magistrate’s court which “on
good and reasonable grounds” may extend such detention
for an additional 90 days.
Regulation 29 gives the steps to be taken including:
Informing on day 20 of the intention to extend
Allowing the detainee to make representations as to why he / she
should be released
Transferring the file to the court registrar
Confirmation by warrant by day 30
The detainee will never appear personally before a court
Section 35(2) of the Bill of Rights should apply, but doesn’t…
yet.
The Act is silent on detentions beyond 120 days
Minimum Standards of Detention
s. 34(1)(e): the detainee must be detained under
minimum standards of detention “protecting his or
her dignity and relevant human rights”
Annexure 2 to the Immigration Regulations, 2005
Very vague standards
Must be held in a place of detention “in a manner and at
a place determined by the Director-General”
Costs of deportation
Section 34(3): the illegal foreigner may be required to
deposit a sum sufficient “to cover in whole or in part”
the expenses related to his or her deportation,
detention, etc.
Failure to comply is an offence (section 34(4))
Returning after being kicked out
Section 34(5): under this section it would appear that a
magistrate can order a deportation if a person has
entered after either being removed from the country
OR has entered despite being informed that he or she
is not admitted at a port of entry…?
convoluted wording
with respect, typical of this poorly drafted act
Deportation after prison sentence
Section 34(6): An illegal foreigner may be deported
prior to the expiration of his or her sentence if he or
she was “convicted and sentenced under this Act”
Most often used to deport sentenced prisoners midway
through their sentence rather than granting parole
Persons held on ships
Section 34(8): illegal foreigners who arrived on ships
must be detained by the master of that ship
Section 34(9): the master must pay the costs of the
detention and deportation
Section 34(11): a person may not be detained on a ship
for longer than 30 days without a warrant
LHR v. Minister of Home Affairs, 2004 (7) BCLR 775 (CC)
The Basics: The Law Cont’d
Police officers cannot deport under s. 34 therefore
detentions are held for the purposes other than
deportation (s. 34 (2))
May not be detained for more than 48 hours
The Basics: Applicable Law
Refugees Act (Act no 130 of 1998)
Provides for detention of asylum seekers who have
breached conditions of permit
Section 23: a permit may be removed by the Minister
and the holder caused to be arrested
Regulation 8(2): when the Minister may remove a permit
The Basics: Refugees Act
Removing an asylum permit does not negate an
asylum claim: Regulation 9 and Section 2
Section 29: Detentions under the Refugees Act must
be reviewed by a High Court every 30 days
Refugees in the Criminal Justice
System
Recognized refugees convicted of crimes should be
treated as any other South African
A criminal conviction cannot be used as a reason to
withdraw status
Is not included as a reason for cessation under section 5
of the Refugees Act
Asylum Seekers in the Criminal
Justice System
One condition of the asylum seeker permit is to
obey the laws of the country.
Breaking a condition is grounds for the Minister to
withdraw a permit:
Section 22(6)
A permit must be distinguished from status:
Section 23
Detention must be reviewed by a High Court every
30 days
Section 29
Section 28, Refugees Act
Rights of refugees in respect of removal from Republic
28. (1) Subject to section 2, a refugee may be removed from the Republic on grounds
of national security or public order.
(2) A removal under subsection (1) may only be ordered by the Minister with due
regard for the rights set out in section 33 of the Constitution and the rights of the refugee
in terms of international law.
(3) If an order is made under this section for the removal from the Republic of a
refugee, any dependant of such refugee who has not been granted asylum, may be
included in such an order and removed from the Republic if such dependant has been
afforded a reasonable opportunity to apply for asylum but has failed to do so or if his or
her application for asylum has been rejected.
(4) Any refugee ordered to be removed under this section may be detained pending his
or her removal from the Republic.
(5) Any order made under this section must afford reasonable time to the refugee
concerned to obtain approval from any country of his or her own choice, for his or her
removal to that country.
“Particularly Serious Crime”
Art. 33(2) Ref Conv., 1951: exception to the “non-
refoulement” principle in this article
Must be:
A danger to the security of the country; or
After a final judgment of a particularly serious crime
Consequences of refoulement
When determining whether the crime is of such a
serious nature that it deserves a violation of this
principle, regard must be given to the consequences of
returning to their country of origin:
Dangers of persecution
Danger to the life of the individual
“Having regard to section 2…”
South African law does not permit the removal of a
recognized refugee based on a criminal conviction
Section 2 of the Refugees Act is broad: “No person…”
Higher protection than that given by the Refugee
Convention, 1951
Arrest and Detention of Asylum Seekers and
Refugees
Dysfunctional refugee system
Severe access problems at all refugee reception offices
Large-scale corruption among officials
Lack of knowledge by police and immigration officers
Attitude of preventing “abusive claims” from entering
RSD system
Immigration + Refugees Acts
Section 21(4) Refugees Act: an asylum seeker cannot be
prosecuted for illegal entry or remaining illegally in
the Republic
Must have made an application for asylum, or
Must have been recognized as a refugee
Immigration + Refugees Acts
Cont’d
In practice, many asylum seekers are unable to access
the RRO’s and are not able to make asylum
applications.
This cannot be used as an excuse to deport asylum
seekers without adjudication
Section 2 of the Refugees Act
Offences under the
Immigration Act
Unfortunately, all too often even asylum seekers and
refugees are charged under the Immigration Act
Section 42: Aiding and Abetting Illegal Foreigners
(1) Subject to this Act, and save for necessary
humanitarian assistance, no person shall aid, abet,
assist, enable or in any way help
(a) an illegal foreigner; or
(b) a foreigner doin’ stuff they’re not allowed to do…
Organisations providing “necessary humanitarian
assistance” should not be harassed under this
provision!
Offences Cont’d
Section 49: lists the main offences
Note that “being illegal” under s. 49(1)(a) carries a three
month maximum imprisonment
Bail is important if the person wishes to contest the
charge because awaiting trial may be far longer than the
maximum sentence!
Role of Law Enforcement (Police)
Police are authorised to identify under s. 41
Must still follow the steps in Regulation 32
Must assist individual with accessing documents and
contacting friends / family to verify identity
Role of Law Enforcement
(Police)
In practice,
Police detain and contact immigration to verify status
In Pretoria and Johannesburg, police rarely contact
Refugee Affairs
Station Commissioner is responsible to ensure all
detainees are legally detained
Will not release someone without documents
Theoretically, they would be allowing the continued
commission of a crime
Role of Law Enforcement
(Immigration Inspectorate)
Immigration inspectors may request any person to
identify themselves under section 41
Regulation 32
Only an immigration inspector has authority
under section 34(1) to arrest and deport.
May detain for up to 30 days without a warrant
No requirement to take detainee to a court
Role of Law Enforcement
(Immigration Inspectorate)
Role of inspector:
Verify documents;
Verifying legality in Movement Control System;
Issue notification of deportation if that inspector is
satisfied that the individual is an “illegal foreigner” as
defined in section 2.
Practical Situations
(Call from Police Station)
Steps to take:
Get details about status in Republic
Contact cells at Police Station and verify that detainee is
being held there
Write or call station commissioner about possible
release
Writing creates a record to of measures taken to resolve
Chance to explain little known area of law
Call from police station
Most likely, the police will not release without
immigration
Perception that this would amount to releasing someone
to possibly continue committing offence (no docs)
Perception that only immigration can properly
investigate undocumented people
Some commissioners in Johannesburg know about
problems at Refugee Affairs and have given orders not to
arrest undoc’d people
Call from police station
Get details of which regional DHA office sends
immigration inspector
Contact immigration officer to explain situation or fax
letter to regional office
Call from police station
Depending on the immigration officer, the
detainee may be released depending on
circumstances
If they are registered at a RRO, you may be able to
contact that office to verify application
Some refugee affairs officers will be hesitant to release
without a power of attorney
Giving the name of a refugee affairs officer to the
immigration officer may help
Call from police station
Convincing an officer that an undocumented, yet
hopeful asylum seeker should be released is more
tricky
May require some knowledge of the country of origin
If a detainee is not released from the police station,
they will most likely be sent to Lindela
Call from Lindela
In some ways, it’s easier to assist a client who is at
Lindela
We can visit them personally
There is a permanent immigration staff at Lindela to
speak with
Call from Lindela
Unaccompanied minors are no longer allowed at
Lindela
They must be placed in a ‘place of safety’ through
Social Development.
Lindela has a policy of not placing any children at
Lindela
This may lead to expedited deportations of women with
children
Zimbabwean nationals in
detention
Zimbabwean nationals are now subject to a
moratorium on deportation
Only those released from prisons for deportation will be
removed from the country
In anticipation of the exemption permits under section
31(2)(b) of the Immigration Act
If they are not being held “for the purposes of
deportation”, they may not be detained for longer than
48 hours (section 34(2) Imm Act).
Call from Lindela
Write a letter to Lindela regarding the detainee’s
situation
Immigration may take a statement from detainee
to determine if they should be released to report to
a RRO.
May be given a section 23 permit from Lindela or
simply released out the front gates.
Lindela is not (yet) a designated Refugee
Reception Office and cannot issue permits
FAX NUMBERS
Refugee Affairs: 012-810-8177
Deportations: 012-810-8522
Legal Services: 012-810-8574
Lindela: 011-660-1305 or 011-665-2554
Bosasa: 011-660-9097
Case Law
Circular 51 Case
DHA issued Circular 51 of 2000 which instructed
immigration officers to refuse entry to aspirant asylum
seekers who travelled through “safe third countries”
Matter brought to court, but settled. DHA withdrew the
circular and issued a new directive regarding the
admission of persons entering for the purposes of
seeking asylum.
Case Law
Lawyers for Human Rights v. Minister of Home Affairs
and Others, 2004 (7) BCLR 775 (CC)
The second applicant was being detained on a ship in
terms of section 34(8) of the Immigration Act
Important points:
Foreign nationals have access to the protection of SA courts if
they are in SA territory (but not yet admitted to the country)
Confirmed that the Bill of Rights applies to foreign nationals,
even the “illegal” ones
Locus standi and acting in the public interest under section
38(1)(d) of the Constitution
Case Law
Centre for Child Law v. Minister of Home Affairs and
Others, case no 22866/04 (TPD) (unreported)
Unaccompanied minors may not be detained in
immigration detention at Lindela
The rights of children in the Bill of Rights applies
equally to foreign children
The Child Care Act (and now the Children’s Act) applies
equally to foreign children and therefore a child in need
of care must be brought before a Children’s Court and
placed in a Place of Safety as any other child.
Case Law
Ulde v. Minister of Home Affairs and Others, [2009]
ZASCA 34
Judgment handed down on 31 March 2009 (fresh off the
presses)
Ulde was arrested as an illegal foreigner even after a
magistrate had granted bail on the same facts in a
criminal setting
Found that section 32(2) Immigration Act which
imposes an obligation to deport an illegal foreigner does
not entail an obligation to detain.
The Basics on Bail
Procedure covered under Chapter 9 of the Criminal
Procedures Act (Act no 51 of 1977)
Section 60(4): where the interests of justice do not
permit release from detention:
(a) likely to endanger public safety
(b) will attempt to evade trial
(c) intimidating witnesses
(d) “undermine or jeopardize” the court’s functions
(e) exceptional circumstances where release will “disturb the
public or undermine public peace or security”
Section 60(6) Factors
Foreign nationals are often seen as a “flight risk” under
section 60(4)(b)
s. 60(6) gives factors to be considered:
(a) Emotional, family, community or occupational ties
(b) assets
(c) means and travel documents to leave the country
(d) ability to afford to forfeit the bail money
(e) whether extradition would be an option if he leaves
(f ) nature and gravity of the charge
(g) strength of the case against him or her
Section 60(6) Factors Cont’d
(h) nature and gravity of the punishment
(i) binding effect and enforceability of the bail
conditions and the ease with which such conditions may
be breached; or
(j) any other factor which in the opinion of the court
should be taken into account.
An address will be extremely important for the
enforceability of bail conditions!
Mobility of Asylum Seekers and
Refugees
Refugees and asylum seekers are a special category of
“foreign national”
They do not have ready access to travel documents
Recognised refugees with United Nations Convention
Travel Documents (“refugee passports”) are prohibited
from returning to their country of origin and have rigid
visa requirements to visit other countries
If an asylum seeker or refugee returns to his / her
country of origin, he or she risks losing their status
An asylum seeker may not leave SA without permission
from the Minister of Home Affairs (section 22(5) Ref Act
Onus of proof
There is no onus on the accused to prove that he or she
will not be a flight risk
Branco 2002 (1) SACR 425 (T)
(as reported in “Criminal Procedure Handbook”, Joubert et al.
8th Edition, Juta & Co., p. 151)
Unlike other jurisdictions
Court may use its “common sense” in considering each
of the factors
Conditions of Bail
The court may grant bail but impose conditions (s.
60(12)).
Besides depositing a sum (s. 60(13)), the court may
impose other conditions “in the interests of justice” (s.
62):
(a) regular reporting in person at a specified place and
time to a specified person
(b) places where the accused may not go
(c) stopping or controlling communication with any
witnesses
Conditions of Bail Cont’d
(d) specified place at which documents may be served
(e) conditions which “will ensure that the proper
administration of justice is not place in jeopardy…”
(f ) supervision by probation or corrections officer
Regular reporting at a police station is often effective
Reminding the magistrate that in the case of asylum
seekers, they are obliged to report on a regular basis to
a refugee reception office