Transcript Document

TESTING THE STANDARD MODEL
AT THE DØ EXPERIMENT
-at present and in the future
Tulika Bose
for the Columbia-D group
10/12/01
T.Bose
1
Outline
The Standard Model
HEP’s burning questions
The Fermilab Tevatron
The D experiment
Acknowledgement: Hal Evans – for letting me steal many of his slides!
10/12/01
T.Bose
2
Particles and forces
Force
Boson
Mass
[GeV]
Strength
Gravity
G
0
10-39
Leptons
E-M

0
10-2
Weak
W
80.419
10-5
e
Z0
91.1882
Strong
g
0
10-1 (MZ)
E-W Sym
H0
>113
mf2
Particle
Chg
[e]
Mass [MeV]
e  
0
O(<eV)

-1

0.5
105
1777
Quarks
u
c
t
+2/3 1–5 1300
d
s
b
-1/3 3–9
150
174300
4400
3
Standard Model –the good and the bad…
Hugely successful !
But lots of problems/unanswered questions :
19 arbitrary parameters
The origin of mass ?
Matter/antimatter asymmetry?
Gravity ?
The Feedback Loop
Trash
Particle Theory
HEP
Experiments
Beyond the SM ???
10/12/01
T.Bose
4
The question of mass
Why is there mass ?
Why do some particles have mass while others are massless?
Why does, say a top quark, have about 40 times as much mass as a bottom quark?
etc.
Electric
EM
Magnetic
Electroweak
Weak
10/12/01
T.Bose
5
HEP’s Most Wanted
Invents a set of particles with very special properties
their interaction with all the standard particles  mass
+ one new particle – the Higgs boson
But where is the Higgs???
10/12/01
T.Bose
6
Higgs in cartoons
10/12/01
T.Bose
7
What’s the matter with antimatter ?
=
Right after Big Bang
Matter
Antimatter
But we exist!!!
Where did the anti-matter go?
But
some asymmetry between matter and antimatter
connects the Universe’s matter dominance with elem. pcles
Proton decay
Rapid expansion
10/12/01
T.Bose
8
Theoretical framework : CKM matrix
atleast 6 quark flavors 
complex phase
Quarks  CP Violation in B0, K0 decays…, Mixing

(t ) 
B
0
ACP
 
   B
 B  J / K S   B  J / K S
0
0
 J / K S
0
0
0
0
 J / K S
0


Is it zero or non-zero
Leptons  Neutrino Oscillations: neutrino mass, mixing & CP
accomodates
but does not explain it!!!
SM amount of
not enough to account for matter dominance
Alternate models include other CP viol. effects
experiments sensitive to physics beyond the SM
10/12/01
T.Bose
9
The gravity of the situation
Hierarchy
problem
10/12/01
T.Bose
10
SUSY to the rescue???
Supersymmetry
adds a Superpartner for every SM pcle
and 5 Higgs: h0, H0, A0, H±
Simplest SUSY models require
Mh < 135 GeV (!!!)
Standard Model
Particle
S
qL , qR
½
½
½
 L , R
L

W , Z ,
0
0
0
0
h ,H , A ,H
g

1
0
1
Superpartners
Sparticle
S
~ ,q
~
q
L
R
~ ~
L , R
~
L


~
1 , ~
2
0
0
0
0
~
1 , ~
2 , ~
3 , ~
4
~
g
0
0
0
½
½
½
11
Answers???
new interactions analogous to the ‘color’ force
new technicolor fermions like quarks at TeV scale
SM particles interact with techi-fermions :
the interaction  mass to the SM pcles
10/12/01
T.Bose
Hierarchy problem solved!
12
Large extra dimensions ??
String Theory
Collision energy 
disappears
Non-conservation of energy
sign of new physics
10/12/01
T.Bose
13
The strategy
Take your favourite beyond the SM theory:
it looks like the SM at low energies , differences only at high E
small corrections to SM predictions
 We
need to look more precisely and at higher energies
10/12/01
T.Bose
14
The truth is out there…
Precision measurements:
Electroweak Physics:
large sample of W & Z bosons
W mass (dM(W) ~ 30 MeV/c2)
W width, W/Z production properties
tri-linear gauge boson couplings
Any deviation  new physics !
Top Physics:
top only produced at the Tevatron
top mass (dM(top) ~ 2.8 GeV/c2)
top pair production cross-section
single top production
W mass + Top mass constrain Higgs mass
10/12/01
T.Bose
15
The beauty of physics
- Large rate:
 ( p p  bb)  150 b at 2 TeV
 (e  e   bb)  7 nb
at Z0
 (e  e   B B)  1 nb at (4S)
– All species, including Bs, Bc, b, produced
CP violation and CKM angles
 Bs mixing
 Cross sections
 Rare decays

10/12/01
T.Bose
16
Tevatron
Fermilab Tevatron
Circumference: 4 mile
20 feet underground
ECM=2 TeV
p p collisions
Underlying
Event
g
d
u
u
q
q
d
u
p (E = 1 TeV)
10/12/01
p (E = 1 TeV)
u
Hard Scatter
T.Bose
17
Tevatron
Protons
Antiprotons
1. H- Source
produce
1. p-Ni p’s
2. Linac
400 MeV
2. Accumulator 8 GeV
3. Booster
8 GeV
3. Main Injector 150 GeV
produce
4. Main Injector150 GeV
4. Tevatron
980 GeV
5. Tevatron
5. Recycler
recovery
980 GeV
18
Tevatron upgrade
Linac upgrade, main injector, new antiproton storage ring
Tot. Anti-p
(x1012)
Bunches
Ib
92-96
IIa
01-03
IIb
03-07…
0.3
1.1
4-11
6x6
36x36
140x103
Spacing
[ns]
3500
396
132
E-CM
[GeV]
1800
1960
1960
Typ. Lumi.
[cm-2s-1]
(x1032)
0.016
0.86
2–5.2
Lumi/week
pb-1
3.2
17.3
40–105
Tot Lumi
fb-1
0.125
2
15–20
2.5
2.3
1.9–4.8
Int’s/X’ing
10/12/01
Extensive upgrade of the D detector
19
10/12/01
The layers
General purpose high energy physics detector
T.Bose
20
The international coalition
>500 people from ~ 50 institutions (17 countries)
Run I (’92-’96)
~ 104 publications…
EW Physics
Top Physics
Top quark co-discovered (w/ CDF) March 95
New Phenomena
B Physics
QCD
Run II started March 1, 2001 !
Detector rolled in.
All component detectors installed
Electronics : final production/installation
10/12/01
T.Bose
21
On the home front
Faculty
Post-docs
Graduate
students
Hal Evans
John Parsons
Mike Tuts
Leslie Groer
Christos Leonidopoulos
Georg Steinbrueck
Tulika Bose
Shaohua Fu
Mingcheng Gao
Burair Kothari
Jovan Mitrevski
Responsibilities
Hal Evans
L2 muon trigger, Si Track Trigger, B phys group co-convener, Run 2b Cal.
Trigger Upgrade leader
Leslie Groer
Detector Commissioning
John Parsons
Top/Higgs group
Georg Steinbrueck
Electroweak group co-convener
Mike Tuts
Calorimeter electronics, Run 2a upgrade co-leader
22
D upgrade
Central Scintillator
Forward Minidrift chamb’s
10/12/01
Forward Scint
Central
PDTs
Shielding
Calorimeter
Tracking: Solenoid,Silicon,Fiber
Tracker,Preshowers
New Electronics,Trigger,DAQ
T.Bose
23
10/12/01
The real thing!
T.Bose
24
Tracking
Readout
Charged
Particle
p=qBR
VB
B
n+
- + 50 m
- +
n
SiO2
- +
Si Detector
300 m
p+
reverse biased
diode
Si wafers:
charged pcle passes thru Si
electrons & holes
charge collected on strip
readout pcle position
points for track fit
Ionization of atoms by charged particles : electrons knocked out
trajectory deduced by measuring ionization at many points along the path
curvature of track measured particle momentum ;
amount of ionization per unit length (dE/dx) depends on particle type, p
particle type identified
10/12/01
Tulika Bose
25
Tracking upgrade
•
•
•
Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SMT)
Central Fiber Tracker (CFT)
2T superconducting solenoid
26
SMT
Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SMT)
6 Barrels : 4 layers of Si microstrip detectors
axial strips (10m resolution)
Layers 1, 3: double-sided 90o strips (30m res.)
(single-sided on 2 outer barrels)
• Layers 2, 4: double-sided 2o stereo (15m res.)
•793k Channels
•SVX IIe Readout
• L2 Trigger (’02)
• 12 F-disks & 4 H-disks
27
SMT & CFT
SMT
high resolution measurements of particle tracks near the beam pipe
(10m res.)
measurement of charged particle momenta
measurement of secondary vertices for identification of b-jets
from top, Higgs, and for b-physics
CFT (Scintillating fiber tracker)
Fibers (830 m) -Axial & Stereo (±3o) on 8 concentric cylinders
light from the fibers converted into electrical pulses by
Cryogenic (LHe) Photon Detectors (new)
VLPC Readout: ~77k Channels (SIFT + SVX IIe)
Hit Resolution (~100 m)
28
Calorimeters
Calorimeter
high density material: particles slow down & stop
energy deposited measured
showers
 shape of shower distinguishes e,  from hadrons
electromagnetic : electrons, positrons, photons
hadronic: hadrons which penetrate EM Cal.
Detector unchanged from Run I (U-LAr)
New electronics to cope with BX frequency
10/12/01
29
Chasing muons
Muon detectors
tracking muons, measure momentum
drift chambers
•
•
•
•
parallel anode wires stretched between two cathode planes
elec liberated by ionization moves towards anode
energy gain further ionization avalanches of elec & +ions
drift time (collection time of avalanches)measure of position
scintillation counters
• excitation of atoms by ionizing particlesluminescence
• light converted into electrical pulses by Visible light photon counters
30
Pictures
Silicon Detector
Fiber Tracker
Muon Detector
31
Physics Rates
Physics Rates
Process
X-Sect
or BR
Beam X’ing
7.5 MHz (132ns)
Inelastic pp
pp  bb ( y  1)
pp WX
pp ZXbbX
p p  tt

 W bW b
-
e/ + jets
only jets
p p  W/Z H(*)
e/  b b
qq  bb
Rate
(L=2x1032)
50 mb
50 b
10 MHz
10 kHz
22 nb
1 nb
4.4 Hz
0.2 Hz
7.2 pb
~100%
35%
44%
5 / hour
425 fb
22%
56%
7 / day
* M(H) = 100 GeV
32
Signal Vs. Background
Signals
High PT Leptons
W/Z, b...
High ET Jets
Massive Objs
~~
pp  t t X  bbjj T
~
~ ; 
~   
~ 0 , qq
~0
t  b
1
1
1
1
Missing ET
’s, LSP
Displaced Vertices
b’s...
Backgrounds
Low ET Jets
ET Balanced
pp  qqgX
No High PT Leptons
No Displaced Vertices
33
Where is the needle?
Out of every trillion proton-antiproton
collisions, about ten top-antitop quark pairs
are produced!!!
34
D Trigger System
Crossing frequency
7MHz
p
p
But data acquisition rate is 50 Hz
New 3 Level Trigger System
L1
7 MHz
L2
L3
10 kHz Decision time 1 kHz Decision time 50 Hz
Decision time
25ms
100s
4.2s
•Single Sub-Det’s
• Towers, Tracks,
ET-miss
• Some correl’s
•Correlations
• Calibrated Data
• Physics Objects
e,,j,,ET-miss
•Simple Reco
• Physics Algo’s
• Not deadtimeless
35
L1 & L2
Detector
Level 1
7 Mhz
Level 2
10 khz
1 khz
CAL
L1Cal
L2Cal
c/f PS
L1PS
L2PS
CFT
L1CTT
L2CTT
SMT
MU
FPD
Lumi
L2STT
L1Mu
L2Mu
L1FPD
Framework
Global
L2
Level 3
36
The importance of beauty
Some Run II physics programs:
Search for the Higgs Boson ( H  bb )
Studies of the top quark ( t  Wb)
B Physics (CP violation etc.)
Search for new particles
b quarks appear in the final state
Tagging of b-quark jets is of utmost importance !
37
Impact parameter
B Decay Products
B-Hadron:
Flight Length ~ mm’s
Collision
Decay
Vertex
Impact
Parameter
Interesting physics is tagged by b-quarks
Impact parameter is a good b-tag
Need sensitivity at level of 10's of microns
CFT: (100m res.) , SMT (10m res.)
38
Trigger thresholds
Momentum Resolution
Evts
Trig Cut
Interesting evts  High PT
Bgrd dominated by Low PT
Bgrd
Signal
(magnified)
soft thresholds allow a fraction of the particles with pT below
threshold to fire (BAD!)
PT
increase in trigger rate
sharp threshold cuts out this background below threshold
decrease in trigger rate (VERY GOOD!)
precise tracking  more efficient use of the data acquisition
bandwidth
39
Physics benefits
New Phenomena
increase Higgs sensitivity 20% ZHbb
double sensitivity
hAbbbb
Top
Trigger on Zbb (increase yield x6)
Cut Mt systematics in half
B-Physics
Increase BKS yield by 50%
40
Silicon Track Trigger
FRC Define search
region in Si
Tracks from
CFT
Data from
SMT detectors
STC
Associate
clusters to
tracks
Form
Clusters
TFC
Re-fit track
with Si
clusters
Global L2
Trigger
50s time budget
via
L2CFT
impact parameter trigger
; 15m at PT=15GeV
improved momentum resolution: (factor 2-3)
Res ~ 30m at PT=2GeV
sharper thresholds
41
The STT Integration
42
Status
Dates
Tevatron
DØ
1/Mar/01
Official Run II Start
Detector Open
3/Apr/01
First Colliding Beam (1x8)
Timing In Detectors
27/Apr/01
36x36 stores
Final mu-chamber gas
3-17/May/01
2-week shutdown
All Si cabled – Close det.
May-Aug/01
36x36 stores w/ shutdowns
Install electronics as avail
Jul/01-Sep/01
L2 Cal and Muon
Oct/01-Nov/01 1-month shutdown
Fully instrument
Nov/01-2003
2 fb-1
Run IIa
Jun/2002
STT installed
2003
Long Shutdown
Install new silicon, etc.
2003-2007
Run IIb
>15 fb-1
10/12/01
T.Bose
43
Status
Dates
Action
~ July 26
By August 15
NOW
Run until ~ Oct 8
Oct 8 - Nov 16
November
December &
January 2002
10/12/01
Continue 36 x 36 running
With detector as described before.
• Increase L3 rate from 4 Hz to Done
In Progress
~100Hz
Done
• Complete L1 Cal
•Take
Start
bringing
up L2 trigger
data
& commission
Offlinepartially
software
In Preparation
Install
AFE8
boards
& other
with real
data;
Calibration
& completion
Alignment
36x36 stores
Commission CFT & L1 track trigger
36x36 fine tune & stabilize;
 stable operation
T.Bose
44
Data!
Z  ee
10/12/01
Muon
T.Bose
45
Di-muon candidate
10/12/01
T.Bose
46
Outlook
Exciting times ahead!
D is the place to be at!
DØ vs. The Standard Model
Precision (2 fb-1)
Searches (20 fb-1)
Quark M vs Weak (2 fb-1)
MW
30 MeV
HSM
180
sin2
0.03
Mt
1.6 GeV
tan,MA
most 5
xs
30
|Vtb|
12%
rare top
10–40
K*+-
700 evts
etc…
etc…
etc…
47
I.P. resolution with STT
•
I.P. Resolution ~ 30 m at pT=2GeV
~ 15 m at pT=15GeV
Tulika Bose
48
Momentum resolution
•
Si precision ~ 10 m , CFT precision ~ 100 m
•
improved momentum resolution: (factor 2-3)
Tulika Bose
49
Improved rates
50