Northwest Association of Networked Ocean Observing Systems INDUSTRY DAY 11 Aug 2005

Northwest Association of Networked Ocean Observing Systems The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Regional Association for the Pacific NW

What are we?

• A regional organization through which to integrate and sustain existing observing capability, to strategize for new operational systems, and to provide easy access to data, data products, model forecasts, etc. about regional marine conditions – Developing a user-driven regional coastal ocean observing system • “ocean” includes inland marine waters

(head of tide to EEZ)

• “user-driven” means users define priorities, delivery • A system designed to produce and disseminate ocean observations and related products deemed necessary to the users, in a common manner and according to sound scientific practice

Fundamental Issue:

We are limited and poorly coordinated with respect to environmental data supporting fundamental societal needs

R. Spinrad, NOAA

The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS)

Oceans & Coasts Component of the U.S. Integrated Earth Observing System (IEOS) & the International GEOSS

An Interagency Collaboration for the Public Good

NOAA Navy NASA NSF USACE USGS MMS EPA USCG DOE http://www.ocean.us

T. Malone, Ocean.US

What will IOOS do?

The U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) is developing as a “user-driven”, integrated system of observations and data telemetry, data management and communications (DMAC), and data analysis and modeling that

routinely, reliably, and continuously provides data and information required to address seven societal goals:

(1) Improve predictions of

climate change and weather

their effects on coastal communities and the nation; and (2) Improve the safety and efficiency of

maritime operations

; (3) Improve forecasts of more effectively;

natural hazards

and mitigate their effects (4) Improve

homeland security

; (5) Minimize

public health risks

; (6) Protect and restore

healthy coastal ecosystems

more effectively; and (7) Sustain living marine

resources

.

1 System, 7 Goals

A brief history of IOOS

• NOPP established by law in 1997 • NORLC has oversight of NOPP • NORLC recommends an IOOS in 1998-1999 • NOPP establishes Ocean.US in 2000 to implement a user-driven IOOS – Global IOOS and Coastal IOOS – Coastal IOOS to have two components: • National Backbone • Regional Coastal Ocean Observing Systems managed by Regional Associations

Coastal Component of IOOS AOOS NANOOS

• • • • •

National Backbone Federal Agencies Responsible EEZ & Great Lakes Core variables required by RAs & Fed Agencies Network of sentinel & reference stations Data Standards/Exchange Protocols NERA CeNCOOS PacIOOS SCCOOS

• • • • •

Regional Coastal Ocean Observing Systems Regional Associations Responsible Involve private & public sectors Inform Federal Agencies of user needs Enhance the backbone based on user needs Incorporate sub –regional systems GLOS GCOOS MACOORA SECOORA CaRA

T. Malone, Ocean.US

The National Federation of Regional Associations (NFRA)

• Foster communication between the RAs and the Federal agencies that establish standards and protocols for an integrated ocean observing system, operate the backbone of the national system, and help fund the RAs; •Serve as an advocate for the RAs to the federal agencies, the Congress and the general public; •Participate with the federal agencies and Ocean.US in establishing, standards, protocols, and best practices for coastal ocean observing systems; •Promote the science, technologies, education, and management required for continuous improvement and reliable operation of coastal ocean observing systems among the Regional Associations and with the federal agencies; and •Promote understanding of the potential of an integrated ocean observing system to meet society’s needs as identified in the seven societal pillars of the IOOS.

Regional Association Progress

Category Activity Funding Organization Infrastructure Education Governance Business Plan TOTAL Funding Year Governing Body Website Staff Stakeholders Inventory Gap analysis Regional Coordination International Coordination Subregional OS Real-time Pilot Project DMAC Implementation Council Plan in Review Approved by Stakeholders In Review Approved by Stakeholders X X Y

3

X X X X 14 3 X X P X X X X 3 X X P X X X X X X X X

7

X X X X 15 X 11 X X X X X 3 X X X X X 3 X X F X X X X X X Y

4

X

8

X X 3 X X P X X X X X X X Y

5

X 3 X X F X X

6

X X X X X X X 13 12 12 2 X P X X X X X X 8 2 X X P X X X X X X X X X X 13 X X X X X X X X 14 1 X X F X X X 1 X X X 3 X X X X 1 X X X 7 8 2 4 3 2 1 11 6 7 10 9 4 8 8 8 8 11 11

The Political Environment

•

Commission on Ocean Policy



Report

•

Executive Order



Ocean Action Plan

•

Pending Legislation

 

Senate (S. 361) House (H.R. 1489, 1584)

T. Malone, Ocean.US

IOOS Legislation

• S. 361– Has been passed unanimously by the full Senate [$150M authorized] • H.R. 1489 – Still in committee. Resumes mark-up by Oct.-Nov. [$ not specified] • H.R. 1584 – Still in committee. Mirrors language of S. 361 [$150M]

Northwest Association Of Networked Ocean Observing Systems (NANOOS)

http://www.nanoos.org

Who are we?

• •

NANOOS Coordinator

(Executive Director per execution of MOA): – Jan Newton, University of Washington

Steering Committee

(Governing Council per MOA): – David Martin, University of Washington (NANOOS PI) – Antonio Baptista, Oregon Health and Sciences University – Jack Barth, Oregon State University – Robert Bohlman, Marine Exchange of Puget Sound – Patrick Corcoran, Oregon Sea Grant Program – Mike Kosro, Oregon State University – Greg McMurray, Oregon Dept of Land Conservation & Development – Ian Miller, Surfrider Foundation – Jay Pearlman, The Boeing Company – Terry Wright, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission

NANOOS Members

to date…

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Ocean Inquiry Project Oregon Dept of Land Conservation & Development Surfrider Foundation The Boeing Company Oregon State University Puget Sound Action Team University of Washington WET Labs, Inc. 9.

Oregon Health and Science University 10. Quileute Indian Tribe 11. Oregon Dept of Geology and Mineral Industries 12. Humboldt University 13. Marine Exchange of Puget Sound 14. Washington State Dept of Ecology 15. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

NANOOS Members

to date…

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Ocean Inquiry Project Oregon Dept of Land Conservation & Development Surfrider Foundation The Boeing Company Oregon State University Puget Sound Action Team University of Washington WET Labs, Inc.

9.

Oregon Health and Science University 10. Quileute Indian Tribe 11. Oregon Dept of Geology and Mineral Industries 12. Humboldt University 13. Marine Exchange of Puget Sound 14. Washington State Dept of Ecology 15. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

NGO State Gov’t Industry Academia/Research Tribes

A brief history of NANOOS

• • • • • • • • Received $100K 1 st year planning grant from NOAA Coastal Services Center (late 2003)

Pacific Northwest Regional Ocean Observing System Workshop I:

23-24 October 2003, Portland State University, Portland, OR

– Signed a Charter establishing NANOOS – Appointed a Steering Committee Two pilot proposals submitted to NOAA CSC; one funded regarding estuaries and coasts NANOOS Governance Workshop II: 5-7 May 2004, Oregon H&S Univ., Beaverton, OR – Gained consensus on Governance Structure and Approach – Held a User Needs Forum – Gained consensus response on prioritization for federal and regional activity Received 2 nd year developmental grant from NOAA with support for Coordinator Hired NANOOS Coordinator on 1 November 2004 3 rd year developmental proposal recommended for funding by NOAA FY ’05-06 NANOOS System Design Workshop III: 28 Feb-1 Mar 2005, NOAA-PMEL, Seattle, WA – Gained input on priority user needs – Gained input on system design responsive to user needs

NANOOS Governance Structure

Steering Committee NANOOS Coordinator DMAC Education Workshops Other NANOOS Priorities User/Stakeholder Outreach

Users Advisory Group Governing Council Executive Committee

Officers, NANOOS Executive Director, Standing Committee Chairs Standing Committees: Operations Committee Data/Information Management and Communications Committee Modeling and Analysis Product Committee Science and Research Committee Education and Outreach Committee Nominating Committee

B A

System Design: strategy

•

Integrate what we have:



NANOOS Pilot project

•

Strategize to build what we need:



Prioritize NANOOS backbone and RCOOS

20

“A Pilot Coastal Ocean Observatory for the Estuaries and Shores of Oregon and Washington”

Goal: Regional integration and expansion of existing but disparate observation and modeling capabilities for the estuaries and shores of Oregon (OR) and Washington (WA).

       Explore and advance the following objectives: Create a regional observation network Create a regional modeling system Create a cross-site information system Create cross-site quality metrics Develop cross-training mechanisms Proactively engage regional and local communities Proactively participate in the design of:   A river-to-ocean NANOOS A national IOOS

NANOOS Pilot Marine Monitoring Components

Willapa Bay, WA South Slough Estuary, OR Puget Sound, WA Columbia River Estuary

Salinity Vision • Marine data & forecasts aboard every vessel • Every vessel as a data source NANOOS Pilot Project •Demonstrated feasibility •Seeks partnerships NANOOS-CORIE forecast at sensor depth Sensor in vessel (real-time) NANOOS-CORIE forecast at sea surface OGI02 • M/V Forerunner • F/V Piky • R/V Wecoma OGI01

System Design

GOAL: To identify and prioritize user-driven data products and design the observational system that can be responsive to these needs.

In 3 rd Planning Workshop, we gained input on:

* What are the specific, prioritized data products and who are the users who need these? * Based on these prioritized products, what variables are needed?

* Given the priority variables identified, what are the system design priorities (location, measurement capabilities, phasing, etc.) for various technologies: Buoys; HF; Satellite infrastructure; Surveys; Other platforms; Models; Data output ?

Based on this and other input, a system design “vision document” will be drafted, compiling and synthesizing the information, and will be used for outreach and further refinement.

ID of PNW User Groups

From NOAA/NANOOS analysis:

• Marine shipping and oil transport/spill remediation • Search and rescue • Shellfish fishery and aquaculture • Marine recreation • Natural resource/environmental management • National and homeland security • Finfish aquaculture • Research institutions • Education • Commercial groundfishing • Crab fishery

Potential Roles of Industry (You’re here today to help define) Table for IOOS/West Coast Industry Meeting Industry R o l e s i n O c e a n O b s e r v i n g

User Data/Infra Comp/Tech Integrator Operator Shipping Software Cruise Ship Petroleum Aquaculture Shipbuilders Electricity Water Desalinization Enviro. Pred ’n Agriculture Ocean tech Com Fish Rec Fish Insurance Tourism Aerospace Oceanroutes x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Value Added x x