Transcript LC - NNPHI
WASHINGTON STATE
BUILDING QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT
LESSONS LEARNED
Rita Schmidt
Department of Health
Jane Lee
Department of Health
POPULATIONS SERVED
Whatcom
193,100
San Juan
Okanogan
Skagit
16,300
Ferry
Pend
Stevens Oreille
7,800
44,000 12,900
Northeast
Tri County
40,500
118,900
Island
Clallam
80,300
704,300
Jefferson
Kitsap
37,600
Seattle - King
247,600
Mason
Kittitas
Tacoma - Pierce
Thurston
249,800
Pacific
21,800
Wahkiakum
Lincoln
Spokane
10,450
465,000
Adams
Whitman
18,000
43,300
1,909,300
56,800
71,200
4,100
72,600
Chelan -Douglas
29,000
Grays Harbor
6,668,200
Snohomish
69,500
39,900
Grant
86,100
813,600
Lewis
Yakima
75,200
238,400
Cowlitz
99,600
Clark
431,200
Garfield
2,250
Columbia
72,700
4,100
Asotin
Walla Walla
21,500
169,300
Benton - Franklin
59,200
Skamania
10,800
Washington State
Total Population
April 2009
Klickitat
20,200
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT DEVELOPMENT
1993 Public Health Improvement Partnership Lawlanguage promotes performance improvement
1995-2010 Development of Public Health
Standards and Measurement Processes
2005-6 MLC 1 Projects for improvement on
Standards using QI strategies
2007-8 MLC 2 QI Projects and Collaborations
2008-11 MLC 3 QI Collaboration-three target
areas
BUILDING BLOCKS FOR
IMPROVING PERFORMANCE
HEALTH INDICATORS
- How healthy are we?
- How does our health compare to others?
- What specific problems could we address
Population level data
STANDARDS AND MEASURES
- What should a health department be able to do?
- Do we provide basic expected functions?
- How do we compare to others?
- Where do we need to improve?
System/organization level data
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS –
PROGRAM/SERVICE BASED
- How can we improve the work we do, that will result
in better health or protection?
ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES
- What does local public health do and how is it done?
Example: Number of food safety inspections,
WIC clients served, health assessments conducted
Service-level data
Levels of QI Integration
Level 1- No interest or activities
Level 2- Awareness, interest and one-time projects
Level 3- Multiple teams and QI tools, but no repetition
or saturation
Level 4- Specific QI model integrated into agency
management structure with continuous
improvement
Bill Riley and Russell Brewer
MLC 1 -Awareness and one time projects
QI Projects
Improvements that address results from the 2005
Performance Assessment
System –wide improvement priority to:
Identify goals, objectives, and performance measures and
establish regular monitoring, reporting, and use of results
QI Training-one day, additional day of consultation on
site
Funding-$4000 for 3 system wide projects
6 Months follow-up phone calls
QI Projects
Grant County -All the Standards related to Access
Cowlitz- Improvement in performance and processes on all standards
that apply to Child and Family Health
Garfield County - All the Standards that apply to the Immunizations
Program
Tacoma Pierce County- Quality Improvement processes and plan
DOH Office of the Secretary- Quality Improvement processes and
plan
Lessons Learned
Money matters
Follow-up can make a big difference
Teaching how to build infrastructure
creates sustainability-Quality Councils
Building infrastructure works better if
there is continuity of staff
MLC 2- Multiple Teams, tools, no repetition
QI Projects funded
Focus: Improvement identified in the 2005 assessment
QI training, and coaching
Collaborative work groups
Selected Target Areas
Training in logic models
QI methods, which they will apply to identify appropriate
measures for a few statewide health indicators.
QI Projects
8 Projects-focused on program work
Development of Logic Models, use of data, communicable
disease
2 Projects focused on building QI infrastructure
Spokane
Mason County
3 Collaborations around focused topics
Immunizations-2 counties
Chlamydia-2 counties
Birth Certificates-Hospital and DOH
Lessons Learned
Money definitely matters
Monthly follow-up sustains projects
Collaboration improves outcomes
Content experts make a difference
Quality improvement isn’t always the
“right” strategy-Ex: Birth Certificate
Project
MLC 3-Some Repetition and integration into
agency structures
Nine Projects –selected through RFP Process
Overlap with legislative mandate
Investigation of notifiable conditions
Improvement of immunization rates
Reduce obesity and risk for chronic disease
Health
problems identified through data
Additional
funding received for prenatal care
Funding- Each project receives $12,000 a year for
2.5 years
PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
Senior leadership involvement and support
Community partnerships
Team effort
Participation in web conferences with peer project
teams and Learning Congresses
Review and understand data
Community involvement and partnerships
OVERALL PROGRESS TO DATE
AIM statements
Web conference sessions every six weeks with
consultants
Work plans
State participation on each team
Learning Congress - August 2009
For three of the projects-part of larger agency-wide
QI efforts
MLC3 Lessons Learned - Projects
Teams of 4-7 people kept everyone motivated
Prizes can make a difference
Aim statements are difficult to write and take time
Start with a small idea for improvement
Know the population you are targeting for improvement
Need better access to best practices
Staff like the opportunity to work on special projects
Projects put on “back burner” with H1N1
Staffing changes significantly affect the project success
MLC3 Lessons Learned - Consultation
Emphasize and teach the Breakthrough Method for
Collaboratives so everyone will understand the process
Plan for support if a crisis arises, such as H1N1 or the
economic downturn
Consider alternating content expertise with QI expertise
Ensure that the Collaborative has sufficient support from
state-level or other (PHI) staff
Plan for several Learning Sessions for the Collaborative
WHAT WORKS IN WASHINGTON
Provide training on Quality Improvement
Provide funding-even if small
Create Quality Councils and infrastructure
Use the collaborative method and provide regular
training
Create projects with similar aims
Connect to other initiatives and work
Involve Leadership
THANK YOU
RWJ and NNPHI
for the support to make a difference