Transcript Diabetes
Diabetes is emerging as the dominant healthcare epidemic Source: Diabetes Atlas 3rd Edition. www.eatlas.idf.org. Last accessed 25 January 2007 The Tale of Two Epidemics AIDS RELATED DEATHS 1990 - 2009 (UNAIDS 2010) • SA prevalence Diabetes = 5.5% • Direct cause of death = 4.3% • Contributory to 14% IHD, 12% hypertensive, 12% renal + 10% stroke deaths • Glycemic Control: 37% of patients have HbA levels < 7.0% • Metabolic Control: 20% achieve HbA + BP + Lipid targets (SAMJ 2007) HIV vs DM in SA • • • • • • • • Absolute No (m) Mortality Rank Mortality Growth Rate ARV vs OHA/Ins (%) VL vs HbA control (%) Medication vintage Advocacy 1 Advocacy 2 • • • • • • • • 6 vs 4 1 vs 6 1 vs 3 37 vs 66 90 vs 30 2010 vs 1947 TAC vs SA Diabetes Guidelines HIV vs DM Cost of DM Care • US 2006: $1 in $7 / $ 200 billion • OPD: 15% / consultations / laboratory / medications • In-Patients: 85% / complications / investigations / procedures / medications Poor Glucose Control in SA • • • • • Many patients Many undiagnosed Few health personnel Poorly skilled personnel Poorly resourced clinics • Reduced patient contact time (40 min per year) • Poor uptake / application of lab testing (30 % have regular tests) • Delay in treatment change / up-titration • Sub-optimal medication Diabetes “Re-thinking the Failure” Defining Mental Retardation “ achieve no result, persist in doing the same and expect and different outcome” (Albert Einstein) UKPDS 35: Higher HbA1c is associated with increased micro- and macrovascular complications in T2DM Each 1% rise in mean HbA1c was associated with – 21% risk increase for any diabetes endpoint (p<0.0001) – 21% risk increase for diabetes-related mortality (p<0.0001) – 14% risk increase for myocardial infarction (MI) (p<0.0001) – 37% risk increase for microvascular complications (p<0.0001) 140 Any diabetes endpoint 120 Adjusted event rate / 1,000 person years • 100 80 Microvascular complications 60 Diabetes-related morbidity 40 MI 20 0 <6% 67% 78% 89% 910% ≥10% Mean HbA1c concentration (%) Stratton IM, et al. BMJ 2000;321:405–12 Diagnosis – Fasting Glucose • Insulin Resistance • > 5.6 mmol/l • Pre-Diabetes • > 6.0 mmol/l • Diabetes • > 7.0 mmol/l T2 DM and Primary Prevention Parameter Success Rate • Weight Loss • <5% • Exercise • <5% Type 2 Diabetes and Primary Prevention ADA CONCENSUS 2007 TREAT PRE-DIABETES (IFG / IGT) LIFESTYLE LIFESTYLE + METFORMIN Age < 60 y Risk Factors (BP, Lipids, BMI) HbAic > 6 % Cost Analysis DPP 10 y FU: Lifestyle vs Metformin:: +$1500 vs -$30 [ADA 71st 2011] Effects of intensive glucose lowering in T2DM ACCORD Standard therapy Intensive therapy 9.0 8.5 HbA1c (%) 8.1% 8.0 7.5% 7.5 7.0 6.4% 6.5 6.0 0 0 1 2 3 Years Gerstein et al. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2545–59 4 5 6 Effects of intensive glucose lowering in T2DM ACCORD Patients with events (%) Standard therapy Intensive therapy 25 First occurrence of non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke or CV death 25 Death from any cause 20 HR (CI) 0.90 (0.78, 1.04) p=0.16 20 HR (CI) 1.22 (1.01, 1.46) p=0.04 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 0 1 2 3 Years 4 Gerstein et al. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2545–59 5 6 0 1 2 3 Years 4 5 6 Side-effects of intensive glucose lowering ACCORD Hypothesis: Standard therapy Intensive therapy Hypoglycaemia* 261 (5.1) 830 (16.2) <0.001 713 (14.1) 1399 (27.8) <0.001 p-value N (%) Weight gain >10kg N (%) Drug interaction 70% of non-insulin-treated and 60% of insulin-treated patients were taking three or more oral antidiabetic drugs at study end *hypoglycaemia defined as requiring any assistance Gerstein et al. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2545–59 Potential mechanisms of hypoglycaemia-induced mortality Cardiac arrhythmias due to abnormal cardiac repolarisation in high-risk patients (IHD, cardiac autonomic neuropathy) Increased thrombotic tendency/decreased thrombolysis Cardiovascular changes induced by catecholamines • Increased heart rate • Silent myocardial ischaemia • Angina and myocardial infarction GLP 1 Mimetics The Virtuous Therapeutic Cycle GLUCOSE CONTROL HbA = 7 % WEIGHT LOSS NO HYPOGLYCEMIA Diabetes Therapy - Safety • • • • Hypoglycemia Weight gain CVS mortality Cancer Strategic Rx ADVERSE AE / PE Wt Gain POSITIVE Hypo’s Wt Loss Met (3) no no yes=no BPLipids etc yes=no SU (0) yes yes no no Pio (2) yes no no yes DPP (3) no no yes>no yes>no GLP1 (4) no no yes yes OHA and CV Protection • Metformin (UKPDS) • MI reduction 39% (vs insulin / chlor / gliben • Rosi / TZD (RECORD) • MI increased (OR 1.43) • Tolbu / SU (UGDP) • CV mortality increased by 30% SU vs Met SU (Schramm T et al, Eur Heart J, April 2011) Glimiperide Increase AllIncrease MI, All Cause Mortality CVD, Stroke 32 % 21 % Glibenclamide 19 % 12 % Glipizide 27 % 17 % Tolbutamide 28 % 27 % [Conclusion: Metformin = protective? vs some SU bad?] DM and Cancer • Medications for DM can affect cancer risk and outcome - ? Insulin ? Pioglitazone • Metformin reduces cancer risk • Sulfonylurea: probably no effect • GLP-1 agonists: currently unknown but seemingly safe GLP-1 and DPP-41 DPP-4 His Plasma t½ = 1–2 min (IV) Ala Glu Gly Thr Phe Thr Ser Asp 7 Val 9 CL = 5–10 L/min Ser Lys Ala Ala Gln Gly Glu Leu Tyr Ser Glu 36 Phe Ile Ala Trp Leu Val Lys Gly Ala CL=clearance rate; DPP-4=dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1=glucagon-like peptide-1; IV=intravenously. 1. Vilsbøll T et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(1):220–224 NH2 Incretin Therapy DPP 4 • • • • Sitagliptin ^ Vildagliptin* Alogliptin Saxagliptin GLP1 • • • • • [*Available / ^ Imminent in SA] Exenatide* Liraglutide ^ Exenatide LAR Albuglutide Taspoglutide Incretin - GLP 1 Therapy • Stimulates insulin secretion • Insulin secretion is glucose dependent • Inhibits glucagon secretion • Increases beta cell mass • Delays gastric emptying • Inhibits appetite • Secretogogue • No hypoglycemia • Reduces meal-related glucose peaks • Maintains beta cell reserve • Reduces meal-related peaks; reduces weight • Reduces weight Liraglutide in combination with metformin presents a low risk of hypoglycaemia Minor hypos/patient/year 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Liraglutide 1.2 mg Liraglutide 1.8 mg Placebo Glimepiride • Minor hypoglycaemic events are at the placebo level (LEAD 2, above) • There is a small but increased risk of minor hypoglycaemia when combined with SUs (1.0 events per subject every second year; LEAD 1) Nauck et al, Diabetes Care, published online 10.23 37/dc08-1355 (LEAD 2) and Marre et al. Diabetes 2008;57(Suppl. 1):A4 (LEAD 1). A quarter of patients lose an average of 7.7 kg with liraglutide Weight change (kg) 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 ≤Q1 Q1-Q2 Q2-Q3 >Q3 Q3-Q4 Liraglutide 1.8 mg + met 0–Q1: mean weight change for the 25% of subjects who had the largest weight loss Q1–Q2: mean weight change for the 25–50% weight loss quartile Q2–Q3: mean weight change for the 50–75% weight loss quartile Q3–Q4: mean weight change for the 75–100% weight loss quartile, that is, the 25% who had the smallest weight loss Nauck et al, Diabetes Care, published online 10.23 37/dc08-1355 (LEAD 2). Sustained weight reduction over 52 weeks with liraglutide ***p<0.0001 for change from baseline 52 *** *** • Waist circumference was reduced from baseline by 3.0 cm with liraglutide 1.8 mg • Waist circumference increased by 0.4 cm with glimepiride (p<0.0001) Glimepiride 8 mg/day Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day Garber et al, The Lancet, early online publication, 25 Sept 2008 (LEAD 3). Liraglutide reduces visceral body fat Visceral vs. subcutaneous fat CT scan 3 +1.1 kg (+0.4%) 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -1.6* (-1.1%*) -2.4* (-1.2%*) Liraglutide 1.2 mg + met Change in percentage fat (%) Change in body fat, kg (%) Change in body fat DEXA scan 10 Visceral Subcutaneous +3.4 5 0 5 -10 -4.8 -15 -7.8* -8.5* -20 -25 -16.4 -17.1 Liraglutide 1.8 mg + met • Two thirds of weight lost was fat tissue (liraglutide 1.8 mg) Data are mean±SEM; *p<0.05 vs. glim+met; n=160. LEAD 2 substudy, originally presented as Jendle et al. Diabetes 2008;57(Suppl. 1):A32. Glimepiride + met Liraglutide improves beta-cell function as measured by HOMA-B and proinsulin:insulin ratio Baseline 56.4% 70.6% 45.5% 56.3% 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.42 HOMA (%) p=0.0033 Liraglutide Liraglutide 1.8 mg 1.2 mg Change in proinsulin:insulin p=0.0313 RosiPlacebo glitazone Marre et al. Diabetes 2008;57(Suppl. 1):A4 (LEAD 1). Data are mean±2SE. Liraglutide Liraglutide RosiPlacebo 1.8 mg 1.2 mg glitazone Diabetes Care – Future? 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Pre-Diabetes CVD Protection Cancer Hypoglycemia Weight Disease Modifying • • • • • • Metformin Metformin, TZD, GLP1 Metformin Metformin, TZD, GLP1 Metformin, GLP1 GLP1