Transcript Document

Month
Aug.
Sept.
Day
26
28
2
4
9
11
16
18
23
Topic
Introduction
The ecosystem concept
Climate/soils
Soils II
Ecosystem energy
balance
Water cycling
Carbon
GPP/NPP
NEP
C,M&M
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
6
Mg C ha-1 yr -1
Climate controls over NPP
25

20
 


  


   

 


l

 l


 l l






 
l
 
15
10
5    

0




0

2000





l

4000
6000
8000
Mean Annual Precipitation (mm)
•
At a global scale, NPP is strongly correlated with ppt and T
•
Water increases plant growth in drier ecosystems. Also
increases decomposition and nutrient cycling.
•
In very wet ecosystems, ppt can limit NPP by decreasing
light or nutrient availability
Climate controls over NPP
Mg C ha-1 yr -1
25

20
15


10

5
 
0
-15 -10 -5




l




l
 


  l

   l 


  


  
0
5











  

10 15 20 25 30
Mean Annual Temperature (ºC)
• Temperature is related to growing season length
• Temperature stimulates decomposition and nutrient
cycling.
25
25

Mg C ha-1 yr -1
Mg C ha-1 yr -1
Climate controls over NPP
20
 


  

   

 


l
 l
l l





 
l
 
15
10
5    
  



0 
0

2000





l

4000
6000

20
15


10

5
 
8000
Mean Annual Precipitation (mm)
0
-15 -10 -5



l





l
 


  l


   l 
    

  
0
5











  

10 15 20 25 30
Mean Annual Temperature (ºC)
In ecosystems where correlations suggest a strong climatic
limitation of NPP, experiments and observations indicate
that this is mediated primarily by climatic effects on
belowground resources.
Resource control
• Proximate control over NPP is availability of
resouces
• Light, CO2, H2O, nutrients (N,P,K,Mg,Ca,…)
• Many ecosystems increase NPP when N or P
fertilizer is added.
• Some ecosystems increase NPP when CO2 or H2O
is added.
• Where T has been manipulated, NPP doesn’t
respond directly.
Vitousek and Farrington 1997
Variation in NPP
Global Potential Net Primary Productivity
Mg C ha -1 yr-1
Biome Differences in NPP (Terrestrial)
• Length of the growing season is the major factor
that explains biome differences in NPP
• Differences in leaf area account for most of the
variation in biome NPP within a growing season
• Leaf area, in turn, is determined by soil resources,
climate, and time since disturbance
• Disturbance substantially modifies the relationship
between NPP and climate
NEP is the balance between two large fluxes:
GPP and ecosystem respiration
Ecosystem Carbon Balance
Net Ecosystem Production (NEP) =
GPP - Recosys
Recosys= Resp. of plants, animals, and
soil microbes
Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) is fairly similar, but…
Remember to check the
sign convention!
Sensu Chapin et al. 2006
Flux to ecosystem
Ecosystem accumulating C-sink
Is + NEE
accumulation of
C in the
ecosystem, or in
the atmosphere?
Ecosystem loosing C-source
Flux to atmosphere
Valentini et al. 1998
Ecosystem Carbon Balance
Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance (NECB) =
Net rate of C accumulation or loss
dC/dt
Sensu Chapin et al. 2006
Ecosystem Carbon Balance
Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance (NECB) =
GPP - Recosys  other C transfers
Recosys= Resp. of plants, animals, and soil
microbes
NECB = NPP  Flateral
-Rheterotrophic
-Fdisturb
-Fleach
-Femiss
Ecosystem
Ecosystem Carbon Balance
+
NEP
0
-
(a very long) time
Atmosphere
Steady state = NEP near zero
Inputs = outputs
Ecosystem Carbon Balance
• Positive NECB; GPP > Recosys + other C losses;
•ecosystem is removing C from the atmosphere = C
sink
• Negative NECB; GPP < Recosys + other C losses;
•ecosystem is releasing C to the atmosphere = C
source
• Factors that affect GPP and C losses differentially will
change NECB
• Increased CO2 and N deposition have greater
direct effect on GPP. Reduction in soil moisture in
a wetland may have a greater effect on Rheterotroph
and fire
GPP is invariant
across latitudes
As a result, NEE
decreases with
latitude
While Re
decreases as
latitude (T proxy)
increases
Valentini et al. 1998
Lecture ended here
Eddy Covariance (NEE)
Eddy Covariance Network
Net Ecosystem Exchange
Tower network observations show that most ecosystems
that have been measured are net sinks for CO2
1. Ecosystems may be typically net sinks of C in between
disturbance (no steady state)
2. Recent environmental changes such as increased atm. CO2
or N deposition may be stimulating GPP more than Recosystem
3. C loss through leaching and other transfers may be an
important component of regional C balance
4. Mid-successional ecosystems with high NPP may be over
represented in the network
Ecosystem
Ecosystem Carbon Balance
+
NEP
0
-
time
Atmosphere
Net Biome Production (NBP) = NECB, integrated
over large spatial scales to include removal of C
by fire and harvest
Sensu Schultze et al. 1997