Transcript Slide 1
Solving the ‘Spectrum Crisis’: Paths to Bandwidth Abundance Open Spectrum and White Spaces Technologies ICTP – University of Trieste, Italy March 12, 2014 Michael Calabrese Director, Wireless Future Program Open Technology Institute New America Foundation [email protected] Public Interest Spectrum Coalition Unlicensed Access to Vacant TV Channels was first advocated in the U.S. by NGOs to facilitate: Wireless broadband for rural and unserved areas: Economic development is increasingly linked to broadband access More robust Wi-Fi networks as both a complement (offload) and alternative (competition) to licensed carrier networks The U.S. NGO White Space Coalition included: • • • • • • • • • Consumer Federation of America Consumers Union Leadership Conference on Civil Rights EDUCAUSE (University CTOs) National Hispanic Media Coalition Free Press Public Knowledge New America Foundation Native Public Media . . . (and other groups) The Untethered User: Internet Everywhere • Ericsson: Mobile data traffic will grow 12X over next 5 years (2018) • Cisco VNI: Projects continued mobile data compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 66% for 2012 - 2017 • FCC: “The broadband spectrum deficit is likely to approach 300 MHz by 2014” • Mobile broadband take-up could double: 50% smartphone adoption (US/UK) 20% households own a tablet (US/UK) Conventional Wisdom: Spectrum is Scarce Reality: Government Licenses are Scarce Reality: Spectrum Bandwidth is Abundant (80% not in use < 3 GHz) The Great Disconnect: Scarcity Amidst Abundance Two Parallel Paths to Bandwidth Abundance: 1. Short Run: Wi-Fi Offload on Unlicensed Bands 2. Longer Run: ‘Use it or Share it’ – Dynamic Spectrum Access to underutilized bands (both licensed and Government spectrum) “Spectrum Crisis”? Why Mobile Carriers Can’t Meet Demand • Running out of spectrum for exclusive licensing All prime spectrum is assigned Takes too long and too expensive to clear for auction • Cell site bottleneck limits spectrum re-use Cell sites increasing < 15% / year Mobile data demand increasing > 60% / year • Mobile market competition More competing carriers requires more total spectrum • Unwillingness to invest where returns are positive but bring down average ARPU/ROI (rural areas) Wi-Fi to the Rescue: Offloads Surging Mobile Device Traffic Wi-Fi offload > 50% of total mobile data in U.S. -- more in Europe Observed and Projected Mobile Data Offload (EC Study, 8/13) Cumulative UK, Germany, France, Italy Nomadic is the New Mobile • The difference between wireline and wireless is blurring . . . • Critical to distinguish two types of “mobile”: Truly mobile (on the go) Nomadic (home, work, café, outdoors near a wire) “Relatively little smartphone data usage is truly mobile.” – European Commission study (Aug. 2013) Mobile device use by location: Two-thirds at home or work (15% on the go) Nomadic Apps Drive Demand • Video is driving mobile device traffic – a majority now (Verizon) and twothirds by 2016 (Cisco) • > 85% is watched indoors – and even more near a wired LAN • Already surveys show 80% of consumers prefer to connect via Wi-Fi (cheaper, faster, easier, more reliable) Preferred Network Access: Wi-Fi or Cellular? Wi-Fi is a Windfall for Mobile Carriers as Well • Consumer Federation of America Study: > $20B savings per year • European Commission: For EU-27, $35B Euros now, $200B/year by 2016 Scarcity to Abundance: Small Cells and Open Spectrum • As high-capacity wireline networks become ubiquitous, mobile devices can transmit data short distances, at low power, over shared spectrum, and into less traffic-sensitive wired networks – replacing the “spectrum crunch” with bandwidth abundance. • Wireline ISPs recognize this . . . They are provisioning dense Wi-Fi hotspot networks and lobbying for more unlicensed spectrum. Carrier-Provisioned Wi-Fi Networks Blanketing Urban Areas Worldwide • BT Wi-Fi > 5 million hotspots in UK 500,000 in London 7 sq. mile WMAN central London Part of FON Consortium’s > 8 million hotspots • Free Mobile (France) > 4 million hotspots Built on wireline subs of parent, Iliad • China Mobile > 2 million Projecting 70% offload rates • U.S. Cable Consortium (5 companies) 200,000 hotspots (mostly outdoors/urban) Comcast: Adopting FON model ~ potential 20 million hotspots Needed: More Open Spectrum for Community Networking and Rural Areas Location, Location, Location! TV Band Spectrum (< 1 GHz) is uniquely valuable: - Larger Coverage Areas - Lower Infrastructure Costs - Better In-Building Penetration Unlicensed Spectrum Enables Small Business WISPs to Serve Rural and Other Unserved Areas WISPs in the U.S. Approx 2,000 Serve approx. 3 million people in rural, small town, unserved areas Most are small, local businesses Often the only local ISP TVWS allows WISPs to expand coverage of unserved areas at affordable prices TVWS: Cost-Effective Community Networks Targeting Unserved Rural Areas In a rural, forested and rugged Maryland County, wireless backhaul from distant State fiber to TVWS base station hubs . . . . . . will connect 3,000 unserved homes and businesses to > 3 mbps Wi-Fi service for $30/month. 20 AIR.U: University of West Virginia TV White Space Network Blankets University tram system with Wi-Fi Connectivity • • • University W. Virginia Personal Rapid Transit System White Space Network Extends Public Wi-Fi Internet Access (Fixed & Mobile) 15,000 Student/Faculty Commuters per day 3.5 miles of track – 5 station platforms PRT route identified in orange 21 What’s Next for White space and DSA? M2M: Sensor Networks, Smart Home, Mobile Payments 22 7/17/2015 What’s Next for White Space? • Text – subtext 23 7/17/2015 What’s Next for White Space and DSA? • Text – subtext 24 7/17/2015 Extending the Wi-Fi Model: Use it or Share it U.S. National Broadband Plan (2010): “The FCC should spur further development and deployment of opportunistic uses across more radio spectrum.” (p. 95) Licenses are for exclusive use … not non-use. Under Communications Act, unused capacity remains available to the public. Proposal: Identify and open the most underutilized and useful bands for opportunistic sharing on a secondary basis . . . . . . Subject to band-by-band conditions protecting incumbent uses from interference: • • • • • Transmit power limits Geographic exclusion zones Coordination with geolocation database (“connected devices”) Sensing/DFS Remote preemption/updating/disabling (“policy radios”) PCAST: Overarching Recommendations President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology (PCAST) advised President Obama to: • Issue an Executive Order stating the USG policy is to share underutilized Federal spectrum (issued June 2013) • Identify 1,000 MHz of Federal spectrum for sharing with the private sector, starting with the 3550-3700 MHz band (FCC rulemaking opened Dec. 2012) Create shared-use Spectrum Superhighways: • 3 tiers of access to Underused Federal Bands • Expand on TVDB to develop a Spectrum Access System to enforce band-by-band “rules of the road” (interference protections) • Emphasize small cell, low-power, spectrum re-use 26 PCAST: 3-Tier Hierarchy of Access Spectrum Access System Dynamic Spectrum Access Spectrumsensing Input(s) Secure band-byband Database Input(s) Frequency Query Secure DSA Geo-location Database Registered Base Station Available Frequency List Advantages of Building on the TV Bands Database No permanent assignments, no stranded users o Any band or channel can be listed for access – then de-listed Access to additional bands can be subject to unique access/operating conditions (e.g., TTLs: time-to-live) Preemption, shut down and priority access can protect primary operations Any ‘Tragedy of the Commons’ can be avoided o A ceiling on the noise floor: At any time/place, access can be limited or rationed via micro-payments Devices can sense and share data on spectrum environment (improving QoS) Dynamic Device Management: SAS can help manage cooperative sharing (e.g., variable power) PCAST: Shared Use Spectrum Superhighway NTIA ‘Fast Track’ Bands: 12 bands identified and prioritized, 950 MHz of which is contiguous (2700 to 3650 MHz) Source: NTIA, “Second Interim Progress Report on the Ten-Year Plan and Timetable,” October 17, 2011 What’s Next for White Space 3.5 GHz NPRM: “Citizens Broadband Service” FCC’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making: FCC: “Modeled on the spectrum access framework proposed in the PCAST Report.” “Three-tiered licensing/interference protection framework”: o Incumbent Access (Federal primaries) o Priority Access (50 mhz licensed by rule for “mission critical” indoor use) o General Authorized Access (opportunistic, but must register in SAS) “An SAS incorporating a dynamic database and, potentially, other mitigation techniques . . . Modeled after TVWS database” Priority Access and GAA would be low power, small cell o Exception: Higher GAA power in non-congested areas (akin to 3650) What’s Next for White Space Extending 5 GHz Unlicensed FCC’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making: • Spectrum Act of 2012 required an FCC proceeding on unlicensed use of an additional 195 MHz by Feb. 2013 – Outdoor devices now permitted in 455 MHz (subject to DFS): • Proposed: 775 MHz contiguous, for indoor and outdoor use – to support wide-channel, high-capacity 802.11ac standard THANK YOU! QUESTIONS? Contact: Michael Calabrese Open Technology Institute New America Foundation [email protected] 33 7/17/2015