Transcript Commodity Chains and Marketing Strategies: Nike and the
Commodity Chains and Marketing Strategies: Nike and the Global Athletic Footwear Industry
Miguel Korzeniewicz, Ch. 18, pp. 163-172 (Excerpted from Korzeniewicz, “Commodity Chairs and Marketing Strategies…,” in Gereffi & Korzeniewicz, eds., Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism,1994) 1
Global Commodity Chains (GCC)
GCC
: the complex global network of economic links which ties together groups, organizations, and regions involved in the production and distribution of goods GCC analysis is a development of the world system or global-system perspective (which, themselves grow out of dependency theory) (Gereffi & Korzeniewicz, eds., Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, 1994) 2
GCC challenges idea that “development” in capitalism is contained within nation-states Development in context of capitalism is a
global process
GCC tracks the
organizational, geographical
, &
cultural
dimensions of world-wide chains for the manufacture & distribution of goods e.g.,clothing, automobiles, food, & drugs (Gereffi & Korzeniewicz, eds., Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, 1994) 3
Focusing on the
distribution
segment of GCC Inadequate attention has been paid to the
design
,
distribution
and
marketing
nodes within a GCC Yet these are often the sources of wealth in a commodity chain
innovation
that allows firms to capture greater shares of 4
Athletic footwear market shows how GCCs are embedded in cultural trends Marketing & consumption patterns in “core” shape production patterns in peripheral and semi-peripheral countries The social organization of advertising, fashion, and consumption shapes the networks & nodes of GCCs 5
Trends in the US Athletic Shoe Market
Continued phenomenal rates of growth Highly segmented by consumer age groups Teenagers the most important consumers Athletic shoes constructed and promoted among teens as important & visible symbol of
social status
and
identity
6
Sports footwear market highly segmented by:
Consumer age group Model/target sport Price
Price
rather than appearance & functionality is the key factor differentiating athletic shoes as
status symbols
7
Nike Corporation has become the largest and most important sneaker company in the US In 2004, Nike’s share of market is 42% # 2: Adidas (27%) # 3: Reebok (12%) 8
The key to Nike’s rise?
ability to capture a succession of nodes along GCC, increasing its expertise and control over critical areas:
design
distribution
marketing
advertising
9
US Athletic Footwear Industry % Market Share by Sales Volume (2004) 12 6 5 3 2 111 27 42 Nike Adidas Reebok Puma New Balance Sketchers K-Swiss Vans Asics Saucony 10
The most fundamental industry innovation is the
creation of a market
constructing a convincing world of symbols, ideas, and values harnessing the desires of individuals to the consumption of athletic shoes
(165) 11
Pd. 1: Gaining control over import & distribution nodes of GCC (1962-1975) Nike sells tens of millions of sneakers in the US annually, yet all manufacturing operations are conducted overseas Nike begins importing shoes from Japan Nike concentrates its design, distribution, and marketing activities in the US 12
Nike is the archetype of a global sourcing strategy:
subcontracting
Nike
originated
Japan by importing shoes from It has subcontracted nearly all of its production overseas ever since Nike’s VP for Asia-Pacific: “We don’t know the first thing about manufacturing.” 13
Pd. 2: Marketing as an
upgrading
strategy (1976-1984)
Nike enhances competitive position by extending control to marketing Nike redesigns subcontracting strategy to seize new opportunities in Southeast Asia First in South Korea & Taiwan Later, China, Thailand, and Indonesia 14
Pd. 3: Design, advertising, and return to the
semiperiphery
(post-1985)
Another period of high growth based on innovations in product design and advertising “Air Nike” comes out Nike signs its most popular endorser, Michael Jordan Continued targeting new niche markets e.g., aerobics & athletic apparel Subcontracting strategy changes again returns to South Korea for more specialized, sophisticated, and experienced manufacturers 15
Conclusions
Case study confirms a division of labor between core & peripheral/semi-peripheral countries Core specializing in services Periphery/semi-periphery specializing in manufacturing Korean and Chinese firms produce the actual shoe, as US-based Nike
promotes the symbolic nature of the shoe
– and appropriates the greater share of value from sales 16