Transcript Document
Policy and programme lessons from the Multi-Country Evaluation (MCE) of IMCI
The MCE Team 1
Health systems Health worker performance
Others, 11% Measles, 1% AIDS, 3% Malaria, 9%
IMCI*: Good health for children
Neonatal, 33% Pneumonia, 21% Diarrhea, 22%
*
I
ntegrated
M
anagement of
C
hildhood
I
llness
Families and communities
2
MCE Objectives
Document IMCI implementation Measure IMCI impact on health and nutrition Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of IMCI Provide feedback to policy makers 3
Major impact on child health and nutrition was expected at country level
Introduction of IMCI Health system improvements Training of health workers Improved quality of care in health facilities Family and community interventions Improved household compliance/care Improved careseeking & utilization Improved preventive practices Increased coverage for curative & preventive interventions Improved health/nutrition Reduced mortality 4
MCE in-depth studies
• Bangladesh: – efficacy RCT of 10 IMCI x 10 comparison areas • Tanzania: – pre-post comparison of 2 IMCI x 2 comparison districts • Brazil: – comparison of 32 IMCI x 32 comparison municipalities • Uganda: – pre-post dose-response analysis of IMCI strength of implementation in 10 districts • Peru: – as in Uganda, for 25 departments 5
MCE step-wise approach
Are adequate services being provided?
at health facility level?
at community level?
Are these services being used by the population?
Have adequate coverage levels been reached in the population?
Is there an impact on health and nutrition?
6
IMCI leads to improvements in health worker performance 100 80 60 69 56 72 65 40 20 19 16 0 Bangladesh NE Brazil
Source: Paryio G, Schellenberg J et al
Tanzania Non-IMCI IMCI 13 29 Uganda
7
And can improve care quality at no extra cost Total spending on child health, Tanzania ('000s 1999 US$) 496 393 Cost per child correctly managed, Tanzania (1999 US$) $25 IMCI Non-IMCI $4 IMCI Non-IMCI Results from the Brazil MCE confirm that IMCI does not cost more than routine care
8
Is IMCI being provided at health facility level?
High training coverage has been reached in defined geographical areas Quality of training is usually good Difficulties in going to scale in relation to staff turnover and maintaining of quality of training Need for health systems support Drugs Supervision Referral District management skills 9
Utilization is often too low to achieve impact through facility-based services alone % sick children who were taken first to a government facility Bangladesh 8 Uganda 15 Tanzania
Source: Arifeen S, Paryio G, Schellenberg J et al
41
10
In Bangladesh, IMCI is associated with increases in health facility utilization IMCI Intervention IMCI Comparison 5 4 1 0 3 2
Data source: MCE-Bangladesh, Routine MIS and GoB MIS But no other MCE site was able to replicate this effect…… 11
100
But coverage for key community interventions remains low in most countries Population coverage for key family practices Uganda MCE – 10 districts
75 50
40 2001 2002 36
25
15 11
0 Child with fever received antimalarials Source: Paryio G et al Child slept under bednet last night
33 32
Measles vaccination 12
In Peru, facility and community IMCI were not implemented in the same departments
120 100
Departmental coverage of IMCI-trained clinical and community workers (2003)
80 60 40 20 Each dot represents one department Similar results in Tanzania 0 0 10 20 30 40 Source: Huicho L et al
Trained clinical health workers (%)
50 60 13
Is IMCI being provided at community level?
Implementation is spotty and uncoordinated with health worker training Community case-management interventions not included Community IMCI includes too many messages These findings have helped generate increased focus on the implementation of community component of IMCI 14
Did IMCI have an impact on mortality?
15
Tanzania: underfive mortality was 13% lower in the two IMCI districts
35 30 25 20 15 10 Full IMCI in HF 13% difference 95% CI: -7%, 30% 1999-00
Morogoro (IMCI) Ulanga
End of study 2001-02
Rufiji (IMCI)
Significant impact on stunting
Kilombero
Source: Schellenberg J et al 16
IMCI: No apparent impact in Peru
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0
IMCI clinical training coverage (%) and underfive mortality reduction
Similar results in Brazil and Uganda 20 40
Training coverage
60 r= 0.048
P= 0.824
80 17
Summing up (1)
• IMCI improves quality of care • IMCI does not increase overall costs – Either for providers or out-of-pocket • IMCI dramatically reduces cost per child managed correctly • IMCI is the gold standard for facility care of children aged 7 days – 5 years 18
Summing up (2)
• IMCI can have an impact on mortality and nutrition • But this requires: – Strengthening health systems – Reaching out to the community • IMCI was least likely to be implemented well where it was needed most 19
What the MCE has contributed
• Feedback at national level • Repositioning IMCI in the context of child survival by WHO and other agencies • Lancet Child Survival Series + 30 papers • Increased advocacy for child survival 20
What the MCE has contributed
• The MCE showed that having interventions is not enough • The real challenge is how to deliver these interventions to those who need them most 21
IMCI and child health
• From MCE we know IMCI works in facilities!
• Requires adequate attention to health systems support and community coverage • MCE was not able to evaluate the effectiveness of the community component of IMCI • IMCI, as originally constructed, may not be the answer in every setting • IMCI is evolving!
22
Scaling up IMCI The Bangladesh experience
• Since these results first came out, IMCI has been scaled up to almost a fifth of Bangladesh, especially in high mortality areas • Quality of training and performance outcomes have been maintained • Initial focus on facility-based services, with increasing inclusion of health systems support and community interventions • Shift from strategy to programme 23
IMCI and child health CHILD HEALTH AND NUTRITION STRATEGY IMCI
24