Transcript Document

Protein Bioseparation - Classification
1. High-productivity, low resolution
2. High resolution, low productivity
3. High resolution, high productivity
Downstream Processing Profile
____________________________________________
Product
---------------------------------------Step
concentration; g/L
Quality, %
___________________________________________________________
Harvest broth
0.1 – 5
0.1 – 1.0
0.1 – 5
0.1 – 2.0
Primary isolation (Step 2)
5.0 – 10
1.0 – 10
Purification (Step 3)
50 - 200
50 – 80
(30 – 90)
Filtration/centrifugation (Step 1)
Formulation/drying etc (Step 4)
90 - 100
____________________________________________________________
Removal
Removal/separation of solids/particles/cells
Cell harvesting in microbial fermentation
Cell removal in animal cell culture
Methods
Settling/sedimentation used in large- scale waste treatment
processes and traditional fermentation industry. The supernatant
may still have some solid contents.
Centrifugation produces a cell-concentrated stream- referred as
cell cream with fluid behaviour. May have about 15% w/v solid
content.
Filtration produces more concentrated (dewatered) cell sludges.
May have upto 40% w/v solid content. The accumulated biomass
filter cake may provide filtration resistance. However, improved by
new technologies.
Selection of the method depends on starting broth, final desired
cell density and scale of operation.
RIPP
•Removal
Filtration
Centrifugation
Factors affecting separation/removal
Broth Characteristics high viscosities, gelatinous broth materials,
compressible filter cakes, particles with small density difference
compared to water, high degree of initial dispersion, and diluteness
of particulate suspension.
Source and bioreactor process bacterial, viral, fungal, plant ,
animal etc., batch or continuous process.
Separation improvements
Broth pretreatments designed to increase ease of cell separation include:
- cell aging, induce clumping of cells together
- heat treatment
- pH treatment
- addition of chemicals to enhance flocculation like calcium chloride,
clay, silica
- addition of polymers like polyelectrolytes
Filtration methods in Bioseparation
1. Direct filtration or dead-end filtration
2. Tangential flow filtration or cross-flow filtartion
Factors affecting
Vs. particle size
separation
Size
Cloth and fiber filters
Microfilters
Screens and strains
Ultrafiltration
Gel chromatography
Ultracentrifuges
Density
Centrifuges
Gravity sedimentation
Angstroms (Aº) 1
Millicrons (nm) 10-1
Microns (µm) 10-4
10
1
10-3
Ionic
range
102
10
10-2
103
102
10-1
Macromolecular
range
104
103
1
105
104
10
Micron
range
106
105
102
Fine
range
107
106
103
Course
range
Microfiltration
Microfiltration is a way of removing contaminants
in the size range of 0.1 to 10.0 µm from fluids or gases, by passage
through a microporous medium such as a membrane.
• Microfiltartion covers both: dead-end filtration and cross-flow filtration.
• Microfiltration is used in both production and analytical applications,
such as
- Filtration of particles from liquid or gas streams
for different industries, e.g.chemical or pharmaceutical
- Production of pure water
- Clarification and sterile filtration
- Waste water treatment
- Fermentations for bioseparations
Dead end and cross-flow filtration
Dead-end filtration: In the dead-end filtration technique all the fluid passes
through the membrane, and all particles larger than the pore size of the
membrane are retained at its surface. This means that the trapped particles
start to build up a "filter cake" on the surface of the membrane, which has an
impact on the efficiency of the filtration process.
Cross-flow filtration: In cross flow filtration, a fluid (feed) stream runs
tangential to a membrane, establishing a pressure differential across the
membrane. This causes some of the particles to pass through the membrane.
Remaining particles continue to flow across the membrane, "cleaning it".
In contrast to the dead -end filtration technique, the use of a tangential flow
will prevent thicker particles from building up a "filter cake".
Dead-end Filtration
All the fluid passes through the membrane and all particles larger
than the pore sizes of the membrane are stopped at its surface.
Their size prevents them from entering and passing through the
filter medium. This means that the trapped particles start to build up
a "filter cake" on the surface of the medium, which reduces the efficiency
of the filtration process.
Classical dead end filtration
Feed stock
Filter cake
Filtrate
•Cake formation limits filtrate flow
•Only for big suspended material
Filtering improvements
• Filtering aids
• pH
• Temperature
• Duration of fermentation
Cross-flow filtration
• The fluid (feed) stream runs tangential to the membrane, establishing
a pressure differential across the membrane.
• This causes some of the particles to pass through the membrane.
Remaining particles continue to flow across the membrane,
"cleaning it".
• The use of a tangential flow will prevent thicker particles from building
up a "filter cake".
Cross-flow filtration
Retentate
Feed
Permeate
•No cake formation
•Feed to retentate flow > > permeate flow
Cross-flow filtration separates substances by passing them through
semi-permeable membranes in hollow fibre or flat sheet formats.
1. Protein solutes are separated from insoluble material such as cells,
insoluble particles, etc.
2. Can be used for micro-, ultra- filtration depending on the size
of molecules to be separated.
3. Used for concentration or change of solvent
4. Also used for removal of viruses from biological solutions
Water
Proteins
Cells
• One stream in- two streams out technology
• Tangential flow parallel to membrane for cell removal
Cross-flow filtration
Pressure
Dead-end filtration
Pressure
Cross-flow
Permeate
Filtrate
Direct Flow Filtration Process
Tangential Flow Filtration Process
Why use cross-flow filtration?
•Easy to set up and use
•No cake formation
•Fast and efficient
•Concentrate and diafilter in the same system
•No scaling limitations- 10 ml to 1000 litres.
•Economical, Reusable
Applications of Tangential/Cross- Flow Filtration
•Cell harvesting
•Recover and removal of viruses
•Clarify cell lysates or tissue homogenates
•Recover and purify plasmid DNA from cell lysates or chromosomal
DNA from whole blood
•Recover antibodies or recombinant proteins from cell culture
media
•Concentrate and desalt, proteins, peptides, nucleic acids
Basic Cross-flow filtration process (batch)
Pressure control value
Feed
Retentate
Concentrate
Feed
CFF
pump
Permeate
Basic Cross-flow filtration process (continuous)
Feed
Concentrate
CFF
Feedpump
Feed
Permeate
Retentate
Microfiltration - Membranes
1845
1855
1962
1963
1963
1963
1964
1970
1970
1975
1979
1980
1981
1984
2000
Schoenbein
Nitrocellulose
Fick
Esters of cellulose-nitrocellulose
Gelman Instrument Co.
Cellulose tri-acetate
Sartorius Co.
Regenerated cellulose
Millipore, Gelman, Sartorius, S&S Polyvinyl chloride and polyamide
General Electric
Polycarbonate
Selas Flotronics
Silver membrane
Celanese Co.
Polypropylene
Gore Corp.
Polytetrafluoroethylene
MembranelEnka
Polypropylene
Gelman
Polysulfone
Millipore
Polyvinylidene fluoride
Nuclepore
Polyester
Norton Co.,
CeraverAlumina
Our research
Cryomembranes/acrylamide/PVA