Transcript Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders

PIN
Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders
Developments Dutch PIN Community
for the CIM user group meeting Prague 2011
Date: 11 May 2001
Richard Uijen (TenneT)
richard.uijen at tennet.eu
Subjects
PIN
• Who are we?
• Developments 2011
• Our ambitions for 2011
• CIM governance
2
17/7/15
PIN membership and associations
PIN
Goal
2010 Milan
• 5 Organizations
Dutch DSO profile that
is maximally derived
from international
standards
2011 Prague
• 7 Organizations
Talks with:
3
17/7/15
Subjects
PIN
• Who are we?
• Developments 2011
• Our ambitions for 2011
• CIM governance
4
17/7/15
Developments 2011 (1/2)
Covering vision, standards, governance
National
Re-use
SECTOR
Vision
PIN
Standards
Regulators
Taskforce
Intelligent
Grids
Main issue
Standards & Interoperability
Together, Dutch Grid Operators Connect
Share
Regional
EU Taskforce SG
International
FERC
Organize &
prioritize
Make &
harmonize
Regulate
5
17/7/15
Developments 2011 (2/2)
PIN
• 2010-07 Final document Dutch TF Smart Grid
• 2011-01 Final public consultation document Dutch TF Smart Grid
– PIN input was used for future steps on standards and
interoperability
Taskforce
Intelligent
Grids
• 2011-02/06 AgentschapNL is forming SG platform. Forseen tasks:
– Dutch Conceptual model.(similar to NIST)
– Selection criteria for standards and determine priorities
– Shortlist of relevant standards for the Netherlands
– Ensuring contribution on international standards
(Based on comply or explain on int. standards and best practices)
• DSO’s and TSO are no competitors, we seek synergy
6
17/7/15
Subjects
PIN
• Who are we?
• Developments 2011
• Our ambitions for 2011
• CIM governance
7
17/7/15
Our ambitions for 2011
PIN
Support the Dutch SG platform on:
• Delivering a set of standards with core and high relevance for the
Netherlands (incl. E-Govermental standards)
• Deliver a set of business issues which can be supported by those
standards. Examples of data exchange:
• between gridoperator and regulator (CODATA)
• between TSO an DSO
• between DSO and Serviceproviders
(= Project DURF digital exchange of revision data of grid components and topology)
• Delivering a set of selection-criteria for adopting standards
• Delivering a development-proces description that can be used by the
dutch grid operators.
8
17/7/15
Subjects
PIN
• Who are we?
• Developments 2011
• Our ambitions for 2011
• CIM governance
9
17/7/15
CIM Governance (1/4)
PIN
Applying CIM…
Before:
Project
Non-standard
interface
Time, knowledge and other constraints
Current:
Project
Architecture:
use standard
Time, knowledge and other constraints
Non-standard
interface
Desired:
Project
Architecture:
use standard
Knowledge
available
Standards
reused
Standardized
interface
10
17/7/15
CIM Governance (2/4)
Common
Information Model
Managed by
PIN
Experts
organized
Formal
representation
International
standardization
IEC CIM
CIM model
manager
CIMug
IEC 57
Regional
standardization
Regional CIM
Profile
Regional profile
manager
ENTSO-E Data
expert group
ENTSO-E
SDC/SOC/MC
National
standardization
National CIM
profiles
National model
manager
PIN
NEC 57 (NEN
working group)
Local
standardization
Local CIM
Local data
manager
Local CIM
experts
Participation in
groups
* CIM represents CIM and other standards like 61850, BAG (Dutch), GBKN (Dutch), KVK (Dutch), etc.
11
17/7/15
CIM Governance (3/4)
PIN
The idea…
Organized
knowledge
TC 57
National
standardization
committee
PIN
Subject
representative
Companies
12
17/7/15
CIM Governance (4/4)
PIN
Challenges to the PIN Group and to company standardization coordinators:
- How to unite the CIM (and other standards) knowledge in a kind of
competence center? How do you organize that?
- How to ascertain that CIM interpretations are the same within all parts of the
company / group of companies?
- How to organize business and IT stakeholders around the CIM? How do you
prevent ‘islands’ to be formed?
I would like to come back from Prague with a set of working (or best) practices.
13
17/7/15