Transcript APEGGA

Northern Pipelining &
Practical Experience
Presentation to:
APEGGA
April 21, 2005
Calgary
1
Topics
• Enbridge (NW) Pipeline System Overview
• “Northern” Pipeline Challenges and
Successes
• Maintenance and Monitoring
• Inspection and Integrity Management
• Reporting
• The people that make it possible
2
Quick Facts
Enbridge (NW) Pipeline System
Inuvik
Norman Wells
Wrigley
Ft. Simpson
•
•
•
•
•
Constructed: 1983 – 1985
Diameter: 323.8 mm
Length: 869 km
Design: Limit States
Features:
–
–
–
–
140 defined water crossings
2 major rivers
150 significant slopes
ambient temperature pipeline
• Design Pressure: 9930 kPa
Zama
3
Quick Facts
Enbridge (NW) Pipeline System
• Throughput: 30,000 BPD (4,800 m3/d)
• One shipper from Norman Wells to KP 839.2
Two shippers from there to KP 869 (Zama)
• Three (3) Pump Stations:
– 1 natural gas powered (NW)
– 2 diesel powered (WG & MC)
• Crude Characteristics:
–
–
–
–
Density = 827 kg/m3
Pour Point = -50° Celsius
RVP < = 103 kPag
Viscosity = 2.0 cSt.
Aerial View of Norman Wells
• Remote Operations from Edmonton
4
“Northern” Pipeline Challenges
Inuvik
Unique “Northern” P/L Issues
• Capital Cost
• Geography and Remote Access
• Permafrost
Norman Wells
Wrigley
Ft. Simpson
Zama
Enbridge Experience Applied to
Future Development
• Proven sub-surface
construction in permafrost
• Proven methods of monitoring
pipeline integrity
5
Norman Wells Successes:
Design Innovation
• Operating
temperatures
• Limit States
Design
– lower cost
– strain limit
0.5%
• Integrity
monitoring
6
Norman Wells Successes:
Permafrost Challenges Met
• Design
• Environmental/ Geotechnical
Ice Rich
– Right of Way
– trenching
7
Norman Wells Successes:
Slopes – Then and Now
• Design
• Environmental/
Geotechnical
1984
1997
– Right of Way
– trenching
– slope
stabilization
8
Experience:
Permafrost
Region requiring design consideration for permafrost
Conventional
pipeline design
and construction
Area of sporadic permafrost that
requires minimal pipeline design
and construction considerations
for permafrost
Map and Diagram from Geological Survey of Canada website
9
Norman Wells Successes:
Dealing with Ice
• Design
• Environmental/
Geotechnical
– Right of Way
– trenching
– slope
stabilization
– thaw
settlement /
frost heave
Ice lens
10
Inertial Inspection Runs –
GEOPIG
% Strain vs Time for Slope 92
3.5
3
Strain
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
Year
11
Integrity Management in
Permafrost
• Geo-Pig
12
Maintenance Activity –
Pipe Replacement
13
Maintenance Activities
Maintenance Activities
Refilling Propane Tanks
Backfilling ditch subsidence
Placing rock rip rap
Erosion control
Reseeding/revegetation
Overturning/cooling wood chips
Crib repairs
Brushing ROW
Pipeline maintenance
Stockpiling sandbags & granular
material
85/86





86/87






87/88







88/89











89/90









Lenth of Ditchline Backfilled
Length (km)
60
50
40
48
37
30
20
10
0
1986
1987
4
2
1988
1989
Year
14
Maintenance Activities to Present
Maintenance
Activities
ILI KP 0 to KP
336
ILI KP 336 to KP
586
ILI KP 586 to KP
869
Filling voids in
wood chip cover
Installation of
additional
instrumentation
Forest fire impact
remediation
Pipeline repairs
Bathymetric
surveys
90/91
91/92
92/93


93/94
94/95
95/96
96/97
97/98
98/99
99/00
00/01





























Note: ILI = In-Line Inspection
15
Monitoring Activities
Activity
Frequency/Monitoring Year
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Detailed Reconnaissance
September
September
September
September
September
Thaw Depth Investigation
October
Note 1
October
Note 1
October
Instrumentation Readings
Note 2
Note 2
Note 2
Note 2
Norman Wells
to Zama
Norman Wells
to Wrigley
Note 2
Norman Wells
to Mackenzie
Highway
Norman Wells
to Wrigley
Norman Wells
to Zama
Visual Reconnaissance
Inertial Geometry Tool
(GEOPIG)
Notes:
1. Unless an ongoing review of instrumentation and other data indicates a need for thaw probing at a particular slope, no probing
will be conducted in odd numbered years.
2. Instrumentation within 1 meter of the pipeline, for a distance of 140 km from Norman Wells, will be read on a monthly basis.
Remaining instrumentation will be read on a monthly or quarterly basis.
16
Reporting to Regulators
• Annual Reports
– Operations &
Maintenance Activities
– Condition of Pipeline
– Terrain Monitoring
– Slope Monitoring and
Performance
– Operations &
Monitoring Program
– Right-of-way
Assessment
17
Pipeline Maintenance
• Hauling propane to remote
area valve sites.
18
Field Personnel
• Employees are permanent residents of the
communities of Norman Wells and Ft. Simpson.
• They provide significant contributions to the quality
of life in the communities through their volunteer
activities.
• Successful and enduring positive northern
relationships are built and maintained on the basis
of mutual honesty, respect and trust.
19
Questions
20