Distribution and Properties of the ISM

Download Report

Transcript Distribution and Properties of the ISM

Heating and Cooling

10 March 2003 Astronomy G9001 - Spring 2003 Prof. Mordecai-Mark Mac Low

Wolfire et al. 1995, Spitzer PPISM

Transparent ISM Mechanisms

• Heating – cosmic rays – photoionization • UV • soft X-rays – grain photoelectric heating – shock heating • Cooling – molecular rotation, vibration – atomic fine structure, metastable – resonance lines – bremsstrahlung – recombination – dust emission

Cosmic Rays

• H ionization produces primary electrons with ~ 35 eV. Counting secondaries, =3.4 eV.

 

CR

CR E e

• Field, Goldsmith, Habing took ζ CR – short path-lengths of low energy CRs = 4  10 -16 • Observations now suggest ζ CR = 2  10 -17 – ionization-sensitive molecules (HD, OH, H 3 + ) s -1 s -1

n

 

CR

  28 -3 erg cm s -1  

CR

 17

n

E ej

  1  

h

  1  

Photoionization Heating

 

ei n n e i

   

E ej

 1 2

m e

j w

3 

j

   1  2

A r

 1 2   2

kT m e

  3 2 recapture const.

2 4

he

2 3 3 2 2 3

m c e h

kT

X-ray Ionization Heating

• Transfers energy from 10 6 T << 10 4 K gas to gas with K, with a small contribution from extragalactic sources • To calculate local contribution, must take absorption into account • Can maintain high electron densities even if heating rate is low.

n

 

XR

4 

n

  species,i

J

h

 exp    

N a

  

i E h

i

 heat from each absorption  primary e of X-rays

Grain Photoelectric Heating

• Small grains (PAHs,

a <

15Å) can be efficiently photoionized by FUV (Bakes & Thielens 1994).

– 10% of flux absorption

n

– 50% of photoelectron production   24 -3 erg cm s -1   0 1/2 going to heat, which depends on G T /n , 0 e and G is FUV intensity normalized to 0  -3 -2 -1 Habing (1968) value (1.6 10 erg cm s )

grains neutral

Efficiency of Grain Heating

grains charged

Shock Heating

• Extremely inhomogeneous • Produces high-pressure regions that interact with surroundings • Traditionally, included in equilibrium thermodynamical descriptions anyway

Cooling

• Radiative cooling requires available energy levels for collisional excitation • Cold gas (10 < T < 10 3 ): excitation of molecular rotational and vibrational lines and atomic fine structure lines

Diffuse ISM Cooling Curve

~ T -0.7

Bremsstrahl.

~ T 1/2

Hollenbach & Tielens 1999, Neufeld et al 1995

Opaque ISM Mechanisms

• Heating – interiors • cosmic rays • grain heating by visible & IR – edges (PDRs) • grain & PAH UV photoelectric • H 2 pumping by FUV • Cooling – gas • molecular rotation, vibration • atomic fine structure, metastable • radiative transfer determines escape of energy from gas – grains • grain emission in FIR • gas-grain coupling

Cooling in Opaque gas

• Emission from an optically thick line reaches the blackbody value: radio brightness temperature

T

T

 1 

e b

• velocity gradients allow escape of radiation   through line wings  • many molecular and atomic lines can contribute in some regimes, but CO, H 2 , H 2 O, and O most important • detailed models of chemistry required to determine full cooling function

• Homonuclear species like H 2 do not have low-lying energy levels • Rarer polar species contribute most to cooling in 10 K gas • Fine structure lines most important at surfaces of PDRs

Isothermal Equation of State

• For densities 10 -19 < ρ < 10 -13 cm -3 , cooling is very efficient down to about 10 K • Gas remains isothermal in this regime, ultimately due to cooling of dust grains by IR emission.

• Compressibility is high: P ~ ρ • When even dust becomes optically thick, gas becomes adiabatic, subject to compressional heating, such as during protostellar collapse.

Energy Equation

T dS dt

d n dt

3 2

kT

kT dn dt n n

cooling time

d dt

   3 2

kT

    3

k

T

T E

2

t c

 so

t c

n

T E n

  heating cooling  10  22 3 erg cm s -1   4 for 10 K

T

6 10 K 6 10 K  0.7

Thermal Instability

Balbus 1986 First law for gas being heated and cooled

dS

  (

n

T n

)

dt

perturb a parcel, changing

S

S

+ 

S

, 

d dt

S

   

dS dt

   

n

T n

  If the change in net hea ting has opposite sign to change in entropy, the system will tend to return to the initial value  stability

Otherwise, instability occurs when      

n

T n

     

A

 0 If gas in thermal equilibrium with

n n

, then Field (1965) instability criterion holds     

T

 

n n

    

A

 0 or, if independent of temper ature     

T

   

A

0 If t cool increases as T increases, then system is unstable

(Isobaric) Thermal Instability

• Perturb temperature of points along the thermal equilibrium curve • Stable if they return to equilibrium • Unstable if they depart from equilibrium

Two-Phase Models

Wolfire et al 1995 log ρ (cm -3 )

Three-Phase Model

• Attempt to extend FGH two-phase model to include presence of hot gas (McKee & Ostriker 1977) • Hot gas not technically stable (no continuous heating, only intermittent), but has long cooling timescale (determined by evaporation off of clouds in MO77 • Pressure fixed by action of local SNR • Temperature of cold phases fixed by points of stability on phase diagram as in two phase model

Turbulent Flow

• Equilibrium models only appropriate for quasi-static situations • If compressions and rarefactions occur on the cooling timescale, then gas will lie far from equilibrium • Conversely, rapid cooling or heating can generate turbulent flows (Kritsuk & Norman)

MHD Courant Condition

• Similarly, the time step must include the fastest signal speed in the problem: either the flow velocity

v

speed

v f 2 = c s 2 + v A 2

or the fast magnetosonic max 

v

, 

x c s

2 

v A

2 

Lorentz Forces

1 4    

B

 1 4  

B

  

B

 1 8  

B

2 • Update pressure term during source step • Tension term drives Alfvén waves – Must be updated at same time as induction equation to ensure correct propagation speeds – operator splitting of two terms

Added Routines