Transcript Slide 1
Michael Flores McKinstry [email protected] 469-789-9920 Funding for Efficient New Buildings through Integrated Project Delivery and High Performance Design-Build Case Study Rolling Plains New Medical Office Building 1 Agenda • Concept of Project – Challenging Metrics • HPDB / IPD – Accountability / Outcomes Focus • Energy Modeling = Total Cost of Ownership • GMAX = Predictable Costs / No Change Orders • Project Schedule = Fast Track / No Faster Way • Deal Structure = Mitigated Owner Risk • Value Engineering = Eliminated • Relationship = Collaborative / Comfortable Objectives • Explain how High Performance Design Build / Integrated Project Delivery (HPDB/IPD) differs from alternative project delivery methods (and why it is usually better!) • Identify the key participants in High Performance Design Build • Identify contractual methods for High Performance Design Build • Understand how High Performance Design Build benefits the construction and turnover processes • Explain how High Performance Design Build provides more efficient operations and maintenance • Understand High Performance Design Build and the software tools that may be used to provide Integrated Project Delivery 3 High Performance Design-Build • Age Myth • Cost Myth • Complexity Myth • Time Advantage • Early Cost Confirmation • Lower Cost For Design Changes What It Means Lower Financial, Technical and Legal Risk Single Point Accountability … • Larger / Complex Projects Increased Owner Control of Outcomes High Performance Design Build Flexibility Adaptability Predictability Schedule Compression and Control Eliminate Relationship Tension When To Use It • Time of the Essence • Multiple Stakeholders • Owner Perceives High Risk • Ongoing Operating Costs Important • Good Public Perception Required • Constrained Budgets Facility Economics – Building Costs Over 40 yrs. Construction 11% 14% Financing 50% Operations & Utility Costs 25% Alterations High Cost of “Traditional” Design Process Ability to impact cost and functional capabilities Cost of design change Preferred Design Process Traditional design process PD SD DD CD PR CA OP HPDB Financials Design | Bid | Build Fees Building Professional Fees High Performance D/B • Architect / Engineer (6%) • General Contractor (8%) 14% Trades Labor and Materials 86% • Mechanical • Electrical • Plumbing • Data • Etc. Change Orders +5-15% Professional Fees • Architect / Engineer / GC 12% Trades Labor and Materials 88% • Mechanical • Electrical • Plumbing • Data • Etc. Fees Building • More Dollars Go To Building • No Change Orders • Better Operating Costs • Equipment Selection Control • No Finger Pointing • Expedient Average Savings of Green Buildings CARBON SAVINGS 35% ENERGY SAVINGS 30% Source: Capital E WATER USE SAVINGS 30-50% WASTE COST SAVINGS 50-90% HPDB Results SCHOOLS 20% BETTER TEST PERFORMANCE RETAIL INCREASE IN SALES PER SQUARE FOOT FACTORIES INCREASED PRODUCTION HOSPITALS EARLIER DISCHARGE OFFICES 2-16% PRODUCTIVITY INCREASE Rolling Plains New Medical Office High Performance Design-Build Integrated Design Process • Design & construction of a 20,000 S.F. 5 clinic doctors’ office building. Objectives • Explain how High Performance Design Build / Integrated Project Delivery (HPDB/IPD) differs from alternative project delivery methods (and why it is usually better!) • Identify the key participants in High Performance Design Build • Identify contractual methods for High Performance Design Build • Understand how High Performance Design Build benefits the construction and turnover processes • Explain how High Performance Design Build provides more efficient operations and maintenance • Understand High Performance Design Build and the software tools that may be used to provide Integrated Project Delivery 13 Energy Modeling 14 Building Efficiency Measures • • • • • • EUI Target – Design to the target! Lighting Improvements – 0.72 watts/sq.ft. HVAC Systems – Packaged VAV w/elec. Heat Building Automation – with Occupant Comfort In Mind Low Flow Plumbing Fixtures Building Envelope – Increased Wall R-value (R13 to R20) – High reflective roofing membrane • Rain and Condensate Water Harvesting • Designed for addition of Solar PV 15 Energy Model - Baseline 16 Energy Model - Actual 17 Energy Model - Results • Annual Consumption – Baseline – Model 255 kWh 184 kWh • Summer Peak Demand – Baseline – Model 110 kW 61 kW • Winter Peak Demand – Baseline – Model 232 kW 206 kW 18 GMAX - Project Costs • Total Project Cost: • Per Square Foot: • Industry Benchmark: $3,500,000 $184.21/sq.ft. $185.07/sq.ft. • Guaranteed Maximum Cost Model • No Construction Change Orders to Owner 19 Project Schedule Design: 6.5 months Construction: 13.5 months Summary - Benefits of High Performance Design-Build • Long-term energy performance – Total Cost of Ownership model • • • • Simplified procurement/contracting Streamlined schedule GMAX pricing Full commissioning and first year M&V 21 Questions? Michael Flores [email protected] 469-789-9920 22