Transcript Wayne Community Schools Data Retreat

September 24, 2007
2nd Annual
Wayne Community Schools
Data Retreat
Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can
be changed until it is faced.
James Baldwin
“Learning For Life”
Quick Fact About Data

Program vs. Cohort Data
Program
1.
Measures the effectiveness of programs
monitoring over multiple years.
2.
Focuses on the same grade level over multiple
years, not the same students.
3.
This is the type of data displayed on the
State of the Schools Report.
Cohort
1. Represents
one group over time.
Quick Fact About Data

Big Picture Includes:
Criterion Referenced Test & Classroom-based Assessments (State Standards Info)
*Teacher Developed
*Measures Local Curriculum
*Reflects Classroom Instruction
Norm-Referenced Test (Terra Nova)
*Developed by a testing company
*Compares student performance to other student performance
*Does not always measure local curriculum & instruction
Statewide Writing Assessment
*Developed by Nebraska educators
*Scored by the state
Quick Facts About Data


Next Step is to break data down even further
Look at :
*Demographic Information:
SPED
ELL
Free/Reduced
Mobility
Gender
Ethnicity
*Enrollment/Attendance/Behavior Data
*Perceptual Data (surveys of students, community,
climate)
So What is Our Point Today?



We are going to look at WCS “big picture”.
“De-emotionalize” the data!
Analyze Data – What does it tell us?
- Use Data Analysis Worksheet to make educational decisions


Build ownership across the system for how
our kids are performing.
Determine if our school improvement goals
are appropriate.
M
Testing Areas
at
h
ce
re
p.
llin
g
di
es
Sp
e
St
u
Sc
ie
n
lS
co
C
om
n
at
h
p.
tio
M
C
om
ec
h.
pu
ta
To
ta
M
C
om
ng
.
So
ci
al
at
h
La
M
e
p.
ag
C
om
ul
ar
y
di
ng
ng
u
ng
.
La
di
ng
La
R
ea
ab
Vo
c
R
ea
Median National Percentile
4th Grade Terra Nova Data
100
90
80
70
60
2004
50
2005
2006
40
2007
30
20
10
0
M
Testing Areas
at
h
ia
l
llin
g
di
es
Sp
e
St
u
e
re
p.
n
nc
lS
co
Co
m
Sc
ie
To
ta
M
at
h
p.
tio
M
Co
m
e
h.
ec
ag
pu
ta
ng
.
Co
m
So
c
at
h
La
M
ng
u
ng
.
La
p.
ul
ar
y
di
ng
Co
m
ab
di
ng
La
Re
a
Vo
c
Re
a
Median National Percentile
8th Grade Terra Nova Data
100
90
80
70
60
2004
50
2005
2006
40
2007
30
20
10
0
Testing Areas
g
di
es
tu
nc
e
Sp
el
lin
lS
Sc
ie
re
m
p.
Co
io
n
To
ta
lS
co
at
h
M
at
M
at
h
Co
m
pu
t
So
cia
at
h
M
p.
La
ng
.C
om
ec
h.
.M
La
ng
ua
ge
La
ng
Vo
ca
bu
la
ry
Re
ad
in
g
Co
m
p.
di
ng
Re
a
Median National Percentile
11th Grade Terra Nova Results
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
2004
2005
2006
2007
30
20
10
0
4th Grade Reading Standards
100
90
% Students Above Proficient
80
70
60
2003
2005
50
2006
2007
40
30
20
10
0
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.1.5
4.1.6
Standard Number
4.1.7
4.1.8
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.4.1
8th Grade Reading Standards
100
90
% of Students Above Proficient
80
70
60
2003
2005
50
2006
2007
40
30
20
10
0
8.1.1
8.1.2
8.1.3
8.1.4
8.1.5
8.1.6
Standard Number
8.1.7
8.3.1
8.3.2
8.4.1
11th Grade Reading Standards
100
90
% of Students Above Proficient
80
70
60
2003
2005
2006
2007
50
40
30
20
10
0
12.1.1
12.1.2
12.1.3
12.1.4
12.1.5
Standard Number
12.1.6
12.1.8
12.3.1
12.3.2
4th Grade Math Standards - page 1
100
90
% of Students Above Proficient
80
70
60
2004
2005
2006
2007
50
40
30
20
10
0
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.1.5
Standard Number
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.3.1
4th Grade Math Standards - page 2
100
90
% of Students Above Proficient
80
70
60
2004
2005
2006
2007
50
40
30
20
10
0
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
Standard Number
4.4.3
4.5.1
4.6.1
4.6.2
8th Grade Math Standards - page 1
100
90
% of Students Above Proficient
80
70
60
2004
2005
2006
2007
50
40
30
20
10
0
8.1.1
8.1.2
8.1.3
8.1.4
8.2.1
8.2.2
8.2.3
Standard Number
8.2.4
8.2.5
8.3.1
8.3.2
8th Grade Math Standards - page 2
100
90
% of Students Above Proficient
80
70
60
2004
2005
2006
2007
50
40
30
20
10
0
8.4.1
8.4.2
8.4.3
8.4.4
8.4.5
8.4.6
8.5.1
8.5.2
Standard Number
8.5.3
8.5.4
8.6.1
8.6.2
8.6.3
11th Grade Math Standards - page 1
100
90
% of Student Above Proficient
80
70
60
2004
2005
2006
2007
50
40
30
20
10
0
12.1.1
12.1.2
12.2.1
12.2.2
12.2.3
Standard Number
12.3.1
12.3.2
12.4.1
12.4.2
11th Grade Math Standards - page 2
100
90
% of Students Above Proficient
80
70
60
2004
2005
2006
2007
50
40
30
20
10
0
12.4.3
12.4.4
12.4.5
12.4.6
12.4.7
Standard Number
12.6.1
12.6.2
12.6.3
12.6.4
4th Grade Statewide Writing
100
100
97
93
89
90
86
83
80
82
80
73
% of Students Above Proficient
70
70
60
Wayne
State Ave.
50
40
30
20
10
0
2001-2002
2003-2004
2004-2005
School Year
2005-2006
2006-2007
8th Grade Statewide Writing
100
91
90
91
88
83
% Students Above Proficient
80
85
91
90
86
82
75
70
60
Wayne
State Ave.
50
40
30
20
10
0
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
School Year
2005-2006
2006-2007
11th Grade Statewide Writing
100
99
98
97
96
96
% of Student Above Proficient
94
93
92
91
90
90
Wayne
90
State Ave.
88
87
86
84
82
80
2003-2004
2004-2005
2005-2006
School Year
2006-2007
NOW WHAT?
Discussion of Data in Learning Teams
*Break into 12 teams (12 pieces of data)
*Data Analysis Worksheet
*Team sharing/analysis/discussion
*Be prepared to report out to large group
Data Retreat Learning Teams
Team 1 – 4th Grade Reading Standards
Lori Ruskamp
Mike Jaixen
Ellen Imdieke
Tony Cantrell
Brad Weber
Sue Buryanek
Team 5 – 8th Grade Reading Standards
Mary Ann Lutt
Nicki Tiedtke
Liz Garvin
Betsy Maryott
Traci Krusemark
Dave Hix
Team 9 – 11th Grade Reading Standards
Sylvia Ruhl
Joan Hansen
Claudia Kober
Jill Nieman
Stephanie Reynolds
Carolyn Harder
Team 2 – 4th Grade Math Standards
Sandy Spethman
Joyce Hoskins
Brendan Dorcey
Shannon Gibson
Emily Loberg
Joan Sudman
Team 6 – 8th Grade Math Standards
Rita Keller
Jen Thomas
Lisa Janke
Karen Schardt
Kay Mader
Kevin Finkey
Team 10 – 11th Grade Math Standards
Duane Blomenkamp
Cheryl Suehl
Jill Pickinpaugh
Rich Rethwisch
Tracy Anderson
Team 3 – 4th Grade Terra Nova
Kathy Ostrand
Diane Long
Dale Hochstein
Deneil Parker
Winter Stewart
Emily Duerst
Team 7 – 8th Grade Terra Nova
Lee Brogie
Jodi Lutt
Nate Wall
Diana Davis
Annette Rasmussen
Lonnie Ehrhardt
Team 4 – 4th Grade Statewide Writing
Kris Janke
Phyllis Trenhaile
Josh Johnson
Becky Miller
Monica Jensen
Christa Dutcher
Team 8 – 8th Grade Statewide Writing
Brad Hoskins
Rob Sweetland
Courtney Maas
Teri Hypse
Jean Dorcey
Jeaneen Kindschuh
Team 11 – 11th Grade Terra Nova
Doris Meyer
Tanya Heikes
Lyndy Williams
Misty Beair
Matt Schaub
Lauren Walton
Team 12 – 11th Statewide Writing
Dwaine Spieker
Colleen Janke
Amy Jackson
Shannon Corkle
Melody Hill
Jessica Sebade
Data Analysis Worksheet
Title of Our Data: _______________________________
What does the data tell us? (Factual Information)
1.
2.
3.
What are some possible reasons why? (Hypotheses)
1.
2.
3.
Are the results a strength or a concern? _______________
What can/should we do about it? (Next Steps)
1.
2.
3.
WCS School Improvement Plan
“The Improvement of Reading”
2007-2008
School Improvement Agenda









Reading Strategies/Learning Communities
Program/Perception Surveys
Disaggregate data into demographic sub-groups
Determine intervention groups
Write action plans
Review action plans with external chair & team members (prior to
implementation)
Review strengths/weaknesses of implemented action plans with staff
Modify action plans as needed
Celebrate!
The Opportunity!
Let’s make the 2007-2008 school year a great
one for ourselves AND for our students!
“Learning For Life”