Transcript Accelerated Learning Program

Community
Baltimore
County
OutlineCollege
of Today’s
Presentation
why we developed ALP
what ALP is
results
A
costs
L
P
the accelerated learning program
future plans
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
CCBC’s Developmental Education Program:
Courses
MATH
081
MATH
082
MATH
083
RDG
051
RDG
052
ENGL
051
ENGL
052
ENG
101
ENG
102
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
The Problem ALP Addresses
results for
students who
took traditional
developmental
writing in fall 06
as of June 2010
took 052
fa 06
1023
S in 052
705
69%
took 101
594
58%
took no
more writing
courses
111
11%
have not
passed 052
318
31%
42%
A, B, or C
in 101
358
35%
D, F. I, or W
in 101
236
23%
Outline of Today’s Presentation
why we developed ALP
what ALP is
results
costs
future plans
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Traditional ENG 052
ENG 052
semester 1
ENG 101
semester 2
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
ALP
ENG 101
ENG 052
semester 1
semester 1
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Outline of Today’s Presentation
why we developed ALP
what ALP is
results
costs
future plans
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
results for
students who
took traditional
developmental
writing in fall 06
as of June 2010
students who
took ALP from
fall 07 to
spring 10
as of June 2010
took 052
fa 06
1023
S in 052
705
69%
have not
passed 052
318
31%
took 052
2007-09
524
S in 052
422
81%
U, W, or I
in 052
102
19%
took 101
594
58%
took no
more writing
courses
111
11%
A, B, or C
in 101
358
35%
D, F. I, or W
in 101
236
23%
students who
took traditional
developmental
writing in fall 06
took 052
fa 06
1023
S in 052
705
69%
have not
passed 052
318
31%
students who
took ALP from
fall 07 to
spring 10
as of June 2010
took 052
2007-09
524
S in 052
422
81%
U, W, or I
in 052
102
19%
took 101
594
58%
took no
more writing
courses
111
11%
took 101
524
100%
took no
more writing
courses
0
0%
A, B, or C
in 101
358
35%
D, F. I, or W
in 101
236
23%
results for
students who
took traditional
developmental
writing in fall 06
as of June 2010
students who
took ALP from
fall 07 to
spring 10
as of June 2010
took 052
fa 06
1023
S in 052
705
69%
have not
passed 052
318
31%
took 052
2007-09
524
S in 052
422
81%
U, W, or I
in 052
102
19%
took 101
594
58%
took no
more writing
courses
111
11%
took 101
524
100%
took no
more writing
courses
0
0%
A, B, or C
in 101
358
35%
D, F. I, or W
in 101
236
23%
A, B, or C
in 101
365
70%
D, F. I, or W
in 101
159
30%
results for
students who
took traditional
developmental
writing in fall 06
as of June 2010
took 052
fa 06
1023
passed 052
705
69%
took 101
594
58%
passed 101
358
35%
have not
passed 052
318
31%
took no
more writing
courses
111
11%
did not
pass 101
236
23%
42%
students who
took ALP from
fall 07 to
spring 10
as of June 2010
took 052
2007-09
524
passed 052
422
81%
have not
passed 052
102
19%
took 101
524
100%
took no
more writing
courses
0
0%
19%
passed 101
365
70%
have not
passed 101
159
30%
ALP Success Rates, 2007-09
75%
69%
pass
ENGL
101
50%
25%
35%
pass
ENGL
101
traditional
052
fall 06
ALP
fall 07
58%
pass
ENGL
101
ALP
spring 08
74%
pass
ENGL
101
ALP
fall 08
70%
pass
ENGL
101
71%
pass
ENGL
101
ALP
spring 09
ALP
fall 09
A
68%
pass
ENGL
101
ALP
spring 10
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
took 052
fa 06
1023
took 052
2007-09
524
passed 052
705
69%
took 101
594
58%
passed 101
358
35%
took
ENG 102
154
15%
passed
ENG 102
107
10%
have not
passed 052
318
31%
took no
more writing
courses
111
11%
did not
pass 101
236
23%
haven’t
taken
ENG 102
125
12%
F, I, or W
in ENG102
47
5%
passed 101
365
70%
took 102
187
36%
passed
ENG 102
127
24%
have not
passed 101
159
30%
haven’t
taken
ENG 102
178
34%
have not
passed
102
60
11%
passed 052
422
81%
have not
passed 052
102
19%
took 101
524
100%
took no
more writing
courses
0
0%
Longitudinal Studies: degree completion
15%
15%
10%
7%
5%
traditional
ENGL 052
fall 06
ALP
2007-8
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Community College of Baltimore County
Accelerated Learning Program (ALP)
Preliminary Analysis of Effectiveness
Nikki Edgecombe and Davis Jenkins
Community College Research Center
Teachers College, Columbia University
Funded by the Lumina Foundation
Outline of Today’s Presentation
why we developed ALP
what ALP is
results
costs
future plans
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Costs Under Traditional Model
500 students
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Costs Under Traditional Model
20 students per section
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Costs for Dev Course Under Traditional Model
25 sections of Dev Eng
X 3 faculty credit hours/section
= 75 faculty credit hours
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Costs for ENG 101 Under Traditional Model
37% of traditional developmental
students take FYC
.37 X 500 = 185 students
185 students ÷ 20 students/section
= 9.25 sections
9.25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section
= 27.75 faculty credit hours
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Costs for FYC* Under Traditional Model
total for developmental course = 75 faculty credit hours
total for FYC = 27.5 faculty credit hours
total = 102.5 faculty credit hours
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Costs Under ALP
500 students
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Costs Under ALP
8 students per section
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Costs Under ALP Model
62.5 sections of ALP Dev Eng
X 2 faculty credit hours/section
= 125 faculty credit hours
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Costs for FYC Under ALP Model
100% of ALP developmental
students take FYC
1.00 X 500 = 500 students
500 students ÷ 20 students/section
= 25 sections
25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section
= 75 faculty credit hours
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
Comparison of Costs for 500 Students
Traditional
ALP
DEV: 25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 75.00 fch*
DEV: 62.5 sect X 2 cr/sect = 125 fch
FYC: 9.25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 27.75 fch
FYC: 25 sect X 3 cr/sect =
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
102.75 fch
75 fch
200 fch
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
An Analogy
cost/year
to operate
widgets
per year
cost per
widget
$100,000
10,000
$10
$200,000
22,000
$9.09
traditional factory
ALP factory
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
An Analogy
cost per year
102.75 fch
students per year
175 (35%) of
500 students
pass FYC
cost per student
.59 fch per passing
student
traditional factory
cost per year
200 fch
students per
year
350 (70%)
of 500 students
pass FYC
cost per student
.57 fch per passing
student
ALP factory
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
ALP Summary
Based on four semesters of data and 227 students, compared
to traditional developmental writing:
 ALP doubles the success rate.
 cuts the attrition rate in half
 does it in half the time
 at slightly less cost per successful student
The Accelerated Learning Project
Outline of Today’s Presentation
why we developed ALP
what ALP is
results
costs
future plans
A
L
P
The Accelerated Learning Project
1280
students
160
sections
640
students
80
sections
320
students
80
students
160
students
20
sections
2007-08
2008-09
40
sections
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Dissemination
Institutions that are currently offering sections of ALP:
El Paso Community College (Texas)
Gateway Community College (Kentucky)
Lone Star College Tomball (TX)
Patrick Henry Community College (Virginia)
Valley Forge Military College (PA)
North Central State College (OH)
Dissemination
Institutions that plan to offer some sections of ALP within one year:
Blue Ridge Community and Technical College (WV)
The Graduate School (DC)
Middlesex Community College (MA)
Missouri State University-West Plains (MO)
Springfield Technical Community College (MA)
West Kentucky Community and Technical College (KY)
West Virginia Northern Community College (WV)
Dissemination
Institutions that are planning to offer some sections of ALP in the future:
Community College of District of Columbia (DC)
Delaware Community and Technical College (DE)
Jackson Community College (MI)
Kingsborough Community College (CUNY)
Scott Community College (IA)
Tulsa Community College (OK)
Wharton County Junior College (TX)
WorWic Community College (MD)
Community College Baltimore County
A
L
P
thanks for your attention
The
Accelerated
Learning
Project