Transcript WHICH ANGLE OF HEAD-DOWN TILT BETTER SIMULATES THE
WHICH ANGLE OF HEAD-DOWN TILT BETTER SIMULATES THE INCREASE IN INTRA-OCULAR PRESSURE THAT OCCURS IN MICROGRAVITY?
Luís Francisco B. Chotgues, MD Dario F. G. de Azevedo, Ph.D.
Thais Russomano, MD, Ph.D.
Physiology of the eye on Earth
• Aqueous Humor
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
Intra-ocular pressure (IOP) in microgravity AUTOMATIC SELF-TONOMETRY 1st German-Russian MIR mission 1992 : 92% IOP rise
Schwartz R, Draeger J, Groenhoff S, Flade K D
Ophthalmologe 1993 Dec; 90(6): 640-2 2nd German D-2 Spacelab-Mission 1993: 114% IOP rise
Draeger J, Schwartz R, Groenhoff S, Stern C
Ophthalmologe 1994 Oct; 91(5): 697-9
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
IOP during parabolic flight IOP increased 58% (19 mmHg) during parabolic flight (20 s of µG) compared to baseline values (12 mmHg) ( n =11) Mader TH et al., Am J Ophtalmol. 1993 Mar 15; 115(3):347-50
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
IOP during HDT Objectives
• • •
To determine the angle of head-down tilt that best simulates the increase in IOP after 15 min insertion in microgravity To evaluate the mechanisms involved in the increase in the IOP during microgravity and HDT To contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of patients who suffer from glaucoma
Microgravity Laboratory -PUCRS
IOP during HDT Protocol
• • •
Number of subjects: 8 (16 eyes) Portable aplanation tonometer IOP measurements:
– –
Sitting position (after 5 min - baseline) 4 randomized angles of HDT (after 15 min):
•
6, 12, 18 and 34 degrees
– –
Time of day: 8 - 12 AM Test duration per subject: 2 h
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
IOP during HDT Material and Methods
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
IOP during HDT Material and Methods
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
Results Intra-ocular Pressure (mmHg) Body position Sitting 6
HDT 12
HDT 18
HDT 34
HDT
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
Mean +/- SE 12.6 +/- 0.5
17.0 +/- 0.7
18.9 +/- 0.7
19.6 +/- 0.7
27.0 +/- 1.5
p < or = 0.05
S S S S
IOP during HDT Results 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 31 55 63 6° HDT
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
12° HDT 18° HDT Body Position 110 34° HDT
IOP during HDT and Microgravity 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 31 55 63 110 114 92 6° HDT 12° HDT 18° HDT 34° HDT D2 mission* Ger-Russ Mir** Body Position
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
* Draeger J et al., 1993 ** Schwartz R et al., 1992
IOP during HDT Conclusion
• • •
IOP enhanced 110% after 15 min of 34° of HDT 34° of HDT was accepted as the angle that best simulates the acute increase in IOP that occurs in microgravity 6° of HDT did not produce the rise in IOP that has been found during space missions
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
IOP during HDT Future Studies
• • •
Increase in IOP in microgravity versus during HDT - Mechanism?
Measurement of venous pressure and IOP during HDT Increase in IOP = Glaucoma
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
Central venous pressure in space Buckey J. C. et al, 1996
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS
Venous pressure in the forehead during HDT
Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS