Transcript Slide 1
FRIDAY PLENARY SESSION
DAY 2 of TeamSTEPPS
National Conference 2012
TeamSTEPPS
How This Conference Fits
What is needed for successful TeamSTEPPS
implementations?
Passion for safety and quality care
Understanding of teamwork tools & how to equip
people to use them
Support to overcome challenges and make rapid
progress
Resources to support implementation efforts and
knowledge about how to use them most efficiently
How AHRQ is addressing each of these needs
Mod 1 05.2 Page 3
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Passion
National Meeting:
Mod 1 05.2 Page 4
Next year: same general time, probable location:
San Antonio
Meeting sponsors
Larger venue
Call for papers/panels to share your
TeamSTEPPS successes
Adjustments made based on feedback from this
year
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Understanding
TeamSTEPPS trainings
Expanded number of seats in trainings and locations
they’re offered
Planning some advance topic trainings
Large backlog of interested participants
Addressing by:
Reallocating resources to offer more trainings
Opening up new set of trainings to enroll in by late
summer
Increased efforts to ensure participants can succeed
Coordinate with hospitals, systems, HENS, etc. to pair
groups wanting trainings with strong training teams
Mod 1 05.2 Page 5
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Support
User Support Network
Webinars
ListServ/Discussion forum
Library of resources
http://teamsteppsportal.com/
Resources:
TeamSTEPPS materials:
http://www.ahrq.gov/teamsteppstools/
TeamSTEPPS mailbox:
[email protected]
Mod 1 05.2 Page 6
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Resources
Mod 1 05.2 Page 7
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Acknowledgments
Mod 1 05.2 Page 8
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Our Organizations
Mod 1 05.2 Page 9
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
TeamSTEPPS National Training
Centers
Mod 1 05.2 Page 10
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Key People
HRET:
Chris Hund
Ashka Dave
Jessica Blake
IMPAQ:
Andrea Amodeo
Booz Allen Hamilton:
Melanie Sellers
ZeAmma Brathwaite
TN Hospital Association
Mod 1 05.2 Page 11
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
The State of
TeamSTEPPS:
New Modules and Other
Available TeamSTEPPS
Resources
TeamSTEPPS
Today’s Presenters
James Battles, PhD (Social Science Analyst for
Patient Safety, AHRQ)
Heidi King, Heidi King, MS, FACHE (Deputy Director
of the Department of Defense Patient Safety Program
Barb Edson, RN, MBA, MHA (Vice President,
HRET)
Deborah Milne, RN, MPA (Senior Research Scientist
American Institutes for Research)
Michelle Pandolfi, MSW, LNHA (Director of
Counsulting Services, Qualidigm)
Melanie Wasserman, PhD (Senior Associate/
Scientist Abt Associates)
Mod 1 05.2 Page 13
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Top 10 for Creating a TeamSTEPPS® Module
It takes a team!
2. Literature review and course design plan
3. Story boards; draft curriculum
4. Identify gaps in content
5. Develop supplemental exercises/activities
6. Field test draft curriculum
7. Develop video vignettes
8. AHRQ review
9. Pilot test with end users
10. Finalize all components
1.
Mod 1 05.2 Page 14
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
For Release in Fall 2012
New TeamSTEPPS®
Modules
New Toolkit, with
TeamSTEPPS integrated
Long Term Care Module
Comprehensive Unit-Based
Primary Care Medical Office
Module
Limited English Proficiency
Module
Mod 1 05.2 Page 15
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
Program (CUSP) Toolkit
TeamSTEPPS
TeamSTEPPS® Sweet 16
Mod 1 05.2 Page 16
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Contact Information
Heidi King
[email protected]
Jim Battles
[email protected]
http://teamstepps.ahrq.gov/
Mod 1 05.2 Page 17
http://health.mil/dodpatientsafety/
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
LEP
module
TeamSTEPPS
Module on patients with limited
English proficiency – why?
Large and growing population – 8.6% of U.S.
Greater length of stay greater risks
line infections, falls, surgical infection, and more
More readmissions
So many horror stories
Mod 1 05.2 Page 19
One misunderstood word, “intoxicado” ->
quadriplegic teen, $71 million settlement
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
The evidence
Patient safety events more severe and more often
due to communication errors for LEP patients (Divi et al.
2006, Flores 2005)
Ad hoc interpreters (family members, house staff)
make serious medical interpretation errors (Flores et al.
2003)
LEP patient safety events cost hospitals millions
Wise 2008; Quan 2010; Carbone et al. 2003)
Mod 1 05.2 Page 20
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
(Price-
TeamSTEPPS
More evidence
Professional interpreters reduce length of stay and
readmissions for LEP (Linholm et al. 2012)
Despite evidence that LEP patients are safer with
professional interpreters, health care providers often
try to “get by” without (Diamond et al. 2009; Ring et al. 2010)
Even when interpreters are present, they often can’t
speak up when they see a patient safety risk (Betancourt
et al. 2012)
Mod 1 05.2 Page 21
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Other reasons for LEP focus
Joint Commission patient-centered communication
standards come into effect July 1, 2012
Mod 1 05.2 Page 22
Identify the patient’s oral and written communication needs; and
Meet those needs
Including the need for qualified interpreters
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
How the LEP module can help
1-hour staff training module and 4-hour train-the-
trainer program so unit staff and interpreters can:
Understand the risks to LEP patients
Assemble the right team (call an interpreter!)
Identify and raise patient communication issues
Also includes a guide for hospital leaders
Mod 1 05.2 Page 23
To identify/ implement needed system changes
ahead of training
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Module Development Process
Adverse Events
Database
Environmental
Scan
Interpreter Pilot
Results
TeamSTEPPS
Module
Qualitative Interviews
with Frontline Staff &
Leaders
Hospital
Guide
Field
test,
Validate
Revisions
508 compliance
production
dissemination
Town Meeting
Original Research
Mod 1 05.2 Page 24
Tool Development
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
We are here!
TeamSTEPPS
Module preview: process map
Mod 1 05.2 Page 25
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Field-test results
Module can be implemented various ways in
various settings
TeamSTEPPS/non-TeamSTEPPS hospital (MO,
DE, NC)
Stand-alone or part of overall TeamSTEPPS
Hospital units (ED, L&D, OB), or primary care
Catalyst for institutional changes
Mod 1 05.2 Page 26
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Evaluation
Module includes an evaluation guide
Mod 1 05.2 Page 27
Satisfaction scores high
Knowledge scores significantly increased
Qualitative results:
Clinicians more aware of need for interpreter
Interpreters more empowered to raise/address
communication issues
Problems with language data challenges
evaluating provider behavior and patient outcomes
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Next steps
Module available late summer/early fall
Mod 1 05.2 Page 28
Want a copy? Sign up with me today!
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Outline
Why LTC version
What changes were made and why
Video creation
TEP recommendations
Field testing
Findings – potential future work
Availability
Mod 1 05.2 Page 30
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Why Long-Term Care?
Long-term care environment is unique
Long-term/chronic and short term/sub-acute
Patients are called “residents”
Multi-disciplinary teams, including non-clinical
staff
Long-term care: custodial care through IV therapy
Approximately 16,000 nursing homes and 1.6M
nursing home residents across the country
Mod 1 05.2 Page 31
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Changes Targeted
The work of this project was to modify the text
and associated training materials to be relevant
to the long-term care environment
Changed language throughout to be meaningful
to long-term care
Exercises, scenarios, tests and videos were
changed and centered around chronic medical or
rehabilitation circumstances
Graphics and pictures were changed to reflect
nursing home staff, care and environment
Mod 1 05.2 Page 32
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Long-Term Care Team
Mod 1 05.2 Page 33
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
Therapeutic
Recreation/Activity
Staff
TeamSTEPPS
Chef
Long
Term Care Team
Social
Worker
Nurse
Assistant
Nurse
Rosie the
Housekeeper
Administrator
Mod 1 05.2 Page 34
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Videos
Two videos created
Long-term care – subtle decline in a resident over
a 24 hour period
Sub-acute care –possible MI/PE in a resident
receiving physical therapy
14 of 15 TeamSTEPPS skills were highlighted
Time-Out is not a skill deemed necessary for most
nursing homes
Mod 1 05.2 Page 35
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Long Term Care Video
Filmed in a Connecticut nursing home
2 days of filming
Over 40 hours of footage
3 nursing home
staff served as
“extras”
Mod 1 05.2 Page 36
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Sub-Acute Video
Filmed in a Massachusetts nursing home’s
rehabilitation gym
1 day of filming
15 hours of footage
Mod 1 05.2 Page 37
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Technical Expert Panel
National Experts in:
Long-term care
TeamSTEPPS (Master Trainers)
Nursing Workforce Development
Culture Change
Quality of Care/Life Outcomes
Individual calls with each TEP Member were
conducted
Materials were sent prior to each call: description,
agenda, questions
Mod 1 05.2 Page 38
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
TEP Recommendations
Joint Commission
Accreditation of nursing homes is very low nationally
Language/terms not commonly used in nursing
homes
Culture Change and Patient Safety
Clear language on the two “concepts”
Sample Exercise
Illustrate benefit of including all members of the
healthcare team in care planning
Mod 1 05.2 Page 39
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
TEP Recommendations2
Other
Mod 1 05.2 Page 40
Content should be delivered at literacy levels
appropriate for the audience
Deliver training in interactive sessions: role play
and “teach back”
Advanced skills introduced after basic concepts
mastered
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Field Testing
120-bed nursing home, part of a continuing care
retirement community (CCRC)
1 day (8 hour) training
Held on the campus of the nursing home
Various departments and staffing levels attended
Mod 1 05.2 Page 41
Nursing
Staff
Development/Education
Therapeutic Recreation
Social Work
Dietary/Food Service
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
Housekeeping
Maintenance/Physi
cal Plant
Administrator/COO
TeamSTEPPS
Field Test Findings
Participants pleased with training
86-98% gave the training session a positive grade
Communication module had widest appeal
Appreciated the interactive exercises; wanted more
Videos complemented material, though “too
clinical”
Add more examples and exercises that included
non-clinical staff/departments
Mod 1 05.2 Page 42
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Field Test Findings2
Recommended including:
resident abuse prevention exercises and
examples
interactions and role plays of communicating
with families (staff to family)
intergenerational communication among staff
removing the multi-team system exercise
Mod 1 05.2 Page 43
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
TeamSTEPPS for Long Term Care
Available: ???
Mod 1 05.2 Page 44
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Contact Information
Abt Associates:
Donna Hurd [email protected]
Qualidigm:
Michelle Pandolfi [email protected]
Ann Spenard [email protected]
TeamSTEPPS® Primary Care Medical Office
Module
Deborah A. Milne, RN MPA
American Institutes for Research
June 22, 2012
Mod 1 05.2 Page 45
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS® Primary
Care Medical Office Module
Deborah A. Milne, RN MPA
American Institutes for Research
June 22, 2012
TeamSTEPPS
First Step
Convened Technical Expert Panel (TEP)
December 2010
Mod 1 05.2 Page 47
Representatives from AHRQ and DoD
Experts in primary care and quality improvement
Interprofessional primary health care providers
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Laying the Groundwork
Mod 1 05.2 Page 48
Defined the “team”
Identified the “system”
Evaluated the challenges
Decided areas of focus
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Primary Care Office (PCO) Team
TEP defined the scope of “team” for purpose of this
project
Focus of the project was intended to be on optimizing
teamwork within the medical office
Caveat - it was noted that external care coordination
is of extreme importance for future work
Mod 1 05.2 Page 49
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Primary Care
Team Structure
Mod 1 05.2 Page 50
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
How is the PCO Different?
Complex Adaptive System
Non – linear, non – episodic
The agents in the system are all the components of that
system
Agents interact and connect with each other in unpredictable
and unplanned ways
Interactions cause regularities to emerge
Start to form a pattern which feeds back on the system and
informs the interactions of the agents
Mod 1 05.2 Page 51
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Model of a Complex Adaptive System
Mod 1 05.2 Page 52
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Primary Care Office Environment
Mod 1 05.2 Page 53
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Some of the “Agents”
Missed appointments
Patient phone
calls/emails
Scheduling
Medication refills
Interruption of patient
flow
Walk-ins, lab results
Formulary questions
Mod 1 05.2 Page 54
Population data
management
Information from
insurers
Urgent appointments
Calls from
consultants/external
providers
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Challenges to Teamwork in Primary
Care Offices
Delayed Manifestation of Mistakes
Role Ambiguity
Non – linear work flow
Mod 1 05.2 Page 55
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Curriculum Training Structure
When training teams to implement TeamSTEPPS:
developed to be taught in conjunction with
TeamSTEPPS Essentials
OR
When training Master Trainers:
To be taught as an addition to TeamSTEPPS
Fundamentals
Mod 1 05.2 Page 56
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Next Steps
Literature review
Curriculum design guide development
Developed draft curriculum slides and instructor
guide
Begin preliminary scripts for video vignettes
Mod 1 05.2 Page 57
We asked all TEP members to send us brief “stories”
that represented actual scenarios they had
experienced
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Field Testing
Two sites
TeamSTEPPS essentials followed by
Primary Care Office Module
Data collection
Mod 1 05.2 Page 58
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Highlights of Field Testing Focus Groups
“What parts of the module are most relevant to
primary care?”
Patient advocacy and communication
Conflict resolution
Situation monitoring
Debriefing
Mod 1 05.2 Page 59
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Highlights of Field Testing Focus Groups
“What improvements could be made to the module?”
More emphasis on roles of non-clinical staff in the care team
More case-based scenarios, especially across team roles
Non clinical staff felt that they often had important
information to communicate but no process to do so
Quote: “Little bits that you don’t automatically put into the
records as a formal thing are so important.”
Resulting module change:
Included 4 scenarios in module that emphasize non-clinical
staff
Mod 1 05.2 Page 60
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Highlights, cont…
“What parts of the module do not make sense?”
Definitions of “Huddles” and “Briefs” conflicts with NCQA
Primary Care Medical Home (PCMH) language
Quote: “PCMH designates the TeamSTEPPS Brief as a Huddle. We
all need to know what we mean in terms of what we’re doing.”
Resulting module change:
More emphasis on flexibility/customizability throughout the
curriculum, as long as each team member has the same
mental model.
Mod 1 05.2 Page 61
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Video Production
Scenario video production – 4 paired scenarios
(right way and wrong way)
Script changes influenced by field testing results
Each based on an actual event
Leadership, Communication, Mutual Support,
Situation Monitoring
Mod 1 05.2 Page 62
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
Comprehensive Unit-based
Safety Program
Barbara Edson, RN, MBA, MHA
VP, Clinical Quality
Health Research and Educational
Trust
American Hospital Association
TeamSTEPPS
What is CUSP?
The Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program
A safety culture program that is designed to;
Educate & improve awareness about patient safety and
quality of care
Empower staff to take charge and improve safety in
their workplace
Create partnerships between units & hospital
executives
Provide resources and tools for unit improvement
Provide tools to investigate and learn from defects
Used in combination with technical intervention
Mod 1 05.2 Page 64
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Adaptive + Technical
CUSP
CAUTI
1. Science of safety
1. Appropriate reason for insertion
(HICPAC Guidelines)
2. Identify defects
2. Prompt removal catheters when no
longer indicated (HICPAC
Guidelines)
3. Sr. exec. partnership
3. Proper care for appropriate
catheters
4. Learning from defects
4. Insertion intervention –sterile
placement
5. Teamwork and communication
Mod 1 05.2 Page 65
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
CUSP Toolkit
Content –CUSP and
Funded by AHRQ
Mod 1 05.2 Page 66
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
other safety content
Modular
PowerPoint presentations
with facilitator notes
Exercises
Short video vignettes
illustrating key messages
Vignettes demonstrate
CUSP used with various
healthcare acquired
conditions
TeamSTEPPS
CUSP Modules
Module steps
Module Description
Learn about CUSP
Describes the CUSP Toolkit and its modules
Assemble the Team
Develop team, characteristics of high performing
teams, define roles and responsibilities
Engage the Senior
Executive
Role, assist with alignment within organization
resources, remove depart barriers, accountability
Understand the Science of
Safety
Context of safety in healthcare, system design,
common system breakdowns
Identifying Defects
Through Sensemaking
Identify potential harms, contributing factors and
potential solutions, organizational learning
Implement Teamwork &
Communication
Importance of communication and safety,
TeamSTEPPS tools
Apply CUSP
Implementation steps, accountability
Mod 1 05.2 Page 67
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
How do you use CUSP?
Educate teams on CUSP components using
PowerPoints with facilitator notes
Share videos, lead discussions with staff
Train on use of teamwork and communication tools
Provide templates and discussion guides to project
leaders
Mod 1 05.2 Page 68
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Briefing
A briefing is a discussion between two or more people, often a team,
using succinct information pertinent to an event.
A briefing immediately:
Maps out the care plan
Identifies each team member’s roles and
responsibilities
Heightens awareness of the situation
Allows the team to plan for the unexpected
Allows team members’ needs and
expectations to be met
Sets the tone for the day
Encourages team members’ participation
As seen in TeamSTEPPS®
Mod 1 05.2 Page 69
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
69
TeamSTEPPS
Mod 1 05.2 Page 70
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
Mod 1 05.2 Page 71
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2
TeamSTEPPS
DISCUSSION AND Q&A
Mod 1 05.2 Page 72
TEAMSTEPPS 05.2