Transcript AirLED O3.2.9

Methodology for the Open Living
Lab process
O4.1.7 Final version
Bologna 21st October 2013
Giuseppe Luppino
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Link OLL to airLED
• A LIVING LAB is a real life environment in which
researchers, developers and users create together
new products or services, through an open
collaboration which leads to local and global
innovation
• A Living Lab in airLED
– Support pilot implementation
– Support policy development
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Different stakeholders for the same OLL
The general structure of a Living Lab influences the relationship between stakeholders and also
the weights are very different. In particular there are 4 types of subjects which are interested in
the creation of an OLL and for different reasons with different involvement of the stakeholders
Utilizer: Utilizers are companies that launch and promote the living lab, in order to develop
and test firm products and services. They use the living lab as a strategic tool to collect data on
users or user communities of their products or services.
Enabler: Enablers include various public-sector actors, non-governmental organizations, and
financiers, such as towns, municipalities, or area-development organisations. Living labs are publicsectors project with the aim at developing a specific region or city area in terms of reducing
unemployment or solving social and structural problems.
Provider: Provider-driven emphasize efficiency and firms’ investments. They aim at promoting
research and theory development, increasing knowledge creation, and solving problems. The
benefits include new researches outputs, practical business solutions to commercialize.
User: User – driven is focused on solving users’ everyday-life problems. These LL are driven by
users, who don’t manage the network or its operations.
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Types of Open Living Labs
1 - Utilizer-driven
2 - Enabler-driven
3 - Provider-driven
4 - User-driven
Purpose
Strategic R&D
activity with preset objectives
Strategy
development
through action
Operations
development through
increased knowledge
Problem solving
by collaborative
accomplishments
Organization
Network forms around
an utilizer, who
organizes actions for
rapid knowledge results
Network forms around a
region (regional
development) or a funded
project (public funding)
Network forms
around a provider
organization
Network initiated by
users lacks formal
coordination
mechanism
Action
Utilizer guides information
collection from the users
and promotes knowledge
creation that supports the
achievement of pre-set
goals
Information is collected
and used together and
knowledge is co-created
in the network
Information is collected for
immediate or postponed
use; new knowledge is
based on the information
that providers gets from the
others
Information is not collected
locally and builds upon
users’ interests;
Knowledge is utilized in the
network to help the user
community
Outcomes
Utilizer guides information
collection from the users
and promotes knowledge
creation that supports the
achievement of pre-set
goals
Guided strategy
change into a
preferred
direction
New knowledge
supporting
operations
development
Solutions to
users’ everydaylife problems
Lifespan
Strategic R&D activity
with pre-set objectives
Short/Medium/Lo
ng
Short/Medium/Lo
ng
Long
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Links with the other activities
• Almost all the activities are linked to this
methodology
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Entry points
The complexity of the situation requires to define
clear entry points which concern
• Topics & related specifications
• Constitutive elements of the OLL
• Processes & working methodologies
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Topics & related specifications
Specific, thematic interactions
among partners & Stakeholders
airLED territorial context and related partners interests
Logistics &
Transport
Spatial
development
environment &
architecture
Business and
investment
development
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Matrix
Partners
Transport and Logistics
spatial development
business and investment
development
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
PP2 - RDA o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
BSC
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
PP4 Mazovia
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
PP7 Vecsés
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
PP8 Cerklje
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
PP9 - RER
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
o Thematic positioning related to airLED
o expected results
o Input on experiences Vs other partner case
LP - bp18
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Constitutive elements of the OLL
Universities
Firms
Public Authorithies
Users Citizens
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
airLED Constitutive elements of the OLL
Local / Regional level
UE level
Policy focus
Technical expertise focus
RDCB
RDCB
Members
ASG
RDCB
Managers
KTI
IUD
Thematic
experts
Political
Board
Partnership
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
airLED Constitutive elements of the OLL
RDCB
Firms
ASG
Public
Authorithies
Users
Citizens
Universities
/ Research
Partnership
Need to answer this complexity with work processes
methodologies and clear setup and enrichments of technical
expertise
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Thematic interactions
Tools
• 4.2.7,11,13,14,18,4.3.1,8,9
Interactions
RDCB Meetings
3.2.10-13 Regional
integrated plans
Peer Review
3.3.12-15 Roadmaps
for endorsement
3.2.9 Transnational strategy
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
RDCB
• O3.3.8-11
• 7 meetings in each region
• It is up to the single partner to define the channels for
stakeholders involvement as well as the relevant
strategies
• ASG support is needed
• Thematic Experts (TE) are needed
• Signature list
• Report of the meeting
• Possibly photos
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
RDCB Meetings
3rd RDCB
•
•
•
SQ analysis finalized/presented
Definition of expected results from the Regional development plan (what is the concrete outputs referred to the matrix of
topics)
Definition of stakeholders to be involved
4th RDCB - Initial milestones of elaboration
•
•
•
•
Backcasting approach suggested
Definition of actors to be involved
Input from SQ analysis output and Peer Review workshops
Actions and Technical studies needed for the development plan
TE
5th RDCB - Midterm milestones of elaboration
•
•
•
Backcasting approach suggested
Discussion on the development plan draft (with ASG written feedback also on reports of RDCB)
Input from GP analysis based on topic matrix draft technical studies & interim pilot tools results
TE
6th RDCB - Final milestones of elaboration
•
•
•
•
•
Backcasting approach suggested
Conclusion of the Regional development plan (with ASG written feedback also on reports of RDCB)
Eventual tuinings
Input from pilots and from master class
Definition of steps for endorsement
TE
ASG
ASG
7th RDCB - finalisation of development plan
•
Internal approval
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Focus on backcasting
Process of moving from the developed scenarios
backwards to the present situation of the participants
BRAIN
STORMING ON
CONSTRAINTS
PROBLEM
SOLVING
BY-EFFECTS
Step 1
Consider possible constraints to realise the back-casting skeleton. Possible
constraints are listed for each of the stakeholders.
Step 2
How to overcome these constraints?
Step 3
Consider possible, positive and negative by-effects of their proposals. By-effects are effects
that are not intended but could occur as part of the process (spillover / side effects).
Please consider the Backcasting process as proposal
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Focus on backcasting
Process of moving from the developed scenarios
Social
imagination
backwards to the present
situation
of the participants
Visions
BRAIN
STORMING ON
CONSTRAINTS
Problems
PROBLEM
SOLVING
BY-EFFECTS
Step 1
Values
Ideas
Consider possible constraints to realise the back-casting skeleton. Possible
constraints are listed for each of the stakeholders.
Step 2
Realisation
How to overcome these
constraints?
Step 3
Consider
possible, positive and negative by-effects of their proposals. By-effects are effects
Overcoming
Change
that are not intended but could occur as part of the
process (spillover / side effects).
barriers
agents
Please consider the Backcasting process as proposal
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Peer review workshop
• Methodological approach of the meeting
– Constitutive phase
– Problems focusing phase
– Co-building phase of regional integrated polycentric
development plan key priorities
• Input
Interactive sessions
– SQ analysis
– Support of the experts and ASG
• Participants
– Partners
– RDCB Members
– ASG
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Constitutive elements
• INPUT from external experts on:
– Examples of airled tools application (real cases)
• Tool 1: Policy making modelling tool
• Tool 2: Airport city with Imageneering
• Tool 3: One stop shop
– High level expert in airport city
– Cases of airport cities
– Financing airport cities
• BEI, Connecting Europe facility (CEF)
• INPUT from ASG (KTI+IRM)
– GP Analysis (O4.1.20)
• Participation of Thematic Expert from partners
– Needed for the transnational workshops
Gaining inputs
Masterclass
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Transnational thematic workshops
• Outputs: 3.2.8-3.2.1.14
– 2 days including 3rd supporting tool workshops;
– 3 experts/PP (internal and 2 external) along the thematic pillar discuss
the outcome of Master Class and further steps to be taken.
– Focus also on finalisation of supporting tools
• Constitutive elements
–
–
–
–
Thematic Expert from partners who participated at the masterclass
ASG
Partners working on the three tools
Airport Regions Conference (ARC)
• Three steps approach
– Workshop 1: O3.1.1 done
– Workshop 2: Main contents of the transnational strategy
– Workshop 3: Draft final of the transnational strategy
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Transnational thematic workshops/2
Possible structure
airLED pillars within the airport city concept
Block 1
Plenary session
Block 2
Parallel sessions per pillar
Logistics &
Transport
Spatial
development
environment &
architecture
Business and
investment
development
Block 3
Plenary session
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Alberto Preti
[email protected]
Giuseppe Luppino
[email protected]
Anna Giarandoni
[email protected]
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.