Transcript Document
NCLB: Challenges & Opportunities Prepared by the Santa Barbara County Education Office NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities No Child Left Behind 2 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Secretary of Education Rod Paige "Our country is uniquely the product of two powerful forces: our love of freedom and our desire for knowledge. With God's grace, every good thing in this country flows from these two rivers of human aspiration. They become one mighty torrent: education is freedom. Our economic wealth, our national security, our rich culture, and our immense technological abilities are the product of our educational enterprise. Our educational endeavor will define our future. ” 10/14/03 3 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities We have moved from… the bell curve, where 50% of students are average or above - to academic standards, where ALL students will reach proficiency or above. This constitutes a PARADIGM SHIFT in educational practice. 4 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Yes, we are working hard, but… …in the old system “If we always do what we’ve always done, we’ll always get what we’ve always got.” We are all on a standards-based system learning curve 5 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities NCLB: Politics of Accountability Variability state-to-state Participation rate Expectations for Special Education & ELL High Quality Teacher and morale Lack of supplemental services providers Non-regulatory guidance 6 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Discussion… What do you currently see as the larger issues surrounding the implementation of NCLB? 7 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities NCLB Performance Goals 1. All students will reach high standards, at a minimum, attaining proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by 2013-2014. 2. All limited-English proficient students will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards, at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language arts and mathematics. 8 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities NCLB Performance Goals 3. By 2005-2006, all students will be taught by highly qualified teachers. 4. All students will be educated in learning environments that are safe, drug free, and conducive to learning. 9 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities NCLB Performance Goals 5. All students will graduate from high school. 10 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Research-Based Improvement Districts must use effective methods and instructional strategies grounded in scientifically based research for: Schoolwide and targeted assistance programs School improvement plans Professional development Technical assistance provided by districts to low performing schools 11 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities We are in the “cold waters” of implementing a new system… Do we grab anything that floats… or get into the lifeboat and row ashore? Our “lifeboat” is…systemic reform Our “oars” are…effective teachers 12 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Title I Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged 13 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Two Systems STATE API - Academic Performance Index Measures all schools in E/LA and math - All accountable Compensatory Measures on a scale with goal of 800 FEDERAL AYP - Adequate Yearly Progress Measures all schools in E/LA and math - only Title I schools under sanctions Sets a bar for all students to reach or exceed Schools must meet 4 measures to make AYP 14 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities NCLB Title I Assessments Science assessments: Grade 5 by 2004-05; Middle and HS by 2007-08 California Standards Tests for Grades 2-8 in E/LA and mathematics CAHSEE for Grade 10 CAPA for severely involved students in special education - limited to 1% of district CAT/6 given only in grades 3 & 8 commencing July 1, 2004 (AB 1485, Firebaugh) CA Standards Test Blueprints: www.cde.ca.gov/statetests/star/resources.html 15 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities 2002-03 API Cycle : Grades 2-8 Base & Growth Elementary/Middle E/LA 60% E/LA NRT • Reading • Language • Spelling E/LA CST Math 40% 12% Math NRT 8% 6% 3% 3% Math CST 32% 48% 16 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities 2002-03 API Cycle : Grades 9-12 Base & Growth High School E/LA 48% NRT • Reading • Language 6% 3% 3% CST 32% CAHSEE 10% Math 24% NRT CST CAHSEE Science 3% 16% 5% 8% NRT 3% CST 5% H/SS CST 20% 17 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities API 2002 Base (Feb. 2003) Elementary & Middle School NRT 20% CST 80% High School NRT 12% CST 73% CAHSEE 15% 88% of high school API is standardsbased 18 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 19 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) NCLB passed into law on January 8, 2002 All students are to reach proficiency in E/LA and mathematics no later than 2013-2014 State 2001-02 assessment data have been used as a baseline for the 12-year timeline AYP information is available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ayp http://ayp.cde.ca.gov 20 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities NCLB Effect on API Used as “additional indicator” in AYP --> included in Phase 2 AYP report Still reported to assist public and schools to monitor improvement State currently resolving issues of any rewards/sanctions for non-Title I schools (Distinguished Schools, etc.) 21 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities AYP is Key Component All schools and districts must meet AYP Schools receiving Title I funds face additional mandates and sanctions Districts face AYP accountability requirements in 2004-05 AYP introduced in 3 phases this year August, November and early February 22 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities 4 Parts to Meeting AYP AMOs - Annual Measurable Objectives in English-language arts and mathematics (schoolwide and subgroups) Participation Rate of 95% (schoolwide and subgroups) Growth in API of at least one point or minimum API score Graduation Rate improved one-tenth of 1% from the prior year (districtwide and schoolwide) 23 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO’s) Elementary and Middle Schools are based on: The California Standards Tests (CSTs) in English language arts and math The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities High Schools are based on: Results from the Grade 10 California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) administration The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities NCLB prohibits the use of norm-referenced test data in measuring student achievement 24 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Annual Measurable Objectives To achieve AYP, a school must meet or exceed Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) schoolwide and for each student subgroup: • economically disadvantaged • major ethnic and racial groups • students with disabilities • English language learners 25 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Percent Proficient Targets Elem. District HS District (K-8, K-6, 6- (9-12) 8, 7-8, etc.) Unified or HS District (7-12) E/LA 13.6 11.2 12.0 Math 16.0 9.6 12.8 26 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities AMO’s: English language arts Elementary and Middle Schools and Elementary Districts 100.0% 100% 89.2% 78.4% 67.6% 56.8% 46.0% 35.2% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 24.4% 13.6% 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 20132002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 27 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities AMO’s: Math Elementary / Middle Schools / Elementary Districts 100.0% 100% 89.5% 79.0% 68.5% 58.0% 47.5% 37.0% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 26.5% 16.0% 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 20132002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 28 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities AMO’s: English language arts High Schools / High School Districts 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 20 01 -2 20 00 02 2 -2 20 00 03 3 -2 20 00 04 4 -2 20 00 05 5 -2 20 00 06 6 -2 20 00 07 7 -2 20 00 08 8 -2 20 00 09 9 -2 20 01 10 0 -2 20 01 11 1 -2 20 01 12 2 -2 20 01 13 3 -2 01 4 0% 11.2% 100.0% 88.9% 77.8% 66.7% 55.6% 44.5% 33.4% 22.3% 29 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities AMO’s: Math High Schools / High School Districts 9.6% 100.0% 88.7% 77.4% 66.1% 54.8% 43.5% 32.2% 20.9% 20 01 -2 20 00 2 02 -2 20 00 3 03 -2 20 00 4 04 -2 20 00 5 05 -2 20 00 6 06 -2 20 00 7 07 -2 20 00 8 08 -2 20 00 9 09 -2 20 01 0 10 -2 20 01 1 11 -2 20 01 2 12 -2 20 01 3 13 -2 01 4 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 30 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities *K-6, 6-8 and 7-8 use chart on Slide 27 AMO’s: English language arts* Unified Districts / High School Districts with Grades 7/8 100.0% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 89.0% 78.0% 67.0% 56.0% 45.0% 34.0% 23.0% 12.0% 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 20132002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 31 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities *K-6, 6-8 and 7-8 use chart on Slide 28 AMO’s: Math* Unified Districts* & High School Districts with Grades 7/8 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100.0% 89.1% 78.2% 67.3% 56.4% 45.5% 34.6% 23.7% 12.8% 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 20132002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 32 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities The API as the “Other” Indicator Defining Progress on the API as the "Other" Indicator of AYP 800 800 770 750 740 710 API Score 700 680 650 650 620 600 560 590 550 500 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 201302 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011 2012 2013 2014 33 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Participation Rate At least 95% of the students enrolled in the school and in each of its subgroups must take the assessment Parent “opt outs” will be included in the denominator and will count against Participation Rate. The State is looking a how to solve the issues surrounding this requirement 34 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Graduation Rate Graduation rate of 82.8% or Improvement in the graduation rate of at least 0.1% or improvement of at least 0.2% in the average 2-year rate (change from the average of 2000/01 to 2002/03) 35 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Mobility Full year = CBEDS Day to the first day of testing Student enrolled in school full year? Counted in school score Student enrolled in district but not school for full year? Counted in district score Student not enrolled in school or district for full year? Counted in state score 36 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Program Improvement If a district and/or school receiving Title I funds does not achieve AYP in one subject area (math or E/LA) for two consecutive years, immediately at the start of the next year, the district/school enters Program Improvement (PI) status and is subject to the following: 37 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities PI Year PI Interventions 1 Revise school plan to cover two years 1 School choice 1 High quality professional development 1 Inform parents of PI status 2 Supplemental Educational Services 3 Corrective Action… 38 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities District Selects One Option… Replace the school staff that is relevant to the school failure. Institute and fully implement a new and effective research-based curriculum. Decrease the school site management authority. Appoint an outside expert to advise Extend the school year or school day for the school. Restructure the internal organization of the school. 39 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities State Action Year 4 PI - State Action SAIT Plan for Alternative Governance SMO option through State Board Action Year 5 PI - Alternative Governance Reopen School as Charter Replace all or most of staff, inc. principal Outside mgmt. State takeover 40 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Professional Development Schools identified for improvement must spend at least 10 percent of their Title I Part A funds on professional development for the school’s teachers and principal, directly addressing the academic achievement problem that caused the school to be identified for improvement. 41 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities PD for PI schools must be on: Specific areas causing school to become PI Use of data/assessments to inform instructional practice ELL instruction/language and support services Classroom management Special needs children Working effectively with parents Technology to improve teaching and learning 42 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Funded PD Opportunities AB 75 Principal Training Program AB 466 Instructional Materials Training Reading First & Early Reading First Grant Enhancing Education through Technology Grant (25%) Title I, Part A (5% or 10% for PI Schools) Title II, Part B: Mathematics & Science Partnerships Title III, English Learners Title IX, Part A: General Provisions 43 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities For a CDE presentation on AYP, go to: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ope/eval/index.htm and select “NCLB Accountability Information” Presentation includes AYP percent proficient charts for E/LA and math 44 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Discussion… What do you see as the positives and negatives of NCLB accountability? 45 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements 46 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Highly Qualified Teacher All students will be taught by highly qualified teachers in core academic areas by July 1, 2006 “New” teachers (credential issued after July 1, 2002) must pass a subject matter competence exam “Not New” teachers must be certified through several options, including HOUSSE (Highly Objective Uniform State Standard of Evaluation) - CURRENTLY IN DRAFT FORM 47 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Core Academic Areas English Reading/Language Arts Mathematics Science Foreign languages Civics/Government Economics Arts History Geography 48 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Demonstrating Subject Matter Competence 49 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Top Priority to Meet Requirements: Teachers hired after the first day of class of the 2002-03 school year into Title I, Part A-supported programs • Schoolwide - all core academic subject teachers • Targeted Assistance - only teachers paid with Title I, Part A funds LEAs have until June ‘04 to ensure these “new hires” have demonstrated subject matter competency (if not already) 50 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Who Does not Meet Requirements? Teachers authorized under: Emergency permits Waivers Pre-intern certificates Planning requires knowing: When teacher was credentialed Grade span responsibilities Funding source 51 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities “Not New” Teachers - Elementary Highly qualified (HQ) through: Graduate Degree (BA or BS) CA credential (or intern credential/certificate for no more than 3 years) Subject matter competence by • Exam or • HOUSSE 52 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities “Not New” Teachers - Middle & HS HQ through: Graduate Degree CA credential (or intern credential/certificate for no more than 3 years) Subject matter competence by • • • • Exam or Coursework or National Board Certification or HOUSSE 53 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities HOUSSE Highly Objective Uniform State System of Evaluation Part 1 - Objective is 100 points Up to 50 points for up to 5 years experience in core area 50 points for academic coursework 90 points for up to 3 years leadership and service to profession in assigned area (LEA can determine some of this area) 54 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities HOUSSE Part 2 - Completes the 100 required points if not gained through Part 1: 20 points for the completion of each successful observation (focus on CA Standards for the Teaching Profession Standards 3.1 & 5) 100 points for completion of successful portfolio assessment 55 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Special Situations USDOE will soon be coming out with new Guidance for: Middle schools Small high schools Alternative education Some special education programs 56 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Notices to Parents Beginning of Year: Notification that parents may request information regarding the professional qualifications of their child’s teacher During year: Timely notification to parents if student has been assigned or has been taught for 4 or more consecutive weeks by a teacher who does not meet NCLB requirements. 57 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities HQT Resources The State Board of Education took action on HQT at their July 11, 2003 meeting. For full draft document, go to: http://www.cde.ca.gov/board/agenda/yr2003/ june/bluejun03item6.pdf Also find the NCLB Teacher Requirement Resource Guide and “Improving Teacher Quality” Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/pr/nclb/ 58 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Paraprofessional Qualifications in Title I Programs/Schools Currently employed paraprofessionals have until January 8, 2006 to complete requirements of competency exam (selected by LEA). As of January 8, 2003, newly hired paraprofessionals must have two years of college and/or an AA degree. All paraprofessionals must possess a high school diploma. 59 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Paraprofessional Resources Refer to January ‘03 CDE NCLB Update, and letter from Jack O’Connell under “Correspondence” at http://www.cde.ca.gov/pr/nclb/ Find Draft Non-regulatory Guidance at http://www.ed.gov/ - Type “paraprofessionals” in the Search box. 60 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Questions? API AYP Program Improvement High Quality Teacher 61 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Discussion How will HQT requirements affect… your district? your school? your students you? 62 Title III NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities National Increase in EL Students Nineteen states have reported an increase of more than 50 percent in English language learners over the last three years-and that growth is expected to continue. NCLB provides $665 million to help EL students acquire English language skills. This is a 49 percent increase over 2001. 64 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities English Language Learners in CA In the 2002-2003 school year there were 1,599,542 English learners in California public schools This is 25.6% of the total CA public school enrollment 68% of these students are in grades K-6 65 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Title III Overview Requires that teachers be certified as English language proficient Requires that curricula be demonstrated to be effective. Targets funds to the school (95%) Establishes annual measurable achievement objectives (AMAOs) for limited English proficient students in English language development 66 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Title III Overview Requires EL students to attain proficiency or greater on academic content and achievement standards Requires reading and language arts assessments of children in English Enforces accountability requirements for AYP Notifies parents about program placement within 30 days of start of school year Promotes high quality professional development 67 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Evaluation Must Include: The progress of children in attaining English proficiency Attainment of the states content and achievement standards Progress in meeting accountability requirements 68 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Evaluation Assessment instrument: California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Language proficiency measured in listening, speaking, reading and writing + comprehension score to be derived for 2004 K-1 must be assessed in reading and writing incorporated into the 2005 CELDT 69 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Language Proficiency Levels Beginning Early Intermediate Intermediate Early Advanced Advanced 70 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities AMAOs 1. Annual increases in the percentage of students making progress in learning English Gain of one proficiency level per year as measured by a percent of students in LEA Current target = 51% 71 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities AMAOs 2. Annual increases in the percentage of children attaining English language proficiency At their May 2003 meeting, the State Board approved the criteria used to determine English language proficiency on the CELDT : Early Advanced level overall AND Intermediate or higher on each individual skill area 72 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities AMAOs Student cohort for measurement will be: 2. Students with 2 years of CELDT scores who have been in U.S. school for 4 or more years Students at the Intermediate level or above who did not reach English proficiency the prior year Student below the Intermediate level the prior year who met English proficient level GOAL is 30% of the cohort reaching English proficiency 73 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Interventions Fail AMAOs for: Two consecutive years = Develop an improvement plan Four consecutive years = Modify the curriculum, program and method of instruction or cut Title III funds FAQ: www.cde.ca.gov/el/title3/faqs.html 74 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Parental Rights Parents of EL students participating in a language instruction program must be noticed not later than 30 days after the beginning of the school year about: Reasons for identification & placement English proficiency & academic levels Methods of instruction How program meets student needs Parental Rights How program will help child achieve proficiency in language and academics Program exit requirements If disability, how program meets IEP goals 75 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Title II: Parent Involvement 76 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Parent Involvement District & school parent involvement policies Meetings and dissemination of information School-Parent Compact, jointly developed www.cde.ca.gov/fc/family/compacts.html Capacity building activities Communication of resources Volunteerism 77 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Parent Involvement • Assistance understanding the state’s academic content and achievement standards • Materials and training to help parents work with their children to improve academic achievement • Training for school staff in how to reach out to, communicate with, and work with parents as equal partners (Ruby Paine) • Parental right-to-know their EL child’s progress (SB 1595 Escutia, 2001-2002) 78 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Parent Involvement • Notice about the option to request the professional qualifications of the child’s teacher • The school’s program improvement status and any failure to make progress • Information about the school and the child’s progress communicated in a language the parents can understand • Information about accessing the California Parent Center at http://parent.sdsu.edu 79 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Resources for Parents The LA newspaper, La Opinión, has published “Padres en la Escuela” supplement to help families better understand NCLB (http://www.laopinion.com/supp5/). For an English translation, contact Families in Schools (http://www.familiesinschools.org/). The federal government Website (www.ed.gov/parents) has a wealth of resources available, many in Spanish. Select “Publications” at the above site and go to “Ed Pubs Online Ordering System” to order publications in quantity for parents, teachers, and administrators. 80 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Key Challenges of Reform Assessment & Data-driven Decisions Research-based programs State and Federal Accountability Teacher and Principal Quality Systems Alignment Collaboration & Shared Leadership 81 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Discussion… How can the district support its teachers and administrators in the reform effort? How do we successfully bridge the gap between the old and new paradigm? 82 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities In closing… “What we have before us are some breathtaking opportunities disguised as insoluble problems.” - John Gardner 83 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Questions? 84 NCLB: Challenges and Opportunities Prepared by Carol Johansen Assistant Superintendent Instructional Services Santa Barbara County Education Office (805) 964-4710, x5219 [email protected] 85