Transcript The Euro After Five Years Achievements and Challenges
Recent Development of the Czech Economy and Perspective of Euro Adoption in New Member States
Ludek Niedermayer Czech National Bank, Prague
www. .cz
Czech economy in 80s
• • • • In 80s, Czechoslovakia one of the most rigid and most heavily regulated economies in the East block; Level of macroeconomic stability, private savings and credibility of the currency relatively high; Nominal inflation low, hidden inflation high (demand overhang on market with state controlled prices); Field for the monetary policy; limited number of banks (monobank dissolved in Nov 89); no financial markets; koruna not convertible, existence of limited black market.
Economic reform – January 91
• • • • • Liberalization of prices; Liberalization of foreign trade; Internal convertibility of Koruna (for CA transactions); Start of privatization; Unification of exchange rates and introduction of
fixed rate
against trade weighted basket.
• Due to weak credibility, low capital inflows , financing through official resources at the beginning.
Results – early days
25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GDP Inflation
Note : In 1993, split of Czech and Slovak Federation Note : Inflation in 1991 was 56,6%, in 1993 VAT introduction
Development in this decade
• • • • Economy faced several problems at the end of 90s: Growing demand, while slow change of suply side Growing internal and external imbalances Corporate governance problems (mainly banks) In May 97, CZK was forced out of semi-fixed FX regime, since 1998 CNB adopted inflation targetting Privatisation of banking sector (since late 90s) Changes in politics, policy of promotion of FDI
New millenium - More growth …
• • From the beginning of decade the economy accelerates its growth, in spite of not always favorable external conditions; Export and investments are leaders of growth in 2006, consumption (and investments) growth is picking up now. 10 8 6 2 4 0 -2 01/I III 02/I III 03/I III 04/I III 05/I III 06/I III 07/I HDP Spotřeba domácností Fixní investice
…inflation mostly below the target …
• • • • • • In 2006 (1-3 Q) inflation is pulled up by regulated prices and energies, net inflation is still low; In 2007 (1- 3 Q) inflation still below the target but heading up, recently 4% y-o-y (food, energy); In 2008, inflation will be pushed up by increase of VAT and other taxes; But the monetary policy will react on 2nd round effects only, the expecatations; Wages are crucial. 7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Globaly, is inflation on the rise?
Meziroční inflace v %
-1.0
1/01 5 9 1/02 5 9 1/03 5 9 1/04 5 9 1/05 5 9 1/06 5 9 1/07 5 9
…allows low nominal interest rates…
3M pribor
• • • • • The inflation in this decade was most of the time below the target; Even long term interest rates often below Euro rates, boosting lending market; Low nominal rates have made CZK financing currency for many investors. Summer market volatility has brought correction; Market is now again expecting appreciation; FX rate uncertainty is one of the key risks of any CNB forecast.
6,0 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 6 2 1 0 5 4 3
Swap rates (1,5,10 Y)
Surplus in trade balance despite high energy costs and growth of demand...
• • • • Change of foreign trade balance into surplus caused mainly by growth of export (role of FDI); Current account deficit is outcome of negative balance of income (mostly reflects the profit of FDI). Part of profit is reinvested, but proportion fluctuates; Currently speed of growth of exports similar to imports, but new capacities can bring improvement; Market pays more attention to external balance now.
-10 -12 -6 -8 4 -2 -4 2 0 Current account and its components / GDP ratios (moving annual cumulations in %) 6 I/98 III I/99 III I/00 III I/01 III I/02 III I/03 III I/04 III I/05 III I/06 III I/07 trade balance income balance current account balance of services current transfers
FDI on GDP
CZ AT DE PT HU 1998 16,7 6,9 5,1 11,7 .
1999 24,4 7,2 7,3 12,7 .
PL SI .
.
11,7 .
SK 6,4 .
Zdroj. Eurostat, výpočet ČNB 2000 29,6 10,8 15,7 16,9 .
13,9 .
.
2001 34,3 11,7 13,8 19,1 .
16,1 10,5 .
2002 37,7 11,2 15,1 20,7 .
15,9 11,8 22,9 2003 34,9 10,8 15,5 20,5 .
17,5 12,6 20,6 2004 37,8 .
14,2 21,6 37,0 22,7 14,3 .
2005 42,2 .
.
.
35,6 22,5 14,9 .
… good macro is pushing CZK …
• • • • Trend of CZK appreciation continues since 90´s and is one of key factors of low inflation; Pro appreciation – strong fundamentals (including BoP until recently), EU catch up; Against – sometime regional links, low nominal interest rates, perspective of the BoP; Recent financial turbulence has caused appreciation of CZK, as many short positions have been cancelled.
30 25 20 15 55 50 45 40 35 40 25 20 35 30 USD XDR EUR (rs)
… labour market improvement substantial, is it just cyclical?
• • Unemployment falls slowly in 2005-6, share of long-term unemployment is high; Since mid 2007, decline more evident despite of no substantial improvement of labour market regulations; • • Employment increased more than 1,7% in 2007; Growing evidence of labour shortage in recent months, outflow of foreign workers is a real threat; • Openness of market (access of non-residents) can compensate small flexibility of domestic labour market; • Than, issue of outflow of foreign labour creates new risk. Míra nezaměstnanosti a Beveridgeova křivka (sezonně očištěné údaje) MPSV VŠPS 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 I/00 III I/01 III I/02 III I/03 III I/04 III I/05 III I/06 III I/07 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 360 8/07 380 1/99 400 1/07 1/01 1/02 1/06 1/00 420 440 460 480 500 Počet nezaměstnaných osob 1/03 1/05 1/04 520 540
… and fiscal policy is source of concern…
• • • • • • Effort to consolidate public finance „in good times“ was „limited“; EU commitment not respected; Since 2007, new social transfers approved, in 2006 tax cuts; Reform package (tax reform and some expenditure cuts) effective next year, is not primarily focused on deficit reduction; After deficit reduction in 2008, year 2009 uncertain; Brussels commitment should be respected as the minimal effort.
10,0 8,0 6,0 4,0 2,0 0,0 -2,0 2 00 0 -4,0 2 00 1 2 00 2 -6,0 -8,0 -10,0 Conv. Prog. XI/05 2 00 3 Budget 2 00 4 2 00 5 Result 2 00 6 2 00 7 Result adj.
2 00 8 GDP
Risks for Economy
• • • Growth perspectives in EU source of more concern than earlier; Reaction of the economy on price increases next year; Currency appreciation – at which level it can hurt the growth?
• • Problems in the field of public finance still last; Problems in structural sphere are not solved so far: Pension reform; Changes in health care.
• • Problems on labour market (partly flexibility of labour market, set up of social system and qualification / regional mismatch) – more should be done; Education system should better respond to a „real world“.
Czech Republic, new EU states and Euro
Discussion on Euro in new EU states …
• New member countries do not have „opt out“, now more „outs“ than „ins“; from 10 new member countries 7 planned after EU accession to adopt Euro till the end of decade, first already in 2007; • Reality different, so far, only Slovenia is in Eurozone, Cyprus and Malta will join next January; • • Some countries „changed their mind“ – issue of willingness to do now the fiscal reform key for many states; In CR the discussion on Euro was not a priority : Crown does not suffer from the lack of credibility and is stable in last years, interest rates are not higher than in Eurozone; Financial market offers different types of short-term FX risk management tools.
New EU states „at glance“
• • „South wing“ Small countries, only one „catching up economy; Managed float, relatively small financial market; North wing Small countries, fastly catching up, closely linked to Scandinavia; Currency pegs for many years;
……
• „Central Europe“ Medium size countries, „catching up economies; All forced to leave FX anchors, currently mostly free floaters; More volatile economic development with periods of divergence; More problems with fiscal policy.
Some aggregate figures – poor and cheap neighbors…
GPD pre capita (EU – 12) Price level (EU – 12)
CZ AT DE 1998
43,4 102,5 110,3
1999
42,9 102,6 109,1
PT HU PL SK
77,5 44,0 47,6 40,3 77,9 44,7 46,1 38,2
SI
70,2 70,4 Zdroj: Eurostat, výpočet ČNB.
2000
45,1 101,8 109,3 79,2 46,9 51,9 42,1 69,7
2001
47,6 104,6 109,0 80,5 49,2 57,8 41,4 70,9
2002
53,2 102,4 107,7 81,0 54,1 54,3 42,6 71,4
2003
50,0 100,6 104,2 80,2 54,0 47,6 45,8 71,7
2004
50,7 100,1 103,1 81,5 56,9 47,0 49,6 70,4
2005
55,3 100,6 103,1 81,2 59,1 54,5 51,3 70,7
2006
57,8 100,0 102,5 81,4 56,5 55,6 53,7 70,6
Growing together ? No, thanks…
• • • GDP cycle symchronisation weak, as economy started its robust growth; Some benefits of both growth or even slow down of EU; Manufacturing influenced by German industry a lot (car market).
2 0 -2 8 6 4 EU-12 CZ -4 01/97 01/98 01/99 01/00 Zdroj: Eurostat, výpočet ČNB.
01/01 01/02 01/03 01/04 01/05 01/06 01/07 16 12 8 -4 -8 4 0 -12 01/99 01/00 01/01 Zdroj: Eurostat, výpočet ČNB.
01/02 01/03 01/04 EU-12 CZ 01/05 01/06
Trade argument holds? Yes !
• • • Very strnong trade relations; Similar development in investments side; Even 3rd country firms producing for EU market.
45 40 35 30 60 55 50 75 70 65 CZ AT DE PT 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Zdroj: IMF, výpočet ČNB.
75 70 40 35 30 65 60 55 50 45 CZ SI HU SK PL 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 45 40 35 30 60 55 50 75 70 65 CZ AT DE PT 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Zdroj: IMF, výpočet ČNB.
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 CZ SI HU SK PL 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Euro dicsussion:
Economy vs. ideology
• Often divided into „nominal convergence“ (mainly Maastricht treaty rules) and „real convergence“ (OCA).
• • Fundamental and well-founded discussion on risks of FX volatility and competitive advantages of countries that will adopt Euro, or on costs of Euro adoption and benefits of independent monetary policy is not too advanced; Many economists do not believe it can bring exact results as exact arguments for or against could be hard to found.
• If anything matters, than it is flexibility of economy ...
• …but it should be demanded also without EMU entry… • …and rate of flexibility is difficult to measure …
“ Real Convergence – CR “
+
• • • Correlation of macro indicators growing up but still “moderate“ at maximum; Structure of economy different from economies of most EU members; No inprovement of the flexibility of economy in recent years; • • • EU growth is a very strong determinant of our economic growth; Very high proportion of foreign trade with EU (FDI as well); Reduction of costs on foreign trade will accelerate economic growth; • •
Members of Eurozone grow more slowly than „outs“; To fulfil the criteria can be difficult.
•
Euro adoption will solve some domestic problems.
… rules and „new“ national strategies are there …
• • Base to access nominal convergence is the fulfillment of Maastricht conditions; Real convergence is relevant for future development (cost / benefits) of a new member of Eurozone.
• • • • Remaining „Outs“ have various strategies – in some cases the „first attempt“ has failed; Peggers are now strugling with high inflation (among other things); Slovakia on its way to adopt Euro in 2009; For rest of the countries in our region, adoption of Euro means more significant change of monetary policy. In some countries, not a clear politic support.
… how are the rules applied ?…
• • Case of Lithuania and Slovenia showed willingness of Eurozone to accept new members but at the same time illustrates that the examination is very strict; Next wave of Cyprus and Malta without big discussion; • Recently more discussion about real convergence issues.
• So are new members ready?
• In general, economic situation and rate of convergence of 10 new members differs from the situation of most countries that have created monetary union.
Balance :
CR vs. Maastricht
• • • • • Stable and safe observance of 3 % limit of public deficit requires changes in public finances (pension reform will can increase deficits in future too); Recent rigid interpretation of inflation criterion could be a source of concerns too and requires certain level of preparation; Capability to limit FX rate volatility, and pass „successfully“ ERM II and „correctly fix FX rate“, could be a challenge for macro policies (see Slovakia);
Other two conditions (public debt and long term interest rates) seem to be easier to fulfil; What means sustainability? Maybe we will learn soon.
New EU vs. Maastricht :
State of play
• • • Entry of new members into Eurozone in 2007 (Slovenia) and in 2008 (Cyprus, Malta); After „Lithuania case“ more concerns among applicants, but Cyprus treated „friendly way“; Baltic applicants out of game for some time due to very high inflation; Next on the line is Slovakia, that is more similar to other VI 4.
• • • Bad state of Hungarian public finances put off possibility of quick Euro adoption in Hungary, in Poland it is not a political priority; These countries do not want to stay at ERM for a long time; New strategy for CR (after giving up date 1/1 2008) set no date so far, yearly autumn evaluations will continue.