Transcript Document
Synthesis and Spectroscopic Analysis of Therapeutic Ru(II) Complexes Samar Moqadasi,a,b Laura Perdisatt,a Christine O’Connor,a,b and Luke O’Neill.a,b aSchool of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kevin Street, bMaterials Synthesis and Applications (MSA) Research Group, FOCAS Institute, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 8, Ireland. [email protected] Previous work carried out on similar complexes has shown promising results. 2,3 The ligands of interest and the corresponding complexes are listed in table 1 and the structure of the resulting Ru(II) complex is given in figure 1. INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to synthesise and characterise new ligands based on a 1,10-Phenanthroline-5,6-dione backbone and their respective Ru(II) complexes; Ru(bpy)2mfmp, Ru(bpy)2fmp and Ru(bpy)2NO2-mp as shown in figure 1.The synthesis of the ligands will be discussed and a variety of Ru(II) complexes. A brief insight of the electronic and NMR spectroscopy will be presented along with preliminary photochemical results such as extinction coefficients, quantum yields and luminescence lifetimes. R1 Ruthenium complexes have well established synthetic and photochemical properties.1The objective of this work is to synthesise Ru(II) complexes for the applications of potential therapeutics. In order to establish their uses in medicinal applications we must first ensure their purity and photochemical properties. O CHO Ru(bpy)2mfmp Ru(bpy)2fmp Ru(bpy)2NO2-mp mfmp fmp NO2-mp CHO H H H CHO NO2 R2 Ru N N 2h reflux N N N RuL2Cl2 + N N R1 8 hrs. reflux 50cm3(ethanol/water) R1 R2 N N N NH N CH3COOH N N phen-dione R2 The respective Ru(II) complexes were prepared as shown in Figure 3 and isolated as a PF6 salt. R2 R2 CH3COONH4 + R1 N dione backbone. Figure 2 depicts the synthetic route of the ligands. R1 Ligands N N Table 1. The complexes and ligands investigated in this research. The ligands have been synthesised based on a 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6O Complexes N Figure 1. The Ru(II) complex structure. EXPERIMENTAL R2 N N N Ru N N N N N L= bpy R1 NH Figure 3. Synthetic route for the Ru(II)complexes N Figure 2. Synthetic route for the ligands Ligand R1 mfmp Table 2. The ligands synthesised in this research. R2 CHO fmp R2 H H NO2-mp R1 All ligands are recrystallised from hot ethanol and the complexes from acetone/water. CHO H N N N Ru N N N L= phen NO2 RESULTS An example of a 1H NMR COSY and HSQC NMR is given for the complex [Ru(bpy)2NO2-mp]. The COSY spectrum shown in Figure 4 confirms 1H NMR assignment for this complex and HSQC in Figure 5 gives further support to 13C NMR assignment. 8 NO2 7 5 4 6 N 10 N NH 11 N Ru 1 N 3 N 9 N 2 N Figure 5. 1H NMR-13C NMR HSQC (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) [ppm] of spectrum of [Ru(bpy)2NO2-mp] Figure 4. 1H NMR-COSY (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) [ppm] of spectrum of [Ru(bpy)2NO2-mp] Initial electronic spectroscopy results have been carried out in Acetonitrile. The results for absorption and emission studies and their respective extinction coefficient and quantum yield are presented in table 3. Complex Abs λmax(nm) -3 -1 [ε](mol dm cm ) Emission λmax(nm) [Фf] Ru(bpy)2fmp Ru(bpy)2mfmp Ru(bpy)2NO2-mp Std: Ru(bpy)3Cl2 457 (10,600) 457 (12,480) 456 (22,480) 451 (12,108) 597 [0.093] 597 [0.067] 600 [0.011] 602 [0.062] Luminescence Lifetime, τ (ns) [Nd: YAG laser] * degassed * 160 (204) * 183 (286) * 102 (164) * 320 (219) Luminescence Lifetime, τ (ns) [TCSPC] 176 254 162 215 Table 3. Absorption, emission, extinction coefficient, quantum yield and luminescent lifetimes (aerated and *degassed) by Nd: YAG laser and Time Correlated Single Photon Counting in Acetonitrile. CONCLUSION The preliminary spectroscopic results such as IR,1H NMR & 13C NMR suggest the complexes and their associated ligands are pure after recrystallisation. The absorption and emission studies were completed on 3 of the Ru(II) complexes and from this the extinction coefficients and quantum yields were calculated. The luminescent lifetimes were determined for each of the ruthenium (II) complexes by two laser techniques (Nd: YAG and TCSPC). REFERENCES 1. V. Balzani, A. Credi, M. Venturi, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998, 171, 3-16. 2. G. J. Ryan, S. Quinn, T. Gunnlaugsson, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 401-403. 3. K. A. O’Donoghue, J. M. Kelly, P. E. Kruger, Dalton Trans., 2004, 13-15. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to my supervisor, Dr. Christine O’Connor, also special thanks to Dr. Luke O’Neill and Laura Perdisatt for all their help. Strand 1 R & D funding 2006, Technological Sector Research Initiative NDP 2000-2006.