Transcript Document
A summary of state of the art in non-invasive diagnosis
of liver disease, liver transplantation, and treatments on
the horizon for hepatitis virus coinfected patients
XVII International AIDS Conference,
Session Room 11, HIV and Hepatitis Virus
Co-infection, Mexico City, Thursday,
August 7th, 2008
Jürgen Rockstroh
Department of Medicine I
University of Bonn, Germany
Hot topics in co-infection
Non-invasive diagnosis of liver
disease
Liver transplantation in co-infection
• Inclusion/exclusion criteria
• Outcome
Treatments on the horizon for
hepatitis virus coinfected patients
Limitations of liver biopsy
Acceptability
Cost
• Euro 1000 per biopsy
Morbidity
• Significant haemorrhage up
to 0.7%
• Mortality up to 0.03%
Reliability
• Length of biopsy
• Inter- and intra-observer
variability
• Assumes uniform disease
process
Blood tests
•
Matrix related:
PIIINP, collagen type IV, laminin
Hyaluronic acid, MMP, TIMP
•
Non matrix related:
AST, ALT, gamma GT
Bilirubin, prothrombin, platelets
Gammaglobulins, ferritin
Alpha 2 macroglobulin, haptoglobin
Apo A1, cholesterol, HOMA
Fibrotest in practice in
HIV/HCV co-infected patients
PPV 86% for F4
NPV 93% for <F1
Avoid liver biopsy in
55% with an
accuracy of 89%
Fibrotest: alpha2-macroglobulin,
haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1,
GGT, bilirubin (age and gender
adjusted)
Myers, R.P. et al., AIDS 2003;17:721-725
APRI:AST/platlets
Transient elastography
(Fibroscan®, Echosens, Paris)
Thresholds >7.9 kPa for ≥F2,
10.3kPa for ≥F3, 11.9 kPa for F4
Panos G et al., WAC 2008; THAB0203
Elastography in HIV/HCV
co-infected patients
De Lédinghen, V. et al., Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome 2006;41(2):175-179
Elastography in clinical practice:
What are the limitations?
Results investigator dependant
BMI > 28 kg/m2
Inter- and intra-observer differences highest
for F0 fibrosis
Ascites
Effect of hepatic steatosis
Effect of hepatic inflammation
Fraquelli, M. et al.,Gut 2007; 56:968-973
Management of HCV infected patients
Hepatitis C Ab +ve
Hepatitis C PCR to confirm active infection
+ perform HCV genotype
Tests of liver
function/status
(Bilirubin / ALT / AST / ALK
Phos / Albumin / PT)
Liver ultrasound
(to be performed
every 6 months)
Exclude other associated
liver disease
(Autoimmune, metabolic,
HBV, HDV)
Stage Liver Fibrosis
Perform non-invasive
marker testing
(serological
markers/fibroscan)
Concordance
Liver Biopsy
Discordance
Expert decision on need to treat
Adapted from the Body and the
Liver Program 2008
Hot topics in co-infection
Non-invasive diagnosis of liver
disease
Liver transplantation in co-infection
• Inclusion/exclusion criteria
• Outcome
Treatments on the horizon for
hepatitis virus coinfected patients
Hepatitis – Liver transplantation
Indications over time in Europe 1988-2000
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
68-8081 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000
Alcoholic cirrhosis: 5819
Primary biliary cirrhosis: 2931
Virus associated cirrhosis: 8025
Survival probability
HIV coinfection Shortens the Survival of Patients with HCVrelated Decompensated Cirrhosis
1.0
.8
Survival among HCV-infected
individuals with and without
HIV coinfection
p=<0.001
HIV-negative
.6
.4
HIV-positive
.2
0.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
HCV/HIV 54%
Months
No. at risk
HIV-negative 1037
HIV-positive 180
619 429
75
46
313 208
30 19
HCV
125year years years
74% 61% 44%
133
11
62
5
40%
25%
9
3
Pineda JA et al. Hepatology. 2005, 41:779-89
Liver transplantation and HIV-Infection
In the pre-HAART era :
1
• No difference in immediate postoperative survival between
HIV+ and HIV- patients
• Long-term high mortality rate due to infections and AIDSrelated complications
• Rapid progression of HIV to AIDS
In the HAART era²:
• No difference in postoperative survival between HIV+ and
HIV- patients
• Survival worse for low CD4-counts (<100/µl), post OLTX
antiretroviral intolerance, VL > 400 copies/ml and HCV
infection
1) Tzakis AG et al., Transplantation 1990;49:354-358
2) Ragni MV et al, J Infect Dis 2003;188:1412-1420
Are you willing to perform organ transplantations
in HIV+ patients ?
case to case
20%
no comment
2%
no
39%
yes
39%
Query in 87 centers in Germany in 2002
Frühauf et al. Chirurg 2004; 7: 681 - 686
HIV Criteria for OLT: European and U.S.A.
Recommendations
C events
- OIs
- Neoplasms
Spain1
Italy2
Some*
No
No <1 yr.
No
CD4 count
>100
VL BDL**
Yes
U.K.3 Germany4 U.S.A.5
No after
IR-cART
>100+/>200 >100+/>200
Yes
Yes
Some*
No
Some*
No
>100
>100
Yes
Yes
* Spain: TB, PCP or candidasis; USA: candidiasis or PCP but currently only PML, cryptosporidiosis and vKS are
exclusion criteria; Germany: PML, HIV-Leukencephalopathy** If VL was detectable, post-OLT suppression predicted in
all cases. +DC=Decompensated cirrhosis; PHT: portal hypertension.
1Miró,
EIMC, 2005; 2Centro Nazionale Trapianti, 2004; 3Brook, HIV Med. 2005/2006; 4German consensus guidelines in press,
5CCTAT, Am J Transplant, 2004.
Clinical data of liver transplanted HIV+ patients in
the Bonn cohort
Age
[Years]
43
34
52
57
58
31
31
56
36
Transmission
Risc
Haemophilia
MSM
MSM
MSM
Haemophilia
Haemophilia
Haemophilia
MSM
Haemophilia
CDC
CD4
A2
A1
A3
A3
A3
A3
C3
B3
B2
[/µl]
210
*50%
223
162
168
239
320
517
250
MELD
CD4
HIV-RNA
Follow-Up
15
HU
HU
25
n.A.
16
15
18
17
[/µl]
497
429
386
84
143
297
129
448
480
[cop/ml]
< 50
52801
< 50
n.d.
< 50
< 50
246
< 50
< 50
[months]
living – 77
living - 127
living – 70
dead - 3
living - 73
living - 53
living - 45
living – 26
living - 33
On the OLTX list
1) Vogel M et al., Liver Transpl 2005;11:1515-1521
2) Woijcek K et al., AIDS 2007;21:1363-1365
Last follow up
Mean follow-up 56mths
Impact of HIV on survival after liver
transplantation in the HAART era
Figure 1: Comparision of survival between HIV+
(n=138) and HIV- (n=30520) after LT
Figure 2: Comparision of survival between
HIV/HCV and HIV-/HCV vs HIV-/HCV- after LT
Mindikoglu A et al., Transplantation 2008;85:359-368
Would you stop HAART to avoid liver
toxicity? = No
Bruno et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007
Hot topics in co-infection
Non-invasive diagnosis of liver
disease
Liver transplantation in co-infection
• Inclusion/exclusion criteria
• Outcome
Treatments on the horizon for
hepatitis virus coinfected patients
Treatment Options for Chronic
Hepatitis B
Approved for HBV
(FDA/EMEA)
•Interferon alfa-2b
•Peginterferon alfa-2a
•Lamivudine
•Adefovir
•Entecavir
•Telbivudine
•Tenofovir DF
Unlabelled
Phase III
•Emtricitabine
Investigational
Phase III
•Clevudine
Phase II
•Pradefovir
•Valtorcitabine
•Amdoxovir
•ANA 380
•Racivir
TDF for the Treatment of HBeAg-Negative and HBeAgPositive Chronic Hepatitis B: Week 72 TDF Data and Week
24 Adefovir Dipivoxil Switch Data (Studies 102 and 103)
RANDOMIZATION 2:1
5 Years
Double Blind
Open-label
Tenofovir 300 mg
Tenofovir 300 mg
Study 102 N=250
Study 103 N=176
Adefovir 10 mg
Tenofovir 300 mg
Study 102 N=125
Study 103 N=90
Pre-treatment
Liver Biopsy
Marcellin P, et al., EASL 2008; Oral # 1602.
Heathcote J, et al., EASL 2008; Oral # 1593.
Week 48
Liver Biopsy
Week 72
Week 240
Liver Biopsy
% Patients with HBV DNA < 69 IU/ml (400 c/mL)
Persistent virologic response*
HBe Ag positive (study 103)
HBe Ag negative (Study 102)
100
100
Open Label TDF
Randomized Double Blind
90
79%
70
76%
60
50
40
(P=0.617)
30
70
50
40
30
20
10
10
0
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
68
72
76
P=0.315
60
20
0
88%
80
Percentage (%)
Percentage (%)
80
Open Label TDF
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
88
170
90
171
Heathcote J, et al. EASL 2008; Oral #1593
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
68
72
Weeks on Study
Weeks on Study
ADV N= 90
TDF N= 176
91%
Randomized Double Blind
90
87
164
ADV N= 125
TDF N= 250
124
243
123
246
Marcellin P, et al. EASL 2008; Oral #1602
* PVR ITT Anaylsis: Patients who discontinued for administrative reasons with
HBV DNA <400c/ml were excluded for visits after discontinuation
124
243
76
New Oral Small Molecule Antivirals in Development
for the Treatment of HCV
Drug name
Drug class
Preclinical Phase I Phase II Phase III
MK-0608 (Merck)
Nucleoside polymerase inhibitor
R7128 (Pharmasset & Roche)
Nucleoside polymerase inhibitor
NIM811 (Novartis)
Cyclophilin inhibitor
ITMN-191 (InterMune & Roche)
Protease inhibitor
X
X
X
MK-7009 (Merck)
Protease inhibitor
X
BI12202 (Boehringer)
Protease inhibitor
X
BI 1220 (Boehringer)
Nucleosite polymerase inhibitor
X
X
X
R1626 (Roche)
Nucleoside polymerase inhibitor
X
DEBIO-025 (Debiopharm)
Cyclophilin inhibitor
X
Telaprevir (Vertex Pharmaceuticals)
Protease inhibitor
X
Boceprevir (Schering-Plough)
Protease inhibitor
X
TMC435350 (Tibotec & Medivir)
Protease inhibitor
Adapted from Manns MP et al. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2007;6:991-1000.
X
PROVE1: Telaprevir + PegIFN/RBV in TreatmentNaive HCV GT 1 Patients
(n=75)
Placebo +
Peg-IFN + RBV
Peg-IFN + RBV
(n=17)
TVR +
Peg-IFN + RBV
Follow-up
(n=79)
TVR +
Peg-IFN + RBV
Peg-IFN + RBV
(n=79)
TVR + Peg-IFN
+ RBV
Control group
Weeks
0
12
Follow-up
Follow-up
Peg-IFN + RBV
24
36
Follow-up
48
60
72
Dosing: Peg-IFN = Peg-IFN alfa-2a 180 µg/week, RBV = RBV 1,000 or 1,200 mg/day,
TVR = TVR 750 mg q8h
McHutchinson J et al., EASL 2008; Oral #4
PROVE 1: Treatment Response Rates (ITT);
undetectable HCV-RNA < 10 IU/ml
Week 4
Undetectable
(RVR)
Week 12
Undetectable
SVR
Relapse
PegIFN/RBV/placebo 48
wks
(n = 75)
11
45
41
23 (8/35)
TVR/PegIFN/RBV 12 wks¶
(n = 17)
59
71
35
6 (3/51)
TVR/PegIFN/RBV 12 wks
PegIFN/RBV 12 wks¶
(n = 79)
81
68
61*
2 (1/41)
TVR/PegIFN/RBV 12 wks
pegIFN/RBV 36 wks
(n = 79)
81
80
67**
33 (3/9)
Treatment, %
*P
= .02 vs pegIFN/RBV/placebo 48 weeks, **P = .001 vs pegIFN/RBV/placebo 48 weeks.
¶Only
subjects who met the RVR criterion and stopped at 12 or 24 total weeks of treatment.
McHutchinson J et al., EASL 2008; Oral #4
Safety and tolerability in PROVE-1
The most common adverse events
reported more frequently than placebo
were gastrointestinal events, skin events
(rash, pruritus) and anemia
Other adverse events reported were similar in
type and frequency to those seen with PegIFN/RBV treatment
Treatment discontinuation through Week 12
due to adverse events were 18% in the TVRbased treatment arms and 4% in the control
arm
Summary
Non invasive markers for assessing liver disease in
coinfection can be used; in unclear cases or discordant
results liver biopsy remains the gold standard
HCV/HIV coinfected patients show a faster progression to
cirrhosis and increased liver-related mortality
OLTX is a treatment option in advanced liver disease and
needs to be considered
New drugs for HCV therapy are emerging promising
shorter PegIFN/RBV treatment durations but challenges
remain
• Drug-drug interactions
• Resistance development
• tolerability