Models of Support to FBO providers to scale up HIV services

Download Report

Transcript Models of Support to FBO providers to scale up HIV services

Models of Support to FBO providers to
scale up HIV services
Members
• Martin Sirengo-Kenya
• Bruno Miteyo-DRC
• Samuel Mwenda-Kenya
• Jean Claude Kazadi-USA
• Robert J. Vitillo –Caritas Int
• Carla Smith-USA
• Abubakar Sebwela-RSA
• Lebo Mothae-Lesotho
• Gift Werekhwe-Malawi
• Mona Bormet-USA
• Nyambura NjorogeSwitzerland
• Mafase Sesani-Malawi
• Bzorg Sandkjaer-Norway
• Sue Parry-Zimbabwe
• Theresa Maseka-Zambia
Introduction
• Arrangements date back to colonial period
• Many countries have national secretariats
coordinating discussions and service delivery
• Some have one umbrella secretariat like
Malawi (CHAM) and Zambia (CHAZ) whereas
others are separate like Uganda and Kenya
• Gentleman's agreement used initially until no
funding was forthcoming. This has led to govts
entering into MOUs with FBOs
Current models (MOUs)
General
1. MOUs-general
2. PPP agreements
Specific
• Financial support agreements
– Between Govt-FBO secretariat
 MOH-FBOs
 MOF-FBOs
• Service agreements -for compensation for certain services
provided
– May differ from one area to another
Areas of collaboration
• Human resource support
– Hire/secondment of HCWs
– Training of HCWs
•
•
•
•
•
Payment of utility bills e.g. Electricity and water
Supply of commodities and essential drugs
Policy formulation and IEC role
M&E: Reporting and accountability
Service delivery
Challenges
• Respect and operationalization of MOUs?-Sometimes
Misinterpretation of MOUs
• Changes in the Political landscape affects existing MOUs
• Govts may have reservations about capacity of FBOs to
provide services. NB: FBOs services are complementary
• Government support not matching the workload of FBOs
• Staff turn-over (back and forth movement depending on
funding esp among seconded HCWs)
• Nationalization of church services by governments causing
suspicion and mistrust
• Compensation may not be commensurate to the workload,
cost of services and may not be timely
Recommendations
1. Have and operationalize MOUs and its specifics i.e
 Funding
 HR support
 Supply chain support
 Service delivery
 M&E
Additionally:
 Monitoring and accountability mechanism for the MOU
implementation
 Harmonization of terms of service, salaries and benefits
for HCWs