Transcript Document
COST Trans Domain Proposals Final Report on TDP SAB TDP Pilot Evaluation and Selection Procedure COST Office 187th CSO Meeting, Brussels, 15th May 2013 COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme ESF provides the COST Office through a European Commission contract TDP-SAB Evaluation The Trans-Domain Proposals Standing Assessment Board (TDP-SAB) was introduced in 2008 in parallel to the launch of the Trans-Domain Proposals evaluation as a means for fostering interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary approaches within COST 1. Preliminary Proposal evaluated remotely by TDP-SAB • A varying amount and profile of DC Members / DC Experts involved at each call, depending on evaluation needs and availability 2. Full Proposal evaluated first remotely and then at a consensus meeting by an External Expert Panel (EEP) • Seen the large variety of topics, a sub-set of the remote evaluators (typically, 40 to 50 per call) has been invited to the EEP meeting 3. TDP-SAB Hearings: final ranking of the proposals and suggestion for CSO approval 2 TDP-SAB Composition • • COST Doc. 205/08: 9 DC Chairs, 18 members nominated by DC Chairs and TDP-SAB Coordinator • External consultant (Georges Wanet) appointed by former CSO President as TDPSAB Coordinator on the basis of 8 working days a year and for 450 EUR / day • Five Open Calls: 2008-1, 2008,2, 2009-1, 2009-2, 2010-1 COST Doc. 4115/10: 9 DC Chairs, TDP-SAB members with broad interdisciplinary expertise nominated by CNCs and TDP-SAB Chair • This form of TDP-SAB was never fully activated seen the low number of nominated TDP-SAB members (12 in total) • Therefore, Since 2010-2, a specific TDP-SAB composition was put in place: 9 DC Chairs, 18 members nominated by DC Chairs, TDP-SAB members nominated by CNCs and TDP-SAB Coordinator • Georges Wanet continued to serve as TDP-SAB Coordinator until 2012-2 3 TDP-SAB Summary of Calls and Approved Actions • A Total of 810 proposals evaluated over 10 calls • 34 running Actions (+ 4 suggested for approval) • Average success rate: 4,8% Call Proposals Actions Success Rate oc-2008-1 oc-2008-2 oc-2009-1 oc-2009-2 oc-2010-1 oc-2010-2 oc-2011-1 oc-2011-2 oc-2012-1 oc-2012-2 Total 65 4 6,2% 81 3 3,7% 97 3 63 3 4,8% 98 4 4,1% 73 3 4,1% 90 4 4,4% 59 4 6,8% 86 6 7,0% 98 4 4,1% 810 38 4,8% 3,1% • Actions allocated to Domains for administrative and monitoring purposes • Actions unevenly distributed by Domain 4 From TDP-SAB to TDP Panel • Following the 2010 Mid-Term Review of COST, the CSO established the Working Group “Implementation” to prepare measures and decisions for the implementation of the CSO Strategy “Shaping COST for the future” • In 2012, the CSO decided to use TDP to test a pilot evaluation and selection procedure to achieve a simple, fair and fast procedure fully transparent towards the proposers. • In the TDP Pilot, the TDP Panel replaces the TDP-SAB as the body supervising the whole TDP Pilot evaluation procedure in order to ensure transparency, fairness and excellence of the process. 5 TDP Pilot Evaluation and Selection Procedure New Proposal Template More concise, aligned with the evaluation criteria 1st Step “Challenge Selection”: Independent External Experts evaluate remotely the scientific and technological soundness of the proposal 2nd Step “Implementation Plan”: TDP Panel members with invited DC Members evaluate remotely the coherence and feasibility of the implementation plan supporting COST mission and criteria TDP Panel prepares consensus reports at a dedicated meeting Hearings “Management Capacity”: TDP Panel with invited DC Chairs evaluate leadership potential, motivation and drive, organisational and communication skills of the proposers Final ranking list established 6 Proposal Evaluation – TDP Panel Composition: Former CNC nominated TDP-SAB members with broad transdisciplinary expertise are formally appointed as TDP Panel members Chair and Vice-Chairs appointed by Presidency Responsible for monitoring all the TDP Pilot procedure Keeper of transparency, fairness and excellence of the evaluation process Involved at all steps of the evaluation 1st step: Validating the independent external experts identified by COST Office 2nd step: Evaluating the COST mission and criteria Hearings: Selecting the final list of proposals to be recommended to the CSO for funding 7 Proposal Evaluation Closing of Registrations (29/3) 2013 Apr 2013 Collection date (14/6) May Identification of External Experts (now to 5/6) 2013 Jun Step 1 Feedback (9/8) 2013 Jul 2013 JAF (16-17/10) Step 2 Feedback (13/9) Aug 2013 Sep Approval CSO (14/11) Hearings (30/9) (final list) 2013 Oct 2013 Quality Check (29/7-2/8) Nov COST Office CoI / Eligibility (14-19/6) Validation of External Experts (14-26/6) Implementation Plan: Remote Evaluation (5/8 – 24/8) Challenge selection: External experts evaluation (1/7 – 19/7) Implementation Plan: invited DC Members Remote Evaluation Consensus Meeting (9-10/9) Hearings (30/9) TDP Panel DC Chairs invited to the Hearings Other Evaluators Supporting TDP Panel 8 COST Experts Database Newly developed (in house) e-COST feature Used for a timely identification of relevant experts As of 13 May 2013: ~ 9773 registered experts Gender balance: 65% male, 35% female experts Age balance: ~64% of experts are younger than 45 Additional effort needed in covering all Research Areas Special access allows CNCs to contact the external experts in their country invited to evaluate TDP proposals (CNC bound by confidentiality) 9 Allocation of External Experts TDP Registrations (closed March 29th): 163 out of 192 intentions to submit are eligible Proposal Submission: Deadline June 14th at 5pm (1 proposal already submitted) External Experts are needed for 163 potential proposals Based on TDP past experience (1-2 proposals assigned per expert) 4-5 External Experts to assign to each proposal to ensure at least 3 evaluations (total: ~550 experts) TDP Panel validation of experts to assign on the basis of set of 7-8 experts/proposal available for evaluation (total: ~ 870 experts available) Availability check to be sent to ~20 experts/proposal (total: ~ 3200 availability checks) All these steps are supported by a tailor-made in house developed IT system on e-COST 10 Thank you COST Office Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium www.cost.eu