Slides for Rosen, 5th edition

Download Report

Transcript Slides for Rosen, 5th edition

Topic #1 – Propositional Logic
Module #1 - Logic
Propositional Logic (§1.1)
Propositional Logic is the logic of compound
statements built from simpler statements
using so-called Boolean connectives.
Some applications in computer science:
• Design of digital electronic circuits.
• Expressing conditions in programs.
• Queries to databases & search engines.
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
George Boole
(1815-1864)
Chrysippus of Soli
(ca. 281 B.C. – 205 B.C.)1
Topic #1 – Propositional Logic
Module #1 - Logic
Definition of a Proposition
Definition: A proposition (denoted p, q, r, …) is simply:
• a statement (i.e., a declarative sentence)
– with some definite meaning, (not vague or ambiguous)
• having a truth value that’s either true (T) or false (F)
– it is never both, neither, or somewhere “in between!”
• However, you might not know the actual truth value,
• and, the value might depend on the situation or context.
• Later, we will study probability theory, in which we assign degrees
of certainty (“between” T and F) to propositions.
– But for now: think True/False only!
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
2
Topic #1 – Propositional Logic
Module #1 - Logic
Examples of Propositions
• “It is raining.” (In a given situation.)
• “Beijing is the capital of China.” • “1 + 2 = 3”
But, the following are NOT propositions:
• “Who’s there?” (interrogative, question)
• “La la la la la.” (meaningless interjection)
• “Just do it!” (imperative, command)
• “Yeah, I sorta dunno, whatever...” (vague)
• “1 + 2” (expression with a non-true/false value)
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
3
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Operators / Connectives
An operator or connective combines one or
more operand expressions into a larger
expression. (E.g., “+” in numeric exprs.)
• Unary operators take 1 operand (e.g., −3);
binary operators take 2 operands (eg 3  4).
• Propositional or Boolean operators operate
on propositions (or their truth values)
instead of on numbers.
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
4
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Module #1 - Logic
Some Popular Boolean Operators
Formal Name
Nickname Arity
Negation operator
NOT
Unary
¬
Conjunction operator
AND
Binary

Disjunction operator
OR
Binary

Exclusive-OR operator XOR
Binary

Implication operator
IMPLIES
Binary
Biconditional operator
IFF
Binary

↔
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
Symbol
5
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
The Negation Operator
The unary negation operator “¬” (NOT)
transforms a prop. into its logical negation.
E.g. If p = “I have brown hair.”
then ¬p = “I do not have brown hair.”
p p
The truth table for NOT:
T F
T :≡ True; F :≡ False
F T
“:≡” means “is defined as”
Operand
column
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
Result
column
6
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
The Conjunction Operator
The binary conjunction operator “” (AND)
combines two propositions to form their
ND
logical conjunction.
E.g. If p=“I will have salad for lunch.” and
q=“I will have steak for dinner.”, then
pq=“I will have salad for lunch and
I will have steak for dinner.”
Remember: “” points up like an “A”, and it means “ND”
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
7
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Conjunction Truth Table
Operand columns
• Note that a
p q
pq
conjunction
F F
F
p1  p2  …  pn
F T
F
of n propositions
T F
F
will have 2n rows
in its truth table.
T T
T
• Also: ¬ and  operations together are sufficient to express any Boolean truth table!
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
8
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
The Disjunction Operator
The binary disjunction operator “” (OR)
combines two propositions to form their
logical disjunction.
p=“My car has a bad engine.”

q=“My car has a bad carburetor.”
pq=“Either my car has a bad engine, or
the downwardmy car has a bad carburetor.” After
pointing “axe” of “”
Meaning is like “and/or” in English.
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
splits the wood, you
can take 1 piece OR the
other, or both.
9
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Disjunction Truth Table
• Note that pq means
p q pq
that p is true, or q is
F F F
true, or both are true!
Note
F T T difference
• So, this operation is
T
F
T
from AND
also called inclusive or,
T
T
T
because it includes the
possibility that both p and q are true.
• “¬” and “” together are also universal.
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
10
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Nested Propositional Expressions
• Use parentheses to group sub-expressions:
“I just saw my old friend, and either he’s
grown or I’ve shrunk.” = f  (g  s)
– (f  g)  s would mean something different
– f  g  s would be ambiguous
• By convention, “¬” takes precedence over
both “” and “”.
– ¬s  f means (¬s)  f , not ¬ (s  f)
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
11
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
A Simple Exercise
Let p=“It rained last night”,
q=“The sprinklers came on last night,”
r=“The lawn was wet this morning.”
Translate each of the following into English:
¬p
= “It didn’t rain last night.”
lawn was wet this morning, and
r  ¬p
= “The
it didn’t rain last night.”
¬ r  p  q = “Either the lawn wasn’t wet this
morning, or it rained last night, or
the sprinklers came on last night.”
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
12
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
The Exclusive Or Operator
The binary exclusive-or operator “” (XOR)
combines two propositions to form their
logical “exclusive or” (exjunction?).
p = “I will earn an A in this course,”
q = “I will drop this course,”
p  q = “I will either earn an A in this course,
or I will drop it (but not both!)”
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
13
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Exclusive-Or Truth Table
• Note that pq means
p q pq
that p is true, or q is
F F F
true, but not both!
F T T
• This operation is
T
F
T
called exclusive or,
T
T
F
because it excludes the
possibility that both p and q are true.
• “¬” and “” together are not universal.
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
Note
difference
from OR.
14
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Natural Language is Ambiguous
Note that English “or” can be ambiguous
regarding the “both” case! p q p "or" q
“Pat is a singer or
F F
F
Pat is a writer.” - 
F T
T
“Pat is a man or
T F
T
Pat is a woman.” - 
T T
?
Need context to disambiguate the meaning!
For this class, assume “or” means inclusive.
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
15
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Module #1 - Logic
The Implication Operator
antecedent
consequent
The implication p  q states that p implies q.
I.e., If p is true, then q is true; but if p is not
true, then q could be either true or false.
E.g., let p = “You study hard.”
q = “You will get a good grade.”
p  q = “If you study hard, then you will get
a good grade.” (else, it could go either way)
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
16
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Implication Truth Table
• p  q is false only when
p q pq
p is true but q is not true.
F F
T
• p  q does not say
F T T
that p causes q!
T F
F
• p  q does not require
T T T
that p or q are ever true!
• E.g. “(1=0)  pigs can fly” is TRUE!
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
The
only
False
case!
17
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Examples of Implications
• “If this lecture ends, then the sun will rise
tomorrow.” True or False?
• “If Tuesday is a day of the week, then I am
a penguin.” True or False?
• “If 1+1=6, then Bush is president.”
True or False?
• “If the moon is made of green cheese, then I
am richer than Bill Gates.” True or False?
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
18
Module #1 - Logic
Why does this seem wrong?
• Consider a sentence like,
– “If I wear a red shirt tomorrow, then Osama bin Laden
will be captured!”
• In logic, we consider the sentence True so long as
either I don’t wear a red shirt, or Osama is caught.
• But, in normal English conversation, if I were to
make this claim, you would think that I was lying.
– Why this discrepancy between logic & language?
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
19
Module #1 - Logic
Resolving the Discrepancy
• In English, a sentence “if p then q” usually really
implicitly means something like,
– “In all possible situations, if p then q.”
• That is, “For p to be true and q false is impossible.”
• Or, “I guarantee that no matter what, if p, then q.”
• This can be expressed in predicate logic as:
– “For all situations s, if p is true in situation s, then q is also
true in situation s”
– Formally, we could write: s, P(s) → Q(s)
• That sentence is logically False in our example,
because for me to wear a red shirt and for Osama to
stay free is a possible (even if not actual) situation.
– Natural language and logic then agree with each other.
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
20
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Module #1 - Logic
English Phrases Meaning p  q
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
7/17/2015
“p implies q”
“if p, then q”
“if p, q”
“when p, q”
“whenever p, q”
“q if p”
“q when p”
“q whenever p”
•
•
•
•
•
“p only if q”
“p is sufficient for q”
“q is necessary for p”
“q follows from p”
“q is implied by p”
We will see some equivalent
logic expressions later.
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
21
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Converse, Inverse, Contrapositive
Some terminology, for an implication p  q:
• Its converse is:
q  p.
• Its inverse is:
¬p  ¬q.
• Its contrapositive: ¬q  ¬ p.
• One of these three has the same meaning
(same truth table) as p  q. Can you figure
out which?
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
22
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Module #1 - Logic
How do we know for sure?
Proving the equivalence of p  q and its
contrapositive using truth tables:
p
F
F
T
T
7/17/2015
q
F
T
F
T
q
T
F
T
F
p
T
T
F
F
pq q p
T
T
T
T
F
F
T
T
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
23
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
The biconditional operator
The biconditional p  q states that p is true if and
only if (IFF) q is true.
p = “Bush wins the 2004 election.”
q = “Bush will be president for all of 2005.”
p  q = “If, and only if, Bush wins the 2004
election, Bush will be president for all of 2005.”
I’m still
here!
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P.2005
Frank
2004
24
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Biconditional Truth Table
• p  q means that p and q
have the same truth value.
• Note this truth table is the
exact opposite of ’s!
Thus, p  q means ¬(p  q)
p
F
F
T
T
q pq
F T
T F
F F
T T
• p  q does not imply
that p and q are true, or cause each other.
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
25
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Boolean Operations Summary
• We have seen 1 unary operator (out of the 4
possible) and 5 binary operators (out of the
16 possible). Their truth tables are below.
p
F
F
T
T
7/17/2015
q
F
T
F
T
p pq pq pq pq pq
T F
F
F
T
T
T F
T
T
T
F
F F
T
T
F
F
F T
T
F
T
T
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
26
Module #1 - Logic
Topic #1.0 – Propositional Logic: Operators
Some Alternative Notations
Name:
Propositional logic:
Boolean algebra:
C/C++/Java (wordwise):
C/C++/Java (bitwise):
not and or
  
p pq +
! && ||
~ & |
xor implies



!=
^
iff

==
Logic gates:
7/17/2015
(c)2001-2004, Michael P. Frank
27