Muir Fundamental School - Santa Ana Unified School District

download report

Transcript Muir Fundamental School - Santa Ana Unified School District

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL

2010 - 11 CST Data Presentation

CST SCORES

2011 CST Results

Santa Ana Highlights

English–Language Arts

 We had more than 900 additional students score proficient and advanced from 2009 to 2011 in English Language Arts; a 5.9% overall increase from 2009.

  Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in English Language Arts increased from 2% to 5% in Grades 2-5, 7-8, and 10-11 from the prior year.

Percent proficient and advanced increased 5% in English Language Arts in Grades 3 and 7 from the prior year.

Mathematics

 In Mathematics, we had more than 1,800 additional students score proficient and advanced from 2009 to 2011; a 8.5% overall increase from 2009.

 Grade 4 exceeded the 2011 NCLB Target (68.5%) in Mathematics for 2011.

   Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in Mathematics increased from 2% to 8% in Grades 2-7 from the prior year.

Increased percent proficient and advanced in Algebra I (Grades 10-11), Geometry (Grade 10), and Algebra II (Grade 11) from the prior year.

There was an increase of approximately 250 students in Grade 10 Algebra II while maintaining the same percent proficient and advanced from the prior year.

Santa Ana Highlights

(cont.)

History-Social Science

There was an increase in the percent proficient and advanced in History Social Science; furthermore, there is a general trend of yearly increases since 2007 in Grade 8, 10, and 11.

Science

 The number of students scoring proficient and advanced in Grade 5 Science increased by 3% from the prior year.

 Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in Biology (Grades 10-11) increased from 2% to 4% from the prior year.

 There was a 3% increase in Grade 10 Chemistry and a 6% increase in Grade 11 Physics in percent proficient and advanced from the prior year.

Overview of SAUSD CST ELA Data 2007 - 11

Overview of SAUSD CST MATH Data 2007 - 11

Overview of SAUSD CST SCIENCE Data 2007 - 11

STATE AND FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS

Our Accountability System

Federal Accountability State Accountability

•Status model •Every school & district has the same target. Targets reach 100% proficient by 2013 2014 •Type of rating =

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

 Meets or does not meet AYP •Growth model with a statewide performance goal of 800 •Schools and all subgroups have growth goals. •Type of rating =

Academic Performance Index (API)

 Scale of 200-1000

The CST is used for both Accountability Systems. The AYP also includes CAPA, CMA (All Schools) & CAHSEE (For High Schools)

Source: California Department of Education (CDE)

Adequate Yearly Progress - AYP Academic Performance Index - API

Components of AYP Components of API • Participation rate • • Percent Proficient API • Graduation rate

All Proficient and Advanced Students Count on Your Score

• • • • • Advanced 1000 Proficient 875 Basic 700 Below Basic 500 Far Below Basic 200

Every Student Counts

AYP Percent Proficient Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Elementary and Middle Schools

are based on:

High Schools are based on:

 The California Standards Tests (CSTs)  Results from the Grade 10 California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) administration  The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities  The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities in English-language arts and mathematics in grade 10  California Modified Assessment (CMA)

NCLB prohibits the use of norm-referenced test data in measuring student achievement

Annual Measurable Objectives

To achieve AYP, a school must meet or exceed A nnual M easurable O bjectives (AMOs) schoolwide and for each student subgroup:  Economically disadvantaged  Major ethnic and racial groups 

Students with disabilities

English language learners

AMOs: English Language Arts Elementary / Middle Schools

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 67.6% 56.8% 46.0% 35.2% 100.0% 89.2% 78.4% 24.4% 13.6% 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014

AMOs: Math

Elementary / Middle Schools

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 16.0% 26.5% 37.0% 47.5% 58.0% 68.5% 100.0% 79.0% 89.5% 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014

API Test Weights

DATADIRECTOR: WHAT’S NEW

Suggested Pre-Built Reports for Viewing STAR Results on DataDirector

Report Name:

CST Scaled Scores

What is it? What does it include? Notes:

Easy to read snapshot of individual student performance on a CST as they relate to the performance band. • • Identifies students who are on the margins of advancing or falling-back a proficiency level Filters and identifies students by performance level or scaled score, e..g. I only want to view students who were on the “bubble,” 340 and above on the CST ELA for grade 9.

CST Cluster Scores Identifies performance for individual students, teachers, district and state on each of the strands tested on the CST.

• Provides pie charts and bar graphs on classroom averages, school averages, district averages as well as performance level distributions. Important: Remember to use the Summary Options menu . Click on the“Include Teacher Summary” option to view the pie charts. Pivot Table CST Percent Proficient Trend Analysis CST or CELDT student performance comparison over a 2 year period. Creates pivot tables that identify “sliders, gainers, stickers.” Multi-tiered analysis of students proficient on the CST. Includes bar graphs and charts of students’ performance over time. Includes disaggregated subgroup performance.

See next slide Compare growth trends in number of students proficient or at the varying proficiency levels for multiple years. Select “Cohort Report” to see only students who took any of the selected assessments. Select “Limited Cohort Report” for students who took all selected assessments. The “Year to Year Comparison” compares students and their test results from one academic year to another.

Finally…

Let’s look at the good stuff!

Schoolwide CST ELA 2005 - 2011

Schoolwide CST Math 2005 - 2011

Schoolwide CST Science 2005 - 2011

CAPA ELA 2005 - 2011

CAPA Math 2005 - 2011

CAPA Science 2009 - 2011

CMA ELA 2009 - 2011

CMA Math 2009 - 2011

CMA Science Trend 2009 – 2011

2 nd Grade ELA 2005 - 2011

2 nd Grade Math 2005 - 2011

3rd Grade ELA 2005 - 2011

3 rd Grade Math 2005 - 2011

4 th Grade ELA 2005 - 2011

4 th Grade Writing Applications 2011

82% Proficient and Advanced 56% Proficient and Advanced

4 th Grade Math 2005 - 2011

5 th Grade ELA 2005 - 2011

5 th Grade Math 2005 - 2011

5 th Grade Science 2005 - 2011

Muir’s API Progress: 1999 - 2010

What was our API slogan?

“878 – We will celebrate!”

2010-11 MUIR API

29 Points!