Transcript Muir Fundamental School - Santa Ana Unified School District
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL
2010 - 11 CST Data Presentation
CST SCORES
2011 CST Results
Santa Ana Highlights
English–Language Arts
We had more than 900 additional students score proficient and advanced from 2009 to 2011 in English Language Arts; a 5.9% overall increase from 2009.
Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in English Language Arts increased from 2% to 5% in Grades 2-5, 7-8, and 10-11 from the prior year.
Percent proficient and advanced increased 5% in English Language Arts in Grades 3 and 7 from the prior year.
Mathematics
In Mathematics, we had more than 1,800 additional students score proficient and advanced from 2009 to 2011; a 8.5% overall increase from 2009.
Grade 4 exceeded the 2011 NCLB Target (68.5%) in Mathematics for 2011.
Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in Mathematics increased from 2% to 8% in Grades 2-7 from the prior year.
Increased percent proficient and advanced in Algebra I (Grades 10-11), Geometry (Grade 10), and Algebra II (Grade 11) from the prior year.
There was an increase of approximately 250 students in Grade 10 Algebra II while maintaining the same percent proficient and advanced from the prior year.
Santa Ana Highlights
(cont.)
History-Social Science
There was an increase in the percent proficient and advanced in History Social Science; furthermore, there is a general trend of yearly increases since 2007 in Grade 8, 10, and 11.
Science
The number of students scoring proficient and advanced in Grade 5 Science increased by 3% from the prior year.
Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in Biology (Grades 10-11) increased from 2% to 4% from the prior year.
There was a 3% increase in Grade 10 Chemistry and a 6% increase in Grade 11 Physics in percent proficient and advanced from the prior year.
Overview of SAUSD CST ELA Data 2007 - 11
Overview of SAUSD CST MATH Data 2007 - 11
Overview of SAUSD CST SCIENCE Data 2007 - 11
STATE AND FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS
Our Accountability System
Federal Accountability State Accountability
•Status model •Every school & district has the same target. Targets reach 100% proficient by 2013 2014 •Type of rating =
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Meets or does not meet AYP •Growth model with a statewide performance goal of 800 •Schools and all subgroups have growth goals. •Type of rating =
Academic Performance Index (API)
Scale of 200-1000
The CST is used for both Accountability Systems. The AYP also includes CAPA, CMA (All Schools) & CAHSEE (For High Schools)
Source: California Department of Education (CDE)
Adequate Yearly Progress - AYP Academic Performance Index - API
Components of AYP Components of API • Participation rate • • Percent Proficient API • Graduation rate
All Proficient and Advanced Students Count on Your Score
• • • • • Advanced 1000 Proficient 875 Basic 700 Below Basic 500 Far Below Basic 200
Every Student Counts
AYP Percent Proficient Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Elementary and Middle Schools
are based on:
High Schools are based on:
The California Standards Tests (CSTs) Results from the Grade 10 California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) administration The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities in English-language arts and mathematics in grade 10 California Modified Assessment (CMA)
NCLB prohibits the use of norm-referenced test data in measuring student achievement
Annual Measurable Objectives
To achieve AYP, a school must meet or exceed A nnual M easurable O bjectives (AMOs) schoolwide and for each student subgroup: Economically disadvantaged Major ethnic and racial groups
Students with disabilities
English language learners
AMOs: English Language Arts Elementary / Middle Schools
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 67.6% 56.8% 46.0% 35.2% 100.0% 89.2% 78.4% 24.4% 13.6% 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014
AMOs: Math
Elementary / Middle Schools
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 16.0% 26.5% 37.0% 47.5% 58.0% 68.5% 100.0% 79.0% 89.5% 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014
API Test Weights
DATADIRECTOR: WHAT’S NEW
Suggested Pre-Built Reports for Viewing STAR Results on DataDirector
Report Name:
CST Scaled Scores
What is it? What does it include? Notes:
Easy to read snapshot of individual student performance on a CST as they relate to the performance band. • • Identifies students who are on the margins of advancing or falling-back a proficiency level Filters and identifies students by performance level or scaled score, e..g. I only want to view students who were on the “bubble,” 340 and above on the CST ELA for grade 9.
CST Cluster Scores Identifies performance for individual students, teachers, district and state on each of the strands tested on the CST.
• Provides pie charts and bar graphs on classroom averages, school averages, district averages as well as performance level distributions. Important: Remember to use the Summary Options menu . Click on the“Include Teacher Summary” option to view the pie charts. Pivot Table CST Percent Proficient Trend Analysis CST or CELDT student performance comparison over a 2 year period. Creates pivot tables that identify “sliders, gainers, stickers.” Multi-tiered analysis of students proficient on the CST. Includes bar graphs and charts of students’ performance over time. Includes disaggregated subgroup performance.
See next slide Compare growth trends in number of students proficient or at the varying proficiency levels for multiple years. Select “Cohort Report” to see only students who took any of the selected assessments. Select “Limited Cohort Report” for students who took all selected assessments. The “Year to Year Comparison” compares students and their test results from one academic year to another.
Finally…
Let’s look at the good stuff!
Schoolwide CST ELA 2005 - 2011
Schoolwide CST Math 2005 - 2011
Schoolwide CST Science 2005 - 2011
CAPA ELA 2005 - 2011
CAPA Math 2005 - 2011
CAPA Science 2009 - 2011
CMA ELA 2009 - 2011
CMA Math 2009 - 2011
CMA Science Trend 2009 – 2011
2 nd Grade ELA 2005 - 2011
2 nd Grade Math 2005 - 2011
3rd Grade ELA 2005 - 2011
3 rd Grade Math 2005 - 2011
4 th Grade ELA 2005 - 2011
4 th Grade Writing Applications 2011
82% Proficient and Advanced 56% Proficient and Advanced
4 th Grade Math 2005 - 2011
5 th Grade ELA 2005 - 2011
5 th Grade Math 2005 - 2011
5 th Grade Science 2005 - 2011