Transcript International Investment
FIN 408 International Investment
Factors affecting Risk and Return Size and Number of International Open-end Funds Global market Correlations Correlation over time - constant vs. non constant Implications on portfolio diversification Gains from International Diversification.
1
Factors Affecting Risk and Return
Returns World Bank projects that 70% of the growth of the world’s real GDP during the next 20 years will come from developing economies in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and Africa January 1987 to may 1993: Stock market growth in Turkey 637%; Argentina 1,374%; Mexico 960% (Source: Investor’s Guide to Emerging Markets).
2
Factors Affecting Risk and Return
There are more people abroad whose incomes are growing faster (China , India, for example) Vast need for infrastructure and technology investment in the emerging economies Risks Faced by International Fund Managers Currency Risk- pegged to US $, mitigates risk if invested in single country; hedge currency exposure.
Political Risk - nationalization Inadequate Accounting Liquidity problems 3
Factors Affecting Risk and Return
Legal and Regulatory Risk Higher costs - market less efficient, higher transaction cost, fund manager incur additional travel costs etc., Size and Number of International Open-end Funds 1990-99: Global/International Mutual Funds assets grew from $46.2b to $501.4b
Cash flow into international funds in 2000 was $49.9b.
4
Why Invest in International Funds
Why Invest in International Funds?
Diversification benefits; Fund managers may earn abnormally high returns because of market inefficiency; 5
Global Market Correlations
Global market Correlations Correlation over time - constant vs. non constant; Correlations between developed markets; Correlations between emerging markets; Implications on portfolio diversification 6
Global Market Correlations
Correlations / Diversifications with ECM:
1985-95: Correlation = .34
ECM had higher return and higher risk than S&P 500 S&P 500 is not on the efficient frontier Minimum Variance Portfolio contained 20% ECM 7
Global Market Correlations
1975-95: Correlation = .27
ECM had lower return but higher risk than S&P 500 Minimum Variance Portfolio contained 30% ECM
1990-95: Correlation = .41
ECM had lower return but higher risk than S&P 500 Minimum Variance Portfolio contained 10% ECM 8
Characteristics of ECM
Characteristics of Developing Countries
: 1995 Annual per capita GDP less than $8,995 85% of wold population 20% of world GDP 11% of world Stock Market Capitalization
Relative Size of Emerging Capital Markets (ECM):
1985 $167.7B
1995 $1.9T
9
Characteristics of ECM
During the same time period, the growth in developed countries
: 1985 $4.5 T 1995 $15.9T
Investors are attracted to ECM because of:
Return potentials Diversification potentials
Performance of ECM:
ECM are characterized by high risk, high return and diversification benefits.
10
Gains from International Diversification
Gains from International Diversification.
Rationale: international equity market has higher E(R) than the US market and can substantially diversify US portfolio.
Asset pricing models do not argue that risk factors have geographically different E(R).
In the US market, value and size explain the difference in E(R) across equity portfolio International value stocks and small stocks diversify US portfolio more than EAFE. 11
Gains from International Diversification
Performance of International Open-end Funds Standard Deviation of Monthly Returns; Sharpe Ratio for International Funds; Jensen’s Alpha for International Funds.
Analyze performance of Well-Diversified Funds.
12
Conclusions
Conclusions:
ECMs are an asset class of growing importance Historical performance is inconsistent with common assertion that ECMs always produce higher average returns.
ECMs offers diversification opportunities to global investors.
Optimal asset allocation changes from period to period.
13
Conclusions
Future studies should examine:
Economic reforms and performance of ECMs Concentration of wealth in the hands of a small number of families/holding companies.
Advantages and disadvantages of these organizational structure?.
Corporate financial policies of firms and their effects on market valuation.
14