Transcript Document

ACCUPLACER

®

New Mexico Higher Education Department July 14, 2008 Albuquerque, NM

ACCUPLACER’s Goal

“Revealing Potential and Expanding Opportunity”

2 through the accurate assessment of knowledge and skills of the incoming student and the support of placement and advisement

Presentation Title, Date here

3

Accuplacer

®

Background—First Computer Adaptive Test

• 1986 - DOS version introduced • • 1995 - Windows version 1999 - ACCUPLACER  OnLine • 2000 - WritePlacer Plus • 2002 - WritePlacer ESL & ESL Listening • 2007 - New Platform Released • 2009 – i3 Launch w/updated WritePlacer Plus and WritePlacer ESL

Presentation Title, Date here

Accuplacer

®

Users

4 • Over 1300 institutions of higher and secondary education • Over 5.8 million units utilized in 06-07 • Various user institutions • 49%-- 2 year • 37%-- 4 year • 14% -- high school partners • Used in every state and several foreign countries

Presentation Title, Date here

Accuplacer

®

Students

5 • Entering college students • ESL/ELL student populations • High school juniors and seniors

(INTERVENTION)

• Distance education students • ABE programs • Workforce development partners (RECRUITMENT & PLANNING)

Presentation Title, Date here

Tests Available

6

GENERAL:

• Reading Comprehension* (20/236) • Sentence Skills* (20/230) • Arithmetic* (17/481) • Elementary Algebra* (12/630) • College Level Math* (20/302) • WritePlacer Plus (1/11) • WritePlacer Texas (1/11) • • •

ACCUPLACER ESL:

ESL Reading Skills (20/361) ESL Sentence Meaning (20/311) ESL Language Usage (20/318) • • ESL Listening (20/192) WritePlacer ESL (1/3) •

SUPPLEMENTARY:

Arithmetic (18) • Elementary Algebra (18)

Presentation Title, Date here

7

COMPANION

• Paper and pencil • Braille • Large print • Audio cassette

Available Formats

ONLINE

• General • ESL/ELL • Supplementary skills modules

Presentation Title, Date here

8

Top Five Reasons

• Computerized Adaptive Testing Format • Internet-based • Immediate Results • Multi-faceted • Institutionally Personalized

Presentation Title, Date here

Computer-Adaptive Testing

9

Increased Difficulty

Typical Pattern of Student Responses

Middle Difficulty Score is calculated and the next best item is selected based on * Difficulty * Content * Test Specifications Decreased Difficulty Presentation Title, Date here

10

Presentation Title, Date here

11

Multi-Faceted

• One program – multiple levels and multiple tests • Entire system can be utilized to meet individual needs • User-friendly system; base operation same throughout

Presentation Title, Date here

Institutionally Personalized

12 • Set-up and organization • Welcome page, report message, and student directions • Background question selection (local and standard) • Establishment of placement scores related to student success strategies • Determination of report format and uploading • Branching profiles and exam delivery

Presentation Title, Date here

Branching Example A

Institutional Preference

13

Arithmetic Elementary Algebra College Level Math Presentation Title, Date here

14

Branching Example B

Test Scores PLACEMENT 20-120 Elementary Algebra 70-90 College Level Math PLACEMENT Arithmetic 20-120 PLACEMENT Arithmetic Supplementary NON PLACEMENT Presentation Title, Date here

15

Branching Example C

Background Question Reading Comprehension ESL Reading Is English your first language?

Presentation Title, Date here

16

Reporting Features

• Instant access - any time, any place • Individual student score reports • Course placements • Score rosters • Background reports • Downloadable to campus database • Captures remote testing scores

Presentation Title, Date here

Admitted Class Evaluation Service™

(ACES)

17 • Free online validity service for ACCUPLACER users • Validates the use of a test score for placement into a given course • Helps translate test scores into probability of success in a specific course at a specific institution/state system • Benefits the institution and the individual student • Results within 8-12 weeks • Provides probability tables for cut scores and a course grade of B or higher/a course grade of C or higher • Presents non-technical analyses of student data with interpretive text that highlights key findings • Can be shared with policy makers with documentation that supports placement decisions at a specific institution or within a system

Presentation Title, Date here

18

Contact Information

Chantel Reynolds

Higher Education Assessment Manager 512-721-1845 [email protected]

Presentation Title, Date here