Transcript Slide 1
Statewide E-Commerce Program 101 Office of the State Controller November 2008 State of North Carolina Three Components Statewide E-Commerce Program Electronic Funds Transfer •Inbound (Collections) •Outbound (Payments) Merchant Cards •Inbound (Collections) Inter/Intra Governmental Transfers •Transfers between accounts at State Treasurer Origination of Concept Senate Bill 222 (1999) E-Commerce Work Group (1999) Statewide Enterprise Approach IRMC (1999) State Cash Management Plan GS 147-86.10 & 11 Statewide E-Government Steering Committee (2000) OSC E-Commerce Task Force (2007) Reports •1999 - “A New Way of Doing Business” (ECWG) •1999 – “ITS Framework for Developing an Ecommerce – Enabled Technical Environment” •2001 – “E-Government – Using Technology to Transform North Carolina’s Governmental Service Operations in the Digital Age” •March 2007 – “Statewide Electronic Commerce Program Status Report” •April 2008 – “Electronic Commerce Task Force Report" Definition “Electronic Payments” Electronic Payments Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Wire Transfers Merchant Cards ACH Transactions Direct Deposit (Outbound) Debit Card (Outbound) Credit Cards Debit Cards Bank Draft (Inbound) Corporate Purchasing Cards (Disbursements) • Wire Transfers primarily handled through State Treasurer’s Office • ACH and Merchant Cards primarily handled through OSC arrangements • • Debit card is a form of ACH remitted to cardholder’s account where cardholder withdraws funds via card Corporate P-Cards administered by Purchase & Contract Division Regulatory Applicability Electronic Payments Wire Transfers •EFTA – Electronic Funds Transfer Act •Reg E ACH Debit Cards Credit Cards •NACHA Operating Rules •EFTA – Electronic Funds Transfer Act • TILA - Truth In •Reg E •PCI Data Security Council Lending Act •Reg Z • Card Association Rules •PCI Data Security Council Reg E and Z issued by Federal Reserve Bank Primary Cost Differences Wire Transfers Item Cost - $6.75+ Same day funds Transfer almost instantaneous Used for critical payments (e.g. debt service) ACH Item Cost < 1 penny Next day funds One day delay in settlement Used for large batch files (e.g., payroll, vendor payments) Merchant Cards Item Cost - $.04 Next day funds One day delay in settlement Primarily for smaller payments Additional costs of interchange (pass through costs) • State Checks Average Cost – $.74 (According to 2008 EC Task Force Survey) • Credit Cards - Paid to Visa, MC, Amex Range 1.5% - 3% Debit Cards – Paid to switch networks Approx. .53% EFT Utilization Biggest Inbound User – (June 30, 2008) • Dept of Revenue – Started 1994 • 130,000 taxpayers remitting electronically • 1.6 million transactions annually • $18.2 billion of $26.7 billion collected = 68% • Increased investment earnings of $6.3 million per year Biggest Outbound Users - (June 30, 2008) • Retirement System – Started 1977 203,000 out of 211,000 = 96% • Central Payroll – Started 1979 96,000 out of 100,000 = 96% • NCAS Vendors – Started 2000 ACH: 254,000 out of 949,000 = 27% Big Opportunity Million 20 18 Paper Warrant Trend 18.2 17.6 16.5 14.7 16 14.3 14 Largest 13.3 12 Accounts 9.3 10 8 6 TANF DOR ChildSup ESC Total 4 2 0 FY02 Decrease of: FY03 FY04 3% 6% FY05 11% FY06 FY07 3% 7% FY08 30% FY 2001-02 was peak in paper warrants = 18.2 million FY 2007-08 had biggest % decrease = 30% (Child Support & ESC) Decrease in paper checks reflective of increase of EFT Cost of Paper State Check Agency Cost Gen. Govt. Agency University Community College Weighted Average $.11 $.11 $.11 $.11 Total Cost $ .54 $1.41 $2.22 $ .74 Two components of cost = Agency cost & DST cost Cost does not include cost to “produce” the check (A/P costs) DST functions as “bank” for agencies • Internal costs = $.09 • FRB fees = $.02 $ .43 $1.30 $2.11 $ .63 DST Cost Cost of the issuance of a paper state check varies from agency to agency General Government agencies experiences lower per item cost due to several large volume accounts Average overall cost for a State warrant is $.74 Smaller check volumes = higher per item costs Some agencies’ cost as high as $35 Merchant Card Utilization $ Million 7,000,000 $650 $600 $550 $500 $450 $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 FY- FY- FY- FY- FY- FY- FY- FY01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 #Transactions FY-01 FY-02 FY-03 FY-04 FY-05 FY-06 FY-07 FY-08 285,000 868,000 1,573,000 2,078,000 2,842,000 3,673,000 4,509,000 6,018,000 FY- FY- FY- FY- FY- FY- FY- FY01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Dollar Amount FY-01 FY-02 FY-03 FY-04 FY-05 FY-06 FY-07 FY-08 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 22.8 76.7 182.6 233.7 311.4 435.7 534.8 646.3 •Cards represent 11% of total collection transactions (But less than 1% of $) •Growth rate of card transactions has been 30% annually •Currently 95 participants (900+ merchant numbers): 21 Agencies 28 Community Colleges 15 Universities 31 Local Governments Card Activity FY 2006-07 Trans. Vol. Pass-Thru Fees Sales Vol. Vendor Fees Total Fees General Govt 1.967 M $ 107.541 M $ 1.895 M $ .140 M $ 2.036 M Universities 1.797 M $ 349.237 M $ 5.634 M $ .168 M $ 5.802 M Com. Colleges .161 M $ 19.910 M $ .283 M $ .019 M $ .302 M Local Units .583 M $ 58.006 M $ .986 M $ .047 M $ 1.033 M LEAs .001 M $ $ $ $ Total 4.509 M .113 M $ 534.807 M DMV Vehicle Registration largest volume •1.25 million transaction •$ 39 million .002 M $ 8.801 M 0M $ .374 M .002 M $ 9.175 M Two Types of Fees •Pass-thru fees are paid to Visa/MC •Vendor Fees are paid to STMS E-Commerce Policies October 1, 2005 – Major rewrite of the State’s E-Commerce policies Intent was to provide foundation for major emphasis on expanding E-Commerce Major room for improvement is vendor payments • Good success in payroll – 96% • Little success in vendor payments – 27% Maximization of Electronic Payments Policy • Specifies requirements of agencies to utilize ecommerce as part of both receipt and disbursement processes PCI Data Security - Issued October 2008 • Specifies process for agencies to be validated as compliant with PCI Data Security Standard ACH – Standard Method of Payment Vendor Payments – “Each NCAS agency shall develop procedures to require the standard method of payment to all vendors and other payors to be by ACH direct deposit, utilizing either the E-Payment feature of NCAS or a standalone system approved by the State Controller. Exemptions for individual payees may be considered if a hardship case can be provided, or if the payments are nonrecurring.” Payroll – “Each payroll center shall utilize ACH direct deposit for all payroll payments to all full-time employees. Exemptions for individual employees may be considered if a hardship case can be provided. Each payroll center is encouraged to offer ACH direct deposit to all part-time and temporary employees.” Implementation of Policy Basis – Policy provides agencies with the basis for requiring electronic payment to be the “standard method of payment” Two types of delivery of payments recognized by statute • G.S. 143-3.2 - “All disbursements made to non-State entities shall be delivered by the appropriate agency to the entity’s legally designated recipient by United States mail or its equivalent, including electronic funds transfer.” • Allows mailing of paper checks or EFT Central Payroll & BEACON Payroll – July 1, 2007, OSC issued a policy requiring all employees paid under an OSC-administered payroll to be paid by direct deposit • • • Effective October 1, 2007 Hardship cases (cannot obtain a bank account) exempted If not direct deposit, pay made by “check” being mailed on payday NCAS Vendors • OSC will be looking at ways to enroll more vendors in EFT • Agencies should take an active role in enrolling vendors in EFT Master Contracts Statewide E-Commerce Program Electronic Funds Transfer October 1, 2005 Merchant Cards American Express August 1, 2006 Discover Related Merchant Card Contract • With Trustwave • For PCI Validation Services Master Contracts Two master contracts to support the SECP • EFT – Wachovia Bank • Merchant Cards – SunTrust Merchant Services Benefits of master contracts • Support the Statewide Enterprise Approach • Leverage volume pricing • Increase competitive bidding OSC also has three supplemental contacts to support cards: Trustwave - PCI Security Validation Services American Express Card Services Discover Network Card Services EFT Master Contract RFP issued in June 2005 Resulting Benefits of New Contract • Five bidders responding • Wachovia Bank re-selected October 1, 2005 • Programs previously operating separately brought under the master contract Central Payroll, DOT Payroll, and universities payrolls Community Colleges and LEAs using Wachovia DST still pays costs, but now operate under Master Contract • Price decreased by over one-half of the old pricing Annual costs will decrease from $1.5 million to $700,000 Per item cost decreased from 2 1/2¢ to .9¢ Tiered pricing of .75¢ once total volume > 5 million Participation • Agencies and universities required to participate unless business case is given • Community colleges and LEAs voluntary, considering local bank arrangements Merchant Card Contract RFP issued in December 2005 Resulting Benefits of New Contract • Four bidders responding • SunTrust Merchant Services re-selected August 1, 2006 • Vendor-levied fees decreased by 63% from the old pricing Per item cost decreased from 10.8¢ to 4¢ Annual vendor-levied fees will decrease from $670,000 to $280,000 (average over 5 years of contract) Interchange fees will remain at actual “pass-through” • Other enhancements Extended negotiations to obtain more favorable terms than the previous contract Different environment today than in 2000, primarily due to PCI Security Compliance Rules and associated fines PCI Data Security Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Standard applies to any agency’s card capture system that: • Stores cardholder data • Transmits cardholder data • Processes cardholder data Non-Compliance can result in possible: • Substantial fines by Visa and/or MasterCard • Termination of services by STMS Hacker Trustwave Validation Services: • Online Portal provided to agencies • Annual Self-Assessment Questionnaire • Quarterly Vulnerability Scans of Networks Monitoring and Management Reports • OSC and STMS has access to Non-compliance reports • Central Oversight agencies provided Confidential Reports Common Payment Service Gateway Service available to participants of the MSA Provided by Office of Information Technology Services (ITS) Gateway for both EFT and Merchant Card transactions For participants: • Having an internet application requiring a gateway to the processor (EFT and Merchant Cards) • Desiring a virtual terminal for capturing card not-present transactions (MOTO) • Not having ability to transmit ACH files directly to bank Wachovia Agency Internet Application Virtual Credit Card Terminal Agency EFT (ACH) API Cards Acct/Pay System Agency Acct/Rec System API = Application Program Interface STMS Outbound Payments State’s E-Commerce Structure Outbound Payments Agency / Univ A/P System Wachovia Web ACHieve (Credits) Gateway ( CPS or Other ) NCAS E-Payments Payee (Citizen / Vendor/ Employee) Central Payroll DOT Payroll University Payrolls Community College Payrolls $ State’s EFT Bank (ODFI) Local Schools Payrolls Child Support Payments ACH Transactions Fed Reserve Bank Payee’s Bank Inbound Payments State’s E-Commerce Structure Inbound Payments Agency POS Terminals NC@YourService Yahoo! Store Agency Windows Client Agency Web Store Front Gateway ( CPS or Other ) Acquiring Processor Agency A/R System Citizen (Taxpayer) Wachovia Web ACHieve (Debits) Agency’s 3rd Party Data Collection Center Payor’s Bank ACH Credit $ State’s EFT Bank (ODFI) $ Card Transactions ACH Transactions $ State’s Depository Bank Cooperative Effort Participants Statewide E-Commerce Program More Information Office of the State Controller Web Site www.osc.nc.gov Three power point presentations are suggested viewing: EFT-101 and Merchant Card Services -101 and CPS-101 Support Services Center (919) 875-HELP (4357) David C. Reavis E-Commerce Manager (919) 871-6483 November 2008 Amber Young Central Compliance Manager (919) 981-5481 David McCoy State Controller