Transcript Dia 1

Quality at European level

Michael Crowley EPR 2008

Modernisation of Social Services

Commission Communication April 2006

Social Services – Growth Sector in Economic Growth and Job Creation

Focus on Quality and Effectiveness

Modernisation in Member States dealing with tension of

Universality / Quality / Financial Sustainability

General Aspects of Modernisation in Member States

Benchmarking / Quality / User Involvement

Decentralisation to regional / Local level

Outsourcing from Public to Private Sector

Development of Public / Private Partnerships for funding

Context and rationale HLDG Positioning Paper Oct 2007 UNIVERSALITY MODERNISATION Quality Assurance SUSTAINABILITY QUALITY

Modernisation - Context and Rationale

Paradigm shift in Health and Social Services

From Public Programming Regulation to Market-based Regulation

Modernisation

• Mainstreaming / Partnerships • Inclusion / Maximise potential • Empowerment • User-centeredness • Outcome Measurement • Cost Effectiveness / Efficiency • Informed choice for Clients • Competition

Elements of quality Certification of Quality

Paradigm shift in disability field

from Medical Model to Social Model

Why is a European approach to quality needed?

Financial pressure

  Shrinking of welfare state Emphasis on cost-effectiveness

Increased competition

  Tendering mechanisms More service-providers on market 

Low price prevails on quality

Quantitative outputs prevail on quality

Need for a European Quality System Transnational services

  Different national standards Unknown service providers

Enlargement of EU

  Different levels Exchange of best practice 

Clients need guarantees

Reference framework for innovation and continuous improvement

European Commission needs to take initiative but has limited competence

How should a European approach to quality look like?

Sectoral Stakeholder Involvement

Multi-perspective approach

Principles and Indicators Flexibility for application in different national contexts

Credibility

Continuous improvement Realistic

Feasible threshold

Acceptable cost

Systematic and coherent framework Key assets of a European Quality System Respect for Local context

Use of local language

Local auditors

Quality at European leve l

• • • • • •

Council of Europe - CoE Position paper Disability - HLG Proposals on Quality in SSGI - SSGI European Quality of Life Principles - EASPD Nine golden principles of Social Platform – SP European Quality Assurance for Social Services - EQUASS

Council of Europe Action Plan 2006 - 2015 To promote the rights and full participation of people with disabilities in society : Improving the quality of life of people with disabilities 2006 - 2015

Council of Europe Action Plan 2006 - 2015

• • • • • • • •

Participation in Public & Political Life Participation in Cultural life Information & Communications Education Employment, Vocational Training & Guidance Built Environment Transport Community Living

Council of Europe Action Plan 2006 - 2015

• • • • • • •

Health Care Rehabilitation Social Protection Legal Protection Protection against Violence & Abuse Research & Development Awareness raising

High Level Disability Group -HLDG

Key Elements of Quality

Affordable

Available

Accessible

European Requirements for Quality in Social Services of General Interest - SSGI

Rights

Person centred

Comprehensiveness

Participation

Partnership

Result Orientation

Good Governance

European Quality of Life Principles EASPD Values Quality of life for all Dignity Emotional well-being Equal opportunities Interpersonal relations Independent living Material well-being Participation in and Personal development Contribution to society Physical well-being Self-determination Social inclusion Equal rights

Golden Quality Principles Social Platform Quality Services :

• • • • • • • • •

Respect human dignity and fundamental rights Achieve results Tailor-made to each individual Ensure security to all users, including the most vulnerable Participative and empower users to take decisions on their own Holistic and continuous Provided in partnership with communities and other actors Provided by skilled professionals working under good employment and working conditions Managed in a transparent way and are accountable

EQUASS as a European approach to Quality of Social Services

EQUASS Concept of Quality

Sector-specific quality framework Multi stakeholder approach Non-prescriptive Measurable Self-evaluation+external verification European quality requirements

Rights

Person focus

Ethics Partnership

Enhanchers

Participation Person centred

Service focus

Comprehensiveness EQUASS Quality Framework

Review

improvement

Multi stakeholder approach

Service-users Service-providers Social partners Funders Policy makers

Non Prescriptive

One way in meeting quality requirements Different ways in meeting quality requirements

Measurable

9 Principles for Quality Criteria 100 Performance indicators

EQUASS profile Continuous Improvement Result Orientation Leadership

60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Rights Ethics Comprehensivenss Partnerships Persons Centred Particpation

Self-evaluation + External verification

Documentation review Interviews

EQUASS Certification programmes

Leadership Rights Ethics Partnership Participation Person centred Comprehensiveness Continuous improvement Result orientation

Benefits for Service Providers

• Proof of quality of services • Strengthen market position • Competitive advantage • Benchmarking • Continuous improvement

Benefits for Public Authorities

• • • • • Nor re-inventing the wheel Accountability • • Preferred supplier Selection in tendering Conformity with European thinking and documents Credibility Feasibility

Benefits for Service Users

• EQUASS Certified Services are: • meeting needs and expectations • respecting rights and dignity of person served • tailor made / personalised • focussed on results / achievements

EQUASS dissemination

Indicators (cumulative figures)

Certified centres European countries covered Local Licence Holder Accredited EQUASS auditors Trained EQUASS consultants • • • Prometheus CEN Workshop Agreement ‘EQUASS Best practice’ 2007 17 7 2 40 12 2008 24 10 4 47 23 2009 55 13 7 60 63