Transcript Chapter 1, Heizer/Render, 5th edition
Operations Management
Decision-Making Tools Module A
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458 A-1
Outline
The Decision Process in Operations
Fundamentals of Decision Making
Decision Tables
Decision Making under Uncertainty
Decision Making Under Risk
Decision Making under Certainty
Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI)
Decision Trees
A More Complex Decision Tree
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-2 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter, you should be able to :
Identify or Define
:
Decision trees and decision tables
Highest monetary value Expected value of perfect information
Describe or Explain :
Sequential decisions
Decision making under risk
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-3 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Models, and the Techniques of Scientific Management
Can Help Managers To:
Gain deeper insight into the nature of business relationships
Find better ways to assess values in such relationships; and See a way of reducing, or at least understanding, uncertainty that surrounds business plans and actions
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-4 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Steps to Good Decisions
Define problem and influencing factors
Establish decision criteria
Select decision-making tool (model)
Identify and evaluate alternatives using decision-making tool (model)
Select best alternative
Implement decision
Evaluate the outcome
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-5 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Models
Are less expensive and disruptive than experimenting with the real world system Allow operations managers to ask “What if” types of questions Are built for management problems and encourage management input Force a consistent and systematic approach to the analysis of problems Require managers to be specific about constraints and goals relating to a problem Help reduce the time needed in decision making
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-6 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Limitations of Models
They
may be expensive and time-consuming to develop and test
are often misused and misunderstood (and feared) because of their mathematical and logical complexity
tend to downplay the role and value of nonquantifiable information
often have assumptions that oversimplify the variables of the real world
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-7 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
The Decision-Making Process
Problem
Quantitative Analysis Logic Historical Data Marketing Research Scientific Analysis Modeling
Decision PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render)
Qualitative Analysis Emotions Intuition Personal Experience and Motivation Rumors
A-8 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Ways of Displaying a Decision Problem
Decision trees
Decision tables Out comes States of Nature Alternatives Decision Problem
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-9 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Fundamentals of Decision Theory
The three types of decision models:
Decision making under uncertainty Decision making under risk Decision making under certainty
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-10 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Fundamentals of Decision Theory - continued
Terms:
Alternative : course of action or choice State of nature : an occurrence over which the decision maker has no control Symbols used in decision tree:
A decision node from which one of several alternatives may be selected
A state of nature node nature will occur out of which one state of
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-11 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Decision Table
Alternatives Alternative 1 Alternative 2 States of Nature State 1 State 2 Outcome 1 Outcome 3 Outcome 2 Outcome 4
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-12 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Maximax - Choose the alternative that maximizes the maximum outcome for every alternative (Optimistic criterion)
Maximin - Choose the alternative that maximizes the minimum outcome for every alternative (Pessimistic criterion)
Equally likely - chose the alternative with the highest average outcome.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-13 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Example - Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Alternatives Construct large plant Construct small plant
States of Nature
Favorable Market $200,000 Unfavorable Market Maximum in Row Minimum in Row Row Average -$180,000 $200,000 -$180,000 $10,000 $100,000 -$20,000 $100,000 -$20,000 $40,000 $0 $0 Maximax $0 Maximin $0 Equally likely $0 PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-14 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Decision Making Under Risk
Probabilistic decision situation
States of nature have probabilities of occurrence
Select alternative with largest expected monetary value (EMV)
EMV = Average return for alternative if decision were repeated many times
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-15 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Expected Monetary Value Equation
i
) = =
i
N = 1 Number of states of nature
i
Value of Payoff Probability of payoff
+
V N
*
N
)
Alternative i PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-16 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Example - Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Alternatives
States of Nature Favorable Market P(0.5) $200,000 Unfavorable Market P(0.5) -$180,000
Construct large plant Construct small plant
Do nothing $100,000 $0 -$20,000 $0 Expected value $10,000 $40,000 Best choice $0 PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-17 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI)
EVPI
places an upper bound on what one would pay for additional information
EVPI
is the expected value with perfect information minus the maximum EMV
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-18 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Expected Value With Perfect Information (EV|PI)
EV | PI
=
j n
= 1
(Best outcome for the state of nature j) * P(S j ) where j=1 to the number of states of nature, n
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-19 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Expected Value of Perfect Information
EVPI = EV|PI - maximum EMV
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-20 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Expected Value of Perfect Information
Alternative State of Nature Favorable Market ($) Unfavorable Market ($) 200,000 -$180,000 Construct a large plant Construct a small plant Do nothing Probabilities $100,000 0.50
$0 $20,000 $0 0.50
EMV $20,000 $40,000 $0
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-21 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Expected Value of Perfect Information
EVPI = expected value with perfect information max(EMV) = $200,000*0.50 + 0*0.50
$40,000 = $60,000
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-22 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Expected Opportunity Loss
EOL is the cost of not picking the best solution
EOL = Expected Regret
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-23 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Computing EOL - The Opportunity Loss Table
Alternative Large Plant Small Plant Do Nothing Probabilities State of Nature Favorable Market ($) 200,000 - 200,000 200,000 - 100,000 200,000 - 0 0.50
Unfavorable Market ($) 0 - (-180,000) 0 -(-20,000) 0-0 0.50
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-24 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
The Opportunity Loss Table continued
Alternative Large Plant Small Plant Do Nothing Probabilities State of Nature Favorable Market ($) Unfavorable Market ($) 0 100,000 180,000 20,000 200,000 0 0.50
0.50
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-25 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
The Opportunity Loss Table continued
Alternative Large Plant Small Plant Do Nothing (0.50)*$0 + (0.50)*($180,000) (0.50)*($100,000) + (0.50)(*$20,000) (0.50)*($200,000) + (0.50)*($0) EOL $90,000 $60,000 $100,000
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-26 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Sensitivity Analysis
EMV(Large Plant) = $200,000P - (1-P)$180,000 EMV(Small Plant) = $100,000P - $20,000(1-P) EMV(Do Nothing) = $0P + 0(1-P)
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-27 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Sensitivity Analysis - continued
250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 -50000 0 -100000 -150000 -200000 Point 1 0.2
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render)
0.4
Point 2 0.6
0.8
1 Values of P
A-28 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Decision Trees
Graphical display of decision process
Used for solving problems
With 1 set of alternatives and states of nature, decision tables can be used also
With several sets of alternatives and states of nature (sequential decisions), decision tables cannot be used
EMV is criterion most often used
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-29 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Analyzing Problems with Decision Trees
Define the problem
Structure or draw the decision tree
Assign probabilities to the states of nature
Estimate payoffs for each possible combination of alternatives and states of nature
Solve the problem by computing expected monetary values for each state-of-nature node
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) A-30 © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
Decision Tree
1 State 1 State 2 Outcome 1 Outcome 2 Decision Node PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) 2 State 1 State 2 Outcome 3 Outcome 4 State of Nature Node © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458 A-31