Break-Even Analysis

Download Report

Transcript Break-Even Analysis

Break-Even Analysis
 Technique for evaluating process and
equipment alternatives
 Objective is to find the point in dollars
and units at which cost equals revenue
 Requires estimation of fixed costs,
variable costs, and revenue
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Break-Even Analysis
 Fixed costs are costs that continue even if
no units are produced
 Depreciation, taxes, debt, mortgage
payments
 Variable costs are costs that vary with the
volume of units produced
 Labor, materials, portion of utilities
 Contribution is the difference between
selling price and variable cost
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Break-Even Analysis
Assumptions
 Costs and revenue are linear
functions
 Generally not the case in the real
world
 We actually know these costs
 Very difficult to verify
 Time value of money is often
ignored
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Break-Even Analysis
–
Total revenue line
900 –
800 –
700 –
Cost in dollars
Total cost line
Break-even point
Total cost = Total revenue
600 –
500 –
Variable cost
400 –
300 –
200 –
100 –
–
0
Fixed cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Figure S7.5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Volume (units per period)
Break-Even Analysis
BEPx = break-even point in units
BEP$ = break-even point in
dollars
P = price per unit (after all
discounts)
x = number of units produced
TR
F
V
TC
=
=
=
=
total revenue = Px
fixed costs
variable cost per unit
total costs = F + Vx
Break-even point occurs when
TR = TC
or
Px = F + Vx
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
BEPx =
F
P-V
Break-Even Analysis
BEPx = break-even point in units
BEP$ = break-even point in
dollars
P = price per unit (after all
discounts)
BEP$ = BEPx P
F
=
P
P-V
F
=
(P - V)/P
F
=
1 - V/P
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
x = number of units produced
TR
F
V
TC
=
=
=
=
total revenue = Px
fixed costs
variable cost per unit
total costs = F + Vx
Profit = TR - TC
= Px - (F + Vx)
= Px - F - Vx
= (P - V)x - F
Break-Even Example
Fixed costs = $10,000
Direct labor = $1.50/unit
BEP$ =
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Material = $.75/unit
Selling price = $4.00 per unit
F
1 -(V/P)
$10,000
1 - [(1.50 + .75)/(4.00)]
Break-Even Example
Fixed costs = $10,000
Direct labor = $1.50/unit
Material = $.75/unit
Selling price = $4.00 per unit
F
1 -(V/P)
BEP$ =
=
BEPx =
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
=
$10,000
.4375
F
P-V
=
$10,000
1 - [(1.50 + .75)/(4.00)]
= $22,857.14
$10,000
4.00 - (1.50 + .75)
= 5,714
Break-Even Example
50,000 –
Revenue
40,000 –
Break-even
point
Dollars
30,000 –
Total
costs
20,000 –
Fixed costs
10,000 –
|–
|
|
|
|
|
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Units
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Multiproduct Example
Fixed costs = $3,000 per month
Item
Sandwich
Drink
Baked potato
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Price
$5.00
1.50
2.00
Cost
$3.00
.50
1.00
Annual Forecasted
Sales Units
9,000
9,000
7,000
Multiproduct Example
Fixed costs = $3,000 per month
Item
Sandwich
Drink
Baked potato
Item (i)
Sandwich
Drinks
Baked
potato
Price
$5.00
1.50
2.00
Cost
$3.00
.50
1.00
Annual Forecasted
Sales Units
9,000
9,000
7,000
Annual
Selling Variable
Forecasted
Price (P) Cost (V) (V/P) 1 - (V/P) Sales $
$5.00
1.50
2.00
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
$3.00
.50
1.00
.60
.33
.50
.40
.67
.50
% of
Sales
Weighted
Contribution
(col 5 x col 7)
$45,000
13,500
14,000
.621
.186
.193
.248
.125
.096
$72,500
1.000
.469
F
Multiproduct
Example
BEP =
V
∑ 1 - P x (W )
$
i
i
i
Fixed costs = $3,000 per month
Item
Sandwich
Drink
Baked potato
Item (i)
Sandwich
Drinks
Baked
potato
Price
$5.00
1.50
2.00
Selling Variable
Price (P) Cost (V) (V/P)
$5.00
1.50
2.00
$3.00
.50
1.00
.60
.33
.50
Annual
Forecasted
$3,000
x 12
Cost =
Sales=Units
$76,759
.469
$3.00
9,000
.50
9,000
$76,759
Daily
= $246.02
1.00
7,000
sales = 312 days
Annual
Weighted
Forecasted
.621
x $246.02 % of Contribution
= 30.6(col
 31
1 - (V/P) Sales
Sales
5 x col 7)
$5.00$
sandwiches
.40
$45,000
.621 per day.248
.67
13,500
.186
.125
.50
14,000
.193
.096
$72,500
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
1.000
.469
Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and
Capacity Decisions
 Determine states of nature
 Future demand
 Market favorability
 Analyzed using decision trees
 Hospital supply company
 Four alternatives
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and
Capacity Decisions
Market favorable (.4)
Market unfavorable (.6)
Market favorable (.4)
Medium plant
Market unfavorable (.6)
Market favorable (.4)
Market unfavorable (.6)
$100,000
-$90,000
$60,000
-$10,000
$40,000
-$5,000
$0
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and
Capacity Decisions
Market favorable (.4)
Market unfavorable (.6)
Market favorable (.4)
Medium plant
Large Plant
EMV =
(.4)($100,000)
+ (.6)(-$90,000)
EMV = -$14,000
Market unfavorable (.6)
Market favorable (.4)
Market unfavorable (.6)
$100,000
-$90,000
$60,000
-$10,000
$40,000
-$5,000
$0
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and
Capacity Decisions
-$14,000
Market favorable (.4)
Market unfavorable (.6)
$100,000
-$90,000
$18,000
Market favorable (.4)
Medium plant
Market unfavorable (.6)
$60,000
-$10,000
$13,000
Market favorable (.4)
Market unfavorable (.6)
$40,000
-$5,000
$0
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy-Driven Investment
 Operations may be responsible for
return-on-investment (ROI)
 Analyzing capacity alternatives
should include capital investment,
variable cost, cash flows, and net
present value
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Net Present Value (NPV)
In general:
F = P(1 + i)N
where
F
P
i
N
= future value
= present value
= interest rate
= number of years
Solving for P:
P=
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
F
(1 + i)N
Net Present Value (NPV)
In general:
F = P(1 + i)N
where
F
P
i
N
= future value
= present value
While this works fine,
= interest rate
cumbersome for
= number ofis
years
larger values of N
Solving for P:
P=
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
F
(1 + i)N
it
NPV Using Factors
F
P=
(1 + i)N
where
Portion of
Table S7.1
X =
Year
1
2
3
4
5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
6%
.943
.890
.840
.792
.747
= FX
a factor from Table S7.1 defined as =
1/(1 + i)N and F = future value
8%
.926
.857
.794
.735
.681
10%
.909
.826
.751
.683
.621
12%
.893
.797
.712
.636
.567
14%
.877
.769
.675
.592
.519
Measuring Supply-Chain
Performance
Typical Firms
Benchmark
Firms
15
8
Time spent placing an order
42 minutes
15 minutes
Percentage of late deliveries
33%
2%
Percentage of rejected material
1.5%
.0001%
400
4
Lead time (weeks)
Number of shortages per year
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Table 11.6
Measuring Supply-Chain
Performance
 Assets committed to inventory
Percent invested
in inventory
=
Total inventory
investment
x 100
Total assets
Investment in inventory = $11.4 billion
Total assets = $44.4 billion
Percent invested in inventory = (11.4/44.4) x 100 = 25.7%
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Measuring Supply-Chain
Performance
Inventory as a % of Total Assets
(with exceptional performance)
Manufacturing
(Toyota 5%)
15%
Wholesale
(Coca-Cola 2.9%)
34%
Restaurants
(McDonald’s .05%)
2.9%
Retail
(Home Depot 25.7%)
27%
Table 11.7
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Measuring Supply-Chain
Performance
 Inventory turnover
Cost of goods sold
Inventory
turnover
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
=
Inventory investment
Measuring Supply-Chain
Performance
Examples of Annual Inventory Turnover
Food, Beverage, RetailManufacturing
Anheuser Busch
15
Dell Computer
90
Coca-Cola
14
Johnson Controls
22
Toyota (overall)
13
Home Depot
McDonald’s
5
112
Nissan (assembly)
150
Table 11.8
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Measuring Supply-Chain
Performance
 Inventory turnover
Net revenue
Cost of goods sold
Inventory:
Raw material inventory
Work-in-process inventory
Finished goods inventory
Total inventory investment
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
$32.5
$14.2
$.74
$.11
$.84
$1.69
Measuring Supply-Chain
Performance
 Inventory turnover
Net revenue
$32.5
Cost
of
goods
sold
Cost of goods sold
$14.2
Inventory turnover =
Inventory:
Inventory investment
Raw material inventory
$.74
Work-in-process inventory
$.11
Finished goods inventory = 14.2 / 1.69 = 8.4 $.84
Total inventory investment
$1.69
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
Measuring Supply-Chain
Performance
 Inventory turnover
Net revenue
$32.5
Cost
of
goods
sold
Cost of goods sold
$14.2
Average
weekly
cost
of
Inventory turnover =
Inventory:
Inventory
= $14.2
/ 52 =investment
$.273
goods sold
Raw material inventory
$.74
Work-in-process inventory
$.11
= 8.4 investment
Inventory
Finished goods inventory = 14.2 / 1.69
$.84
Weeks
of supply
=
Total
inventory
investment
$1.69
Average weekly cost of goods sold
= 1.69 / .273 = 6.19 weeks
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall