Transcript Document

WLI ANNUAL REPORT 2013
GUIDELINE
Bezaiet Dessalegn
[email protected]
WLI ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Introduction
 WLI in country __X_: Overall
objective and linkage with
national objectives
Site Description
 Location (map and coordinates),
site characterization, bio-physical
and socio-economic targets, and
areas for up-scaling
WLI ANNUAL REPORT 2013
(11/12-10/13)
 Context – in relation to national
policies, site characterizations,
maps, etc.
 Maps
MAPS
SUMMARIES
 Strategic activities for
knowledge exchange
and enhancement
 Field date collection
and processing –biophysical, livelihood
studies, etc.
 Key findings and
recommendations –
WLM and livelihoods
 Page limits
 References
 Appendices
 2013 Workplan indicating activities complete or incomplete
 Final FTF indicator reporting
 Full listing of participants in trainings (including identification of gender:
M/F)
 Questionnaires or check-lists used for socio-economic data collection
 Specification of equipment used for biophysical measurement
 Compiled datasets (or list of Excel tables available separately)
 Technical reports on modelling activities
 Completed scientific publications
 Outlines for future scientific publications
 Webpages, brochures or other outreach materials developed
 High quality photographs to be used in promotional materials
NEXT STEPS
 Workplan 2014
 Up-scaling and complementary activities to be supported from other
sources
 Strategy for development of full WLI Country Program
FEED THE FUTURE
INDICATORS
FEED THE FUTURE INITIATIVE
 Indicators selected for
monitoring and
evaluating the
President’s global hunger
and food security
initiative
 M&E system for tracking
and measuring change,
helping to pinpoint
where, when and how the
processes of change
facilitated through
project interventions are
occurring (or not).
WLI - FEED THE FUTURE (FTF) INDICATORS
Seven indicators selected from a comprehensive list of per formance
indicators (57 indicators)
 Number of hectares under improved technologies or management
practices as a result of USG assistance
 Number of farmers and other s who have applied new technologies or
management practices as a result of USG assistance
 Number of individuals who have received USG suppor ted shor t -term
agricultural sector productivity or food security training
 Number of food security private enterprises (for profit), producers
organizations, water user s associations, women's groups, trade and
business associations, and community -based organizations (CBOs)
receiving USG assistance
 Number of stakeholders implementing risk -reducing practices/actions
to improve resilience to climate change as a result of USG assistance
 Number of new technologies or management practices in one of the
following phases of development: (Phase I/II/III – under research/field
testing/made available for transfer)
 Gross margin per unit of land, kilogram, or animal of selected product
PROJECT BENEFICIARIES
Individuals within the
target area that receive
direct benefits (i.e.,
goods or services) from
the program) including
Individuals who receive
training or benefit from
program-supported
technical assistance or
service provision
FTF REPORTING TEMPLATE
Reporting Period
Indicator / Disaggregation
Oct. -Dec. 2012
(Due January 15,
2013)
Jan-March 2013 April-June 2013 July-Sept 2013
(Due April 15, (Due July 15,
(Due Aug. 15,
2013)
2013)
2013)
Annual
Report
4.5.2(2): Num ber of hectares under im proved technologies or m anagem ent practices as a result of USG assistance
Technology type
Crop and /or animal genetics
Pest and/or disease management
Climate mitigation or adaptation
Land management
soil-related
conservation agriculture
Water management
Irrigation
Water harvesting
Post-harvest handling and storage
processing
Fishing gear/technique
Association-applied
Other
Total w /one or m ore im proved technology
Disaggregates Not Available
New /Continuing
New
Continuing
Disaggregates Not Available
Sex of landow ners
Male
Female
Association-applied
Disaggregates Not Available
Set targets for
2013
Targets for
2014
GENDER
 Fe e d t h e Fu t u r e r e c o g n i z e s t h e r o l e o f wo m e n
i n a g r i c u l t u r e a s b e i n g c r i t i c a l to i n c r e a s i n g
a g r i c u l t u r a l p r o d u c t i v i t y, r e d u c i n g p ov e r t y a n d
i m p r o v i n g n u t r i t i o n , a n d i s t h e r e fo r e
i n te r e s t e d i n m o n i to r i n g h ow i t s b e n e fi t s a n d
s e r v i c e s a r e d i s t r i b u t e d a m o n g fe m a l e s a n d
males.
 5 o f t h e 7 i n d i c a to r s s e l e c te d fo r W L I r e q u i r e
d i s a g g r e g a t i o n by s e x ( e . g . , m a l e , fe m a l e ) .
T h e r e q u i r e m e n t r e l a te s to b ot h te c h n o l o g y
a n d m a n a g e m e n t p r a c t i c e s i n d i c a to r s ( 4 . 5 . 2 - 2
a n d 4 . 5 . 2 - 5 ) , a n d to a l l fi ve d a t a p o i n t s fo r
gross margin (4.5-15).
 A sex disaggregation of " joint" can be used in
t h o s e c a s e s w h e r e m e n a n d wo m e n s h a r e
equally in decision-making regarding the use
of land. “Joint” is not applicable to situations
in which a male makes the management
decisions about the land and a female mainly
p r o v i d e s l a b o r.
 who makes the decision(s) on what to plant
and how, when to har vest, which inputs to
purchase and how to use them
AGGREGATION
 For number of hectares
(4.5.2-2), the area
planted is counted each
time it is cultivated with
one or more improved
technologies or practices
during the reporting year.
For example, if a farmer
applies an improved
technology or practice to
a plot that is cultivated
three times during the
reporting year, the area
of the plot is counted
each time and reported
as a sum.
THANK YOU
Thank you
NEW CATEGORIES
 A s ex d i s a g g r eg a t i o n o f " j o i n t " c a n b e u s e d i n t h o s e c a s e s w h e r e m e n a n d w o m e n
share equally in decision -making regarding the use of land. “Joint” is not applicable
t o s i t u a t i o n s i n w h i c h a m a l e m a ke s t h e m a n a g e m e n t d e c i s i o n s a b o u t t h e l a n d a n d
a f e m a l e m a i n l y p r ov i d e s l a b o r.
 who makes the decision(s) on what to plant and how, when to har vest, which inputs to
purchase and how to use them
 T h e s e c o n d n ew d i s a g g r e g a te c a te g o r y, “ a s s o c i a t i o n - a p p l i e d ” , c a n b e u s e d w h e n t h e
t e c h n o l og y o r m a n a g e m e n t p r a c t i c e i s a p p l i e d b y a g r o u p o r a s s o c i a t i o n . Fo r
ex a m p le , a g r o u p o f f a r m e r s a p p l i e s a n ew f e r t i li z e r o n a d e m o n s t r a t io n p l o t . I n
t h i s c a s e , t h e h e c t a r e s a r e c o u n te d a s “ a s s o c i a t io n - a p p l ie d ” u n d e r 4 . 5 . 2 - 2 ( n u m b e r
o f h e c t a r e s ) a n d g r o s s m a r g i n ( 4 . 5 - 1 5 ) . T h e f a r m e r s a r e c o u n te d a s o n e ( 1 ) g r o up
u n d e r 4 . 5 . 2 - 4 2 , Fe e d t h e Fu t u r e ’s i n d i c a tor r e f e r r i n g to “ g r o ups ” .
 T h e a s s o c i a t i o n - a p p l i e d d i s a g g r e g a te i s o n l y n ew f o r g r o s s m a r g i n ( 4 . 5 - 1 5 ) ; i t
a l r e a d y ex i s te d f o r h e c t a r e s u n d e r i m p rove d te c h n o l o g y o r p r a c t i c e s ( 4 . 5 . 2 - 2 ) .
 4 . 5 . 2 - 4 2 N u m b e r o f p r i va te e n te r p r i s e s ( f o r p r o fi t ) , p r o d uc e r s o r g a ni z a t i on s , w a te r
u s e r s a s s o c i a t i on s , w o m e n ’ s g r o up s , t r a d e a n d b u s i n e s s a s s o c i a t i o n s , a n d
c o m m uni t y - b a s e d o r g a ni z a t i on s ( C B O ) t h a t a p p l i e d n ew te c h n o l og i e s o r
m a n a g e m e n t p r a c t ic e s a s a r e s u l t o f U S G a s s i s t a n c e.
 Fe e d T h e Fu t ur e A g r i c ult ur a l I n d i c a to r s G u i d e : G u i d a n c e o n t h e c o l l ec t i o n a n d u s e
o f d a t a f o r s e l e c te d Fe e d t h e Fu t u r e A g r i c ult ur a l I n d i c a to r s . J u l y 2 01 3 . `
MEASURING AGRICULTURAL AREA
 Two of the four indicators covered in this guide require
measurement of the area under production – gross margin (4.515) and hectares under improved technologies or management
practices (4.5.2-2). In both cases, the relevant measure for crops
and aquaculture ponds is hectares, often converted from local
units. For gross margin, this data point represents the unit of
production, and is used in the denominator when calculating the
commodity -specific gross margin value. For many livestock
products, the unit of production is not land -based (i.e., cannot be
measured by area), and is therefore reported as the number of
animals involved in production; for fisheries, the unit of
production is either hectares (for aquaculture ponds) or cages .
Pp 14 –different methodologies of measurements for different
land types including ponds – tape and compass, GPS, Pacing,
farmers’ estimates and remote sensing
 Preliminaries < 10
 Executive Summary 1
 Body
 Introduction
 Site Description
 Strategic Activities
 Field Data collection and processing
 Summary of Analysis
 Next steps
 References
 Appendices
 Workplans
 FtF Indicators
 monitoring uptake of improved technologies and practices
 This indicator seeks to measure the number of farmers and
others (e.g., farmers, ranchers, producers, entrepreneurs,
managers, traders, processors (individuals only), natural
resource managers) that are applying improved technologies
or management practices promoted through USG -supported
programs, disaggregated by whether or not the farmer had
begun applying the technology or practice for the first time
within the reporting year (new) or whether s/he had begun
using it in the year prior to the current reporting year and
continues to apply it in the current reporting year
(continuing), and by sex. In the Feed the Future context, it is
assumed that any “new” technology is an “improved”
technology.
 A p p l i c a t i o n i s t h e u s e o f te c h n o l o g y o r m a n a g e m e n t p r a c t i c e by a f a r m e r o r o t h e r
p r o d u c e r ov e r a t l e a s t o n e c r o p s e a s o n o r e q u i v a l e n t p r o d u c t i o n p e r i o d i n t h e c a s e o f
l i v e s to c k o r fi s h e r i e s . A d o p t i o n i s t h e u s e o f te c h n o l o g y o r m a n a g e m e n t p r a c t i c e by a
f a r m e r o r ot h e r p r o d u c e r i n a s u s t a i n a b l e way ov e r a n e x te n d e d p e r i o d o f t i m e .
 N e w v s . c o n t i n u i n g : B ot h t h e n u m b e r o f h e c t a r e s ( 4 . 5 . 2 - 2 ) a n d t h e n u m b e r o f f a r m e r s
( 4 . 5 . 2 - 5 ) i n d i c a t o r s r e q u i r e d i s a g g r e g a t i n g by w h e t h e r a te c h n o l o g y o r p r a c t i c e p r o m o t e d
by t h e p r o j e c t to i m p r ov e p r o d u c t i v i t y wa s a p p l i e d fo r t h e fi r s t t i m e d u r i n g t h e r e p o r t i n g
ye a r ( n e w ) o r w h e t h e r i t wa s a p p l i e d i n t h e c u r r e n t r e p o r t i n g ye a r a n d i n t h e p r e v i o u s
r e p o r t i n g ye a r ( c o n t i n u i n g ) , i . e . , ov e r t wo c o n s e c u t i v e ye a r s .
 Fo r n u m b e r o f f a r m e r s ( 4 . 5 . 2 - 5 ) , “ n e w ” i n d i c a t e s t h a t , a s a r e s u l t o f U S G a s s i s t a n c e , a
f a r m e r f i r s t a p p l i e d t h e te c h n o l o g y o r p r a c t i c e d u r i n g t h e c u r r e n t r e p o r t i n g ye a r ; i t d o e s
n o t r e f e r to w h e t h e r a f a r m e r wa s p r e v i o u s l y f a m i l i a r w i t h a te c h n o l o g y o r m a n a g e m e n t
p r a c t i c e ( i . e . , w h e t h e r o r n ot i t wa s “ n e w ” to h i m / h e r ) . A f a r m e r i s o n l y c o u n te d o n c e ,
r e g a r d l e s s o f h ow m a ny i m p r ov e d te c h n o l o g i e s o r p r a c t i c e s s / h e a p p l i e s i n a r e p o r t i n g
ye a r.
 “Continuing” indicates that, as a result of USG assistance, a farmer applied the
te c h n o l o g y o r p r a c t i c e i n t h e p r e v i o u s r e p o r t i n g ye a r a n d i s c o n t i n u i n g to a p p l y i t i n t h e
c u r r e n t r e p o r t i n g ye a r. I n t h o s e c a s e s w h e r e a b e n e fi c i a r y f a r m e r wa s a l r e a d y a p p l y i n g
a n i m p r o v e d te c h n o l o g y a t b a s e l i n e , t h ey a r e c o u n te d a s “ c o n t i n u i n g ” i f t h ey c o n t i n u e to
a p p l y t h e te c h n o l o g y o r p r a c t i c e p r o m ote d t h r o u g h yo u r c u r r e n t p r o g r a m a c t i v i t i e s d u r i n g
t h e r e p o r t i n g ye a r. A f a r m e r m u s t a p p l y a te c h n o l o g y o r p r a c t i c e o v e r t wo c o n s e c u t i v e
ye a r s ( i . e . , t h e c u r r e n t a n d p r e v i o u s r e p o r t i n g ye a r s ) to b e c o n s i d e r e d a s “ c o n t i n u i n g ” .
Fo r e x a m p l e , i f a f a r m e r a p p l i e d t h e te c h n o l o g y o r p r a c t i c e i n r e p o r t i n g ye a r 1 o f a
p r o j e c t , d i d n ot a p p l y i t d u r i n g t h e s e c o n d r e p o r t i n g ye a r, b u t a p p l i e d i t a g a i n i n
r e p o r t i n g ye a r 3 , s / h e i s r e p o r te d a s “ n e w ” i n ye a r 1 , n ot a p p l y i n g i n ye a r 2 , a n d “ n e w ” i n
ye a r 3 .