Transcript Slide 1
DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Mining Management Act Workshop and Information Session Mining Operations MMP Francess Perrett 13 and 20 February 2009 www.nt.gov.au/drdpifr DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES LARGE MMP Mining operations DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES MMP Format for Mining Operations • Advisory Note • Environmental Management System (EMS) • Risk Based DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Risk Based Approach 1. 2. 3. Identify potential hazards Assess the risk Treat the problem • Elimination • • • • 4. Continually improve Substitution Re-engineering Procedures PPE DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES AS/NZS4360 – 2004 Risk Matrix (sample only) CONSEQUENCES LIKELIHOOD Catastrophic 5 Major 4 Moderate 3 Minor 2 Insignificant 1 Almost certain 5 10 9 8 7 6 Likely 4 9 8 7 6 5 Possible 3 8 7 6 5 4 Unlikely 2 7 6 5 4 3 Rare 1 6 5 4 3 2 DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Risk Assessment - Considerations • Objectives of project and opportunities • Tolerability of risks to others • Whether a risk needs treatment • Deciding whether risk can be accepted • Whether an activity should be undertaken • Priorities for treatment DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Scenario 1: TSF wall failure State of the art engineering design Recently commissioned Partially filled (15% capacity) Fitzroy Land Snail (critically endangered) risk evaluation CONSEQUENCES LIKELIHOOD Catastrophic 5 Almost certain 5 10 Major 4 9 Moderate 3 8 Minor 2 7 Insignificant 1 6 Likely 4 9 8 7 6 5 Possible 3 8 7 6 5 4 Unlikely 2 7 6 5 4 3 Rare 1 6 5 4 3 2 determine if the level of risk is acceptable Extreme Immediate action required High Action plan required, attention senior management Moderate Specific monitoring or procedure required Low Manage through routine procedures DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Scenario 2: Seepage from the TSF Designed to the highest standards of the time (15 years ago) Withstood 2 category 3 cyclones Filled to capacity Slow seepage detected yesterday risk evaluation CONSEQUENCES LIKELIHOOD Catastrophic 5 Almost certain 5 10 Major 4 9 Moderate 3 8 Minor 2 7 Insignificant 1 6 Likely 4 9 8 7 6 5 Possible 3 8 7 6 5 4 Unlikely 2 7 6 5 4 3 Rare 1 6 5 4 3 2 determine if the level of risk is acceptable Extreme Immediate action required High Action plan required, attention senior management Moderate Specific monitoring or procedure required Low Manage through routine procedures DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Scenario 3: Minor fuel spill Manual handling 20L drums risk evaluation CONSEQUENCES LIKELIHOOD Almost certain 5 Catastrophic 5 Major 4 Moderate 3 Minor 2 10 9 8 7 determine if the level of risk is Insignifican acceptable t 1 Extreme Immediate action required 6 Likely 4 9 8 7 6 5 Possible 3 8 7 6 5 4 Unlikely 2 7 6 5 4 3 Rare 1 6 5 4 3 2 High Action plan required, attention senior management Moderate Specific monitoring or procedure required Low Manage through routine procedures DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Contents of a mining operations MMP • Environmental Impact Assessment • Commitments • Consultation • Mine Design, Construction and Scheduling • Baseline Monitoring • Corrective Action or Mitigation Measures • Closure Planning • Security Calculation • Maps, Plans, Diagrams, Images etc DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Details to include Outcomes of the Environmental Impact Assessment • PER • EIS • Environmental Assessment Report DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Commitments • Summary • Streamline assessment process • Auditable “…only use providence species for rehabilitation”. DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Consultation • Social impacts • Agreed outcomes • Closure planning DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Mine Design, Construction and Scheduling • Comprehensive details • Technically achievable • Alternatives discussed • Minimise environmental impact DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Baseline Monitoring • • • • Methods Results Discussion Conclusion DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Corrective Action or Mitigation Measures Needed when environmental targets are not being reached • Water quality SMART • Air quality S – Specific M – Measurable • Rehabilitation A – Achievable R – Realistic T – Timely DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Closure Planning • Central to the management of any operation • Closure objectives developed • Consultation with all stakeholders • Closure plan is developed and refined DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Closure Planning • Closure objectives • Schedule of proposed works • Previous rehabilitation • Monitoring and remediation DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Expected Closure Objectives • Compatibility with agreed post mining land use • Rubbish clean-up • Physical safety • Revegetated or otherwise improved • Low risk to biota • Visual amenity • Stability • Heritage and archaeological sites DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Security Calculation • Operator self assessment • Departmental assessment • Security cost estimates • Security Assessment Board (SAB) DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Contents of a Large MMP • Maps • Plans • Diagrams • Images • Tables • Graphs DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Mining Management Plans Summary • MMP’s are required as part of and application for an Authorisation. • The MMP need to be updated every 12 months for ongoing operational activities. • The MMP must include a security cost estimate. • The MMP is auditable and stand alone document. • The MMP is a planning document and needs to be comprehensive enough to be read by anyone on site giving them an understanding of the activities, obligations and commitments of the project. QUESTIONS?